PDA

View Full Version : Challenge for you gurus: travel tripod


keenasmustard
28th of December 2005 (Wed), 22:30
Firstly, many apologies for yet another thread on tripods. I have read through many of the ones on here, plus other forums and I'm starting to go a little mad I think. One promising thing is it seems as though everyone goes through this same frustration. It's very difficult to wade through the threads to find other recommendations that best fit what I'm after. Therefore, I throw this challenge out to you wonderfully helpful people to hopefully give me a hand:

My current equipment should now show up in my signature below, and as you can see the biggest weight (plus my camera of course) is my 70-200IS; so I've worked out I need a tripod and head combo which can hold a minimum of about 2kg/4.5lbs.

I have been given advice by a friend that it is good to have a tripod which is at least as tall as me (minus the height of my camera and tripod head etc), to give me the extra benefit of taking shots while having the tripod on the ground and then standing on a rock. Therefore achieving a great range of angles in my shots. I'm 162cm/5'3", so have come up with a rough minimum for tripod to be 135cm/53"- without the centre pole raised. (hope that's correct)

I take a lot of shots also at ground level, so would like the tripod to have a good minimum height, if possible. Therefore I would prefer no centre post or a removable one.

I have gleaned that a 3 section tripod is much more stable.

My main uses in the immediate future will be landscape and wildlife photography. In the future, I will be doing sports photography, but realise I may have to get a different tripod head and/or possibly a monopod to accommodate a different type of activity.

Whatever I get, must be reasonably compact and lightweight, as I intend to travel a lot on airlines and also tend to do a lot of jumping in and out of my car (preferably once it has come to a stop) to snap a shot of a landscape.

Budget: I threw this question at my husband earlier, and he said "try and see what you can get for under $300US" (tripod and head). I will want to get quick release plates too, but they can fall outside that margin. If I see it's beneficial to stretch my budget, I will, but I have to have some sort of guidelines!

I have read the following article:
http://www.bythom.com/support.htm
But the thought of spending $600-1000 seems rather overthetop. I do get his point of trying to get the right thing first go & "you get what you pay for"- that's why I invested in my 70-200IS for example, but surely there are other options out there? I want to get something that will do a good job and not be garbage, but I'd prefer it not to completely break the bank!

OK, I lay down the challenge for someone to find me something that might fit all of those criteria, and apologise for the length and possible repetition of this type of thread! :o It would be great to hear the perspective of people who are perhaps doing the same style of photography I am, ie travel, landscape & wildlife, as you may have actually tested this sort of thing in the field.

Mike K
28th of December 2005 (Wed), 23:24
so I've worked out I need a tripod and head combo which can hold a minimum of about 2kg/4.5lbs.
I have been given advice by a friend that it is good to have a tripod which is at least as tall as me (minus the height of my camera and tripod head etc), to give me the extra benefit of taking shots while having the tripod on the ground and then standing on a rock. Therefore achieving a great range of angles in my shots. I'm 162cm/5'3", so have come up with a rough minimum for tripod to be 135cm/53"- without the centre pole raised.
I have gleaned that a 3 section tripod is much more stable.
Whatever I get, must be reasonably compact and lightweight, as I intend to travel a lot on airlines and also tend to do a lot of jumping in and out of my car (preferably once it has come to a stop) to snap a shot of a landscape.

Budget: I threw this question at my husband earlier, and he said "try and see what you can get for under $300US" (tripod and head).

I have read the following article:
http://www.bythom.com/support.htm
.
I fully agree with T. Hogan.
I think if you reread your request tomorrow you will realize that you want everything great and cheap too, don't we all. The real issue in photo gear (life) is how to prioritize what is important to you. If you don't have $600-1000 you will spend less or get no tripod at all. That means some requirements will have to be compromised. which will they be? Its a good thing you are not a tall guy or the standing on a rock requirement would immediately dissapear because there are no really tall, compact, stable, light, cheap tripods. First off tall, 3 section tripods are not compact, that all there is to it!

Simply live with the fact that you will purchase some gear that is a compromise in a few dimensions (that prioritization again), and that when you can afford better gear, you will buy something with less compromises.
Mike K

keenasmustard
28th of December 2005 (Wed), 23:49
Thank you Mike. I realise that my wishlist is probably unrealistic, that's why I've put the thread out there in the hope that I might be able to get further guidance in the right direction. I'm not sure that I've got my calculations correct for best tripod for my height, as it seems few tripods even come within the parameters I've mentioned (and I'm pretty short!). Also, I could bend on the minimum height and opt for using a beanbag method for low-to-ground shots, if it meant that I got a fantastic tripod that met my other requirements.

Thanks for taking the time to read my post.

JmprSteve
29th of December 2005 (Thu), 00:25
Have you considered something like the Bogen/Manfrotto 3021 pro tripod (switchable center column - long and short) and the center arm can be mounted laterally. Supports 11 lbs. Four leg angle settings(26, 45, 75 & 90 degrees) allow expansive height range. About $150 from B&H. Also the Gitzo 1276 universal ballhead with Quick Release also at B&H for $185. This system will support more than you specified, and maybe heavier than what you are looking for. I use this combination and like it since I don't do alot of hiking so the weight is not a problem. I like the flexibility the legs offer and the ballhead only has two adjustment knobs (one for panning - the other for everything else). I stand about 5' 5" in the morning ( about 5' 4" later in the day) and I find the heigth of the tripod comfortable to use. Hope this helps.

keenasmustard
29th of December 2005 (Thu), 10:20
Thanks Steve, that setup does sound promising. The tripod does have a heck of a range.

Longwatcher
29th of December 2005 (Thu), 10:46
Maybe go in another direction for a tripod.

While I have a very good tripod for my use under most circumstances (a bogen/manfrotto combination); it is fairly heavy and difficult to travel with. What I also have is a cheap light-weight Kodak Tripod with center monopod that runs about $30. It is not realy recommended with my 1DsMkII and heavy lenses , but I have used it.

It is only rated at 4lbs so a bit under your 4.5lbs requirement,
but I have had over 6.3lbs on mine without too much problem. This is a 1DsMkII mounted to the Tripod with 70-200/2.8L IS extending out the front (I really should mount the lens to the tripod, but I get lazy occasionally). I kept the neck strap on just in case, but it did provide the stability I needed. What I really like is the center monopod ability though.

The best part is (if remembering to keep a watch on it) is if you break it you can replace it multiple times before getting to the price of one of the expensive tripods.

Now if you can afford one of the really good ones, I highly recommend going for that instead, but as I only need a light weight tripod about once or maybe twice a year, that Kodak tripod works real well for that.

Disclaimer, I am kind of hard on my photo equipment so maybe don't pay attention to me, but it is something to think about.

rklepper
1st of January 2006 (Sun), 09:01
Check out the Feisol carbon fiber. www.feisol.com

Great tripod and light weight. Also, within your stated budget.