Sigma 30mm f1.4 EX DC HSM

[Tony-S]

Is that Hyde and Fes? :)

[Dick Emery]

A couple of my friends before going to a halloween party. The bounce flash was not working to well for me on this occasion.

http://gallery.me.com/jmnel/100287/IMG_4934/web.jpg?ver=12569600790001

http://gallery.me.com/jmnel/100287/IMG_4940/web.jpg?ver=12569600900001

A little underexposed they could have done with a little more fill flash to my eyes. EDIT: Oops! I missed what you wrote. Yeah you noticed it too. You can always try using the fill light tool in Lightroom if you have it.

[Dick Emery]

I tweaked them. Hope you don't mind.

http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/7304/web1z.jpg

http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/5404/webui.jpg

[CO Mac]

Thanks for the retouch. The flash in that room was really giving me problems. I know they're not the best photos but I think they're pretty funny.

[runninmann]

Thanks for the retouch. The flash in that room was really giving me problems. I know they're not the best photos but I think they're pretty funny.If you want other members to feel comfortable manipulating your uploaded images, you can set your profile to display "Image Editing OK" in the User CP.

[CO Mac]

Went to a workshop this morning. Here's some results.

http://gallery.me.com/jmnel/100287/IMG_5151/web.jpg?ver=12570153640001

http://gallery.me.com/jmnel/100287/IMG_5247/web.jpg?ver=12570153780001

[Dick Emery]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2588/4061428177_5ed9462a59_o.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2789/4061427651_6b6ebcbd2e_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3526/4061426361_b2bd8d4710_o.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2752/4061426877_f6a4731c78_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3517/4061427129_406c9d738c_o.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2641/4062167912_8e7ccba2ef_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3246/4062168974_bf7a2605eb_o.jpg

[Simply Ravishing]

Some Halloween Goodies

"Freddie Mercury"
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2644/4071885933_4b70f8401b.jpg


"The Most Interesting Man In The World"
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2457/4072648266_59ab4536f6.jpg


"Random people with wizard staffs"
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2496/4071883387_4dfd2e4c80.jpg


BTW wizard staffs are the beer cans duct taped together... by the end of the night it gets very interesting... haha

[Karizmatik]

Went to a workshop this morning. Here's some results.

I usually don't comment on model's because I think it's rude.... But I have to say, what the hell? :shock: :| :???:

[NaKiD EyE]

I'm pretty stoked. I sold my 28-135 kit lens today and bought the Sigma 30 1.4 from B&H just now. Should be here on friday, hope I get a good copy!

[SMP_Homer]

I'm pretty stoked. I sold my 28-135 kit lens today and bought the Sigma 30 1.4 from B&H just now. Should be here on friday, hope I get a good copy!

If you think you have focus issues, remember that 1.4 is very thin DOF

give it a good chance! And have a good weekend...

[NaKiD EyE]

If you think you have focus issues, remember that 1.4 is very thin DOF

give it a good chance! And have a good weekend...

right on. I will put it through the tests though as I have heard of some focus issues with this lens. Granted some of those can be attributed to lack of knowledge about DOF like you say but nonetheless.

[darosk]

Went for walkies today, here are a few of my fav's :)

http://www.daroskoding.com/photos/703690911_Pa6uc-O.jpg

http://www.daroskoding.com/photos/703690973_P7BGn-O.jpg

http://www.daroskoding.com/Flowers/Assorted-Flowers/IMG5964/703690355_ZDHzi-O.jpg

http://www.daroskoding.com/Flowers/Assorted-Flowers/IMG5933/703690309_sQZ2a-O.jpg

[DStanic]

Wondering how long it will take for my Tamron 17-50 VC to be shipped.... makes me want to figure out a way to make $300 quick and buy this lens (it's next on the list).

[jdlloyd67]

Went for walkies today, here are a few of my fav's :)


Very nice set!!! I'm back and forth on selling this lens. It sits in my bag waiting for the right opportunity for me to use it and it never seems to come. Your great pics have me leaning back to keeping it.

[darosk]

Very nice set!!! I'm back and forth on selling this lens. It sits in my bag waiting for the right opportunity for me to use it and it never seems to come. Your great pics have me leaning back to keeping it.
Thank you very much! I work on a lot of student film sets shooting Behind-the-scenes stills, and have enjoyed the low-light capabilities of this prime lens immensely. I am also a sucker for sharp, thin DOF.

Give the lens a chance :) On my last shoot, I forced myself to use only the 30mm. Results were superb, in my eyes. I might post some samples.

[NaKiD EyE]

just received my copy today. I love this lens already!

[pridash]

Picked up a used one of a member here (TeeTee) and looking forward to testing it out tonight at an indoor event - should be fun! Quick tests show the focus to be spot on!

[notpencil]

this lens has spoiled me,, i can't get it off.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2651/4051516334_96d073c844_b.jpg

[pridash]

Probably not the best test, but here is just one shot I quickly did - I love the 3D effect it starts to give wide open!

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2525/4086700591_42ec39f258_o.jpg

[CO Mac]

Took some today of my friend for his Match.com profile.

http://gallery.me.com/jmnel/100431/IMG_0420/web.jpg?ver=12577301320001

http://gallery.me.com/jmnel/100431/IMG_0516/web.jpg?ver=12577321370001

[jbkalla]

Took some today of my friend for his Match.com profile.



Hopefully, he'll find a nice Canon user in the area from these shots! :-)

[Depth]

Joiner for class.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2487/4092247418_7f48b792ca_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/42504877@N00/4092247418/)

[Paul Li]

How?

[Jeff81]

I'm curious, anyone used this lens on a 7D? How were the results?

[NaKiD EyE]

I'm curious, anyone used this lens on a 7D? How were the results?

I have it on my 7D now. I am doing a shoot this weekend, so I will be able to give you some examples... but so far I love it!

[NaKiD EyE]

I'm curious, anyone used this lens on a 7D? How were the results?

out in my backyard today testing out AI Servo and my new sigma 30 1.4 Although I must say flickr seems to underexpose my images a bit... not sure what is up with that. these images were shot in RAW and processed in photoshop.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2486/4101172447_2283a4019f_o.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2766/4101927198_172562a2a2_o.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2580/4101194643_6552906d5b_o.jpg

[darosk]

Walkabout at the local Arboretum:

1)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v135/opiate_eyes/IMG_6132.jpg

2)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v135/opiate_eyes/IMG_6144.jpg

3)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v135/opiate_eyes/IMG_6147.jpg

[NaKiD EyE]

one more from the 7D/Sig 30 combo.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2686/4103848541_c90c7822ce_o.jpg

[cancan7]

one more from the 7D/Sig 30 combo.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2686/4103848541_c90c7822ce_o.jpg

That's a really beautiful shot!

[Jeff81]

one more from the 7D/Sig 30 combo.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2686/4103848541_c90c7822ce_o.jpg

Very nice colors. I've been debating whether to go with the sig 50 and canon 100 f/2 or the sig 30 and canon 85. I had the sig 30 a while back when I had a 40D and loved it. Sold it when I moved to FF. I think I'll be picking it up again.

[NaKiD EyE]

one more from the 7D/Sig 30 combo.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2686/4103848541_c90c7822ce_o.jpg

That's a really beautiful shot!

thanks.

[tkbslc]

I don't know why but I really like this one

30mm @ f2

407266

[jdlloyd67]

One of my wife's last shots with this lens before I sold it to Amy here on POTN.

http://www.dldigitalimages.com/misc/Madison_110709_sm.jpg

[RPCrowe]

I am seriously considering this lens for my low light glass on an upcomng trip to China. I especially want to do a lot of shooting in the night markets and believe that this lens might be the right choice.

I had a 28mm f/1.8 Sigma and I liked the focal length quite well on a 1.6x crop camera. However, like many older Sigmas, this lens will not work with any camera newer than a 10D and my 10D really doen't have the high ISO performance of my 40D.

My question is: How long is the average turn around at the Sigma service center? I am expecting to leave for China at the end of March. Would that be enough time for a couple of trips to the Sigma sevice center is necessary?

[Yamaha451]

Generally 1 month turn around, mine was 2 weeks (50 1.4). Just order it, you will be impressed. My 30 did not need any adjustments.

[tkbslc]

Generally 1 month turn around, mine was 2 weeks (50 1.4). Just order it, you will be impressed. My 30 did not need any adjustments.


I would think easily by march, but likely you will not need any adjustments. The 30s are not as bad as the 50s for AF issues.

[egordon99]

My 30 was (is) fine out of the box. GREAT lens! It will serve you well as a "street scene/night-time" lens.

[Jeff81]

I would think easily by march, but likely you will not need any adjustments. The 30s are not as bad as the 50s for AF issues.

That's good to hear. I ordered a 30 and it should arrive tomorrow. The last time I owned the lens I bought it used and didn't have to worry about sending it in. The previous owner had gone through three copies. I sent a sigma 50 in about 10 months ago and had it back in a week, but lately it seems from what others are reporting, it is taking longer now.

I am seriously considering this lens for my low light glass on an upcomng trip to China. I especially want to do a lot of shooting in the night markets and believe that this lens might be the right choice.

I had a 28mm f/1.8 Sigma and I liked the focal length quite well on a 1.6x crop camera. However, like many older Sigmas, this lens will not work with any camera newer than a 10D and my 10D really doen't have the high ISO performance of my 40D.

My question is: How long is the average turn around at the Sigma service center? I am expecting to leave for China at the end of March. Would that be enough time for a couple of trips to the Sigma service center is necessary?

I think that should give you enough time. I really think you'll love the lens as well.

[GregSteer]

A few from a out and about shoot at Howk Bobbin Mill nr Caldbeck, Cumbria in September. Just to show it can be used for landscapes as well as people :)

http://www.gregsteer.co.uk/resources/images/potn/landscapes/001_CaldbeckBobbinMill_20090910_IMG_3383_Web1024.j pg

http://www.gregsteer.co.uk/resources/images/potn/landscapes/002_CaldbeckBobbinMill_20090910_IMG_3379_Web1024.j pg

http://www.gregsteer.co.uk/resources/images/potn/landscapes/004_CaldbeckBobbinMill_20090910_IMG_3397_Web1024.j pg

http://www.gregsteer.co.uk/resources/images/potn/landscapes/005_CaldbeckBobbinMill_20090910_IMG_3340_Web1024.j pg

NB: Second copy, first from Jessops was obviously an ex-demo one that made a very suspect grinding noise when focused, second one was factory fresh and I've had zero problems with it.

[NaKiD EyE]

love the sky in the last one Greg! what CP do you use with the sigma?

[Jeff81]

love the sky in the last one Greg! what CP do you use with the sigma?

Just a guess but the Hoya Pro 1-D 77mm Circular Polariser is listed in his full gear list.

[GregSteer]

Just a guess but the Hoya Pro 1-D 77mm Circular Polariser is listed in his full gear list.

No CP what-so-ever I have to admit, thats pure heavily processed sky.

Good dob of vibrance, curves, split toning, vignettes and grad filters.

[courier]

Anyone got any pictures of this attached to their camera?

[KarlosDaJackal]

Anyone got any pictures of this attached to their camera?

how about on a 40d without the hood
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3091/3156230249_049d6676eb_b.jpg

[Jeff81]

First shot with the new lens.

[X-Warrior]

Looks like you focused nicely ;)

Congrats on the purchase. Go and enjoy it :)

[sconner69]

OK got the Sigma 30 last night and maybe I am doing something wrong but it appears to be front focusing to me. I took this series of pictures to do two things check the focus and see where my sharpest AV was here is what I got, these are straight conversions from RAW to JPG in DPP nothing else done to them.

So in the pictures below I used single point focus and focused on the third ball in the center row, at 1.4 you can clearly see the lens focused on the second ball in the center row. My question do you see the same thing and if so how do I fix it?

I also derived from this that I should be able to take some pretty nice portraits at 2.8 because the DOF should be sufficient for a face and it appears really sharp. Am I right or am I looking at it wrong?

Thanks so much.

1.) Shot at 1.4
http://www.brandy-scott.com/Our_Home_Site/Pictures_files/POTN/DPP_0001.JPG

2. Shot at 1.8
http://www.brandy-scott.com/Our_Home_Site/Pictures_files/POTN/DPP_0002.JPG

3. Shot at 2.2
http://www.brandy-scott.com/Our_Home_Site/Pictures_files/POTN/DPP_0003.JPG

4. Shot at 2.8
http://www.brandy-scott.com/Our_Home_Site/Pictures_files/POTN/DPP_0004.JPG

5. Shot at 3.5
http://www.brandy-scott.com/Our_Home_Site/Pictures_files/POTN/DPP_0005.JPG

6. Shot at 4.0
http://www.brandy-scott.com/Our_Home_Site/Pictures_files/POTN/DPP_0006.JPG

[Tim Uhler]

My wife and I took turns using this lens last weekend to shoot our nieces.

#1 was f2.5 1/800th iso 200

#2 was f2.8 1/800th iso 200

[Dick Emery]

sconner69 those shots definitely show how some cameras overexpose at F1.4 with this lens. Typically you need to use -1/3 or more EC at that aperture. YMMV obviously.

[palaima]

It is soooooo annoying. I can't find this lens in any camera stores! So i can't try it out :/

[Jeff81]

OK got the Sigma 30 last night and maybe I am doing something wrong but it appears to be front focusing to me. I took this series of pictures to do two things check the focus and see where my sharpest AV was here is what I got, these are straight conversions from RAW to JPG in DPP nothing else done to them.

So in the pictures below I used single point focus and focused on the third ball in the center row, at 1.4 you can clearly see the lens focused on the second ball in the center row. My question do you see the same thing and if so how do I fix it?

I also derived from this that I should be able to take some pretty nice portraits at 2.8 because the DOF should be sufficient for a face and it appears really sharp. Am I right or am I looking at it wrong?

Thanks so much.


Definitely looks like its front focusing. After inspection, mine is doing the same thing. You can see it in the first post on this page. My wife's hand is in focus while my daughters eyes are a bit soft. A +20 micro adjust got mine close. Since your camera doesn't have micro adjust, your options are to exchange it or send it in to Sigma for adjustment. I'd send it directly to CRIS in Arizona. You can get their info from Sigma. I'll be sending mine in after the holidays. Micro adjust made it so its usable, and there are conflicting reports on how long CRIS is taking to perform work lately.

[sconner69]

Dick,
The overexposure in pic one was my fault, shutter too slow. But it still shows what I was afraid of, front focussing.

Jeff,
I will have to check on Sigma's site and see what I come up with, I do not want to be with out this lens through the holidays also, so I am going to try and keep the AV up so that it is in focus on the whole face.

Thanks for looking and giving your opinions.

[chrispychicken]

My wife and I took turns using this lens last weekend to shoot our nieces.

#1 was f2.5 1/800th iso 200

#2 was f2.8 1/800th iso 200

The first shot is stunning...

Here's one of mine, at 1.6. Bokeh's yummy.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2505/4084057215_909719db37.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/cphoniball/4084057215/)

[Mark-B]

Aquarium of the Americas in New Orleans, LA

f/1.8 @ ISO 800
http://bienvenu.zenfolio.com/img/v8/p808898233-5.jpg

f/2 @ ISO 1600
http://bienvenu.zenfolio.com/img/v1/p844614686-5.jpg

[Ricky09]

It is certainly lighter ... by almost 1000 bucks ;) That's ... one-thousand.

Spend 1000 bucks and forget about it and in the end you don't have to scratch your head and say, what the hell happen to this pic?

Yes, this lens ruin some of my reunion pics. I should've read the reviews about the focus issue before taking this lens to that reunion. I bet the 30 f/2 would have satisfied me more that night even at f/2.0.

[pixel_junkie]

Spend 1000 bucks and forget about it and in the end you don't have to scratch your head and say, what the hell happen to this pic?

Yes, this lens ruin some of my reunion pics. I should've read the reviews about the focus issue before taking this lens to that reunion. I bet the 30 f/2 would have satisfied me more that night even at f/2.0.

I came back to the SIGMA from a 35L. Used it for 3-4 months so I know how well the 35L can focus. If your lens works well, it is just as good. Don't knock it just because YOU have a bad copy. It happens, fix it and move on. Or sell it, whatever ...

[Wawrzysz]

sigma is sharp and the focus issue is fixable. What I dislike about sigma lenses in general is brownish cast to color, it makes the hues flat and dull, you can always try to fix stuf in PP but it will never be close to canon prime lenses - especially 35l. I looked at tons of pictures taken with 30 1.4 and yes it is a bright lens - but thats all. Just my opinion.

[tkbslc]

sigma is sharp and the focus issue is fixable. What I dislike about sigma lenses in general is brownish cast to color, it makes the hues flat and dull, you can always try to fix stuf in PP but it will never be close to canon prime lenses - especially 35l. I looked at tons of pictures taken with 30 1.4 and yes it is a bright lens - but thats all. Just my opinion.

It's also a bright lens that is sharp wide open, has fast AF and great bokeh.

You are entitled to your opinion on the color, but I think you are in small company. I, for one, am blown away by the great color and contrast of the Sigma 30. My pictures are not flat, dull, or brown.

Looking at the controlled tests between the L and the Sigma, I don't see what you are talking about: http://www.pbase.com/lightrules/30v35_2nd

[Ricky09]

I came back to the SIGMA from a 35L. Used it for 3-4 months so I know how well the 35L can focus. If your lens works well, it is just as good. Don't knock it just because YOU have a bad copy. It happens, fix it and move on. Or sell it, whatever ...

Yes I had a bad copy and I'm pretty sure more bad copies are out there than good ones. Don't get me wrong, I like the size of the Sigma and its perfect for my XSi and I just wish I'm lucky like you to get a very rare good copy. As far as the 35L, the only complain I hear over at their forum is the high price so I assumed its got focus spot on.

[Ricky09]

It's also a bright lens that is sharp wide open, has fast AF and great bokeh.

You are entitled to your opinion on the color, but I think you are in small company. I, for one, am blown away by the great color and contrast of the Sigma 30. My pictures are not flat, dull, or brown.

Looking at the controlled tests between the L and the Sigma, I don't see what you are talking about: http://www.pbase.com/lightrules/30v35_2nd

I looked back and forth between the 35L and Sigma thread and the pics of the 35L just look amazing. The Sigma shots are sharp, but just doesn't have the amazing or pop or wow look. The color is too warm and the bokeh is harsh. I'm sorry maybe my eyes just like the 35L shots more

[tkbslc]

I looked back and forth between the 35L and Sigma thread and the pics of the 35L just look amazing. The Sigma shots are sharp, but just doesn't have the amazing or pop or wow look. The color is too warm and the bokeh is harsh. I'm sorry maybe my eyes just like the 35L shots more

You are probably noticing the shots from the full frame cameras. IT has a totally different perspective and DOF on FF.

[sconner69]

Spend 1000 bucks and forget about it and in the end you don't have to scratch your head and say, what the hell happen to this pic?

Ricky,
Some of us don't have the extra $1000 and this lens make a viable substitute for the L

So I got one that front focuses, I have simply been focusing on the neck instead of the eyes, then recomposing. that will work (actually works quite well) until after Christmas and I will send it in to have it recalibrated.

[pixel_junkie]

Yes I had a bad copy and I'm pretty sure more bad copies are out there than good ones. Don't get me wrong, I like the size of the Sigma and its perfect for my XSi and I just wish I'm lucky like you to get a very rare good copy. As far as the 35L, the only complain I hear over at their forum is the high price so I assumed its got focus spot on.

The one I own now is my fourth SIGMA 30. Trust me, I know all about that. I can also tell you that I've tried it on another body, a 30D. And while focusing perfectly on mine, the same lens performs poorly on that 30D. Seems, at the factory, the lens gets calibrated for a certain body type and works with only it. Thats why when you send your lens to SIGMA for calibration, they insist on getting your body with it as well. It is a PITA lens for sure, but I still prefer it over the 35L - more specifically, the color rendition.

[Ricky09]

Ricky,
Some of us don't have the extra $1000 and this lens make a viable substitute for the L

So I got one that front focuses, I have simply been focusing on the neck instead of the eyes, then recomposing. that will work (actually works quite well) until after Christmas and I will send it in to have it recalibrated.

I don't have that extra money either and that's why I bought the Sigma in the first place. It turned out to be a disaster though. I know you can get it recalibrate,but its not always guarantee it'll be corrected. It's just a hassle and an insult to buyers like me knowing Sigma knows the problem,but never bothered to fix it in the first place. What's the point of saving money if you're not happy? The Sigma is an outstanding (price,sharpness and weight) lens IF Sigma can fix the problem.

[Ricky09]

Just to let you know, I got some good shots too with this lens.

http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii187/_spade_357/IMG_1693Edit.jpg?t=1259204543

http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii187/_spade_357/INFO.jpg?t=1259204653

[X-Warrior]

How'd you get DPP to show the focus spot on a 3rd party lens? It doesn't do so for mine :?

...
it's not DPP is it?

[pridash]

I think you can only view focus points on any lens with Zoombrowser.

[Sean]

How'd you get DPP to show the focus spot on a 3rd party lens? It doesn't do so for mine :?

...
it's not DPP is it?

When you are in "loupe" view it's ALT+L.

[Depth]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2681/4138987455_7e57ce9d68_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/42504877@N00/4138987455/)

[X-Warrior]

When you are in "loupe" view it's ALT+L.
That will just show me a bunch of black focus points, not the red one selected at the time of the picture.

I think you can only view focus points on any lens with Zoombrowser.
Ah, thanks for that. Pity DPP still can't do it - something I wouldn't mind Canon to fix.

[pridash]

That will just show me a bunch of black focus points, not the red one selected at the time of the picture.


Ah, thanks for that. Pity DPP still can't do it - something I wouldn't mind Canon to fix.

Yeah, I really don't know why Canon doesn't add it in...it is so useful and avoids having to use 2 different programs!

[Swann1]

How'd you get DPP to show the focus spot on a 3rd party lens? It doesn't do so for mine :?

...
it's not DPP is it?
What version of DPP are you using? I have 3.7.2 and it shows the AF points. Maybe you need to update?

All the AF points show as black if you use manual focus. When you use auto focus, the selected point(s) turn red.

(AF points are nothing to do with the lens, it's a body thing)

[X-Warrior]

A new version? Right, I just updated to see if anything changed, but alas. Apparently when I have all focus points selected (fast moving children, so AI servo), they all end up red in DPP. When I manually select a focus points, all are black.
I once downloaded someone's raw file for some reason of a shot made with a Canon lens, and it worked just fine for that one. It just doesn't want to show the selected focus point when using Sigma lenses.


Btw, as I used this lens again this afternoon, in a pretty dark room, focus was spot on every single shot. Except when the little kids were too fast to keep up with, but that's not a lens problem :roll:. Just amazing. I would not get such results on my 400D, that's for sure.

[Swann1]

I just did some testing with my 40D/Sigma 17-70 and found:
One-Shot AF
Manually select AF point - only that one lights up red in DPP
Automatically select AF point - only the ones that achieve focus light up red in DPP

AI Servo AF
Manually select AF point - only that one lights up red in DPP
Automatically select AF point - all points light up red in DPP

Manual Focus
All points are black, regardless of whether you use Manual or Automatic AF point selection.

As I said, it's the body not the lens.

[Ricky09]

Ok, I just read somewhere that BHPhoto has a fix/better version of this lens, is that true? I heard its darker color also.

[tkbslc]

I don't why the AF point overlay in DPP is useful anyway. All it shows is which AF point you used. It doesn't tell you if the subject moved, or you swayed, or you recomposed, etc. So it is really useless for diagnosing Focus errors. You have no way of ruling out user errors in between focusing.

[tkbslc]

Ok, I just read somewhere that BHPhoto has a fix/better version of this lens, is that true? I heard its darker color also.

I don't think so. Nobody (including Sigma) has any info about a version 2 of this lens. You might have just seen the lens in a different mount. The Sony And Pentax mount versions came out a little later than the Canon and NIkon and look just a little bit different.

[pixel_junkie]

Product photography ...

http://www.emilkara.com/IMAGES/glenlivet.jpg

[jdlloyd67]

Product photography ...

http://www.emilkara.com/IMAGES/glenlivet.jpg
Wow! Good stuff Pixel_Junkie!!! Great lighting!!!

[pixel_junkie]

Thanks. Lighting manufacturer - IKEA

[EdZep]

I like this lens. I didn't quite nail focus on the first two; both guys were animated.

@f/2
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2462/3682788735_e09290d40e_b.jpg

http://www.flickr.com/photos/wwfloyd/3682788735/in/pool-sigma30mm

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2531/4035366585_76f357bf6d.jpg

http://www.flickr.com/photos/wwfloyd/4035366585/in/pool-sigma30mm

@f/10
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2662/4035366583_f8bc0e6e5d_b.jpg


http://www.flickr.com/photos/wwfloyd/4035366583/in/pool-sigma30mm (http://www.flickr.com/photos/wwfloyd/4035366583/in/pool-sigma30mm)

@f/4
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2701/4035366577_cda88c4c9e_b.jpg


http://www.flickr.com/photos/wwfloyd/4035366577/in/pool-sigma30mm (http://www.flickr.com/photos/wwfloyd/4035366577/in/pool-sigma30mm)

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2462/4035366569_c2b363c2a8.jpg


http://www.flickr.com/photos/wwfloyd/4035366569/in/pool-sigma30mm (http://www.flickr.com/photos/wwfloyd/4035366569/in/pool-sigma30mm)

f/2.5, 1/400, fill flash, ISO 3200 + NR
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2692/4329621975_62bb16ea3a_b.jpg
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wwfloyd/4329621975/

[myjunk]

I really like the firehydrant and the product shot. Were these wide open @1.4?

[EdZep]

Thank you. f10 on the hydrant valves. f4 on the boys with new clothes (I see my editing destroyed the EXIF). The first portrait was f2.

I really like the firehydrant and the product shot. Were these wide open @1.4?

[JakubPhoto]

Few shots from a windy day at the beach.

http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/968/img7197edit.jpg (http://img14.imageshack.us/i/img7197edit.jpg/)

http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/5336/img7209edit.jpg (http://img163.imageshack.us/i/img7209edit.jpg/)

http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/5792/img7210edit.jpg (http://img14.imageshack.us/i/img7210edit.jpg/)

http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/6975/img7195edit.jpg (http://img40.imageshack.us/i/img7195edit.jpg/)

[Cassie]

Product photography ...

http://www.emilkara.com/IMAGES/glenlivet.jpg

Love the ligthing on this.

[Austin.Manny]

First shot with the new lens.

Great way to start off its life! :D

[courier]

Ive just bought this so please humour me until it arrives and i can post

[gopack471]

Just got this lens today. First couple shots, going out later to hopefully get some xmas lights. First one is f/2, last two are f/1.4

http://i149.photobucket.com/albums/s44/tpodell140/sigma%2030/IMG_3754.jpg

http://i149.photobucket.com/albums/s44/tpodell140/sigma%2030/IMG_3760.jpg

http://i149.photobucket.com/albums/s44/tpodell140/sigma%2030/IMG_3777.jpg

[myjunk]

Thanks. I really do wish that at least there was some mention of the aperture it was shot at. I, for instance (and I'm talking specifically about me), would like to see how the lens holds up wide open rather than stopped down.

If stopped down, might as well use my kit lens :-)

[pridash]

Thanks. I really do wish that at least there was some mention of the aperture it was shot at. I, for instance (and I'm talking specifically about me), would like to see how the lens holds up wide open rather than stopped down.

If stopped down, might as well use my kit lens :-)

Yes, I agree about the mention of aperture when posting shots...although if you have an exif viewer plug-in installed (Firefox) you can tell in 2 clicks anyway!

However, shooting wide open is not the only benefit of this lens. The colours, contrast sharpness, and obviously the bokeh are far superior, not to mention the HSM and FTM.

If I had to choose between the kit lens (presuming that you are talking about the 18-55) and the Siggy at the 30mm setting, I'd choose the Sigma without hesitation, even stopped down. And I say that even though I don't have a bad kit lens, quite the opposite - I've had some fantastic shots with it.

[DaveSt]

Thanks. I really do wish that at least there was some mention of the aperture it was shot at. I, for instance (and I'm talking specifically about me), would like to see how the lens holds up wide open rather than stopped down.

If stopped down, might as well use my kit lens :-)

Yeah, but you are going to have to stop down a LOT to lose the advantage this lens gives you over the kit lens.

[tkbslc]

Thanks. I really do wish that at least there was some mention of the aperture it was shot at. I, for instance (and I'm talking specifically about me), would like to see how the lens holds up wide open rather than stopped down.

If stopped down, might as well use my kit lens :-)

If you ONLY shoot stopped down, yeah. It is nice to be able to shoot razor sharp shots at f5.6 outside and then walk inside and shoot nice sharp ones at f1.4-2.8.

[jbkalla]

I also like FXiF (http://ted.mielczarek.org/code/mozilla/fxif/) in Firefox. Right-click on the photo and it should tell the camera settings, unless the photo's been stripped of EXIF.

Works in Mac or Win, of course...

[SMP_Homer]

took this tonight... 20th anniversary of the Montreal massacre...

[C1rrus]

I've used three copies of this lens, and only one copy has felt truly sharp. Here's my latest copy, which I'm still unsure about:

http://www.paulwhittaker.net/Portraits/2009-11-21-Rachel-Garret/MG2128/734672416_W48Mz-XL.jpg
http://www.paulwhittaker.net/Portraits/2009-11-21-Rachel-Garret/MG1904/734672182_wpqSC-XL.jpg
http://www.paulwhittaker.net/Portraits/2009-11-21-Rachel-Garret/MG1936/734672181_gomqx-XL.jpg
http://www.paulwhittaker.net/Portraits/2009-11-21-Rachel-Garret/MG1991/734672224_jo98m-XL.jpg

All photos post-processed (and sharpened quite a bit) in ACR.
EXIF info here (http://www.paulwhittaker.net/Portraits/2009-11-21-Rachel-Garret/10574627_y4mkK#734672224_jo98m)

... And here's one taken with a sharp copy (my friend's):
http://www.paulwhittaker.net/photos/734742403_8osam-XL.jpg

[DStanic]

I've used three copies of this lens, and only one copy has felt truly sharp. Here's my latest copy, which I'm still unsure about:


Nice photos. when I borrowed my friend's copy I found the lens had a "natural" look to it, not razor sharp like my 85mm or even 70-200 f/4L, but still sharp enough wide open that I found the images to be pleasant to look at.

If you are planning on selling let me know!

[courier]

took this tonight... 20th anniversary of the Montreal massacre...

like the light bokeh on the right :)

[courier]

I have just bought this lens. Can anyone recommend the best way to test it for sharpness?

[sconner69]

I have just bought this lens. Can anyone recommend the best way to test it for sharpness?

Line some identical items up and focus on one of the items and see which one is actually in focus. I used golf balls, some others have used batteries, buttons, any thing relatively small so you can see that it is focusing spot on and not front focusing like a large percentage do.

[courier]

Line some identical items up and focus on one of the items and see which one is actually in focus. I used golf balls, some others have used batteries, buttons, any thing relatively small so you can see that it is focusing spot on and not front focusing like a large percentage do.

thanks i will post the results later

[Cassie]

about:

... And here's one taken with a sharp copy (my friend's):
http://www.paulwhittaker.net/photos/734742403_8osam-XL.jpg

Likes!

[courier]

http://i849.photobucket.com/albums/ab58/MattPetley/Rach-esc.jpg

http://i849.photobucket.com/albums/ab58/MattPetley/charingX.jpg

http://i849.photobucket.com/albums/ab58/MattPetley/floorlights.jpg

[EdZep]

Very colorful and stylish, courier. I especially like the face in the tube.

[courier]

Very colorful and stylish, courier. I especially like the face in the tube.:)


http://i849.photobucket.com/albums/ab58/MattPetley/livstbw.jpg

http://i849.photobucket.com/albums/ab58/MattPetley/pillar.jpg

http://i849.photobucket.com/albums/ab58/MattPetley/rachplatform-1.jpg

http://i849.photobucket.com/albums/ab58/MattPetley/tubepair.jpg

[sempaidavid]

Just got the lens, do far I like it. Here is my Wife's cat looking out the window.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2747/4182544466_23e562c857_b.jpg

[Depth]

One problem with the Sigma 30mm is with cluttered backgrounds it gets really nervous bokeh.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2535/4182826772_0b3870b69f_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/42504877@N00/4182826772/)

[tkbslc]

One problem with the Sigma 30mm is with cluttered backgrounds it gets really nervous bokeh.

It is just because it hasn't blurred it enough. Pretty much any lens would do the same because it is only slightly blurred and there are still some sharp edges.

[hiddengamer7]

Lovin the Soho SS with drops, great choice!

[AWGD8]

(just testing it at wide open f 1.4 )

http://img696.imageshack.us/img696/7130/mg4921.jpg (http://img696.imageshack.us/i/mg4921.jpg/)

http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/4867/mg4951.jpg (http://img36.imageshack.us/i/mg4951.jpg/)

http://img683.imageshack.us/img683/2633/mg4957.jpg (http://img683.imageshack.us/i/mg4957.jpg/)

http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/1347/img5059b.jpg (http://img707.imageshack.us/i/img5059b.jpg/)

http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/9341/mg4980.jpg (http://img101.imageshack.us/i/mg4980.jpg/)

http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/9524/mg5052.jpg (http://img707.imageshack.us/i/mg5052.jpg/)

[AWGD8]

Love this lens! (f /1.4)

]http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/8451/mg51712.jpg



http://i47.tinypic.com/250m4ut.jpg

[sconner69]

Glad to see some of you have been getting good ones out of the box! Mine front focused so bad I sent it back and bought the Canon 50 f/1.4

[AzzKicker]

Just purchased this lens and it gets here on Monday! Can't wait to try it out.

[DStanic]

Got mine a few days ago! :D

Can't wait to get a chance to get out and use it. When I get home from work it's dark all I can do it take pics of my cats lol.

[NaKiD EyE]

few recent shots with the sigma 30

http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/7812/img1148hi.jpg

http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/233/img1009l.jpg

http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/4914/img0949p.jpg

http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/9739/img0950h.jpg

[pridash]

few recent shots with the sigma 30

http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/7812/img1148hi.jpg]

Excellent pose and outfit!

But a little underexposed - it looks so much more striking with a curves adjustment. But you haven't got "Image Editing OK" on, so I can't show you at the mo.

[Paul Li]

^ also, WB

[NaKiD EyE]

^ also, WB

i like the WB... i get so sick of doing the typical "glam" lighting that i am constantly trying different PP (as everyone should). This was just a test shot for my new 20° grid so i don't really care for it anyways as it should of had one more light in it. the background was just a black sheet that had wrinkles in it and i can't even believe i took the time to edit those out.

[Paul Li]

Time well spent IMO

[NaKiD EyE]

Time well spent IMO

lol well i have the actual shoot for a similar outfit (or lackthereof) coming next month so i will see how those turn out with 3 lights and my real backgrounds. thanks though. this shot was also mainly to prove how well the lens AF is in very low light... almost no searching.

i am curious to know pridash on your interpretation. i turned it on for ya.

[pridash]

lol well i have the actual shoot for a similar outfit (or lackthereof) coming next month so i will see how those turn out with 3 lights and my real backgrounds. thanks though. this shot was also mainly to prove how well the lens AF is in very low light... almost no searching.

i am curious to know pridash on your interpretation. i turned it on for ya.

Well, it's pretty much a simple curves adjustment, but as another post has mentioned, there is also a WB issue that needs correcting on the raw image.

If this is your test shot, with a "test" model...I really look forward to the real shoot - it's gonna look fantastic! And I agree, the lens is excellent in low light...I just got to get it out again and use it!

Anyway, here's my take on your photo: -

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4005/4196474827_fafc407d1f_o.jpg

[CBokeh]

Actually, I think pridash's version doesn't do justice to the original exposure (sorry). Less than a minute in Photoshop...

[NaKiD EyE]

lol well thanks for both of your interpretations. hate to say it but i like mine still not that it matters as i said. thats why i hate judging photos online... different color profiles, non-calibrated monitors, etc. everyone is gonna view the image a little different.

and as far as her being a "test model" pridash more like a test g/f hahaha. it's nice to have a pretty subject to shoot whenever i need one.

[NaKiD EyE]

and here is the original. but as i said i was just trying something different and this is not going in my port.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2590/4202870432_4edc05e621_o.jpg

[geoff5093]

lol well thanks for both of your interpretations. hate to say it but i like mine still not that it matters as i said. thats why i hate judging photos online... different color profiles, non-calibrated monitors, etc. everyone is gonna view the image a little different.

and as far as her being a "test model" pridash more like a test g/f hahaha. it's nice to have a pretty subject to shoot whenever i need one.
The first version has way too low of a color temp, the skin has a bluish tint on my MacBook.

[pridash]

Actually, I think pridash's version doesn't do justice to the original exposure (sorry). Less than a minute in Photoshop...

The first version has way too low of a color temp, the skin has a bluish tint on my MacBook.

Yes I prefer your version too!...no apology needed! :D

I noticed the blue/green tint on the skin, but couldn't get if off quickly...well, not in the time I spent on it anyway!

[DStanic]

I like that last one (the original) the edit from CBokeh is very nice too but a bit over saturated. But it could look slightly different on a different calibrated monitor. :)

Very nice shot !

[Depth]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2625/4204809112_a92a689d32_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/42504877@N00/4204809112/)

[AWGD8]

I bought this lens for indoor shots (Family gatherings, musuem, etc.. w/ a nice BOKEH!) My next plan is to get a 17-40L for outdoor shooting. (Will be using 20mm to 40 mm). Do you think this is redundant? The Sigma prime can still do a decent outdoor shots right? Or should I just get a 50mm prime next for reach? Possibly, a 50mm f1.4 .

[DStanic]

I bought this lens for indoor shots (Family gatherings, musuem, etc.. w/ a nice BOKEH!) My next plan is to get a 17-40L for outdoor shooting. (Will be using 20mm to 40 mm). Do you think this is redundant? The Sigma prime can still do a decent outdoor shots right? Or should I just get a 50mm prime next for reach? Possibly, a 50mm f1.4 .

Yes I do think it's redundant. Personally I don't understand why people get the 17-40 for crop bodies. Yeah it's sharp and has good colors, but I don't think there would be a huge difference over the 18-55IS kit lens for outdoor stuff. Why not look for an ultra wide, or at least a Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 so you can use it for low light as well?

[RyanB]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2625/4204809112_a92a689d32_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/42504877@N00/4204809112/)

Man, what a view. I'd love to have a Hasselblad.

[dank ink]

^ I agree. Love the Hassy's but my RB67 will do for now.

[bennnjaamin]

I bought this lens yesterday. Love it! One of the first shots:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2791/4211286277_0da18466ba_o.jpg

[JayStar86]

this thread makes me want to get this lens so bad, lol! this lens is #2 on my lens list.... i need to get a UWA first.

[DStanic]

this thread makes me want to get this lens so bad, lol! this lens is #2 on my lens list.... i need to get a UWA first.

You might get more use out of it right now during the crappy winter months. ;) I like my UWA but it really only sees use in summer.

[hiddengamer7]

I really think that this lens is much better than any UWA.

[jbkalla]

I'm finally giving in and going full-frame (5Dmk2), so I'm giving this lens away with the 40D. It's been an amazing lens, but I suppose the 50mm f/1.4 Siggy will replace it on the 5D. (that's another fantastic Sigma!)

I've realized that I need to be able to get wider than my 16-35mm shows on the 40D, but I've loved the all-around usefulness of the 30mm. It was my first prime and my first wide-aperture lens. From the minute I started using the 30mm, I sold my high-aperture lenses and started taking a lot more natural-light shots. Love this lens!

[JayStar86]

You might get more use out of it right now during the crappy winter months. ;) I like my UWA but it really only sees use in summer.

^^^^ agreed... you do have a point there... will think about it for sure.

I really think that this lens is much better than any UWA.

^^^^ agreed... but each serves different purposes.

[JelleVerherstraeten]

I just bought this lens!

I did a few handheld shots and I think it's a bit backfocusing on my 40D.

I have to do a serious test on tripod to see it's bad backfocusing orspot on.
But I'm very pleased with the speed of this lens! And the build is also great!

[JelleVerherstraeten]

Just did tests on my tripod and the focus is tack sharp!
I'm happy!
I'll be posting in this thread shortly!

[JMS803]

hey everyone, I'm about to buy this lens for my XS. Only place its in stock is amazon, which is through J&R. Is this reputable enough? Just being careful because of all the quality issues with this lens. For some reason the canon version is out of stock at B&H and Adorama.

[bennnjaamin]

hey everyone, I'm about to buy this lens for my XS. Only place its in stock is amazon, which is through J&R. Is this reputable enough? Just being careful because of all the quality issues with this lens. For some reason the canon version is out of stock at B&H and Adorama.

Yes J&R is a legit store. They are located in City Hall in New York City, they own a whole city block down there. I picked up my 50mm f1.8 II there last summer, and my friend has bought his 7D from them. I go there when things in adorama or bandh are sold out. J&R is closer to me location wise, but I just like shopping at adorama much more than the other two.

[Dick Emery]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2786/4219792560_eb9857a7a5_o.jpg

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4067/4219786552_1d79cf1cba_o.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2706/4219017315_f934a40dc3_o.jpg

[Sven-EOS]

Yep, I have one as well. Ordered yesterday, delivered today before 12 o clock!
I couldn´t remember what it was I had to shoot, dogs or ducks. So I shot my cats.

f/1.4 1/20s ISO 100
http://lh4.ggpht.com/_kjJaNzHgeY0/SzyxGR_KQxI/AAAAAAAAJ80/1ZcSmbAKDrg/DPP_0001.JPG

f/1.4 1/180s ISO 800
http://lh3.ggpht.com/_kjJaNzHgeY0/SzyxCZWtUDI/AAAAAAAAJ8w/rgqNpGK0xHc/DPP_0008.JPG

[KarlosDaJackal]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2794/4227675873_71d9c1820f_b.jpg

f/4.5 - 1/250 - ISO400 - minor white balance and levels tweak in capture one 5.0.1

[Pauly_G]

A few shots from Berlin, visited over the Christmas break - the lens did me proud as usual.

ISO 400, f2.2, 1/50
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2743/4228347146_f3156f3549_b.jpg

ISO 800, f2.0, 1/60
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4020/4227576825_1379204a92_b.jpg

ISO 400, f1.8, 1/100
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4023/4228346456_4b8dfd1198_b.jpg

[X-Warrior]

I couldn´t remember what it was I had to shoot, dogs or ducks. So I shot my cats.

It's ducks. So get out there and make up for it :p
And post it here of course ;)

[richierich1212]

I love this lens, just got it a few days ago. Here's one SOOC (RAW>JPEG, white balance adjustment only), @ f1.4, 1/40, ISO 400:

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4037/4234302811_f97ee09279_b.jpg

[S-S]

couple of recent ones from this lens, f/1.4

http://www.availablelight.co.nz/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/personal-2nd-02.jpg

http://www.availablelight.co.nz/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/personal-31st-01.jpg

[gdl357]

I just my copy of this lens and I really like it. This lens just took the place of my 17-40mm as my new walk around lens. The f/1.4 is really fun to play with and can change the whole feeling of the shot where the 4.0 would have lost out.

One thing I don't like is the click/lock of the hood onto the lens as compared to Canon. It feels like the hood is barely holding on.

The other thing is that is is not supported in my 7D under lens option to help with the vignetting. Only Canaon lens are. I don't know how much of an importance this is as I don't think I would like to replace the 30MM with a 28mm or 35mm Canon as they don't seem as robust in build. This 30mm looks robust on my 7D, ok not like my 70-200 2.8 IS but makes my 50 Nifty look like a toy you find in a Kellogs box.

I would recomend this Sigma to everyone. I find 30mm the perfect focal length for any crop sensor camera.

Thx