clos
27th of June 2003 (Fri), 10:43
Newbie, sorry if wrong furum but...
I have been using ACDsee 4.01 for a few years now and love the application. It is great for viewing, browsing, and renaming JPEG files. However I have recently purchased BreezeBrowser and although it is not as "user friendly" than ACDsee it has superior picture quality in high quality mode.
Please let me know if anyone out there has diferent results but when I compare full screen to full screen and toggle between the same picture, BreezeBrowser is sharper, much sharper. I have set ACDSee for high quality viewing and tweeked all the settings but I can't get the same picture quality.
Please help this is driving me crazy.
-Clos
PS. I got a 10D a few months ago. First one front focused, returned it, now I get tack sharp pictures without much post processing. 20,000 pictures and still going strong.
I have been using ACDsee 4.01 for a few years now and love the application. It is great for viewing, browsing, and renaming JPEG files. However I have recently purchased BreezeBrowser and although it is not as "user friendly" than ACDsee it has superior picture quality in high quality mode.
Please let me know if anyone out there has diferent results but when I compare full screen to full screen and toggle between the same picture, BreezeBrowser is sharper, much sharper. I have set ACDSee for high quality viewing and tweeked all the settings but I can't get the same picture quality.
Please help this is driving me crazy.
-Clos
PS. I got a 10D a few months ago. First one front focused, returned it, now I get tack sharp pictures without much post processing. 20,000 pictures and still going strong.