hceline
19th of May 2003 (Mon), 16:00
I have a technical question.
I've been using Canon SLRs (lately the Elan 7) and I'm really happy with them. But I'm thinking about picking up a 10D--I love digital, and ALL the photos I take end up going through Photoshop at some point. I primarily shoot art photography and other photos which must be printed at 8 x 10 or larger.
My question is, how does the 10D CCD RAW image compare in terms of dynamic range with, say, Velvia or B&W print film?
I'm asking because the images I take tend to have a slightly 'warm' analog feel, and I'm nervous that because of having to white-balance or whatnot that my color response will be unnaturally neutral.
It also seems that film responds to light differently in regard to it's color ramp (shadow/midtone/highlight distribution)--I suppose you could try to approximate this with curves in PS, but would it be of equivalent quality?
My last digital was a Nikon Coolpix 990, a point-and-shoot from about two generations ago (the pictures it too looked good at first, but didn't print well and were terrible at any ISO over 100), so I'm a little nervous in getting a digital SLR. Obviously technology has improved since then and Canon is leading the pack, but is the color depth in a 10D film-equivalent and as subtle as slide and B&W (or damn near close enough)?
Because being able to shoot available light at ISO 400 without film grain would be fantastic!
Thanks,
-=H=-
I've been using Canon SLRs (lately the Elan 7) and I'm really happy with them. But I'm thinking about picking up a 10D--I love digital, and ALL the photos I take end up going through Photoshop at some point. I primarily shoot art photography and other photos which must be printed at 8 x 10 or larger.
My question is, how does the 10D CCD RAW image compare in terms of dynamic range with, say, Velvia or B&W print film?
I'm asking because the images I take tend to have a slightly 'warm' analog feel, and I'm nervous that because of having to white-balance or whatnot that my color response will be unnaturally neutral.
It also seems that film responds to light differently in regard to it's color ramp (shadow/midtone/highlight distribution)--I suppose you could try to approximate this with curves in PS, but would it be of equivalent quality?
My last digital was a Nikon Coolpix 990, a point-and-shoot from about two generations ago (the pictures it too looked good at first, but didn't print well and were terrible at any ISO over 100), so I'm a little nervous in getting a digital SLR. Obviously technology has improved since then and Canon is leading the pack, but is the color depth in a 10D film-equivalent and as subtle as slide and B&W (or damn near close enough)?
Because being able to shoot available light at ISO 400 without film grain would be fantastic!
Thanks,
-=H=-