Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM

[BRobiPhotog]

@quadrap ... nice photos!

[Aszental]

just picked one of these up for $800 used... so excited! Won't have it for another 2 weeks though.

[dannygt]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2516/4076342647_52496ec856_o.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2550/4077098230_e0f78d2db9.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2554/4077073174_9c054c155a.jpg

[Marloon]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2516/4076342647_52496ec856_o.jpg

Wow that's a fantastic shot! Do you find this lens definitely worth it?

[tortellino]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2516/4076342647_52496ec856_o.jpg


:shock:

I LOVE THIS PHOTO!!!!!!!!!!

:shock:

[dannygt]

Wow that's a fantastic shot! Do you find this lens definitely worth it?

Yes of course, if you need this focal length.

I just love the compression of the bokeh and the quality of the contrast that lens gives.

[dannygt]

:shock:

I LOVE THIS PHOTO!!!!!!!!!!

:shock:

thanks haha!

[quadrap]

@quadrap ... nice photos!

Thanks BRobiPhotog

[ckfishel2001]

From a session yesterday..

http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t187/musiccuts/daniel.jpg

http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t187/musiccuts/Alexis2copy.jpg


wowbw!

[Marloon]

Yes of course, if you need this focal length.

I just love the compression of the bokeh and the quality of the contrast that lens gives.

have you ever tried the 85mm f1.8 + 1.6x vs 135L + FF? Which would you prefer and why?

[ScarySquirrel]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2516/4076342647_52496ec856_o.jpg





Is that clock from Ikea? The wind up one?

[maxblack]

Can somebody do me a favor?
Can you check to see if your Canon ET-78II Lens Hood for this lens
has the plastic spring clips on either side, inside.
I let my best friend use the lens and it was fine.
I tried it today and the lens hood is really hard to take on and off. My other lens hoods have the clips but this one does not.
I hoping that is the problem.
I just want to make sure the clips are suppose to be there
before ordering one for $43.95. Jeez!!! :mad:
Thanks in advance.

[macroshot]

No spring clips on mine as you describe it, Max. All my other hoods have those two little tabs in there though. This one is snug, some may say tight, but it comes off w/o any difficulty.

[inthedeck]

Yeap, no clips here, either. Just notches in the hood/lens. Unlike the 85L which is a spring clip mechanism. Wish every hood had that. :lol:

[maxblack]

Thanks for checking guys. ^^^
I wonder why this hood is different?
I guess only Canon knows.
Thanks again!

[dannygt]

have you ever tried the 85mm f1.8 + 1.6x vs 135L + FF? Which would you prefer and why?

Yes, I used to own a 40D and a 85mm 1.8.. and there is no comparison possible imo other than focal lenght!

The bokeh on a fullframe is much more appealing and strong v.s the bokeh from a 1.6x, mainly because the sensor is bigger I think.

Also, the quality of the color and contrast coming from the 135L is just amazing.

[Marloon]

Yes, I used to own a 40D and a 85mm 1.8.. and there is no comparison possible imo other than focal lenght!

The bokeh on a fullframe is much more appealing and strong v.s the bokeh from a 1.6x, mainly because the sensor is bigger I think.

Also, the quality of the color and contrast coming from the 135L is just amazing.

yeah tell me about it. just bought the lens tonight and i LOVEEEE ITTT!!!!

5dII + 135L, ISO 2000, 135mm, f2.0, 1/125
http://i33.tinypic.com/4sntky.jpg

100%
http://i38.tinypic.com/2ynrxvr.jpg

[dannygt]

yeah tell me about it. just bought the lens tonight and i LOVEEEE ITTT!!!!


Hey you got like the best set of lens ever lol.

For my use, I would get a 50L instead of a 85L, but then, wow...

I want my 35L soon :(

[Marloon]

Hey you got like the best set of lens ever lol.

For my use, I would get a 50L instead of a 85L, but then, wow...

I want my 35L soon :(

Yeah... the 50L is nice, but it's so hard to find such a good copy! Sigh...

I think in terms of lenses, i am pretty good for now. LOL. It's time to move on and work on lighting LOL

[wbm]

Just got the lens yesterday (wow!), and went for a walk with it today. Here's a couple taken with my 5D2 at an abandoned kirk in Dalgety Bay, Fife.

http://photos.flybacon.com/photos/705048438_2Qd2T-L-1.jpg
1/200s, f/2.0, ISO 200 -- the inscription on the gravestone says "1787/James:Scott/Two:Breids"

http://photos.flybacon.com/photos/705060675_Z6jzQ-L.jpg
1/250s, f/2.0, ISO 200

I love this lens!

Ewan

[Marloon]

the photos this lens produces SOOC is amazing! just as good as the 35L and better than the 85L - maybe i just havent used the 85L in a long time LOL

[Tareq]

the photos this lens produces SOOC is amazing! just as good as the 35L and better than the 85L - maybe i just havent used the 85L in a long time LOL

I have a feeling that this lens 135L is better than 85L and 35L, it is one of the sharpest lenses of Canon over 35L and 85L.

[dannygt]

I have a feeling that this lens 135L is better than 85L and 35L, it is one of the sharpest lenses of Canon over 35L and 85L.

they are all amazing lens anyways.

[Tareq]

they are all amazing lens anyways.

I know they are all amazing glasses.

[Marloon]

http://i36.tinypic.com/fycsiu.jpg

After a long day of studying and spending time with my gf, i wanted to come home and play with the 135L. Though this picture was taken last night, i played with it this morning, and i think that f2 is the max ill go... i dont think ill ever go back to f2.8 unless its the 300 f2.8 and above. (which i doubt ill get because i dont need the FL).

[John Photography]

http://johnphotography.zenfolio.com/img/v5/p318714808-4.jpg

[waynema]

All shot wide open!

http://waynesfoto.smugmug.com/Cars/SR-Exotics-110709/IMG1668/706048031_KaSY2-XL.jpg

http://waynesfoto.smugmug.com/Cars/SR-Exotics-110709/IMG1681/706048185_ax4EK-XL.jpg

http://waynesfoto.smugmug.com/Cars/SR-Exotics-110709/IMG1688/706048466_5XbWN-XL.jpg

http://waynesfoto.smugmug.com/Cars/SR-Exotics-110709/IMG1691/706048615_e7R5b-XL.jpg

[Hatch1921]

From this afternoon.... I love the 135L

GOOD TIMES!
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2781/4085173498_4efd695f1a_o.jpg

02
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2427/4085173426_fdc61ac645_o.jpg

03
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2751/4085173352_8173dea4a5_o.jpg

04
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2723/4084416179_31ae565efa_o.jpg

05
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2788/4085173110_1c233a9bab_o.jpg

06
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2583/4085173772_4e49d3432c_o.jpg

07
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2556/4085173576_1db54c1ce1_o.jpg

And this is how we ended. LOL
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2638/4085173834_d5a734e5be_o.jpg

[Headshotzx]

Was the little girl adopted?

And the boy has some cool hair during the shoot. You could've made him look like ice-man or something. Haha. Great shots there!

[Hatch1921]

Was the little girl adopted?

And the boy has some cool hair during the shoot. You could've made him look like ice-man or something. Haha. Great shots there!


Yes she is adopted... a 6 yr journey in the making. :)

Glad you like the shots and thank you for the comments.
Hatch

[advaitin]

From today, in daughter's backyard, her new puppy. This was shot with the 5DM2 and 135mm L. ISO 400, 1/400s @ f5. This is a crop to one third of the image, then the second crop is to the 100 percent level. No USM.

[Marloon]

I am starting to love my 135L. it seems to overshadow my 85L and 35L at the moment.

[quadrap]

Natural light @ f 2.8
http://kendraalexis.com/IMG_1010.jpg

[toffiloff]

I'm still having a strong mental debate if I should get the 135L or the new 100 2.8L macro. On one hand the features of the macro is appealing, on the other hand the pictures in this thread is so awesome I can't stop looking at them over and over again. I hope someone will post a picture soon that will just push me over the edge and make me buy one ;) Great work guys!

[Gel]

I was thinking this, get the Macro. (I own both).

A month ago I would of said the 135L but I love the Macro shots, very rewarding.

Apart from the focal length difference you lose the dreamy look the 135L gives wide open....but you get Macro and IS with the other. A no brainer.

You 'could' also buy a used 40D and turn the Macro into a 160mm Macro with IS, turn that 50mm of yours into an 85mm and the 24-105L into a 35-160mm too.

[Hatch1921]

I'm still having a strong mental debate if I should get the 135L or the new 100 2.8L macro. On one hand the features of the macro is appealing, on the other hand the pictures in this thread is so awesome I can't stop looking at them over and over again. I hope someone will post a picture soon that will just push me over the edge and make me buy one ;) Great work guys!


Have a look a the bokeh the two produce... from the sample shots I have seen of the new 100mm macro... it looks just like the old 100mm macro and having owned the lens.. and loving it... the 135L blows it out of the water IMO.

If you need the IS... might be a good move. The 100mm is sharp...as it should be for a macro lens. But... the 135L has a "quality" to it like the 85L or the 35L.... just a fantastic lens all around. Super sharp...even at F/2.0...very fast to focus... great bokeh.

Just my $.02.... unless you are shooting bugs... and need IS... I would go for the 135L :)

Hatch

[ckfishel2001]

I'm still having a strong mental debate if I should get the 135L or the new 100 2.8L macro. On one hand the features of the macro is appealing, on the other hand the pictures in this thread is so awesome I can't stop looking at them over and over again. I hope someone will post a picture soon that will just push me over the edge and make me buy one ;) Great work guys!

It's a great lens...I really like it. It's smallish, so it travels well. I can use it for things like indoor gymnastics and outdoor soccer. The 135 is a bugger to find....haven't checked availability on the 100 2.8. It should really come down to what you want to do with the lens. The new macro has IS.....I've gotten to be a huge fan of IS. 100 2.8 should be fast enough to blow out the background for portrait work if you plan to do more than take pictures of bugs:) Again, the IS can help with that if you're going to hand hold. The 135 is that much faster, and a little longer....but you're not going to get good pictures of bugs:) It's hard not to get sucked into the pictures on the threads....believe me, I've 'fallen' a few times as a result of these blasted threads....but in the end, if you look through the thread for the 50 1.8 there will be plenty of shots in that thread that will look similar to the shots in this thread. Your best bet on the decision on those two is some thought as to what you're going to be shooting the most of.....and then buy the lens that best accomplishes that task......and I don't think you'll go wrong with either choice.

[toffiloff]

Thanks for the input guys... I'm not really a big fan of macro pictures, other than my girlfriend really likes me to shoot some flowers now and then, but the IS is very tempting, after I've gotten used to it on my 24-105.

However, I have reasonably steady hands, and the 135mm is compatible with the 1.4x which would really extend my total focal length range. I also have the 3 piece Kenko extension tube set, which I use for close-up emergencies...

Getting a used 40D is out of the question though, as I hate getting more gear I have to lug around for no good reason other than getting a lot of attention ;p

And finally, the 100L macro looks plain ugly to be frank. But tempting nonetheless in its versatility.
However, I think I will stay with the 135L, given that I can find it when I go to China in Febraury.

[ckfishel2001]

Thanks for the input guys... I'm not really a big fan of macro pictures, other than my girlfriend really likes me to shoot some flowers now and then, but the IS is very tempting, after I've gotten used to it on my 24-105.

However, I have reasonably steady hands, and the 135mm is compatible with the 1.4x which would really extend my total focal length range. I also have the 3 piece Kenko extension tube set, which I use for close-up emergencies...

Getting a used 40D is out of the question though, as I hate getting more gear I have to lug around for no good reason other than getting a lot of attention ;p

And finally, the 100L macro looks plain ugly to be frank. But tempting nonetheless in its versatility.
However, I think I will stay with the 135L, given that I can find it when I go to China in Febraury.

135 all the way then. Focuses close enough that you should be able get some fine flower photos for the girlfriend:) Have fun in China.

[advaitin]

135 and 35mm extension tube on Canon 50D, ISO 400, AV, f8 @ 1/400s, -.33 Ev. Whole image and crop, no added USM. I might have wished for a tripod and less wind, but this ain't so bad.

[chrisforshaw]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2576/4089508033_c9730b6ea6_b.jpg

I have to be honest, I struggle with this focal length. Great lens and all but just not that useful for me.

[advaitin]

Of course, without the extension tube, close focus can still be quite sharp. 50D, 135 L, ISO 200, f 3.5 @ 1/400s, .33 Ev.

[ckfishel2001]

Of course, without the extension tube, close focus can still be quite sharp. 50D, 135 L, ISO 200, f 3.5 @ 1/400s, .33 Ev.

Nice...love that dirt/nut leftovers on his face.

[advaitin]

Nice...love that dirt/nut leftovers on his face.

Youngish female, she was very bold. Maybe she had young to feed. She licked cream out of a spoon I held for her.

[nicksan]

http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v6/p612190629-4.jpg

http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v4/p381875617-4.jpg

http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v1/p214026571-5.jpg

http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v8/p233714535-4.jpg

http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v6/p194479624-4.jpg

[Marloon]

http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v6/p612190629-4.jpg

http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v4/p381875617-4.jpg

http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v1/p214026571-5.jpg

http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v8/p233714535-4.jpg

http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v6/p194479624-4.jpg

great photos nicksan! :D

[Brett]

135 all the way then. Focuses close enough that you should be able get some fine flower photos for the girlfriend:) Have fun in China.

Agreed. It's a fine flower lens. The bokeh really makes it for me.


http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3366/3670816210_a1fa48b30f_o.jpg


http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3490/3714790199_b7f1f4cb7c_o.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2468/3762878573_ea283536bc_o.jpg

[poppie guy]

Give me a minute...... gotta dig 'em up. (I LOVE this lens)

Were you the original owner? Since the PermiPuddles went to the dark side, I'm the one who's loving it. I have no intentions of ever letting it go.


http://mchurliman.zenfolio.com/img/v7/p776574446-5.jpg

[hammer418]

Mine's a keeper.

http://hammer418.smugmug.com/Other/Crown-Hill-Cemetery/IMG2971/708916813_dbsXf-L.jpg

[ojat]

just got this lens yesterday, the bokeh is damn amazing..

http://i34.tinypic.com/2zs8cbk.jpg

[inthedeck]

Brett, nice flower shots. Like the first and third one a lot. :) Not sure about the crop on the second one...but, the light on the flower is nice...almost like a 'spotlight' hitting that one.

ojat -- congrats. Lovely lens it is... ;)

[samurairx7]

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3366/3670816210_a1fa48b30f_o.jpg


Very nice.... =)

[Gabe63]

great photos nicksan! :D


I don't know if this is just great PP but I really like your photos. Great eye!

[Markitos]

This lens is magic for portraits:

http://markschuelerphoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Kim-1543.jpg

http://markschuelerphoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Kim-1526.jpg

http://markschuelerphoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Kim-1484.jpg

[poppie guy]

This lens is magic for portraits:

http://markschuelerphoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Kim-1543.jpg[/IMG]

http://markschuelerphoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Kim-1526.jpg[/IMG]

http://markschuelerphoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Kim-1484.jpg[/IMG]
Nice photos and pp. I like my 135L almost as much as my 85L II.

[Markitos]

Nice photos and pp. I like my 135L almost as much as my 85L II.

Yeah, I want the 85L, but just have a hard time justifying it when I use this lens--it has faster AF and has a similar look to it. I've only run into it being too long a few times.

[mxracer535]

Markitos, very nice shots, the pp is perfect. Love the last one!

[Brett]

Brett, nice flower shots. Like the first and third one a lot. :) Not sure about the crop on the second one...but, the light on the flower is nice...almost like a 'spotlight' hitting that one.

ojat -- congrats. Lovely lens it is... ;)

Yeah, the second one was cropped for a print for my Mom. I liked the look when printed, but it does look a bit strange here. The light is all natural, from her yard.

Very nice.... =)

Thanks.


This lens is magic for portraits:


Love these. Very nice. :)

[ojat]

ojat -- congrats. Lovely lens it is... ;)
thanks :)

another experiment with the lens. Taken with my 450D. A lil bit too long on this camera, but it's not a problem :)

http://i38.tinypic.com/rkq0wx.jpg

PP in PS

[inthedeck]

Yeah, the second one was cropped for a print for my Mom. I liked the look when printed, but it does look a bit strange here. The light is all natural, from her yard.

Nice present. Happy b'day to your mom. ;)

[dannygt]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2441/4100144380_f8bfec67c3.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2532/4100144472_d945a8169d.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2503/4100144576_da8d49628b.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2726/4099388843_38a0bda25e.jpg

[Sangreal]

For some odd reason I really love those vegetable shots :) The colours, the composition and the bokeh, all splendid! For me it somehow feels like paintings from the 18th century or something. Well done!

[dannygt]

For some odd reason I really love those vegetable shots :) The colours, the composition and the bokeh, all splendid! For me it somehow feels like paintings from the 18th century or something. Well done!

Thank you :)

[ckfishel2001]

Thank you :)

And it's extremely healthy!:)

[maximus96]

I just got my 135 in the mail today. I noticed that the hood doesn't have that springy snap lock feel, if that makes sense. It kinda just twist on until it hits the stop. Is this normal? It's different compared to my other hoods. Thanks

[Drozz119]

F2 1/250

http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t187/musiccuts/IMG_1907copy2.jpg

[wbm]

I just got my 135 in the mail today. I noticed that the hood doesn't have that springy snap lock feel, if that makes sense. It kinda just twist on until it hits the stop. Is this normal? It's different compared to my other hoods. Thanks
Mine's was a bit stiff, then I applied some "nose grease" (sounds minging, but rub your finger down the outside of one of your nostrils, rub same finger on the hood-mount grooves on both the hood and lens and voila: smooth hood action! :D) — I can't really believe I've just typed this! :oops:

Ewan

[maximus96]

Mine's was a bit stiff, then I applied some "nose grease" (sounds minging, but rub your finger down the outside of one of your nostrils, rub same finger on the hood-mount grooves on both the hood and lens and voila: smooth hood action! :D) — I can't really believe I've just typed this! :oops:

Ewan

right but does your click after hitting the end of the turn? my other lens and hood, when i put the hood on, i would feel the tension of the hood on the lens as i turn it, then at the end, it click into place. there is none of that tension or click with my 135 hood so i'm wondering if its normal. thanks

[wbm]

right but does your click after hitting the end of the turn? my other lens and hood, when i put the hood on, i would feel the tension of the hood on the lens as i turn it, then at the end, it click into place. there is none of that tension or click with my 135 hood so i'm wondering if its normal. thanks
The hood doesn't click with the same solidity as my other L lenses, but clicks in better than the hood for my 50/1.4. I've seen comments about the hood in other forums, I think that poor hood fit seems par for the course with this lens. I'll forgive it for the optics! :)

Ewan

[maxblack]

The Canon ET-78II Lens Hood doesn't have those clips that most Canon hoods have.
I had an issue last week in that mine was very tight getting it on and off.
Those clips probably cause the "click" you mention.
I don't know why this hood is different.

[philthejuggler]

F2 1/250

http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t187/musiccuts/IMG_1907copy2.jpg


Super portrait! Well done!

[Tom K.]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2778/4094950692_c0788361a0_o.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2599/4092081428_e776f8dcf6_o.jpg

[colin842]

Something different for me with my 135L, tried out some HDR landscape.

[Headshotzx]

Whoooaaaaa ^

[TC_Fenua]

o_O , really nice Colin842 !

[Brett]

Something different for me with my 135L, tried out some HDR landscape.

Gorgeous. :) Looks like it's from Blade Runner or some sci-fi movie.

[advaitin]

Something I had not previously done with the 135 L, I attached a 1.4 TC II to the lens on my 1DM3. EXIF reports 189mm. In this image the ISO was 1600. I let program do its thing, but I changed the Ev to -1.33 to prevent highlight burnout. This exposure of horse and rider is 1/250s @ f3.5.

The second shot is without the TC. Still ISO 1600, and fairly close to the subject. 1/125s @ f2. A lot of movement so some is sharp and most is not, but I like the capture.

I guess my eyes are getting old. In more than one shot what looked in focus in the viewfinder was not when I saw it on screen--even shots where I took my time--things in the distance, in the dark, are just too hard to get right--trouble is the camera doesn't seem to like the dark any better. Sharpness of subjects under colored gel light don't fare well either for the autofocus. I won't bother to post my failures--it's enough to know that they get more frequent.

[wimg]

Gorgeous. :) Looks like it's from Blade Runner or some sci-fi movie.
Yes, my thoughts too!

Kind regards, Wim

[wimg]

Something I had not previously done with the 135 L, I attached a 1.4 TC II to the lens on my 1DM3. EXIF reports 189mm. In this image the ISO was 1600. I let program do its thing, but I changed the Ev to -1.33 to prevent highlight burnout. This exposure of horse and rider is 1/250s @ f3.5.

The second shot is without the TC. Still ISO 1600, and fairly close to the subject. 1/125s @ f2. A lot of movement so some is sharp and most is not, but I like the capture.

I guess my eyes are getting old. In more than one shot what looked in focus in the viewfinder was not when I saw it on screen--even shots where I took my time--things in the distance, in the dark, are just too hard to get right--trouble is the camera doesn't seem to like the dark any better. Sharpness of subjects under colored gel light don't fare well either for the autofocus. I won't bother to post my failures--it's enough to know that they get more frequent.
Great shots, nonetheless, Advaitin!

And to be very honest, with these light levels, all the movement going on, and relatively slow shutter speeds, it is extremely hard to get a sharp shot - I should know.

I have gone to shooting at 6400 iso a lot lately ... :D

Kind regards, Wim

[colin842]

Thanks guys!

[Tareq]

http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/9517/1ds34927.jpg

http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/5311/1ds34932.jpg

http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/9480/1ds34933.jpg

http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/9875/1ds34944.jpg

http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/6731/1ds34964.jpg

[gp070575]

Just ordered mine 2 hours ago.......
Hope the shipping company will not lost it !
Nobody have it in stock here in Belgium. Waiting deliveries from Canon but no expected date.
Can't resist, bought it from UK which have it in stock.
Was on my wish-list for more than one year.
Main idea was to wait till beginning of march (funds) but it's too late now :lol:

[Opa114]

some mixed shots....

http://photos.mirrortheworld.de/images/20091102172322_img_4275.jpg

http://photos.mirrortheworld.de/images/20091005182638_img_3830.jpg

http://photos.mirrortheworld.de/images/20090717152702_img_3138.jpg

http://photos.mirrortheworld.de/images/20090717152540_img_3350.jpg

http://photos.mirrortheworld.de/images/20090605135017_img_2776.jpg

[xdmg]

some mixed shots....







I really like #3.. I need to get this lens... still deciding if i should get the more versatile 70-200 f/4 IS or complete my "trinity"

[Opa114]

I really like #3.. I need to get this lens... still deciding if i should get the more versatile 70-200 f/4 IS or complete my "trinity"

it's a hard decision ;-) i've sold my 70-200 for the 135 ;-)

[Tareq]

I really like #3.. I need to get this lens... still deciding if i should get the more versatile 70-200 f/4 IS or complete my "trinity"

it's a hard decision ;-) i've sold my 70-200 for the 135 ;-)

And because it is a hard decision i bought both ;):p

[Opa114]

And because it is a hard decision i bought both ;):p

yeah... :cool:

[maxblack]

And because it is a hard decision i bought both ;):p

Might be the only solution. Two great lenses.:D

[Markitos]

http://markschuelerphoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Part-II-Eli-and-Amanda-2730.jpg

http://beltie.smugmug.com/Other/Recent-Photos/More-leaves-9677/715199331_cvovp-O.jpg

http://beltie.smugmug.com/Other/Recent-Photos/PADthrough-the-porthole-9668/715199385_8nnZy-L.jpg

http://markschuelerphoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Part-II-Eli-and-Amanda-2712.jpg

http://markschuelerphoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Eli-and-Amanda-2755.jpg

[Tareq]

yeah... :cool:

Might be the only solution. Two great lenses.:D

In fact this forum making it very hard decision for all or most lenses, i have to learn how to avoid this forum, otherwise i will end up with 100 lenses and "ZERO" money! :D

[eric gautier]

http://markschuelerphoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Eli-and-Amanda-2755.jpg

stunning! was this taken w/ the 5d or the 1d3? also, how is the 135 on the 1d3?

[Markitos]

stunning! was this taken w/ the 5d or the 1d3?

The 1D3

also, how is the 135 on the 1d3?

Not sure what you mean. It's FOV is narrower, but it's not like it turns into a different lens or anything. It's the bomb no matter what you put it on.

[hammer418]

It's the bomb no matter what you put it on.

That's a fact ! :cool:


http://hammer418.smugmug.com/Other/Crown-Hill-Cemetery/IMG2960/708914948_WkRm7-L.jpg

[eric gautier]

The 1D3



Not sure what you mean. It's FOV is narrower, but it's not like it turns into a different lens or anything. It's the bomb no matter what you put it on.

thanks. well, i'm deciding between the 135 or 70-200 2.8.. :confused:..

[Markitos]

thanks. well, i'm deciding between the 135 or 70-200 2.8.. :confused:..

I have thought seriously--VERY seriously--on multiple occasions about selling the 70-200 f/2.8. It's a fantastic lens, and very flexible, but it's also big, heavy, expensive, and the 135L is just sooooooooooo good.

However, until I can shoot a few weddings trying out the 135 in place of the 70-200, I can't get rid of the zoom.

[quickster]

135L test

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2618/4113656298_9af6505d6b_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2779/4112882533_182382f1c3_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2498/4113651134_7a6906ce6a_o.jpg http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2529/4113651052_b6131f6d64_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2581/4112879157_53ac32bb32_o.jpg http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2505/4112879033_ef153b41d7_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2545/4113642884_178ed83e7d_o.jpg http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2652/4112874071_bfce3e5021_o.jpg

[airbutchie]

^ Looks damn good to me, bro!!! Hehehheehhehee... Lovin' the doggie pics, too!!! Congrats on the new acquisition and welcome to the club...

- airbutchie ;)

[dlintz]

I have no new pics to add but just wanted to say that I love my 135L.

Carry on.

d.

[myjunk]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2777/4083458995_54f6b581c1.jpg
My contribution.

135L @ F2 on a 7D @ ISO 400

http://www.flickr.com/photos/lotso/4083458995/in/photostream/

[ChrisGorabPhotography]

Do any of you 135L owners also have the 85 1.8? And do you find that you never use it because you always go to your 135L? I am finding that, but I have a hard time putting the 85 up for sale because it's also such a great lens.

[ckfishel2001]

Do any of you 135L owners also have the 85 1.8? And do you find that you never use it because you always go to your 135L? I am finding that, but I have a hard time putting the 85 up for sale because it's also such a great lens.

Yes and sold a couple weeks ago.

[eric gautier]

Do any of you 135L owners also have the 85 1.8? And do you find that you never use it because you always go to your 135L? I am finding that, but I have a hard time putting the 85 up for sale because it's also such a great lens.

hey off topic.. how do you like the 35L on the 1D? Do you find it 'wide' enough for you?

[ChrisGorabPhotography]

hey off topic.. how do you like the 35L on the 1D? Do you find it 'wide' enough for you?

I don't really consider it "wide" on the 1D. And even though I like the 35L on the 5D a lot, it's a good focal length on the 1D because it's a little tighter. My 24-70 on the 1D puts things a little wider, even though the field of view is not the traditional full frame 24mm field of view.

[dlintz]

Do any of you 135L owners also have the 85 1.8? And do you find that you never use it because you always go to your 135L? I am finding that, but I have a hard time putting the 85 up for sale because it's also such a great lens.

The 85 1.8 is definitely a good lens but I sold mine....not entirely because of the 135L. Acquiring a Sigma 50 1.4 played a part too.

d.

[ckfishel2001]

The 85 1.8 is definitely a good lens but I sold mine....not entirely because of the 135L. Acquiring a Sigma 50 1.4 played a part too.

d.

agreed there too

[airbutchie]

Just two... I love me some 135L goodness... Hehehehhehehe...

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2716/4117267455_fcbc52690e_b.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2516/4118038206_8e10888198_b.jpg

- airbutchie ;)

[Marloon]

http://i46.tinypic.com/2cr13jo.jpg

http://i50.tinypic.com/2vmvcyt.jpg

i wonder how to resize shots to 1024.

[Headshotzx]

That is an awesome shot Marloon! I'd love to get my hands on that instax some day once my dslr needs are (mostly) met!

[booja]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2616/4118557531_1d129f0a93_b.jpg

[samurairx7]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2516/4118038206_8e10888198_b.jpg



that is one super sharp picture.... gj

[Brett]

Do any of you 135L owners also have the 85 1.8? And do you find that you never use it because you always go to your 135L? I am finding that, but I have a hard time putting the 85 up for sale because it's also such a great lens.

I own both, and the Sigmalux, and none of them are going anywhere. They complement each other quite well. 135L is the best of the bunch, but often too tight of a FL for what I want to do. 50mm is great for "everything" shots; IOW it's very versatile when things might be a bit tight (events). 85mm is great for mid-range telephoto, street shooting, etc., but there's more context in the frame than the 135L. 135mm is great when you want that intimacy, head-and-shoulders or just head portraiture. It also excels at full-body shots from a distance, and subject isolation at any range.

That said, I generally leave the house with only one of those primes, as I hate carrying a bag. I make a guess as to what I'll be shooting, and choose a lens. If there's likely to be a lot of scenery, or tight crowds, it's 50mm. If it's probably looser distance-to-subject (street) shooting, 85mm. And if it's a big event with spread-out people, 135mm. Or just strap on the 135 and make it work! :) It's that good, IMO. ;)

[toffiloff]

I own both, and the Sigmalux, and none of them are going anywhere.

The Sigmalux and the 135L just happen to be the next lenses I am buying in February ;) This thread continues to make me drool! (Hoping time passes more quickly...)

[Brett]

The Sigmalux and the 135L just happen to be the next lenses I am buying in February ;) This thread continues to make me drool! (Hoping time passes more quickly...)


Just looked at your flickr. You've got some really nice work there.
I think you'll put both lenses to good work. I see you're a fan of narrow DoF, and both of those lenses have some of the finest (IMO) bokeh you can get in AF lenses for EF mount.

[toffiloff]

Just looked at your flickr. You've got some really nice work there.
I think you'll put both lenses to good work. I see you're a fan of narrow DoF, and both of those lenses have some of the finest (IMO) bokeh you can get in AF lenses for EF mount.

Thanks! I am just a beginner though, and I mostly do photography simply as a hobby. But it is very addictive, and very expensive :) I have no doubt I will have tons of fun with these two lenses. Looking forward to posting in this thread myself :)

[J-B]

With 36mm extension tube:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2772/4124324511_9da2f6ac84.jpg

[airbutchie]

that is one super sharp picture.... gj

Thanks for the comment... Here's a few more for the road...

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2686/4125950954_f17865d28a_b.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2522/4117269329_2517a2f96c_b.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2615/4118038754_e8403db63b_b.jpg

- airbutchie :D

[chrisforshaw]

If anyone is looking for a mint condition 135L mine is up for sale.

[Stan Jones Photography]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2773/4100365777_3aced20326_b.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2610/4126737990_b4e65123c8_b.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2589/4125969877_8c12a09c86_b.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2589/4126014773_5ae842c47e_b.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2803/4126035827_8df417cd38_b.jpg

[airbutchie]

^ Love that 1st shot, Stanley... Great set... Thanks for sharing...

- airbutchie ;)

[J-B]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2698/4128949810_fa5d61d5e5_o.jpg

Mr. bear also likes the 135L, seems like he was smiling at me :)

[helloagain36]

^ Love that 1st shot, Stanley... Great set... Thanks for sharing...

- airbutchie ;)

Agreed, that first shot is the biz!

[Drozz119]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2773/4100365777_3aced20326_b.jpg





Sick!! 580 camera left? Any mod?

[teatime0315]

Hey everyone! I was wondering how many of you use the 135L on a crop body? More specifically 40D's. I'm debating on whether this lens is worth pairing with the 40d since the lens would be roughly 216mm on a crop body. It seems like everyone using this lens is pairing it up with a FF body.

[Stan Jones Photography]

Sick!! 580 camera left? Any mod?


Ah, thanks everyone!!!

:)


Actually, I think I doubled up the 580 and the 430 into a medium shoot thru umbrella, it works like a charm when you're poor! :D

Cheers!

[AKHOO]

Hey everyone! I was wondering how many of you use the 135L on a crop body? More specifically 40D's. I'm debating on whether this lens is worth pairing with the 40d since the lens would be roughly 216mm on a crop body. It seems like everyone using this lens is pairing it up with a FF body.

I use it on my 500D and absolutely love it...

[ckfishel2001]

I use it on my 500D and absolutely love it...

7D and love it. 50D and love it. Don't have the great portrait shots that the others have been sharing, but did get some nice shots of youth soccer.

[teatime0315]

thanks for everyone who shared their experience with this lens on a crop body. I think i'm sold. Time to sell my current gear.

[bubba zanetti]

I only used 2 lenses here...24mm & the 135 (so the head shots are all the 135)

The lighting was disastrous but the 135 got me through. (http://www.brisbanephotosonline.com/Music/B52s/10413061_d56N3)

[bubba zanetti]

Hey everyone! I was wondering how many of you use the 135L on a crop body? More specifically 40D's. I'm debating on whether this lens is worth pairing with the 40d since the lens would be roughly 216mm on a crop body. It seems like everyone using this lens is pairing it up with a FF body.

Ive only used it on a crop body for 5 years.

[Leisa]

I'm off to pick mine up tomorrow!! :)

[ckfishel2001]

I only used 2 lenses here...24mm & the 135 (so the head shots are all the 135)

The lighting was disastrous but the 135 got me through. (http://www.brisbanephotosonline.com/Music/B52s/10413061_d56N3)

Love shack babieeee......ah, memories of college

[cppalermo]

The sharpness of this prime is amazing....this is definitely going to be on my list of lenses to buy.

[quadrap]

135 \ f 6 ISO 50 Alien bees 400 with medium octa and sliver reflector under

http://kendraalexis.com/IMG_0454.jpg


http://kendraalexis.com/IMG_0478.jpg

http://kendraalexis.com/IMG_0480.jpg

[pixel_junkie]

^^^ Amazing! So 3D...

[quadrap]

^^^ Amazing! So 3D...
Thanks.

[liclic]

i am missing this lens already, had it with me while on my Europe curise, thinking between 135L or 100L
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3428/3705293027_ac17c15355.jpg

[ken2000ac]

Probably my least used lens, but only because of the FL. It is typically brilliant. Check my Flickr for higher res versions: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ken2000ac/

Recent shots:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2455/4035229301_4b67561da3.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2494/4030530657_ddb778c2f7.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2517/4030461879_bf84c91572.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3483/4031181732_104541b015.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2526/4030426781_bb62dbdd75.jpg

[ckfishel2001]

Probably my least used lens, but only because of the FL. It is typically brilliant. Check my Flickr for higher res versions: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ken2000ac/

Recent shots:





http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2517/4030461879_bf84c91572.jpg




Love this shot.

[ChrisGorabPhotography]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2517/4030461879_bf84c91572.jpg



Looks like a Windows desktop image

[ckfishel2001]

Looks like a Windows desktop image

it kinda does...now it's ruined:(

[jeremietard]

Love this shot! Where did you take the picture from?


http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2494/4030530657_ddb778c2f7.jpg

[ken2000ac]

Love this shot.

Thank you. It was my wife's idea for me to pull over on the A6 into Paris to snap this shot. We printed this shot in a 36 x 24 and hung it over our couch so I suppose the risk to life and limb was worth it.

[ken2000ac]

Love this shot! Where did you take the picture from?

It's geotagged on my Flickr page, but it was taken from atop the Montparnasse Tower in central Paris, east of the Eiffel Tower. There are no lines to gain access and the entry fee is far cheaper than the Eiffel. I preferred the view as well. :)

[cherrymoon]

Are you KenClark2000 from eos-numerique.com, a french forum ???

[exodusfman800]

i am missing this lens already, had it with me while on my Europe curise, thinking between 135L or 100L
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3428/3705293027_ac17c15355.jpg
haha, that's a great shot. As far as the 135 and 100...I'd probably go with the 100 for the macro ability and IS. They're both tack sharp and around the same price. The 135 is a hair faster...idk how much that matters to you though.

[ken2000ac]

Are you KenClark2000 from eos-numerique.com, a french forum ???

Haha no sorry. Only been to France once. I am currently in the US. :)

[Marloon]

http://i48.tinypic.com/ymqkm.jpg
Quick portrait.

[Evo-L]

I must have the 135L!!

[Tareq]

I must have the 135L!!

I must have the 135L-100=??? ;)

[liclic]

haha, that's a great shot. As far as the 135 and 100...I'd probably go with the 100 for the macro ability and IS. They're both tack sharp and around the same price. The 135 is a hair faster...idk how much that matters to you though.
man so hard to choose, probably go with the 100 to try out the new IS