PDA

View Full Version : Kingston vs Sandisk - reliability


tim
19th of October 2005 (Wed), 03:43
I'm thinking of picking up more memory, for the weddings I shoot, and i'm trying to decide on brand. I have 6GB of Sandisk Ultra 2 cards (2*2GB, 2*1GB) and i've never had a problem with them, but I have a small 256MB Kingston card I used for my little camera that always worked fine too.

I can pick up a Kingston 2GB Elite Pro 60x card for NZ$235, or a 2GB SanDisk Ultra II 60X for NZ$340, and i'm not sure which to get. I don't really care about speed, just about reliability, this will be a backup "just in case I get trigger happy" card. Thoughts?

farrukh
19th of October 2005 (Wed), 04:19
I had problems with a Sandisk SD card about 8 month ago, since then im not trusting Sandisk anymore. and using Kingston without any problem ever.

When it comes to memory, Kingston is always known as memory specialist. 60X by ElitePro card is decent speed.

i2iSTUDIOS
19th of October 2005 (Wed), 04:27
I had problems with a Sandisk SD card about 8 month ago, since then im not trusting Sandisk anymore. and using Kingston without any problem ever.

When it comes to memory, Kingston is always known as memory specialist. 60X by ElitePro card is decent speed.
Were you using the regular SanDisk card or an Ultra for Extreme card?

I have a SanDisk Extreme III 1 gig card and it comes with a lifetime warranty that in case of failure they SanDisk will recover my images and the card wasn't all that expensive, I got it for $84 USD last year which is cheaper than what I can get it for now. Don't forget to format your card regularly at least I think that's what you're supposed to do.

farrukh
19th of October 2005 (Wed), 04:33
It was a regular Sandisk SD card, and i was using it in a point and shoot camera.

tim
19th of October 2005 (Wed), 04:46
Thanks farrukh, any more opinions on Kingston?

m3incorp
19th of October 2005 (Wed), 04:55
I think that generally you will not have any reliability issues with either a Kingston Pro or Sandisk. The Kingston works just as fine as any other, and you did say you were going to use it as a backup. Course I will take that mean, when the other two or full you will then fill it also. It should do you fine.

Carzee
19th of October 2005 (Wed), 04:56
I read loads of reviews and tests. I like Kingston Elite Pro's rep and the price is right. I have never had a single error or problem. I own 3 of the 1GB.

tim
19th of October 2005 (Wed), 04:59
Cheers everyone, Kingston it is then :)

Jon
19th of October 2005 (Wed), 08:52
I've had one Kingston (of 5) and one SanDisk (Ultra) out of 8 (6 Ultra, 2 regular) fail for photography purposes. I'm not one of those who grant a brand a pass for all product lines just because they're good for one. For instance, SanDisk's USB flash drives, though 2.0, are horribly slower than others'. I don't see Lexar as an across-the-board flash memory provider.

Kingston sources their own computer RAM chips; their CF are (every one I've seen) from Toshiba.

subtle_spectre
19th of October 2005 (Wed), 09:32
I endorse Kingston products. Most memory products come with a lifetime warranty and are quality items. Their customer is exemplary.

Dave_G
19th of October 2005 (Wed), 10:18
I've got a 1gb Kingston and it's been fine.

A SanDisk 1gb - also fine.

And a SanDisk Ultra II 1gb - guess what, also fine.

BottomBracket
19th of October 2005 (Wed), 14:17
I have both Kingston Elite Pros and Sandisk Ultra cards, both 1 and 2 GB's. I have no problems with either, and to me, they work just the same. I'd lean towards the Elite Pros because they ar emuch more inexpensive.

tim
19th of October 2005 (Wed), 15:44
The Elite Pro do 3.5MB/sec, the Ultra II do 5MBps. So it takes 2.7 seconds to empty the buffer with the first, and 2 seconds with the second... not a big difference really. I think i'll get the Kingston.

farrukh
19th of October 2005 (Wed), 16:12
if Elite pro is 60x then
1x=150kb
so 60x150 =9000 KB
which is 8.7890625 MB/sec

tim
19th of October 2005 (Wed), 16:15
if Elite pro is 60x then
1x=150kb
so 60x150 =9000 KB
which is 8.7890625 MB/sec

Don't trust the labels on products, trust the tests.

http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=6007-7303

cmM
19th of October 2005 (Wed), 16:16
I have both, I use both, never had a problem with either one of them, can't complain about speed either.

farrukh
19th of October 2005 (Wed), 16:20
Don't trust the labels on products, trust the tests.

http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=6007-7303

Then i would like to do my own tests as i doubt 3.5mb/sec is not right as i feel it copies 2 jpg images per sec where average image size is around 2.8mb.

I think Kingston got good reputation so they cant afford to lie and it must be 100% gurantee that it will do 60x if used with a proper reader/writer.

m3incorp
20th of October 2005 (Thu), 00:04
So many variables such as your particuliar camera, your card reader. I agree that you have to use it in your device, rather than going with the mathmatical equation.

cfcRebel
20th of October 2005 (Thu), 09:54
I have two 2Gb and two 256Mb Kingston Elite Pros. They work great. Great price too.

johnnybfan
20th of October 2005 (Thu), 20:19
I've got 2 - 1GB (not ElitePro) and 1 - 2GB ElitePro Kingston cards and really like them. No problems at all.

tim
20th of October 2005 (Thu), 20:22
Well mine turn up today, no fancy wrapping like my Sandisk cards, but that wrapping's just annoying anyway... and no doubt adds to the cost. I'll try it tonight, hopefully I won't have to use it tomorrow, i'd like to test it a bit more before trusting wedding pictures to it! I'm up to 8GB now, the rest is Sandisk Ultra II :)

BlanceEMT
20th of October 2005 (Thu), 20:46
i have a kingston elite pro w/o problems. mines 50x though