PDA

View Full Version : Best lens for a d-60 on a budget


evilenglishman
7th of July 2003 (Mon), 12:30
--

Morden
7th of July 2003 (Mon), 12:33
As an "all round" lens, I like Canon's EF 28-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS USM.

evilenglishman
7th of July 2003 (Mon), 12:55
--

chris.bailey
7th of July 2003 (Mon), 13:42
Morden wrote:
As an "all round" lens, I like Canon's EF 28-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS USM.

I would second that though be aware that the actual focal range is 45-215 so it not all that wide at its widest. It is also quite large but balances well with the D60.

Morden
7th of July 2003 (Mon), 13:56
I would second that though be aware that the actual focal range is 45-215 so it not all that wide at its widest. It is also quite large but balances well with the D60.
Agreed - both the 'cropping' factor and the balance. I prefer the longer 'effective' length, so the 28-135 is very useful to me!

brunz
7th of July 2003 (Mon), 16:04
I agree that the 28-135 is a nice lens for the money. I have made razor sharp 16x20's with my D60 and this lens. I would also consider the 20-35 USM. This is a fine lens and gets more wide angle than the 28-135. I use both at weddings. Neither are fast but both are sharp and relatively cheap.Good luck...get a 50 1.8 too...they are sharp and dirt cheap...good available light lens.

MarkH
7th of July 2003 (Mon), 17:31
I started with the 28-135IS and thoroughly recommend it. This lens give the equivalent of 216 at full zoom and it will focus down to .5M (1.6ft) so I use it as a Macro for reasonable results (not as good as a proper macro lens of course). The IS is really useful for "available light" shots.

Based on advice here and on newsgroups I also bought a 50 f1.8, I don't use it a lot because it doesn't have the flexability of a zoom. However it was cheap, it IS sharp and it makes a nice portrait lens. It is also fairly good in low light, the f1.8 is around a stop better then the f3.5 I get at the wide end on my 28-135.

I found myself needing a longer zoom so I added a Canon 75-300 III USM lens. This lens is quite good for the price, but in poor light it is only usable from a tripod. Usually I stick to the 28-135 unless I am outside in the sun.

I like my selection of lenses and the range of zoom I have available. Of course I can still add more, once I pay of the credit card (10D + lenses) but I can have a lot of fun now with what I have.

I would never recommend L series lenses to someone with a low budget, but remember they are available if you want to take a step up later. If I had unlimited funds then I would get:
17-40L
24-70L
70-200L IS
100-400L
1.4x Extender
2x Extender
180L Macro

But you have to just select what you can afford and get out and have fun with the camera.

David Lawson
10th of July 2003 (Thu), 16:08
On a budget 24-85 usm and get a second hand one in good condition. If you buy a new one the minute you hand over the cash it's second hand, but it will probably be as good as new : )