View Full Version : 20D vs Nikon D-200
John Sheppard
2nd of January 2006 (Mon), 19:33
I have a 20D and am happy with it. I reallyt need the 5 FPS for sports. But the new Nikon D-200 seems to be a better performer and better built. DPREVIEW.COM has not compared images taken with the D-200 yet. What are the opinions here?
SHEP:)
Ronald S. Jr.
2nd of January 2006 (Mon), 19:36
Hmm...opinions....Nikons are stinky? :-D All of the Nikons I've used (D70, D100, D2X) suck at low light/ high ISO shots. Far too noisy. Also, the shots in general seem to "lack". Of course, that depends on the lens used, and any and all PP.
Basically, I've just never been impressed by any means by a Nikon body. Some of their lenses are quite the gems, but the bodies are just...eh. I love my 20D.
nosquare2003
3rd of January 2006 (Tue), 05:08
Bodies come and go. But Canon higher end bodies always come faster. Look at Nikon D100, it challenged the Canon D60, 10D and 20D until now!!!
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.