KevC
6th of January 2006 (Fri), 13:52
Hey,
A friend of mine is also a photographer and she wants to "join forces" and get serious about doing this professionally.
We're both honest and trustworthy people, but money scares everyone which is why I'm asking here.
Equipment costs? Materials cost? How is it divided? Profits?
There's also another issue. She shoots film. And she shoots Minolta. She could stick to film and I'll stick to digital, she suggests keeping equipment seperate completely seperate.
But how about materials cost? She'll spend more money buying/developing/printing film. How about profits? Chances are, I'll shoot more because I shoot digital..
I was thinking this: Make a company. Keep the company seperate from ourselves. Expenses will be the company's, and we just write ourselves a salary.
The equipment costs still bother me.
I'm considering convincing her to switch to digital, and Canon for that matter so she can use my lenses. And she doesn't have to spend so much with film. But that's a grand right there spent.
How about if this doesn't work out? Who gets to keep what? She'll hafta pay for her own equipment then? Isn't asking her to spend a grand right away a lot? Sure is...
It's all very complicated, and I don't want to ruin friendships over this. I'm not money hungry and neither is she. But I want to be fair.
Maybe it's not such a good idea, but having a second shooter is always good. Less missed shots, twice as much "networking", hopefully more clients. Sure, the profits may be lower BUT we'd probably get more deals and get our names out faster...
Thoughts?
A friend of mine is also a photographer and she wants to "join forces" and get serious about doing this professionally.
We're both honest and trustworthy people, but money scares everyone which is why I'm asking here.
Equipment costs? Materials cost? How is it divided? Profits?
There's also another issue. She shoots film. And she shoots Minolta. She could stick to film and I'll stick to digital, she suggests keeping equipment seperate completely seperate.
But how about materials cost? She'll spend more money buying/developing/printing film. How about profits? Chances are, I'll shoot more because I shoot digital..
I was thinking this: Make a company. Keep the company seperate from ourselves. Expenses will be the company's, and we just write ourselves a salary.
The equipment costs still bother me.
I'm considering convincing her to switch to digital, and Canon for that matter so she can use my lenses. And she doesn't have to spend so much with film. But that's a grand right there spent.
How about if this doesn't work out? Who gets to keep what? She'll hafta pay for her own equipment then? Isn't asking her to spend a grand right away a lot? Sure is...
It's all very complicated, and I don't want to ruin friendships over this. I'm not money hungry and neither is she. But I want to be fair.
Maybe it's not such a good idea, but having a second shooter is always good. Less missed shots, twice as much "networking", hopefully more clients. Sure, the profits may be lower BUT we'd probably get more deals and get our names out faster...
Thoughts?