View Full Version : graffiti pictures
atheistjihad70
16th of January 2006 (Mon), 03:51
critiques welcom
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v449/bunkerking70/Untitled-2copy0.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v449/bunkerking70/IMG_0889copy.jpg
Nidz
16th of January 2006 (Mon), 05:23
There's a fine line between what is art and what is vandilism. I feel the picture art looks nice but tagging is not good. Still nice pics.
kenyc
16th of January 2006 (Mon), 05:54
As far as the photos, I can't really tell much about what is going on so I have to say they are not that great. As far as tagging, I agree, it's not good. If it's art, that's at least better, but should be done with permission and not illegally.
KAC
Tlee05
16th of January 2006 (Mon), 06:37
I cant see what is happening here :( maybe another angle?,
I really like a artist who does work illegally some of you might know of him he has just had a exhibition in London
http://www.artofthestate.co.uk/Banksy/Banksy_photos_exhibitions_001.htm
But I believe his work is art.
bikerider
17th of January 2006 (Tue), 04:54
The pics don't show the art which is a shame........personally I don't have a problem with street art, legal or otherwise. Graffiti has a history going back thousands of years, I'm glad there's people out there keeping it alive. I've been thinking about getting a graffiti artist to do a feature wall outside at my place.
Roger.
wu_wei0
17th of January 2006 (Tue), 07:15
They are not the best either technically nor as a storytelling venue. There is such potential here that hasn't been captured.
I'd really like to be able to see the art. ALso, neither shot really shows me much either about the context or the process, either. There's no story visible here but I know it has to be here somewhere.
Keep trying! :)
~wu
716-239photo
20th of January 2006 (Fri), 22:57
graffiti is an art, period.
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.