Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM

[elysium]

Well this was what happened to me.

Had the 24-70L. Bought the 85 1.8 and fell in love. Sold the 24-70L...

Bought the 135L and now the 85mm just sits there for just in case situations. Even my 17-40L sits collecting dust at times. But I do warn you, do not attempt to try out a 135L. :lol:

[Tareq]

Once that 135L unite with FF, then no power can take it off unless another killer no slough prime can take it off.

http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/4785/ds30110.jpg

http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/7915/ds30113.jpg

[J-B]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2423/3528716079_ecc6076d1d.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2228/3528715815_75474831bc.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3390/3529528208_1ea01c58e6.jpg


(Already posted in the 5D2 topic)

[Gliderparentntn]

So what do you guys think of the 135 on a Mark III is it too much for general purpose or should I look more at the 85 f/1.8?

[Garion]

So what do you guys think of the 135 on a Mark III is it too much for general purpose or should I look more at the 85 f/1.8?Personally I feel its a bit too long on a 1.3x cropper but YMMV (Your Mileage May Vary).

85mm is a very nice focal length on the Mk III.

[jft158]

So what do you guys think of the 135 on a Mark III is it too much for general purpose or should I look more at the 85 f/1.8?

Have not touched my 85 since i got the 135L....:D

[p360]

Mine's en route. The Brown truck should be stopping by on Tuesday, the 19th.

[FlyingPhotog]

Just ordered one myself from Canoga...

(I Hate This Place)

[Tareq]

Mine's en route. The Brown truck should be stopping by on Tuesday, the 19th.

Just ordered one myself from Canoga...

(I Hate This Place)

Same feeling and action in the past about 135L or any another lens, now i don't need to go to each lens samples thread, i know what i am looking for and i just order it if i can afford it before looking at samples.

[nicksan]

I found it too long...or more accurately in no-man's land.
That's why I sold it, but now that I got a 5DMKII as a second body, I miss it. I make do with the half priced 100 f2, which does about 90% of what the 135L does...but the 135L is a magical lens.:D
So what do you guys think of the 135 on a Mark III is it too much for general purpose or should I look more at the 85 f/1.8?

[20DNewbie]

Just ordered one myself from Canoga...

(I Hate This Place)

:lol: This thread is why I picked one up also.

[maxblack]

I found it too long...or more accurately in no-man's land.
That's why I sold it, but now that I got a 5DMKII as a second body, I miss it. I make do with the half priced 100 f2, which does about 90% of what the 135L does...but the 135L is a magical lens.:D

... and it looks nice from the front. :lol:

[Helena]

I posted these in the 5D thread, but thought I'd put them here as well.


http://www.graphicgarden.com/keep/POTN/2009/20090514_003_5dbb.jpg

http://www.graphicgarden.com/keep/POTN/2009/20090514_004_5dbb.jpg

http://www.graphicgarden.com/keep/POTN/2009/20090514_010_5dbb.jpg

http://www.graphicgarden.com/keep/POTN/2009/20090514_008_5dbb.jpg

http://www.graphicgarden.com/keep/POTN/2009/20090514_009_5dbb.jpg

[primalcarl]

Lovely shots. I'm currently without any lenses for my 40D after a clear out, just bought one of these so going to be my only lens for a while. Madness!

[J-B]

A few more with a 12mm extension tube:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3539/3535197905_0d45da49f5.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2126/3536015384_0ba573ea2b.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2234/3535197559_940a4df0e4.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3621/3536015048_5c5dc3cdc1.jpg

[jasonleehl]

Wow. Here comes the flower craze. Just one over the weekend:

http://jasonlee.smugmug.com/photos/538520494_jWqWL-L.jpg

[Jean-Louis]

Caught yesterday at Montreal Biodome. Nice place to work with the 135 and the iso capability of the 5d mark II.

f/2, 1/250, iso 2000

http://img195.imageshack.us/img195/2947/potn0436.jpg (http://img195.imageshack.us/my.php?image=potn0436.jpg)

f/2, 1/160, iso 2000

http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/8161/potn0429.jpg (http://img188.imageshack.us/my.php?image=potn0429.jpg)

[preciousvoices]

Here's a recent one of my son Shelby.
http://i433.photobucket.com/albums/qq51/pvoices1971/20090510-IMG_1565-1.jpg

[Scout_Pete]

Just getting started. I can tell this L will be very expressive:

1/640; f/2.5; ISO 100

[JhnRX7]

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3412/3534547736_b658457683.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnrenna/3534547736/)

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2181/3539877155_9c2510a45c.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnrenna/3539877155/)

[deci]

That duck is hypnotic, the 'seperation' is just great :)

[poppie guy]

Here's a recent one of my son Shelby.
http://i433.photobucket.com/albums/qq51/pvoices1971/20090510-IMG_1565-1.jpg

Handsome son, beautiful photo.

[p360]

Caught yesterday at Montreal Biodome. Nice place to work with the 135 and the iso capability of the 5d mark II.

f/2, 1/250, iso 2000

http://img195.imageshack.us/img195/2947/potn0436.jpg (http://img195.imageshack.us/my.php?image=potn0436.jpg)

f/2, 1/160, iso 2000

http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/8161/potn0429.jpg (http://img188.imageshack.us/my.php?image=potn0429.jpg)



Love the colors. Awesome.

Mine's coming tomorrow. I can't wait..!!

[yoyoer13]

hmmmmmmmm.......

I have wanted a the 135 for as long as I discovered Canon, but went with the 70-200 after (in my mind) needing the versatility.

What do most of you who have the 135 and say not anything in the 200 range. Do u cope, or is it just more of a, "Well its so flipping amazing I dont care about 200 or versatility".

Most of my metadata tells me that 135 is great, but I also use the 70-200 at 200 quite often at the 200 end.

[FlyingPhotog]

hmmmmmmmm.......

I have wanted a the 135 for as long as I discovered Canon, but went with the 70-200 after (in my mind) needing the versatility.

What do most of you who have the 135 and say not anything in the 200 range. Do u cope, or is it just more of a, "Well its so flipping amazing I dont care about 200 or versatility".

Most of my metadata tells me that 135 is great, but I also use the 70-200 at 200 quite often at the 200 end.

Slap it on the "Ol' Cropper" as you call it and you're getting the same FOV as 216mm but 2/3 of a stop faster!

[TMR Design]

Just got my 135mm f/2 last week. This was from my first shoot with it.

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=366170&d=1242694339

[inthedeck]

hmmmmmmmm.......

I have wanted a the 135 for as long as I discovered Canon, but went with the 70-200 after (in my mind) needing the versatility.

What do most of you who have the 135 and say not anything in the 200 range. Do u cope, or is it just more of a, "Well its so flipping amazing I dont care about 200 or versatility".

Most of my metadata tells me that 135 is great, but I also use the 70-200 at 200 quite often at the 200 end.

Or on a FF, in addition to what Jay mentioned, slap on a 1.4x for 189 at f/2.8. ;)


Robert, congrats on the lens and nice shot. :)

[TMR Design]

Robert, congrats on the lens and nice shot. :)

Thanks Manish. The 135mm f/2 is a wonderful lens. Love it!

[inthedeck]

Same here. ;) I've yet to put mine through it's paces, but, I'll get there. Once the rain stops here, in FL. :lol:

[FlyingPhotog]

I Hate Waiting For The BBT...! :confused::(

[brianch]

Just ordered a brand new one =D My old one broke down.

[inthedeck]

Et tu, Jay? Congrats. Where ya headed to, next?

[FlyingPhotog]

Et tu, Jay? Congrats. Where ya headed to, next?

Back to Charlotte in the morning. Coca Cola 600 on Sunday...

But, we get Friday off and I'm hoping to give the new 135 a workout (if the damn truck gets here...)

[inthedeck]

Cool. It's been raining here, for three days...and it's 'cold' to boot. :(

[dlintz]

I found it too long...or more accurately in no-man's land.
That's why I sold it, but now that I got a 5DMKII as a second body, I miss it. I make do with the half priced 100 f2, which does about 90% of what the 135L does...but the 135L is a magical lens.:D

Update: your old 135L is happy and doing well. :cool:

d.

[dlintz]

hmmmmmmmm.......

I have wanted a the 135 for as long as I discovered Canon, but went with the 70-200 after (in my mind) needing the versatility.

What do most of you who have the 135 and say not anything in the 200 range. Do u cope, or is it just more of a, "Well its so flipping amazing I dont care about 200 or versatility".

Most of my metadata tells me that 135 is great, but I also use the 70-200 at 200 quite often at the 200 end.

I have the 300L f/4 for more reach. I've debated getting the 70-200 but at this point these two lenses work well for me.

d.

[cherrymoon]

I need this lens !

[TMR Design]

Here is one from today's head shot session with the 135mm f/2 @ f/9.

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=366446&stc=1&d=1242778316

[airbutchie]

^ Tack sharp, Robert... Nicely done my friend...

- airbutchie :)

[TMR Design]

^ Tack sharp, Robert... Nicely done my friend...

- airbutchie :)

Thank you airbutchie. I've totally fallen in love with the 5DMk II & 135mm f/2 combination. Fun combo to shoot.

[FlyingPhotog]

Got my 135 today:

(Disclaimer: I shot a duck but it's not worthy of public display so...)

Water Fowl of a different sort:
http://www.pbase.com/flyingphotog/image/112743418/original.jpg

Had to try f/2 .. It's awfully creamy (and shalloooooooow)
http://www.pbase.com/flyingphotog/image/112743419/original.jpg

Both on a 5D Classic @ ISO 400 (Rare cloudy afternoon here in Phoenix)

[inthedeck]

^congrats!

[FlyingPhotog]

^congrats!

Gratze...

[p360]

Got mine today, too.

Just haven't had a chance to go out and shoot ducks yet. :)

I am headed to Jerome, AZ this weekend; workout time for the newly arrived, of course.

[FlyingPhotog]

Got mine today, too.

Just haven't had a chance to go out and shoot ducks yet. :)

I am headed to Jerome, AZ this weekend; workout time for the newly arrived, of course.

Perfect place to go wring it out. Jerome would be one of my first choices if I weren't headed out of town for work this weekend.

[p360]

Who knows, Jay. May be it was the same truck that delivered both of ours today..! We're both in Chandler.

I've been itching to go out and shoot. Anything. I've been too busy with work lately.

[kgoings]

Great lens, and a bunch of great pics here

[Stealthy Ninja]

Arrghh, why did I click on this again.

Question.

85 1.8
135L

or both?

I have the 200 2.8L and the 50 1.4 Want a sent of primes for portraits (FF).

[Rudi]

Arrghh, why did I click on this again.

Question.

85 1.8
135L

or both?

I have the 200 2.8L and the 50 1.4 Want a sent of primes for portraits (FF).

Both, or just the 85L! :D On full frame, the 85/1.2 L is the best lens for portraiture that I have used. I have the 135L, but find it just a little too long for the way I like to work...

[Rudi]

Here's another one with my 5D and 135L

http://rudiphoto.zenfolio.com/img/v0/p717357855.jpg

[kandyredcoi]

can anyone post a lowlight handheld pic???

[Stealthy Ninja]

Both, or just the 85L! :D On full frame, the 85/1.2 L is the best lens for portraiture that I have used. I have the 135L, but find it just a little too long for the way I like to work...

Let me check something.

Hong Kong prices (retail price, I'd probably get them 2nd hand I think):
135L + 85 1.8 = 6,780 + 2,950 = $9730

85L = 15,300

So $5570 difference. Is it REALLY worth that much of a difference (that's $720USD)??

Does anyone here have a 200 and a 135? If so, do you guys find they're too close, or different enough to warrant both?

[Rudi]

Let me check something.

Hong Kong prices (retail price, I'd probably get them 2nd hand I think):
135L + 85 1.8 = 6,780 + 2,950 = $9730

85L = 15,300

So $5570 difference. Is it REALLY worth that much of a difference (that's $720USD)??

Yeah, it really is! :)


Does anyone here have a 200 and a 135? If so, do you guys find they're too close, or different enough to warrant both?

I haven't got both, but do have the 1.4x Extender in case I want to use my 135L as a longer prime (and the image quality is fine with the Extender in place). My next longer prime is the 300mm f/4 L IS, and I find that most times I don't need the in-between step of a 1.4x TC (but that's me, might be different for everyone).

[Stealthy Ninja]

I haven't got both, but do have the 1.4x Extender in case I want to use my 135L as a longer prime (and the image quality is fine with the Extender in place). My next longer prime is the 300mm f/4 L IS, and I find that most times I don;t need the in-between step of a 1.4x TC (but that's me, might be different for everyone).


The 135 with the 1.4 is 189. Sorta close to 200. Is the difference worth it in your opinion.

I've heard it said before that the 200 and the 135 have a different sort of look, so they're worth the difference. BUt I just want doods opinions. :)

Maybe I should look into 2nd hand 85L lenses... man, this forum costs money! :lol:

[Rudi]

The 135 with the 1.4 is 189. Sorta close to 200. Is the difference worth it in your opinion.

I've heard it said before that the 200 and the 135 have a different sort of look, so they're worth the difference. BUt I just want doods opinions. :)

I don't have a 200/2.8 because I have the 135L and 1.4x TC, and they do a fine job. If I really want to have a 200mm f/2.8, I just slap on my 70-200/2.8 L. Don't get me wrong, the 200/2.8 L is a wonderful lens, it's just that I would rather have the 135L, which is a whole stop faster, and more useful to me, and with the 1.4x TC I have the best of both worlds. If I shot an image with a 135L and 1.4x TC, stripped the EXIF and didn't tell you, there would be no reason for you to suspect that it wasn't done with the 200 prime. Is the optical quality as good as the naked prime? Of course not, but it's so close that you won't be able to tell unless you're viewing identical images side-by-side on a computer (and who does that??).

[GMCPhotographics]

I have both (all three that you mentiond) and the 200mm f2.8 IIL is slightly sharper wide open than my 135L. It's also free of LoCA too. I can use a 1.4x tc on my 135L and I get a drop in IQ, but the same 1.4x tc has no such IQ drop on my 200mm f2.8 IIL.
I have both because I don't use a 70-200, they are too soft and cumbersome for my shooting tastes. I like the purity and IQ that primes offer but at the inconvienience of needing to swap lenses more frequently.
The 135L is a stunning lens, but the 200 IIL is slightly superior. As yet, I haven't found a review that shows this...so I currently take every lens review site with a big pinch of salt. Show me a 400mm f5.6 L review that has charts that say it's sharp. You won't find one, and yet the forums are full of sharp 400mm images.

[Stealthy Ninja]

I have both (all three that you mentiond) and the 200mm f2.8 IIL is slightly sharper wide open than my 135L. It's also free of LoCA too. I can use a 1.4x tc on my 135L and I get a drop in IQ, but the same 1.4x tc has no such IQ drop on my 200mm f2.8 IIL.
I have both because I don't use a 70-200, they are too soft and cumbersome for my shooting tastes. I like the purity and IQ that primes offer but at the inconvienience of needing to swap lenses more frequently.
The 135L is a stunning lens, but the 200 IIL is slightly superior. As yet, I haven't found a review that shows this...so I currently take every lens review site with a big pinch of salt. Show me a 400mm f5.6 L review that has charts that say it's sharp. You won't find one, and yet the forums are full of sharp 400mm images.

I'm actually thinking of not getting the 70-200 2.8L IS because of how good the 200 2.8L II is.

I shoot events now and then and honestly, for that I think the 24-105 on my 5Dmkii and a choice prime on a 5D (2nd body) might be a good choice.

The last event I shot (a wedding) I used a combination of 24-105, 70-200 f/4 IS and my 200mm 2.8L

The nicest shots came from the 200 2.8L by far. :)

I'm thinking (perhaps) the 135 would give me a slightly wider option, though still longer than 105mm. I could choose depending on the event.

The 24-105 is actually a really good event lens on the 5Dmkii.

Opinions?

[infinite012]

http://www.dirtysamurai.com/wp_gallery/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/5d_img_2117.jpg

http://www.dirtysamurai.com/wp_gallery/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/5d_img_2114.jpg

[GMCPhotographics]

I use a 24-70/2.8 on my 2nd camera so the bottom end of the 70-200 range is already catered for. The 24-70 also focusses a lot closer than the larger 70-200 can and again it's IQ is better, it's lighter and less obtrusive. My primary body is my fixed lens swap out body. This takes either my 85IIL, 135L or 200IIL depending on my shooting needs. I use a sweet little Think Tank UD 40 as a lens changing bag which carries my primes. I can swap out lenses quicker than some guys can swap out cameras. I pound my lens mount, but no breakages so far.
I get critisied for claiming that a good 24-70 can rival a prime for IQ and look if used intelligently. It has a very close min focus distance and as such it can blow background out of focus better than any other zoom that I have owned. It's sharp, contrasty and has the same vignette look that my primes have. I'm talking look here, not brightness.

I wouldn't say that my 200IIL would ever replace my 135L. My lens choice depends on light levels and proximity. If the light is really low then I use my 50/1.2 and 85/1.2 and I move a lot closer. I personally find that my primes provide me with better low light shooting options than an IS equipped f2.8 zoom can offer. Plus I'm less obtrusive and I'm more happier with my images.
One of the dangers of using a zoom is that it only gets used at it's two extreams of Focal length. In this case 70mm and 200mm. The 85,100,135 and 160mm point all need learning too. A 135L has a particular look to it that is fantastic and worth the effort to master.

[Scout_Pete]

can anyone post a lowlight handheld pic???

Frustrated middle-age texter next to me at the ball park last week. Slight crop and resize only. Shot at 1/100; f/2.0; ISO 640

[Rudi]

... and here's one from the 50D with 135L on it:

http://rudiphoto.zenfolio.com/img/v2/p846291844.jpg

[In2Photos]

Back to Charlotte in the morning. Coca Cola 600 on Sunday...

But, we get Friday off and I'm hoping to give the new 135 a workout (if the damn truck gets here...)
You should come by and let me try out your 300! ;)

[Palna]

Here is one I took yesterday at 2.2

[FlyingPhotog]

You should come by and let me try out your 300! ;)

Sorry Mike, I didn't bring it on this trip...

The 135 works for birding! ;)
http://www.pbase.com/flyingphotog/image/112780390/original.jpg

[Alejandro Sandoval]

love this lens...

[inthedeck]

TheAztech, that came out of nowhere. :lol: But, OK! ;)

Jay, nice shot. Never knew one could use it for birds. Guess you proved that. ;)

[Alejandro Sandoval]

TheAztech, that came out of nowhere. :lol: But, OK! ;)

Jay, nice shot. Never knew one could use it for birds. Guess you proved that. ;)

nahh I look this thread on daily basis I'm an 135 holic

[Tareq]

nahh I look this thread on daily basis I'm an 135 holic

Post photos from that beast 135, show us your 135 holic ;)

[skygod44]

I'm actually thinking of not getting the 70-200 2.8L IS because of how good the 200 2.8L II is.
Me too....or the 135L....though that's very close to my 100 f/2.8.
Reading GMCPhotographics comments, I find myself thinking more and more about two bodies (1.6x and FF/1.3x), being able to be stealthy, and wanting glass which is, IMO, "better" than the zoom options.

I'm finding myself shying away from any of the white lens options in the 70-200 area, so although my next lens purchase has a way to go, the 200L is looking more and more like a winner.

Thoughts anyone? For or against?

[FlyingPhotog]

Jay, nice shot. Never knew one could use it for birds. Guess you proved that. ;)

Thanks...

That Heron was so calm, I probably could have walked up and sat down next to it.

Couple More:
http://www.pbase.com/flyingphotog/image/112781043/original.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/flyingphotog/image/112781044/original.jpg

[Alejandro Sandoval]

Post photos from that beast 135, show us your 135 holic ;)


I'm doing some "humbling" shooting Medium format (Mamiya RZ67) pure black and white and developing my own film...on my way to become Amish :D

PS. I miss you too.

[skygod44]

Thanks...

That Heron was so calm, I probably could have walked up and sat down next to it. Couple More:

Great shots Jay!

[Stealthy Ninja]

I use a 24-70/2.8 on my 2nd camera so the bottom end of the 70-200 range is already catered for. The 24-70 also focusses a lot closer than the larger 70-200 can and again it's IQ is better, it's lighter and less obtrusive. My primary body is my fixed lens swap out body. This takes either my 85IIL, 135L or 200IIL depending on my shooting needs. I use a sweet little Think Tank UD 40 as a lens changing bag which carries my primes. I can swap out lenses quicker than some guys can swap out cameras. I pound my lens mount, but no breakages so far.
I get critisied for claiming that a good 24-70 can rival a prime for IQ and look if used intelligently. It has a very close min focus distance and as such it can blow background out of focus better than any other zoom that I have owned. It's sharp, contrasty and has the same vignette look that my primes have. I'm talking look here, not brightness.

I wouldn't say that my 200IIL would ever replace my 135L. My lens choice depends on light levels and proximity. If the light is really low then I use my 50/1.2 and 85/1.2 and I move a lot closer. I personally find that my primes provide me with better low light shooting options than an IS equipped f2.8 zoom can offer. Plus I'm less obtrusive and I'm more happier with my images.
One of the dangers of using a zoom is that it only gets used at it's two extreams of Focal length. In this case 70mm and 200mm. The 85,100,135 and 160mm point all need learning too. A 135L has a particular look to it that is fantastic and worth the effort to master.


Thanks dude (sorry for hijacking the thread a little, but it is concerning the 135L). After reading that, I'm thinking the zoom/prime combination is a good idea for events. It is what I've been doing so far, and it's worked out OK. Just a few more primes would give me more of a choice and they'd be faster too.

So I will be getting a 85 1.8 and a 135L :)

I might pick up a 24-70 2.8 too (maybe Sigma) just to have something a little wider but faster.

70-200 2.8L IS mkII ( ;) ) maybe later.

If anyone is reading this and they think the mkII of the 70-200 2.8L IS is out, I was only joking...

[steveathome]

Here is one from today's head shot session with the 135mm f/2 @ f/9.




Very nice Rob.

I've read lots of good things about the 135mm, and this image confirms it.
I look forward to seeing more.

[Tareq]

I'm doing some "humbling" shooting Medium format (Mamiya RZ67) pure black and white and developing my own film...on my way to become Amish :D

PS. I miss you too.

Ah cool, then we will see more blown away shots by you then ;)

I just don't get much playing with cameras these days, i am now more picking to what to shoot more or rather than shoot everything and whatever.

[sagray]

http://grayimagery.smugmug.com/photos/541822533_Tvt4v-L.jpg

http://grayimagery.smugmug.com/photos/541822510_rV5ej-L.jpg

[FlyingPhotog]

Some folks with whom I work:

1DMkIII + 135mm f/2L USM .. Various SSs @ f/2.2 ISO 200
http://www.pbase.com/flyingphotog/image/112805105/original.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/flyingphotog/image/112805102/original.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/flyingphotog/image/112805101/original.jpg

[primalcarl]

Jay, were those seriously shot at that aperture? Plenty of detail!

[FlyingPhotog]

Jay, were those seriously shot at that aperture? Plenty of detail!

Yup... All f/2.2

That aperture was suggested by a fellow 135 user. The ability to separate subjects from the background is rediculous.

[WhyFi]

Quick shot of my neighbor's son -

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3356/3554761603_3218e15361_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/whyfinyc/3554761603/)

100% Crop aka self portrait -

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3651/3554761611_1d074030e0_o.jpg

[yoyoer13]

Edit: ^ HOLY Crap... self portrait is right.




I'm actually thinking of not getting the 70-200 2.8L IS because of how good the 200 2.8L II is.

I shoot events now and then and honestly, for that I think the 24-105 on my 5Dmkii and a choice prime on a 5D (2nd body) might be a good choice.

The last event I shot (a wedding) I used a combination of 24-105, 70-200 f/4 IS and my 200mm 2.8L

The nicest shots came from the 200 2.8L by far. :)

I'm thinking (perhaps) the 135 would give me a slightly wider option, though still longer than 105mm. I could choose depending on the event.

The 24-105 is actually a really good event lens on the 5Dmkii.

Opinions?




Same here man. I kept my 70-200 2.8 solely for the reason that I knew I was doing a wedding and ended up that I really felt I didn't need the versitility at all.

Thanks to everyone else that responded to my earlier post. I'm deciding which prime at this point, 85L or 135... I'm going to need to do a lot of gaffer tapping the 7-2 to see what I'm at normally. Metadata is very mixed when I look at that.


I really like the 85 1.8 and 135 option that many talk about and have. Most everyone seems to absolutely love it too.

[thatkatmat]

My kids and the 5Dmk2/135L wide open......converted from RAW in DPP, very minor adjustments

http://lh6.ggpht.com/_ux3BqxhvvGM/ShjipXqM6uI/AAAAAAAAEWg/OLRxO9gVx_4/s800/IMG_1973.JPG

http://lh3.ggpht.com/_ux3BqxhvvGM/ShjjGbLNeNI/AAAAAAAAEW8/04gE9774Eio/s800/IMG_1992.JPG

http://lh3.ggpht.com/_ux3BqxhvvGM/ShjjKl_ccpI/AAAAAAAAEXA/v7RJezB1L2w/s800/IMG_1995.JPG

http://lh4.ggpht.com/_ux3BqxhvvGM/ShjjmniR-NI/AAAAAAAAEXg/GNT9AV_hLk8/s800/IMG_2008.JPG

http://lh6.ggpht.com/_ux3BqxhvvGM/ShjjgmkjOOI/AAAAAAAAEXc/j1eUV3jqUVU/s800/IMG_2004.JPG

[FlyingPhotog]

^^^ Fabulous ^^^

Perfect anticipation for frames 2 and 3. Proof positive it's the Indian and not the Arrow!

[aebrown]

This thing is absolutely tack sharp! It's the next thing on my list to buy once I'm done renting it!

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3618/3559047658_0285486eec.jpg?v=0

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2467/3559043026_471107e9f3.jpg?v=0

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3627/3559049122_6967698146.jpg?v=0

[primalcarl]

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3367/3560727628_02faf146a7_b.jpg

First time using this lens, and yes the seperation is stunning!

[preciousvoices]

latest of my wife, used a gold reflector camera right, white diffused reflector for some soft fill light camera left, hairlight is natural sunlight through a diffused glass window.
http://i433.photobucket.com/albums/qq51/pvoices1971/People/danette-1.jpg

[wildcart]

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3558/3554274025_bf8c7b0624_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3404/3554270097_a5ea9c32c1_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3340/3555070848_b66dedc02d_o.jpg
More @ http://www.flickr.com/photos/wildcart/

[primalcarl]

latest of my wife, used a gold reflector camera right, white diffused reflector for some soft fill light camera left, hairlight is natural sunlight through a diffused glass window.


Nice detail, what aperture did you use? Have yet to use this for people portraits

[preciousvoices]

Nice detail, what aperture did you use? Have yet to use this for people portraits
That is wide open f2 - it is fantastic for portraits, will be pretty long on your 40D though, you will need plenty of room to move.

[thatkatmat]

^^^ Fabulous ^^^

Perfect anticipation for frames 2 and 3. Proof positive it's the Indian and not the Arrow!

Thanks Jay:)

primalcarl: Not a huge fan of Dog shots but I really like the one above.

[preciousvoices]

First time using this lens, and yes the seperation is stunning!

I had heard that this lens (shallow DOF) was not popular for dog portraits due to the distance between nose and eyes, but I think this one looks great.

[inthedeck]

Not a portrait, but, some nature. ;)

http://inthedeck.smugmug.com/photos/545074320_RNjzc-XL.jpg

And an Amtrak train.
http://inthedeck.smugmug.com/photos/545035747_6dZ7X-XL.jpg

[Stealthy Ninja]

latest of my wife, used a gold reflector camera right, white diffused reflector for some soft fill light camera left, hairlight is natural sunlight through a diffused glass window.
http://i433.photobucket.com/albums/qq51/pvoices1971/People/danette-1.jpg

Seen this one before, EXCELLENT SHOT! Totally awesome. :)


Same here man. I kept my 70-200 2.8 solely for the reason that I knew I was doing a wedding and ended up that I really felt I didn't need the versitility at all.

Thanks to everyone else that responded to my earlier post. I'm deciding which prime at this point, 85L or 135... I'm going to need to do a lot of gaffer tapping the 7-2 to see what I'm at normally. Metadata is very mixed when I look at that.


I really like the 85 1.8 and 135 option that many talk about and have. Most everyone seems to absolutely love it too.

Yeh, I'm thinking to go for the 85/135 first at least. If Canon bring out a new 70-200 2.8L IS I might go for that (if it delivers on quality).

Love primes at the medium/longer end, even without IS. :)

[Tony-S]

Man, I was ready to buy this lens today, but no one has it in stock. Bummer.

Oh, and welcome back SN. ;)

[Stealthy Ninja]

Man, I was ready to buy this lens today, but no one has it in stock. Bummer.

Oh, and welcome back SN. ;)

Thanks dude. It was tough in the "jail"... ;)

I'm deciding if I should get this lens or the 85 1.8 first. Decisions decisions. :)

[Tony-S]

I'm about to unload my 85 f/1.8. Fab for a crop sensor, no so much for a ff.

[Stealthy Ninja]

I'm about to unload my 85 f/1.8. Fab for a crop sensor, no so much for a ff.

So would a 50 1.4 cover the wider end in your opinion (considering perspective is more about distance from the subject over actual focal length, I could just crop to get 85mm).

People with FF, does the 85 make sense if you have 135?

[thatkatmat]

I found I didn't use my 85L much, at first I thought perhaps the slow AF was making me reach for the 135L more, so I sold the L and picked up the 85/1.8....Suffice to say I think it's just 85mm on my FF, the 135L is seeing all the action while my very sharp and very fast AF 85/1.8 spends most of its time in the bag.

[OC Zoom]

Iv'e been reading these posts for the last two months and have decided to get the 135L. Amazing everything about this lens. I used to use a 135mm back in the film camera days when I took lots of portraits. I'm going to hook it up to my 5D Mk II. I'm getting this even before I get a walk around lens. So now that it's been ordered I just have to wait about seven more days until it arrives. Until then I will just keep looking at the fabulous images that you are submitting to this post.

[Tony-S]

So would a 50 1.4 cover the wider end in your opinion (considering perspective is more about distance from the subject over actual focal length, I could just crop to get 85mm).

When I only had the 30D I used my 30mm f/1.4 and 85mm f/1.8 quite a bit. Now it's the Siggy 50mm on the 5Dii, and soon the 135L. I think it's largely what I'm used to - the step up in sensor size makes these the functional equivalents (30mm=50mm, 85mm=135mm).

People with FF, does the 85 make sense if you have 135?

For my shooting, the 85mm seems a bit awkward on a ff. A lot of people still think it's a great lens, particularly portraiture, but it just doesn't suit me that well.

[Tony-S]

So now that it's been ordered I just have to wait about seven more days until it arrives.

Where did you find it? All the usual suspects seem to be sold out ATM.

[OC Zoom]

Where did you find it? All the usual suspects seem to be sold out ATM.

I was on the waiting list at B&H Photo. They sent me an e-mail when it came in and I ordered it on the spot. The arrival date is June 1st. :):):cool:

[p360]

It's first "real" test, since I got it last week.

Jerome, AZ - yesterday. Wide open.

368094

[p360]

One more from Jerome. Love it so far.

368095

[p360]

Here's one from Watson Lake in Prescott, AZ. Taken at f/11.

368102

[bad karma]

Apparently this lens is made by God himself

[infinite012]

Here's one I took during a concert last night:

http://www.dirtysamurai.com/wp_gallery/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/40d_img_7159.jpg

A bit blurry, but he was moving pretty fast...

[lz7j]

I missed this lens since I sold it back in January.
Good news though. Today, I bought it again... for the 4th time!!!

Has anyone else done this?

[Hatch1921]

I missed this lens since I sold it back in January.
Good news though. Today, I bought it again... for the 4th time!!!

Has anyone else done this?

There will be no selling of this magical glass... I'd sell my 70-200L f/2.8 IS before I let the 135L go:D

[thatkatmat]

On on my 3rd and hopefully last copy:) When shooting full frame, this is the glass you want.

[DarthVader]

My next lens :)

[Feudal1]

There will be no selling of this magical glass... I'd sell my 70-200L f/2.8 IS before I let the 135L go:D

I've only had it for a short time, but already, I see certain qualities in this glass that make it a winner. I really like the color and saturation - it adds a certain warmth to the photo.

One of my first shots using the 135mm:

http://cwhite.smugmug.com/photos/546917376_vhHaP-L.jpg

[sagray]

http://grayimagery.smugmug.com/photos/546879244_M7PXB-L.jpg

[Cl!ckFoto]

sadly i just let one of these go, but i will be back. it is an amazing piece of glass for sure.

[JhnRX7]

sadly i just let one of these go, but i will be back. it is an amazing piece of glass for sure.

:sad:

[Cl!ckFoto]

big time sad face.

[FlyingPhotog]

It does abstract as well:

http://www.pbase.com/flyingphotog/image/113028213/original.jpg

[yoyoer13]

^ like it

did you PS the first triangle and third one? they look severely cut off.

[FlyingPhotog]

^ like it

did you PS the first triangle and third one? they look severely cut off.

I think the Curves adjustment I laid on this truncated the devide between the dark wood and the blown out sky.

In the original (read: boring color) version, the transition is definately smoother. I need to go back and do this again with masks instead of just a selection.

Glad you like it though...!

[macroshot]

I like the abstract idea (pretty heavy crop)

368685

[philthejuggler]

A few with the 50D and the stonking 135L!!

http://www.philhackettphotography.com/img/v6/p1069569174-4.jpg

http://www.philhackettphotography.com/img/v3/p864650494-4.jpg

http://www.philhackettphotography.com/img/v6/p884979315-4.jpg

http://www.philhackettphotography.com/img/v3/p594192332-4.jpg

[philthejuggler]

http://www.philhackettphotography.com/img/v6/p697701639-4.jpg


http://www.philhackettphotography.com/img/v3/p890812820-4.jpg

[macroshot]

Yes, quite stonking.

(I had to google it.)

[philthejuggler]

Yes, quite stonking.

(I had to google it.)

PMSL!!!!

[thatkatmat]

5Dmk2, 135L
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3569/3571516126_cd1fdcfdf4_b.jpg

[nicksan]

Matt, Nice! I can't wait to get my dirty hands back on the 135L :D

5Dmk2, 135L
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3569/3571516126_cd1fdcfdf4_b.jpg

[thatkatmat]

Thanks Nick, the cool thing about the 135L (as you know) is that it just does what you want it to do and does it perfectly...You're gonna love it on your 5Dmk2.

[Scout_Pete]

Handy as a "sports photographer" lens in a pinch, too ....

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/pete2210/Public%20Linked/stringer01sm.jpg

[MinhThien]

I sold my 135L last week :( here are some I took couple weeks ago!

[poppie guy]

Beautiful photos Minh, why did you sell the lens?

[primalcarl]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2437/3576447745_d889a468ec.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3259/3576843306_05690fe839.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3586/3576842216_d887d36646.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3376/3576034975_4bc9a9d923.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3405/3576033375_a45f24b805.jpg

[MinhThien]

Beautiful photos Minh, why did you sell the lens?
Thank you! I sold it because I don't really use it much.

[xoldboy]

My god i cannot wait for this lens to come in next week.

Look at all these professional pictures!

[Jeff81]

My god i cannot wait for this lens to come in next week.

Look at all these professional pictures!

Mine gets here early next week as well. I'm really excited! :)

[yoyoer13]

Check out Thomas Hawk if you guys don't know him.
He pretty much convinced me to sell my 70-200 and get the 135L.

Here's a video Mark Silber did of Thomas Hawk were he mentions its his favourite lens. Check out there blogs if you havent.

http://www.silberstudios.tv/tomas-hawk/

[justaf IREMAN]

what was it that convinced you to go the 135 route? I'm currently undecided between those two lenses.

Check out Thomas Hawk if you guys don't know him.
He pretty much convinced me to sell my 70-200 and get the 135L.

Here's a video Mark Silber did of Thomas Hawk were he mentions its his favourite lens. Check out there blogs if you havent.

http://www.silberstudios.tv/tomas-hawk/

[p360]

I was hesitant for quite a while with the idea of buying a 135L. I wasn't sure if the constant 135mm focal length would be right enough to justify spending close to a thousand dollars.
I recently sold my 70-200 f/4L IS and replaced it with one.

I have to admit, that was the best photography decision I made in my recent memory. This thing is truly amazing.

[Tony-S]

Well, Canoga had the lens in stock, so I placed my order. Should be here Wednesday if they get it out tomorrow. Really looking forward to this lens on the 5Dii.

[yoyoer13]

I was hesitant for quite a while with the idea of buying a 135L. I wasn't sure if the constant 135mm focal length would be right enough to justify spending close to a thousand dollars.
I recently sold my 70-200 f/4L IS and replaced it with one.

I have to admit, that was the best photography decision I made in my recent memory. This thing is truly amazing.

Well if that doesn't make you want one... haha I'll be looking for someone to sell my 70-200 very soon. I'm hoping to find someone out there up for a swap tho to make things really easy.

[poppie guy]

I was hesitant for quite a while with the idea of buying a 135L. I wasn't sure if the constant 135mm focal length would be right enough to justify spending close to a thousand dollars.
I recently sold my 70-200 f/4L IS and replaced it with one.

I have to admit, that was the best photography decision I made in my recent memory. This thing is truly amazing.

I borrowed a 135L a couple of weeks ago. Since then I've found a buyer for my 70-200 f/4IS and will be using the money for a 135L.

[Stealthy Ninja]

I've flip-flopped and I was going to get this lens instead of the 70-200 2.8L IS. But yesterday I was photographing some stuff with my 200mm 2.8L and my 24-105. I found I really prefer the 85mm focal length and the flexibility of a zoom was what I needed at the longer end (can stick around 85 or zoom in if I need to also I am trying to break into kids parties :shock: so I need more flexibility for shooting kids, as kids move fast. Man that last sentence would look bad taken out of context :lol: ). Also the IS would help on occasion.

But what you guys were saying above has be thinking harder about this lens.

Eventually I'll get this lens, but the 70-200 2.8L IS will be first I think. Unless someone can change my mind. ;)

[lz7j]

it's rare that I get to use this lens and will often (95%) of the time mount the 70-200 2.8IS instead. there are situations where this lens shines the most... indoor sports being one of them. af speed and accuracy is spectacular with this lens compared to any of my other lenses.


http://www.nikkophotography.com/temp/fight-1.jpg


http://www.nikkophotography.com/temp/fight-3.jpg


http://www.nikkophotography.com/temp/fight-6.jpg

[Stealthy Ninja]

it's rare that I get to use this lens and will often (95%) of the time mount the 70-200 2.8IS instead. there are situations where this lens shines the most... indoor sports being one of them. af speed and accuracy is spectacular with this lens compared to any of my other lenses.



Nice photos. :)

This is why I'm thinking the 70-200 would be better for ME (YMMV). I just need the flexiblity of a zoom for live events... or do I?! I think for wedding, I could get away with a 24-70 + prime (85/135/200)

However for shooting kids at a party (lol don't misquote me) you really need the flexibility of a zoom. BTW I'm not intending to do this casually (just with family), but rather as a part of my business.

Probably I'll go for the 85 1.8 first (cheaper) then seen if I can get the 135 at a later date. Especially if I start getting some more portrait work... 70-200 2.8L IS is first up though. :)

135 will beckon me back one day I guess. I've wanted this lens since I first saw this thread. :) One day... but you gotta go with what you NEED before you go with what you WANT. ;)

[maxblack]

I've flip-flopped and I was going to get this lens instead of the 70-200 2.8L IS. But yesterday I was photographing some stuff with my 200mm 2.8L and my 24-105. I found I really prefer the 85mm focal length and the flexibility of a zoom was what I needed at the longer end (can stick around 85 or zoom in if I need to also I am trying to break into kids parties :shock: so I need more flexibility for shooting kids, as kids move fast. Man that last sentence would look bad taken out of context :lol: ). Also the IS would help on occasion.

But what you guys were saying above has be thinking harder about this lens.

Eventually I'll get this lens, but the 70-200 2.8L IS will be first I think. Unless someone can change my mind. ;)

Man that is an unfortunate way of writing it :lol::lol::lol:
If you're going to be inside I would go with the 85mm. The 135 might be a little long for inside.
If outside, either one would be cool.
Judging from your previous post, I think you've already decided and that's good because that's the hard part. :D
Do eventually get it (135) though, because it's a great lens.

[inthedeck]

Here's one that I took in Orlando, a weekend or so, ago. Old town Kissimmee.

A picture of a mural on the wall. The wall was across a tiny street.

5D + 135L + 1/250th at 8.0, ISO 50.
http://inthedeck.smugmug.com/photos/551013742_nzhH5-L.jpg

[Stealthy Ninja]

^^ I thought this was a good lens... but that photo looks all 2D and lifeless. :p

Man that is an unfortunate way of writing it :lol::lol::lol:
If you're going to be inside I would go with the 85mm. The 135 might be a little long for inside.
If outside, either one would be cool.
Judging from your previous post, I think you've already decided and that's good because that's the hard part. :D
Do eventually get it (135) though, because it's a great lens.

I will get one soon enough. I wish I had the money for every lens I WANTED... but then I'd be a rich dude... and probably too busy to POTN very much (yeah, Skygod44 got me using POTN as a verb...).

[royv]

Here are a few taken yesterday with the amazing 135L and 5D combo! ;)


http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3397/3585121530_e22de113e7_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3306/3585120166_3fefccfb11.jpg?v=0http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3626/3584314327_847c17e49e.jpg?v=0

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3375/3585119828_d9bf0869a8_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3409/3585118816_a679d50c06_o.jpg
Peek-a-boo-cow :)

Cheers!

[inthedeck]

^^ I thought this was a good lens... but that photo looks all 2D and lifeless. :p

DOH! I should have told the paintings to pop out of the wall, for a couple of shots. My mistake. :lol:

[OC Zoom]

Royv, How were you able to combine two photos into one as shown on your second photo.? I'm trying to do a before and after show and this would be a great way to do it.

[OC Zoom]

Well, Canoga had the lens in stock, so I placed my order. Should be here Wednesday if they get it out tomorrow. Really looking forward to this lens on the 5Dii.

My order of the 135L is arriving today around 11A.M. I bought it from B&H Photo. After viewing these posts for about 2 months you can imagine my excitement in getting this lens. I'll match it with my 5DII. This should keep me busy for awhile. I think this is a perfect portrait lens.:):cool: