PDA

View Full Version : Tonal Range Digital vs Film


hceline
19th of May 2003 (Mon), 16:00
I have a technical question.
I've been using Canon SLRs (lately the Elan 7) and I'm really happy with them. But I'm thinking about picking up a 10D--I love digital, and ALL the photos I take end up going through Photoshop at some point. I primarily shoot art photography and other photos which must be printed at 8 x 10 or larger.

My question is, how does the 10D CCD RAW image compare in terms of dynamic range with, say, Velvia or B&W print film?

I'm asking because the images I take tend to have a slightly 'warm' analog feel, and I'm nervous that because of having to white-balance or whatnot that my color response will be unnaturally neutral.

It also seems that film responds to light differently in regard to it's color ramp (shadow/midtone/highlight distribution)--I suppose you could try to approximate this with curves in PS, but would it be of equivalent quality?

My last digital was a Nikon Coolpix 990, a point-and-shoot from about two generations ago (the pictures it too looked good at first, but didn't print well and were terrible at any ISO over 100), so I'm a little nervous in getting a digital SLR. Obviously technology has improved since then and Canon is leading the pack, but is the color depth in a 10D film-equivalent and as subtle as slide and B&W (or damn near close enough)?

Because being able to shoot available light at ISO 400 without film grain would be fantastic!

Thanks,

-=H=-

justme_dc
19th of May 2003 (Mon), 16:54
I my experience the 10D has a tonal range closer to E6 than to C41 film. To put it in numbers print film has a tonal range (stops of light captured) of about 8 slide has a range around 5, digital hits right around 6 or so. Of course you mileage and epxosure may vary. I Personally feel that Digtial is closer to E6 in it's look which is fine by me because that is mostly what I shoot anyway. Slide Film (expecially Fuji) has a certian "feel" to it that is hard to replicate with digital. I am still figureing out how to either make the 10D behave like film or adjust my shotting so that digital looks "right".


Good Luck to you!

Mr.Jalapeno
19th of May 2003 (Mon), 17:52
It's more like slide film in that the exposure latitude is fairly narrow. Also, like slide film, it's very easy to blow out the highlights.
However, once you have a properly exposed image in your computer, you can either expand or contract the tonal range with your imaging program.
I treat exposure with my Canon EOS 10D like Provia or Sensia. However, digital images tend to be less contrasty than slide film, sort of like NPH--shadows don't block up as easily as Velvia. Moderate highlights clip and have a different sheen than negs or slides. Brilliant highlights are easy to blowout. If you save in raw format you can extend the dynamic range, especially highlights, over JPEGS.