PDA

View Full Version : Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM


dolina
7th of February 2012 (Tue), 00:28
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7151/6834273809_b5cf5dc2dc_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/alabang/6834273809/)
EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM (http://www.flickr.com/photos/alabang/6834273809/) out some time in 2011 @ $2300 (AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Autofocus Lens $1887)

Product Page: http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/cameras/ef_lens_lineup/ef_24_70mm_f_2_8l_ii_usm

Focal Length & Maximum Aperture
24-70mm, 1:2.8

Lens Construction
18 elements in 13 groups

Diagonal Angle of View
84° - 34°

Focus Adjustment
Inner-focusing with USM

Closest Focusing Distance
0.38m/1.25 ft.

Zoom System
Rotating Type

Filter Size
82mm

Max. Diameter x Length, Weight
3.5 x 4.4 in., 28.4 oz. / 88.5 x 113mm, 805g

airbutchie
7th of February 2012 (Tue), 07:29
Yay!!! No more extending barrel... WOO HOO!!! Too bad no "IS", either... Oh well...

:D

amd is the best
7th of February 2012 (Tue), 09:16
Looks great! I wish they added IS though.

WARAT
7th of February 2012 (Tue), 13:04
You meant out some time in 2012 right? :)

And the price is whoa. Must be way better in terms of optics compared to the first gen.

cbadie
7th of February 2012 (Tue), 21:34
No kidding....seems way too pricey

bberg
7th of February 2012 (Tue), 23:06
Yay!!! No more extending barrel... WOO HOO!!! Too bad no "IS", either... Oh well...

:D

Huh? Of course the barrel will extend, just like the 24-105 IS. Only difference is it isn't a reverse zoom like the 24-70 Mk1. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if it extended further than the original 24-70. Not to mention zoom creep all over the place, thus the reason for the zoom locking switch.

commonjunks
7th of February 2012 (Tue), 23:11
2,299.00 :(, is it for real?

WARAT
8th of February 2012 (Wed), 17:00
According to the MTF charts, its suppose to outperform the brick in all aspects IQ wise. We need to see some real independent samples naow!!

Marloon
8th of February 2012 (Wed), 22:08
Huh? Of course the barrel will extend, just like the 24-105 IS. Only difference is it isn't a reverse zoom like the 24-70 Mk1. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if it extended further than the original 24-70. Not to mention zoom creep all over the place, thus the reason for the zoom locking switch.

True! Now, I ask myself, why would I buy a 2300 lens with zoom creep? The 24-105 creeped too, didn't it? I haven't touched that lens in over 3 years.

Invertalon
8th of February 2012 (Wed), 22:53
The 24-105 does not creep normally. Although Canon loosened my zoom ring when I got it repaired so it would creep a little when walking. Just had them fix it like it was new though when I sent it in for CPS check/clean... No creep anymore.

I think though, the 24-70 II may have more creep "issues" due to the weight of the glass in the extending barrel. It is probably difficult to make a zoom ring that is easy to turn and not allow creep in a lens design like this. The non-extending zooms (70-200's) are great designs, allowing different methods then extending models to prevent creep.

pbelarge
8th of February 2012 (Wed), 23:35
I have the 24-70 and have not experienced lens creep at all. I carry the lens when using it, as I do not like using a strap.

I did experience lens creep with my 70-300.

Downs Photography
13th of February 2012 (Mon), 12:18
No is. Oh well first page!