View Full Version : Cathedral indoor
Guillermo Freige
12th of July 2003 (Sat), 22:44
One of my first pictures taken inside a big structure with available light with my S50. Taken in RAW and curves postprocessed in PS. Some USM applied too.
http://gfreige.homelinux.org/gallery/photos/small/CRW_1109.jpg (http://gfreige.homelinux.org/gallery/photo.php?photo=433&size=standard&exhibition=7)
The picture was taken inside the La Plata Cathedral, in my own city.
Click in the picture for a larger size or additional pictures.
What do you think?
pappy
12th of July 2003 (Sat), 22:54
You have done very well with this Guillermo, the highlights are perfectly exposed and you have allowed the deep shadow to remain that way which is exactly how this image should be.
I like the upward 'movement' of the composition which hints at the magnificence and size of the cathedral.
Excellent work.
Regards,
Peter
Guillermo Freige
12th of July 2003 (Sat), 22:59
pappy wrote:
You have done very well with this Guillermo, the highlights are perfectly exposed and you have allowed the deep shadow to remain that way which is exactly how this image should be.
Peter:
Thanks for your comments :)
One of the most difficult things with the S50 is to keep the highligths. Almost always I must use negative EV compensation.
Guillermo
Leighow
13th of July 2003 (Sun), 11:19
Great shot. I would crop just below the left hand window to strenghthen the diagonal across all three windows.
HOWIE
Guillermo Freige
13th of July 2003 (Sun), 12:51
Leighow wrote:
Great shot. I would crop just below the left hand window to strenghthen the diagonal across all three windows.
HOWIE
Someting like this?
http://gfreige.homelinux.org/gallery/photos/small/CRW_1109_modif.jpg
Intresting. I like it. But my target crop area was a 3:2 one (to print it in 4x6), so I've done my best in that aspect ratio. The original image is a 4:3 one.
Leighow
13th of July 2003 (Sun), 15:29
Well maybe. If you allow me to ignore the 4 x 6 constraint, I would be trying to frame the three windows in black. To do so using your initial post:
1: I dropped the brightness overall in curves
2: Color balanced a bit toward yellow, green, and red (very, very little).
3: I added 1/10 of an inch of black canvas to all sides
4: Recropped the image as shown
5: Isolated the windows and brightened them just a tad.
6: Tried to deepen the blue.
HOWIE
http://members.rogers.com/hleigh/CHURCH.jpg
Guillermo Freige
14th of July 2003 (Mon), 23:25
Howie:
why the assimetrical black border, to compensate for the missing image parts?
Leighow
15th of July 2003 (Tue), 17:46
Well to balance the image and frame it in black so that it would look complete.
************************************************** ****
I did not see any other solution. Of course if the right side had extended into darkness, that might not have been necessary.
Hey look, I am an amateur, this is an amateur's critique. I looked at the dark line down the right hand side that this border introduces, played around (blur, shading), and then decided that it was best to live with it.
Guillermo Freige
15th of July 2003 (Tue), 18:00
It was not a critic, only a doubt :)
Probably my poor english was the culprit. probably the right question might be:
"Is the black border there to compensate for missing parts of the image?"
At least that was my intention :)
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.