View Full Version : The masters of portrait photography. Who are they?
DocFrankenstein
28th of December 2005 (Wed), 22:54
What are the Ansel Adamses of portrait photography?
Tlee05
28th of December 2005 (Wed), 22:56
Me....
aam1234
28th of December 2005 (Wed), 22:57
One name that comes to mind is Karsh (hope I got the name right). Check him out, he is really special.
Edit: Here's a site about Yousuf Karsh (http://www.westongallery.com/artists/y_karsh/yousuf_karsh.html).
Edit2: Another one is the British photographer who just passed away, maybe 3-4 weeks ago. Hope somebody knows his name. He has an outstanding work, and some of his photos are icons.
cdifoto
28th of December 2005 (Wed), 23:10
Anyone who makes a lot of (make up your own definition of a lot) money at it is a master. Doesn't matter if they're actually good or not.
Curtis N
28th of December 2005 (Wed), 23:11
Steve McCurry.
scotgasch
28th of December 2005 (Wed), 23:40
Don Blair, Dean Collins, Hugh Frazier, and Frank Cricchio to name a few.
grego
28th of December 2005 (Wed), 23:49
Greg Gorman http://www.greggormanphotography.com/
Annie Leibovitz (can't find a site of hers)
Robert_Lay
28th of December 2005 (Wed), 23:58
That is soooo subjective. Each of us can think of several portrait photographers who stand above the crowd. It really depends on the "style" of portraiture that you like. In many ways, Irving Penn's approach is ludicrous, with his grey bedsheet backdrops, but I like the end result. His concept of isolating his subjects while preserving their unique attributes is very revealing and appealing.
grego
29th of December 2005 (Thu), 00:05
That is soooo subjective. Each of us can think of several portrait photographers who stand above the crowd. It really depends on the "style" of portraiture that you like. In many ways, Irving Penn's approach is ludicrous, with his grey bedsheet backdrops, but I like the end result. His concept of isolating his subjects while preserving their unique attributes is very revealing and appealing.
Yup, that's photography for you, even in a more isolated topic like portraits. :)
Jon
29th of December 2005 (Thu), 13:07
Halsmann.
Sageg
29th of December 2005 (Thu), 13:18
I'd include Anton Corbijn
http://www.corbijn.co.uk/
Longwatcher
29th of December 2005 (Thu), 14:53
I will add my vote for Annie Leibovitz.
Everyone else will get a lot of "who?"
I have a lot of favorites who do portraits, but when I think of THE portrait photographer I think of Annie Leibovitz.
DocFrankenstein
29th of December 2005 (Thu), 16:16
I wouldnt' mind any "whos?" as long as they have nice work.
F. Stop Fitzgerald
29th of December 2005 (Thu), 16:34
In many ways, Irving Penn's approach is ludicrous, with his grey bedsheet backdrops, but I like the end result. His concept of isolating his subjects while preserving their unique attributes is very revealing and appealing.
Interesting thought here. My sentiments too, but strangely, his name and Yusef Karsh's name came to mind first.
Barb42
29th of December 2005 (Thu), 20:55
That is soooo subjective. Each of us can think of several portrait photographers who stand above the crowd. It really depends on the "style" of portraiture that you like. In many ways, Irving Penn's approach is ludicrous, with his grey bedsheet backdrops, but I like the end result. His concept of isolating his subjects while preserving their unique attributes is very revealing and appealing.
Ludicrous? Strong word. I can't say that I understand why using a background is ever 'ludicrous'.
Robert_Lay
30th of December 2005 (Fri), 01:23
Ludicrous? Strong word. I can't say that I understand why using a background is ever 'ludicrous'.
You are correct. "Using a background" is not ludicrous.
Perhaps you have never seen the actual backdrops that he used in his Neutral Ground series. If not, visit your nearest Pizza Hut! Then decide what the proper adjective should be. Maybe I should have said that they were "amusing", or "very unusual".
Mark_Cohran
30th of December 2005 (Fri), 16:25
Another vote for Steve McCurry here. He gets the job done in the field and under the worst conditions. That makes him a master in my book.
Mark
F. Stop Fitzgerald
30th of December 2005 (Fri), 17:51
Ludicrous? Strong word. I can't say that I understand why using a background is ever 'ludicrous'.
You need to see Penn's work from this time period. He was reaching for minimalism, hence, the plain gray background.
Nightcrawler
30th of December 2005 (Fri), 22:55
My vote is for Kevyn Major Howard. http://www.headshot-photography.com/
maderito
31st of December 2005 (Sat), 12:08
My vote is for Kevyn Major Howard. http://www.headshot-photography.com/ Interesting site. Howard's approach is to capture the eyes. In looking through samples of his work, it's really interesting how your viewing eye is drawn immediately to the subject's eye. Well conceived and executed photographic technique.
Barb42
6th of January 2006 (Fri), 03:25
I searched for Penn's work on the Internet, specifically looking for his gray backgrounds. Quite interesting actually. It is apparent that he wants the subject alone to hold sway over the visual stage he establishes and the background appears to help. It has an interesting effect of pulling the subject out of its own time.
garbidz
7th of January 2006 (Sat), 07:04
I really like Sally Mann
http://www.art-forum.org/z_Mann/gallery.htm
dietcookie
7th of January 2006 (Sat), 11:48
Steve McCurry is good, David Lachapelle is really really good too.
HJMinard
7th of January 2006 (Sat), 13:40
Herb Ritts
TheFlyOnTheWall
8th of February 2006 (Wed), 09:36
Another Corbijn fan here...
NickUK
8th of February 2006 (Wed), 09:41
Lichfield and Bailey.
aam1234
9th of February 2006 (Thu), 14:43
Martin.
ctymom
9th of February 2006 (Thu), 16:11
Annie Leibovitz (can't find a site of hers)
Wish she did have a site. Would love to see some other takes on the photo session she did with the Carpenters for Rolling Stone Magazine.
Pamela
vBulletin® v3.6.7, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.