View Full Version : Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM
ukcyberboy
28th of June 2011 (Tue), 04:32
I haven't posted here in a while just a shot with the teleconverter and SOOC.
nothing interesting just like the quality.
541751
duymy
28th of June 2011 (Tue), 05:46
http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/ww281/duy-my7/Cacke5.jpg
http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/ww281/duy-my7/Cacke4.jpg
http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/ww281/duy-my7/Ong2-1.jpg
http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/ww281/duy-my7/Ong1-1.jpg
RobinSchouten
28th of June 2011 (Tue), 06:12
Outstanding pictures, duymy! How did you take these?
DigitalTuned
28th of June 2011 (Tue), 06:19
Outstanding pictures, duymy! How did you take these?
agreed... great series
some from yesterday
http://img818.imageshack.us/img818/633/img4677z.jpg
http://img121.imageshack.us/img121/184/img4663gd.jpg
http://img863.imageshack.us/img863/1254/img4664u.jpg
Sirrith
28th of June 2011 (Tue), 09:30
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5304/5879552224_4807eca79f_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/noobography/5879552224/)
IMG_6025e (http://www.flickr.com/photos/noobography/5879552224/) by noobographer (http://www.flickr.com/people/noobography/), on Flickr
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5143/5879670462_6b0db18d1e_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/noobography/5879670462/)
IMG_6058cbw (http://www.flickr.com/photos/noobography/5879670462/) by noobographer (http://www.flickr.com/people/noobography/), on Flickr
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5195/5879109189_49cfee1d80_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/noobography/5879109189/)
IMG_6008 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/noobography/5879109189/) by noobographer (http://www.flickr.com/people/noobography/), on Flickr
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5276/5878987029_e52dc4932c_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/noobography/5878987029/)
IMG_6054 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/noobography/5878987029/) by noobographer (http://www.flickr.com/people/noobography/), on Flickr
Johan_C
28th of June 2011 (Tue), 12:37
Macroglossum stellatarum ;)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5227/5881156841_2e34ba236a_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/sparrow73/5881156841/)
Macroglossum stellatarum (http://www.flickr.com/photos/sparrow73/5881156841/) par Sparrow73 (http://www.flickr.com/people/sparrow73/), sur Flickr
jonneymendoza
28th of June 2011 (Tue), 14:53
Hi... just awesome! This is one of the best picture I've seen from any EOS xxxD. You made me "trust" my camera now and I'm convinced to go the L way.
Yup. its all in the lens mate. Some 400d users put all these 7d/5d mk2 users to shame :)
Mookalafalas
29th of June 2011 (Wed), 07:33
Wow! I've tried to shoot a hummingbird hawk moth before--fantastic job!
Alos, Digital, nice to see you over here. A bit late, but congrats on the lens.
DigitalTuned
29th of June 2011 (Wed), 07:55
thx Al
optiklenz13
29th of June 2011 (Wed), 08:04
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5280/5883344806_dbeab7284d_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/optiklenz13/5883344806/)
Zach (http://www.flickr.com/photos/optiklenz13/5883344806/) by optiklenz13 (http://www.flickr.com/people/optiklenz13/), on Flickr
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6005/5875615314_ef07908dec_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/optiklenz13/5875615314/)
Singing in the Rain (http://www.flickr.com/photos/optiklenz13/5875615314/) by optiklenz13 (http://www.flickr.com/people/optiklenz13/), on Flickr
mattymx
29th of June 2011 (Wed), 20:09
http://www.mattymx.com/Sports/Vaqueros-Arena/i-TLXPJ5t/0/XL/MG5915-XL.jpg
http://www.mattymx.com/Sports/Vaqueros-Arena/i-9x6J2f5/0/XL/MG5957-XL.jpg
http://www.mattymx.com/Sports/Vaqueros-Arena/i-nM8RvT3/0/XL/MG5972-XL.jpg
duymy
29th of June 2011 (Wed), 20:47
Outstanding pictures, duymy! How did you take these?
Thank you, with a canon closeup 500D and 70-200mmF4 you can take these shots easily!
Some more pics
http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/ww281/duy-my7/Buom.jpg
http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/ww281/duy-my7/Cuonchieu.jpg
duymy
30th of June 2011 (Thu), 03:39
Robber Fly and Fly ...
http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/ww281/duy-my7/Ruoianthit2-1.jpg
http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/ww281/duy-my7/Ruoianthit1-1.jpg
http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/ww281/duy-my7/Ruoi1-4.jpg
http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/ww281/duy-my7/Ruoi2-1.jpg
haifangshi
30th of June 2011 (Thu), 03:58
Meet you here, nice macro shots. You did it again.
rikwong
30th of June 2011 (Thu), 04:22
...
http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/ww281/duy-my7/Cacke4.jpg
...
This is awesome! :D
Thank you, with a canon closeup 500D and 70-200mmF4 you can take these shots easily!
Some more pics
http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/ww281/duy-my7/Buom.jpg
...
A very beautiful butterfly! Is it a Acraea sp.? :confused:
duymy
30th of June 2011 (Thu), 04:28
This is awesome! :D
http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/ww281/duy-my7/Buom.jpg
A very beautiful butterfly! Is it a Acraea sp.? :confused:
Thank you rikwong, I love your butterfly photos so much ... all great work really.
Here is the butterfly infos:
Family : Nymphalidae
Scientific Name : Acraea violae
Common Name : Tawny Coster
duymy
30th of June 2011 (Thu), 20:59
Robber fly
http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/ww281/duy-my7/Ruoianthit2-1.jpg
http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/ww281/duy-my7/Ruoianthit1-1.jpg
Unkown Fly
http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/ww281/duy-my7/Ruoi1-4.jpg
http://i728.photobucket.com/albums/ww281/duy-my7/Ruoi2-1.jpg
DigitalTuned
30th of June 2011 (Thu), 22:11
sorry fb quality
http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/262212_213600475348171_203070129734539_560650_4031 481_n.jpg
rikwong
1st of July 2011 (Fri), 11:31
Thank you rikwong, I love your butterfly photos so much ... all great work really.
Here is the butterfly infos:
Family : Nymphalidae
Scientific Name : Acraea violae
Common Name : Tawny Coster
Thank you!! :D
DigitalTuned
1st of July 2011 (Fri), 14:05
http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/2936/img4693pp.jpg
Phil8
1st of July 2011 (Fri), 17:37
http://photos5.media.pix.ie/3F/65/3F654CA2050D4A57BBBB7B8A1139AA60-0000336131-0002246038-00800L-5152177B83D84E419C34F142D3748D10.jpg (http://pix.ie/phil8/2246038)
http://photos3.media.pix.ie/7A/C7/7AC72B0CCBAC4650BFEA7A66902E26C2-0000336131-0002312031-00800L-C83027102E6046CB960AD07D3AC8B5D0.jpg (http://pix.ie/phil8/2312031)
PhilF
1st of July 2011 (Fri), 18:58
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6008/5883134430_6e0034f95e_b.jpg
DigitalTuned
1st of July 2011 (Fri), 19:03
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6008/5883134430_6e0034f95e_b.jpg
Awesome Phil
optiklenz13
2nd of July 2011 (Sat), 00:32
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5196/5893067838_f86b801ebd_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/optiklenz13/5893067838/)
King of the Jungle (http://www.flickr.com/photos/optiklenz13/5893067838/) by optiklenz13 (http://www.flickr.com/people/optiklenz13/), on Flickr
duymy
2nd of July 2011 (Sat), 05:31
2 more pics just shot today
http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss345/duy-my9/Hoa2-1.jpg
http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss345/duy-my9/Hoa1.jpg
duymy
2nd of July 2011 (Sat), 06:21
http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss345/duy-my9/Bo2-2.jpg
http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss345/duy-my9/Bo1-3.jpg
duymy
2nd of July 2011 (Sat), 07:54
Lynx spider
http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss345/duy-my9/Nhen2-7.jpg
http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss345/duy-my9/Nhen1-6.jpg
Bang Bang Boy
2nd of July 2011 (Sat), 09:31
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6041/5893799446_dac792f2e7_b.jpg
DigitalTuned
2nd of July 2011 (Sat), 16:29
http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/7079/img4723mc.jpg
http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/2328/img4701bj.jpg
http://img708.imageshack.us/img708/3306/img4739o.jpg
CHUCK A
2nd of July 2011 (Sat), 19:14
Just received this lens last week...very impressed.
jakele_x
2nd of July 2011 (Sat), 21:43
This lens is just plain amazing :)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5072/5895358733_1d151ff66d_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/jakelephoto/5895358733/)
Laying Down Chillin' (http://www.flickr.com/photos/jakelephoto/5895358733/) by Tai Le Photography (http://www.flickr.com/people/jakelephoto/), on Flickr
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5306/5895922218_47f559acb3_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/jakelephoto/5895922218/)
Hiding (http://www.flickr.com/photos/jakelephoto/5895922218/) by Tai Le Photography (http://www.flickr.com/people/jakelephoto/), on Flickr
duymy
2nd of July 2011 (Sat), 23:25
Green bee
http://i432.photobucket.com/albums/qq46/Duy-My/Ongxanh1.jpg
http://i432.photobucket.com/albums/qq46/Duy-My/Ongxanh2.jpg
http://i432.photobucket.com/albums/qq46/Duy-My/Ongxanh3.jpg
ashiundar
3rd of July 2011 (Sun), 02:57
Just got mine yesterday. Love it to death :D
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5301/5895701021_2d12682e43_z.jpg
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5061/5895696107_f6c444c144_z.jpg
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5039/5893023267_20f9ecfe39_z.jpg
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6025/5893577952_840f51f34f_z.jpg
mek501st
3rd of July 2011 (Sun), 05:02
hey guys, i am seriously considering this lens, however there is one thing stopping me right now. Is it possible to handheld this lens at 200mm? I've seen excellent photos in this forum, are they handheld or taken with a tripod.
Thank you very much!!
CHUCK A
3rd of July 2011 (Sun), 05:12
The non IS model is light and easy to hand hold....all day long
duymy
3rd of July 2011 (Sun), 05:32
hey guys, i am seriously considering this lens, however there is one thing stopping me right now. Is it possible to handheld this lens at 200mm? I've seen excellent photos in this forum, are they handheld or taken with a tripod.
Thank you very much!!
All my shots in this forum are handheld because I have no tripod. My pics always keep exif with them, you can read many pics were shot at 200mm (handheld)
VeijoM
3rd of July 2011 (Sun), 05:33
hey guys, i am seriously considering this lens, however there is one thing stopping me right now. Is it possible to handheld this lens at 200mm? I've seen excellent photos in this forum, are they handheld or taken with a tripod.
Thank you very much!!
Weight is one matter, the steadyness is another. As long as your shutter speeds are short (in normal daylight they easily are short enough) the lens won't give "shaken" images. And the lens is light enough to shoot handheld.
This lens seriously is worth every dollar/euro/yen/what ever if the focal lenght is suitable ;)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5148/5722601523_4f1118e7f2_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/35883172@N02/5722601523/)
Squirrel35 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/35883172@N02/5722601523/) by VeijoM (http://www.flickr.com/people/35883172@N02/), on Flickr
-Veijo-
mek501st
3rd of July 2011 (Sun), 07:34
thank you very much guys :D
duymy, your photos r amazing !!
duymy
3rd of July 2011 (Sun), 07:49
@mek501st: you are welcome! I hope you will soon get this good len.
Some more pics
http://i432.photobucket.com/albums/qq46/Duy-My/Ongden1.jpg
http://i432.photobucket.com/albums/qq46/Duy-My/Bongua-1.jpg
DigitalTuned
3rd of July 2011 (Sun), 08:04
This lens is just plain amazing :)
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5072/5895358733_1d151ff66d_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/jakelephoto/5895358733/)
Laying Down Chillin' (http://www.flickr.com/photos/jakelephoto/5895358733/) by Tai Le Photography (http://www.flickr.com/people/jakelephoto/), on Flickr
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5306/5895922218_47f559acb3_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/jakelephoto/5895922218/)
Hiding (http://www.flickr.com/photos/jakelephoto/5895922218/) by Tai Le Photography (http://www.flickr.com/people/jakelephoto/), on Flickr
nice set jakele_x
phant0mv87
3rd of July 2011 (Sun), 15:00
how close is the subject to the front element of your 70-200 duymy?
duymy
3rd of July 2011 (Sun), 16:26
how close is the subject to the front element of your 70-200 duymy?
It's around 50cm.
SimpleJack
4th of July 2011 (Mon), 00:56
This is one of the best pictures Ive ever seen taken with this lens, thanks for sharing.
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5115/5874250220_54d281d4aa_z.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/jonasvonhofsten/5874250220/)
_MG_0219.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/jonasvonhofsten/5874250220/) by Jonas von Hofsten (http://www.flickr.com/people/jonasvonhofsten/), on Flickr
Shot wideopen with my old 30D and a 580EX II mounted on camera, had it printed 70x100cm for the customer to put in the stable.
duymy
4th of July 2011 (Mon), 04:49
Some more pics just shot this morning ...
http://i629.photobucket.com/albums/uu17/duy-my1/Hoadai1.jpg
http://i629.photobucket.com/albums/uu17/duy-my1/Hoadai4.jpg
http://i629.photobucket.com/albums/uu17/duy-my1/Hoadai2.jpg
http://i629.photobucket.com/albums/uu17/duy-my1/Hoadai3.jpg
RobinSchouten
4th of July 2011 (Mon), 05:31
All those shots look perfect, duymy! How is the sharpness with that closeup lens?
duymy
4th of July 2011 (Mon), 06:14
@RobinSchouten : the sharpness is fine, I love it very much.
Some more pics just shot this morning ...
Orange bee
http://i629.photobucket.com/albums/uu17/duy-my1/Ongvang2-1.jpg
http://i629.photobucket.com/albums/uu17/duy-my1/Ongvang1-1.jpg
mek501st
4th of July 2011 (Mon), 07:32
wow @duymy
considering these were handheld, the level of sharpness is breath taking!!
bw!
Jonko
4th of July 2011 (Mon), 15:51
This is one of the best pictures Ive ever seen taken with this lens, thanks for sharing.
Thank you! I am very pleased with it too and so was the client.
duymy
5th of July 2011 (Tue), 07:09
Some pics just shot today
http://i571.photobucket.com/albums/ss154/duy-my2/Caocao.jpg
http://i571.photobucket.com/albums/ss154/duy-my2/Congi.jpg
micallef1990
5th of July 2011 (Tue), 08:24
are you using any extensions for those insect shots pal? they are super sharp
duymy
5th of July 2011 (Tue), 08:25
Buterfly
http://i571.photobucket.com/albums/ss154/duy-my2/Buom2-5.jpg
http://i571.photobucket.com/albums/ss154/duy-my2/Buom1-5.jpg
duymy
5th of July 2011 (Tue), 08:28
are you using any extensions for those insect shots pal? they are super sharp
My gear for those insect shots : 50D + EF 70-200mm f/4L + Closeup 500D ... handhold and pop up flash
micallef1990
5th of July 2011 (Tue), 08:29
might have to give it ago then. what do you mean closeup 500D? another camera
hienz
5th of July 2011 (Tue), 08:32
might have to give it ago then. what do you mean closeup 500D? another camera
Probably Canon's close up filter:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/87503-REG/Canon_2824A001_77mm_500D_Close_up_Lens.html
micallef1990
5th of July 2011 (Tue), 08:33
arrr right cheers pal :) i need a 10 stop first
Jaynez
5th of July 2011 (Tue), 10:03
Buterfly
http://i571.photobucket.com/albums/ss154/duy-my2/Buom2-5.jpg
http://i571.photobucket.com/albums/ss154/duy-my2/Buom1-5.jpg
Excellent !! Does this close-Up filter fit on any lenses from 70mm+ ?
I don't see the 70-200mm F4L on the list.
Compatibility
-- EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM
-- EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM Refurbished
-- EF 16-35 2.8L USM
-- EF 20-35 3.5-4.5 USM
-- EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM
-- EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
-- EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Refurbished
-- EF 24mm f/1.4L II USM
-- EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM
-- EF 28-70 2.8L USM
-- EF 300 4.0 L
-- EF 300mm f/4L IS USM
-- EF 300mm f/4L IS USM Refurbished
-- EF 400mm f/5.6L USM
-- EF 600mm f/4L IS USM
-- EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
-- EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM Refurbished
-- EF 70-200mm f/2.8L Refurbished
-- EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM
-- EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
-- EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Refurbished
-- EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM
-- EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM Refurbished
Jaynez
5th of July 2011 (Tue), 10:18
NVM, i found out U can use a Step-Up Adapter Ring 67mm!!
duymy
5th of July 2011 (Tue), 10:28
@Jaynez : if your len is not on the list, you need a step ring!
duymy
5th of July 2011 (Tue), 20:54
2 more Orange bee pics from different angles
http://i657.photobucket.com/albums/uu296/duy-my3/Ongvang3.jpg
http://i657.photobucket.com/albums/uu296/duy-my3/Ongvang4.jpg
duymy
5th of July 2011 (Tue), 21:41
Pink dragonfly
http://i571.photobucket.com/albums/ss154/duy-my2/Chuon2-1.jpg
http://i571.photobucket.com/albums/ss154/duy-my2/Chuon1.jpg
Jaynez
5th of July 2011 (Tue), 21:47
duymy u r tempting me to buy the 500D close up >.> I'm saving for 5D mark II
duymy
6th of July 2011 (Wed), 01:45
duymy u r tempting me to buy the 500D close up >.> I'm saving for 5D mark II
Cheer!!!bw! :D :D
Some more pics ...
Buterfly
http://i657.photobucket.com/albums/uu296/duy-my3/Buom2-1.jpg
http://i657.photobucket.com/albums/uu296/duy-my3/Buom3-1.jpg
http://i657.photobucket.com/albums/uu296/duy-my3/Buom1-1.jpg
Mookalafalas
6th of July 2011 (Wed), 07:19
I've been neglecting this lens...Anyway, here are a few from the other day.
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5240/5908656690_11be675a71_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mookalafalas-pixgalore/5908656690/)
Boy at tea stand.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mookalafalas-pixgalore/5908656690/) by Mookalafalas (http://www.flickr.com/people/mookalafalas-pixgalore/), on Flickr
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5038/5908654046_6f0f079db4_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mookalafalas-pixgalore/5908654046/)
Workers from Surface to Depths.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mookalafalas-pixgalore/5908654046/) by Mookalafalas (http://www.flickr.com/people/mookalafalas-pixgalore/), on Flickr
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6017/5908097723_a3068230f8_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mookalafalas-pixgalore/5908097723/)
Untitled.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mookalafalas-pixgalore/5908097723/) by Mookalafalas (http://www.flickr.com/people/mookalafalas-pixgalore/), on Flickr
netsrek
6th of July 2011 (Wed), 17:32
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6060/5910402912_55368cd5cb_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/pckersten/5910402912/)
IMG_4541 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/pckersten/5910402912/) by PKersten (http://www.flickr.com/people/pckersten/), on Flickr
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5074/5909841177_c2f2603cc0_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/pckersten/5909841177/)
IMG_4507 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/pckersten/5909841177/) by PKersten (http://www.flickr.com/people/pckersten/), on Flickr
DigitalTuned
6th of July 2011 (Wed), 18:23
I've been neglecting this lens...Anyway, here are a few from the other day.
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5240/5908656690_3e15c085f3_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mookalafalas-pixgalore/5908656690/)
Boy at tea stand.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mookalafalas-pixgalore/5908656690/) by Mookalafalas (http://www.flickr.com/people/mookalafalas-pixgalore/), on Flickr
thats great mook.. cool first shot
phant0mv87
6th of July 2011 (Wed), 19:57
one from this lens
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v111/phant0mapoclypse/95448de8.jpg
Mookalafalas
6th of July 2011 (Wed), 20:05
thats great mook.. cool first shot
Thanks, digital. It was just a snap, really, but came out well. I'm afraid that poor kids is going to have some serious dental issues when he gets bigger...
DigitalTuned
7th of July 2011 (Thu), 05:44
Thanks, digital. It was just a snap, really, but came out well. I'm afraid that poor kids is going to have some serious dental issues when he gets bigger...
lol nooo come on.. hahahaha ur bad
DigitalTuned
7th of July 2011 (Thu), 05:44
one from this lens
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v111/phant0mapoclypse/95448de8.jpg
good stuff phant0m this is what i like to see
phant0mv87
7th of July 2011 (Thu), 14:45
good stuff phant0m this is what i like to see
Thanks! =]
dmnelson
9th of July 2011 (Sat), 04:20
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6021/5911851884_b0c9261b01_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidmnelson/5911851884/)
Louie (http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidmnelson/5911851884/) by davidmnelson (http://www.flickr.com/people/davidmnelson/), on Flickr
mek501st
9th of July 2011 (Sat), 06:14
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6021/5911851884_b0c9261b01_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidmnelson/5911851884/)
Louie (http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidmnelson/5911851884/) by davidmnelson (http://www.flickr.com/people/davidmnelson/), on Flickr
awesome picture!!! was this handheld?
dmnelson
9th of July 2011 (Sat), 14:51
Thanks, and yes it was hand-held. I was shooting at ISO400 and f/9 in hopes of getting a fast shutter speed while also avoiding any focus issues. Worked out pretty well, as it resulted in a shutter speed of 1/1600. However I don't feel the actual image quality is spectacular if you look at a 100% crop. :)
mek501st
9th of July 2011 (Sat), 23:03
Thanks, and yes it was hand-held. I was shooting at ISO400 and f/9 in hopes of getting a fast shutter speed while also avoiding any focus issues. Worked out pretty well, as it resulted in a shutter speed of 1/1600. However I don't feel the actual image quality is spectacular if you look at a 100% crop. :)
does it look good on an A4 print?
thanks :)
dmnelson
10th of July 2011 (Sun), 02:38
I would imagine it's fine at that size but I haven't had the opportunity to find out. :)
haifangshi
10th of July 2011 (Sun), 22:56
My gear for those insect shots : 50D + EF 70-200mm f/4L + Closeup 500D ... handhold and pop up flash
Duymy: The 70-200 f/4 has a 67mm filter size, while Canon 500D Close-up Lens has filter size of 77mm, wonder how you can put it on the lens. ??
professoryeti
11th of July 2011 (Mon), 16:31
From my honeymoon.
The Toronto skyline across Lake Ontario (probably 30 miles away) @200mm 30 second exposure
http://www.joshnibertphotography.com/Life/Honeymoon/i-FBdSFbX/0/L/MG0316-L.jpg (http://www.joshnibertphotography.com/Life/Honeymoon/17944005_CN4mFF#1374099722_FBdSFbX-A-LB)
A little relaxation on the porch
http://www.joshnibertphotography.com/Life/Honeymoon/i-ZV73tTh/0/L/MG0812-L.jpg (http://www.joshnibertphotography.com/Life/Honeymoon/17944005_CN4mFF#1373992948_ZV73tTh-A-LB)
RAW-Shooter
11th of July 2011 (Mon), 16:39
Duymy: The 70-200 f/4 has a 67mm filter size, while Canon 500D Close-up Lens has filter size of 77mm, wonder how you can put it on the lens. ??
Step-up ring... like this one: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/60514-REG/Tiffen_6777SUR_67_77mm_Step_up_Ring_Lens.html
HTH
DigitalTuned
11th of July 2011 (Mon), 20:27
sorry fb quality
http://a2.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/264992_218328788208673_203070129734539_575682_3003 562_n.jpg
http://a8.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/267652_218328804875338_203070129734539_575683_3385 982_n.jpg
http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/268633_218146094893609_203070129734539_574546_2132 707_n.jpg
http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/270325_218146078226944_203070129734539_574545_6581 705_n.jpg
http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/268757_218335688207983_203070129734539_575711_7473 303_n.jpg
http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/261245_218335651541320_203070129734539_575710_2665 14_n.jpg
Jaynez
11th of July 2011 (Mon), 20:59
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6125/5928180727_a8cd0a5310_z.jpg
kf095
11th of July 2011 (Mon), 21:22
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-rWQb_0Kd0Cg/Thuvc5EabsI/AAAAAAAAVkU/AlN0SGTg__E/s800/_MG_8111-3.jpg
f4 200mmon Rebel 500D
lankforddl
11th of July 2011 (Mon), 21:24
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-rWQb_0Kd0Cg/Thuvc5EabsI/AAAAAAAAVkU/AlN0SGTg__E/s800/_MG_8111-3.jpg
f4 200mmon Rebel 500D
NICE!
JVS
11th of July 2011 (Mon), 22:55
awesome picture!!! was this handheld?
I am assuming it is handheld as it looks like it's day time... so there's a lot of light, which allows the shutter to capture fast motion. I love the 2.8 aperture... but I found myself to hardly shoot at night with it or under cloudy weather, so I I haven't really benefit from the IS. Unless I shoot less than 1/200 sec would I need to use the IS to esnure the image to be stablized.
duymy
11th of July 2011 (Mon), 23:31
Duymy: The 70-200 f/4 has a 67mm filter size, while Canon 500D Close-up Lens has filter size of 77mm, wonder how you can put it on the lens. ??
I used a step ring to fix Closeup 500D to 70-200mmF4 len.
jimmiegrunde
13th of July 2011 (Wed), 09:32
Been using this lens for about a month now and I love it!
Here's a few examples from me, all hand held.
First off, the mandatory image of a duck;
http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/jj136/jimmiegrunde/1.jpg
Next one is a Great Tit;
http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/jj136/jimmiegrunde/3.jpg
A chilling cow;
http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/jj136/jimmiegrunde/2.jpg
And last but not least, a 100% crop from the above picture;
http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/jj136/jimmiegrunde/2-100crop.jpg
Cheers!
Neil B
14th of July 2011 (Thu), 00:34
just ordered this lens, will be here Friday....
y2k_o__o
14th of July 2011 (Thu), 02:19
=) Today I just traded my sigma 50mm f/1.4 for this lens !
f4L is nice and light for its size
and now I added 1 more L lens to my collection
but sadly the weather today was really bad
haven't had a chance to shoot it :)
mek501st
14th of July 2011 (Thu), 09:36
cant wait for mine!!! its coming on my BD!
Neil B
14th of July 2011 (Thu), 10:30
=) Today I just traded my sigma 50mm f/1.4 for this lens !
f4L is nice and light for its size
and now I added 1 more L lens to my collection
but sadly the weather today was really bad
haven't had a chance to shoot it :)
congrats!!!
k1ll4k4m
14th of July 2011 (Thu), 22:46
http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z71/k1ll4k4m/IMG_0132edit.jpg
mek501st
15th of July 2011 (Fri), 10:01
i got mine today...
im not sure if im paranoid but i feel that when i zoom, the zoom ring makes a little creak sound.. is it normal?
skyking517
15th of July 2011 (Fri), 10:32
Just got mine today as well, all seems well. Can't wait to use it!!!
Giom
15th of July 2011 (Fri), 10:33
@ K1: Thats a brilliant shot mate!
@mek501st: Doesn't sound normal.
MKII
15th of July 2011 (Fri), 14:27
I'll have to add at least one photo taken with this superb lens...
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3109/5844746310_41fd501010_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/35883172@N02/5844746310/)
PonyEye1 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/35883172@N02/5844746310/) by VeijoM (http://www.flickr.com/people/35883172@N02/), on Flickr
Thanks everyone for submitting images in this thread, they were helping the decision to buy this lens. How cheap lens for it's IQ ;)
-Veijo-
thats by far The best image in the thread..!!!
VeijoM
15th of July 2011 (Fri), 14:58
thats by far The best image in the thread..!!!
Thank you for your compliment, though I cannot take a position to say anything about my "snapshot" :oops:. I have seen lots of spectacular images in this thread.
This lens is different from every other lens I have ever owned: whenever I want to take a pic, the lens just doesn't let me down. All other lenses have some "best" range, or focal length, or aperture, or only good front or background bokeh, but this lens just takes good pictures one after another. It is totally different matter if I have talent to use this lens so that the image ends up to be worth publishing.
-Veijo-
MKII
15th of July 2011 (Fri), 15:06
its a great image..!!! not even close in the snapshot category...iam ordering this lens in monday..i so excited about this lens...!!!
Neil B
15th of July 2011 (Fri), 16:17
http://i54.tinypic.com/2887cls.jpg
first test shot with this lens, just got it today :D
mek501st
15th of July 2011 (Fri), 23:15
@ K1: Thats a brilliant shot mate!
@mek501st: Doesn't sound normal.
so yours make no noise at all? shud i go n return it?
thanks :)
micallef1990
16th of July 2011 (Sat), 05:02
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6028/5931596153_90b661d45e_z.jpg
DigitalTuned
16th of July 2011 (Sat), 08:09
http://i54.tinypic.com/2887cls.jpg
first test shot with this lens, just got it today :D
NIIICE JOB!
VeijoM
16th of July 2011 (Sat), 09:43
so yours make no noise at all? shud i go n return it?
thanks :)
In my piece of lens the sound of zooming is a bit like dragging feets on the floor when using socks. So, I guess you don't loose by trying another sample, but might gain a sample that is "as expected". ;)
-Veijo-
mek501st
16th of July 2011 (Sat), 10:39
In my piece of lens the sound of zooming is a bit like dragging feets on the floor when using socks. So, I guess you don't loose by trying another sample, but might gain a sample that is "as expected". ;)
-Veijo-
I have tried youtube unboxing vids and boosting the volume when they turn the zoom ring.
After all mine is normal! Thanks for your help :)
Neil B
16th of July 2011 (Sat), 22:50
http://i51.tinypic.com/16bfyoy.jpg
shot this handheld with the 70-200
Johan_C
17th of July 2011 (Sun), 05:15
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6150/5945422711_7103c7284f_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/sparrow73/5945422711/)
Nadeah (http://www.flickr.com/photos/sparrow73/5945422711/) par Sparrow73 (http://www.flickr.com/people/sparrow73/), sur Flickr
mek501st
17th of July 2011 (Sun), 10:25
First 2 Images with my new lens. Im very happy with it.
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6127/5946189725_ff6b7ed02d_b.jpg
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6018/5946170945_862ba2659a_b.jpg
Taken in front of my house :)
Drucifer29
18th of July 2011 (Mon), 07:40
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6013/5948135299_b0d33c98cf_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/42198641@N06/5948135299/)
IMG_1880 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/42198641@N06/5948135299/) by Drucifer30 (http://www.flickr.com/people/42198641@N06/), on Flickr
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6148/5948134521_57b65b05ed_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/42198641@N06/5948134521/)
IMG_1875 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/42198641@N06/5948134521/) by Drucifer30 (http://www.flickr.com/people/42198641@N06/), on Flickr
chinorider
18th of July 2011 (Mon), 12:41
My 70-200 F4 L IS arrived this week-end but I couldn't squeeze the time to take it out for a spin. I did poke around with it around the house tho and I really think it is going to be my go to lens.
This thread has been very useful in helping me decide what long lens to get
Thanks
mek501st
19th of July 2011 (Tue), 10:01
Came across this the other day, lucky i had my lens out :)
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6122/5950509262_21a65a744a_b.jpg
ukcyberboy
19th of July 2011 (Tue), 10:11
My 70-200 F4 L IS arrived this week-end but I couldn't squeeze the time to take it out for a spin. I did poke around with it around the house tho and I really think it is going to be my go to lens.
This thread has been very useful in helping me decide what long lens to get
Thanks
chinorider you need the 70-200 f/4 IS (http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=278617&highlight=70-200+F4L+IS) thread so you can use the IS :lol:
rogertb
19th of July 2011 (Tue), 11:00
Hi chaps - is there a way of checking the file info (is it called exif) on the shots posted here, admiring lots of them it would be really interesting to know focal length, ISO etc etc ... many thanks Roger
Sirrith
19th of July 2011 (Tue), 14:04
If using firefox you can download add ons such as fxif which let you right click to get exif data, otherwise if there is a link to flickr, you can check there.
I'm loving this lens more than the IS version I had earlier :)
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6123/5954879785_b6d9eebe55_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/noobography/5954879785/)
IMG_7473 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/noobography/5954879785/) by noobographer (http://www.flickr.com/people/noobography/), on Flickr
micallef1990
19th of July 2011 (Tue), 16:53
very sharp ^^
JoeyBowman
19th of July 2011 (Tue), 19:09
http://www.joeybowman.net/photos/i-sKsTHLn/0/L/i-sKsTHLn-L.jpg
Jaynez
19th of July 2011 (Tue), 19:38
Finally got some time to try my 500D close-up lens
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6011/5956414184_c7404949c3_b.jpg
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6130/5955808697_99c3088f70_b.jpg
rogertb
20th of July 2011 (Wed), 03:41
Thanks Sirrith
DanielSPhoto
20th of July 2011 (Wed), 07:50
Iīm actually starting to concider this lens. I had decided to buy the one with IS, but Iīm not sure if thatīs needed. I have the 85 f1,8 and the 50 f1,8 for lowlight shooting, so this one would only be used outside shooting some sport, events, concerts and people.
Maybe I donīt need the IS?
I also have a monopod in case of lower light.
Is the IS version worth the extra money in my case you think? Is the IS version better optically?
Best regards/Daniel
RobinSchouten
20th of July 2011 (Wed), 08:04
Iīm actually starting to concider this lens. I had decided to buy the one with IS, but Iīm not sure if thatīs needed. I have the 85 f1,8 and the 50 f1,8 for lowlight shooting, so this one would only be used outside shooting some sport, events, concerts and people.
Maybe I donīt need the IS?
I also have a monopod in case of lower light.
Is the IS version worth the extra money in my case you think? Is the IS version better optically?
Best regards/Daniel
Yes, the IS version has a slight optical improvement over the non-IS version.
No, the price difference isn't worth it for YOU.. Only if you think you have plenty to spend. :P
Do you work at short or long focal lengths? At the longer end, IS would provide some assistance, but a monopod can get you there too.
DanielSPhoto
20th of July 2011 (Wed), 09:16
Yes, the IS version has a slight optical improvement over the non-IS version.
No, the price difference isn't worth it for YOU.. Only if you think you have plenty to spend. :P
Do you work at short or long focal lengths? At the longer end, IS would provide some assistance, but a monopod can get you there too.
Thanks!
I donīt have too much too spend so I guess youīre right. I like to work at long focal lengths but i guess I will manage it with my monopod. Hmm, I will have to think about it a little more, but thanks for your answer.
Best regards/Daniel
Mookalafalas
20th of July 2011 (Wed), 09:25
Thanks!
I donīt have too much too spend so I guess youīre right. I like to work at long focal lengths but i guess I will manage it with my monopod. Hmm, I will have to think about it a little more, but thanks for your answer.
Best regards/Daniel
This is a common topic in this thread. I must say, I have never minded the lack of IS at all. I have recommended to other people, turn the lights down a bit in a room and practice taking shots of your book case at lower shutter speeds and see if you can't improve your form/technique a bit. I did that for 30 minutes or so on a couple of occasions, and really improved my low light skills--by about 2 stops, perhaps. As the non IS is about $600USD less, I figured that was the best paid hour of work I ever spent!
ChuckingFluff
20th of July 2011 (Wed), 10:12
Iīm actually starting to concider this lens. I had decided to buy the one with IS, but Iīm not sure if thatīs needed. I have the 85 f1,8 and the 50 f1,8 for lowlight shooting, so this one would only be used outside shooting some sport, events, concerts and people.
Maybe I donīt need the IS?
I also have a monopod in case of lower light.
Is the IS version worth the extra money in my case you think? Is the IS version better optically?
Best regards/Daniel
The IS version is a completly different lens and much sharper.
RedMatrixXRS
20th of July 2011 (Wed), 15:05
My old f/4. I regret selling it.
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6144/5956547150_fb93ee71a6_b.jpg
Giom
20th of July 2011 (Wed), 15:26
Iīm actually starting to concider this lens. I had decided to buy the one with IS, but Iīm not sure if thatīs needed. I have the 85 f1,8 and the 50 f1,8 for lowlight shooting, so this one would only be used outside shooting some sport, events, concerts and people.
Maybe I donīt need the IS?
I also have a monopod in case of lower light.
Is the IS version worth the extra money in my case you think? Is the IS version better optically?
Best regards/Daniel
I'm using the IS version and find the IS crucial at low light when hand held. I can get sharp images with burst mode, I mean really sharp. Just for interest sake, I've turned the IS off on a couple of occasions... sharp images was not possible! So, again, depends on what you're going to use it for, but for my money, I'll always go for the IS.
DanielSPhoto
20th of July 2011 (Wed), 15:26
This is a common topic in this thread. I must say, I have never minded the lack of IS at all. I have recommended to other people, turn the lights down a bit in a room and practice taking shots of your book case at lower shutter speeds and see if you can't improve your form/technique a bit. I did that for 30 minutes or so on a couple of occasions, and really improved my low light skills--by about 2 stops, perhaps. As the non IS is about $600USD less, I figured that was the best paid hour of work I ever spent!
Sounds like a good idea. I will have to try this lens for sure. Thanks for the tips.
Best regards/Daniel
The IS version is a completly different lens and much sharper.
Iīll take that in concideration. The uestion is if the extra sharpness and the IS is worth the extra 8-900 dollars it costs here in Sweden, when on a budget.
Best regards/Daniel
DanielSPhoto
20th of July 2011 (Wed), 15:27
I'm using the IS version and find the IS crucial at low light when hand held. I can get sharp images with burst mode, I mean really sharp. Just for interest sake, I've turned the IS off on a couple of occasions... sharp images was not possible! So, again, depends on what you're going to use it for, but for my money, I'll always go for the IS.
Thanks for the answer. It will not be used much in low light.
Best regards/Daniel
Brules
20th of July 2011 (Wed), 16:30
I often wish I had the IS. When you are at 200mm, you need to have it at 1/200 or higher....when light starts fading it becomes worse. Love my lens, but the IS sure would come in handy at times.
proletsearch
20th of July 2011 (Wed), 17:44
Great photos!!! I have purchased the non-IS version as the IS is not worth the extra money. IS plays a role for steady objects (and of course when not used on a tripod - under low light situations, not so for moving objects and I think, that if I ever have to choose between the version with IS and the 2.8 version without IS, my pick will probably be the 2.8 without IS...
psyber_0ptix
20th of July 2011 (Wed), 17:52
From DTM Showcase - München
1. http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6014/5957793599_dba191a754_b.jpg
2. http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6014/5957754343_57d4f045ce_b.jpg
flickr is being a pain, i'll post some later
Brules
20th of July 2011 (Wed), 20:37
Great photos!!! I have purchased the non-IS version as the IS is not worth the extra money. IS plays a role for steady objects (and of course when not used on a tripod - under low light situations, not so for moving objects and I think, that if I ever have to choose between the version with IS and the 2.8 version without IS, my pick will probably be the 2.8 without IS...
No totally true. The IS version has a lot of the newer optics from the 2.8 IS - so it is even sharper than the original F4L. Go check out the IS thread, the IQ is pretty amazing.
Non-IS is though by FAR the best bang for the buck out there. It is phenominal and will only disappoint if you try to do things it isn't great at.
And KILLER shot there psyber! Wow!
phant0mv87
20th of July 2011 (Wed), 23:45
one from a shoot for a friend of mine
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6006/5960189304_7d794d96f1_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/phant0mv87/5960189304/)
Untitled (http://www.flickr.com/photos/phant0mv87/5960189304/) by phant0mv87 (http://www.flickr.com/people/phant0mv87/), on Flickr
Genome
21st of July 2011 (Thu), 02:54
No totally true. The IS version has a lot of the newer optics from the 2.8 IS - so it is even sharper than the original F4L. Go check out the IS thread, the IQ is pretty amazing.
Non-IS is though by FAR the best bang for the buck out there. It is phenominal and will only disappoint if you try to do things it isn't great at.
And KILLER shot there psyber! Wow!
the IS version is also weather sealed where as this version isn't.
However I personally don't think the barely noticeable IQ improvement, IS and sealing is worth twice the price as all three are of little use to me. For someone who needs those things it prob is worth it.
ChuckingFluff
21st of July 2011 (Thu), 09:39
It is claimed that the IS f4 version is sharper than the original IS f2.8 version. It was the sharpest 70-200 zoom until the f2.8 IS mkii came out. If you don't shoot in low light get the non IS if you're on a budget. I love mine and use it with a monopod with great results. Even though I love it I find myself at the 200 end 90% of the time so this will be replaced with the 200mm f2.8 mkii soon. That's another option if you find your using 200 more than anything else.
veereshai
21st of July 2011 (Thu), 13:05
"Man's Best Friend"
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6028/5959622239_7bd32a8404_z.jpg
LePhotog
21st of July 2011 (Thu), 15:51
just sent money for mine today! i cannot wait until it comes!
proletsearch
21st of July 2011 (Thu), 16:53
My first duck with my first L
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-QOJiU5rk0Zo/TiiMpV8Xa2I/AAAAAAAAAJQ/sr0XRnY8ZLc/s720/IMG_1880.JPG (https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/6sCTgTAsLXJwQsMYma1w3ucTlpgW3f2bMKB9Xmm_R0M?feat=d irectlink)
And some action also from today - not a perfect shot, but I like it quite:
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-XJgdanZYFLQ/TiiUNn5-8HI/AAAAAAAAAJY/RLPlQGaZPBw/s720/IMG_1838_1600.JPG (https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/lWpV8NuCdr_4-loUK78Dt-cTlpgW3f2bMKB9Xmm_R0M?feat=directlink)
mek501st
22nd of July 2011 (Fri), 11:07
Really love this lens!!!! Now i want more L glass :)
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6024/5963955193_e68264f2e2_b.jpg
Image is cropped..
mrbubbles
22nd of July 2011 (Fri), 11:24
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6150/5952395681_34ee72ba72_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrbubbles916/5952395681/)
Climb (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrbubbles916/5952395681/) by bjacobsen311 (http://www.flickr.com/people/mrbubbles916/), on Flickr.
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6128/5952395545_1030a61275_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrbubbles916/5952395545/)
IMG_2286 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrbubbles916/5952395545/) by bjacobsen311 (http://www.flickr.com/people/mrbubbles916/), on Flickr
imposterjeff
22nd of July 2011 (Fri), 16:39
this will be my next lens of purchase as i have found i like this range for automotive photography and portraits. yea i have a 85 but sometimes i need a zoom for some stuff
proletsearch
22nd of July 2011 (Fri), 18:45
No totally true. The IS version has a lot of the newer optics from the 2.8 IS - so it is even sharper than the original F4L. Go check out the IS thread, the IQ is pretty amazing.
Non-IS is though by FAR the best bang for the buck out there. It is phenominal and will only disappoint if you try to do things it isn't great at.
And KILLER shot there psyber! Wow!
I will have the chance to compare them, because a friend of mine will share just for a day his lens with me. As for the quality of the lens without IS - I am just amaized how great this lens performs even without tripod or monopod. The sharpness, focusing speed and colors are first class. Weather sealed on a not weather sealed body like the one I own - EOS 600D (t3i) is just pointless to me right now.
Jaynez
22nd of July 2011 (Fri), 21:57
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6025/5965976744_389ba96ae6_b.jpg
mpeason
23rd of July 2011 (Sat), 14:05
A few from this weekend
http://easonphoto.com/img/v17/p178253306-3.jpg
http://easonphoto.com/img/v21/p276481083-3.jpg
http://easonphoto.com/img/v8/p274955323-4.jpg
http://easonphoto.com/img/v21/p152398553-3.jpg
DigitalTuned
23rd of July 2011 (Sat), 18:46
posted on the wrong thread- removed
Mookalafalas
25th of July 2011 (Mon), 03:16
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6006/5973016503_e2a11f7b16_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mookalafalas-pixgalore/5973016503/)
Side Street Scene.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mookalafalas-pixgalore/5973016503/) by Mookalafalas (http://www.flickr.com/people/mookalafalas-pixgalore/), on Flickr
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6013/5973017445_e18f14a87c_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mookalafalas-pixgalore/5973017445/)
Melon Seller.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mookalafalas-pixgalore/5973017445/) by Mookalafalas (http://www.flickr.com/people/mookalafalas-pixgalore/), on Flickr
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6125/5973016947_6186426c6f_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mookalafalas-pixgalore/5973016947/)
Where to Go from Here-.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mookalafalas-pixgalore/5973016947/) by Mookalafalas (http://www.flickr.com/people/mookalafalas-pixgalore/), on Flickr
optiklenz13
25th of July 2011 (Mon), 20:30
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6001/5975827531_1467167cf7_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/optiklenz13/5975827531/)
Oh Hai!! (http://www.flickr.com/photos/optiklenz13/5975827531/) by optiklenz13 (http://www.flickr.com/people/optiklenz13/), on Flickr
Giom
26th of July 2011 (Tue), 04:31
She forgot to take her bra off... he he he. Nice bike tho!
minijag
26th of July 2011 (Tue), 16:05
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5304/5846378223_abceee13ae_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/minijag/5846378223/)
Safety Car (http://www.flickr.com/photos/minijag/5846378223/) por Nuno Castelhano (http://www.flickr.com/people/minijag/), no Flickr
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5199/5858407374_0c9fd82c3f_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/minijag/5858407374/)
Twins (http://www.flickr.com/photos/minijag/5858407374/) por Nuno Castelhano (http://www.flickr.com/people/minijag/), no Flickr
LePhotog
26th of July 2011 (Tue), 17:51
First few shots with new lens!
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6028/5979603266_592447b50d_z.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/wraysinclair/5979603266/)
A Flower (http://www.flickr.com/photos/wraysinclair/5979603266/) by WraySinclair (http://www.flickr.com/people/wraysinclair/), on Flickr
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6136/5979628584_d2773c1172_z.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/wraysinclair/5979628584/)
Klondike (http://www.flickr.com/photos/wraysinclair/5979628584/) by WraySinclair (http://www.flickr.com/people/wraysinclair/), on Flickr
n4ck
26th of July 2011 (Tue), 18:09
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6146/5979676306_cc594af450_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/nackphotography/5979676306/)
Downtown Seattle (http://www.flickr.com/photos/nackphotography/5979676306/) by N|M Photos (http://www.flickr.com/people/nackphotography/), on Flickr
minijag
27th of July 2011 (Wed), 03:56
^^ Awesome!!
mek501st
27th of July 2011 (Wed), 07:38
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6024/5981293224_a36fd3c06a_b.jpg
Cropped
stevewch
28th of July 2011 (Thu), 00:40
http://www.flickr.com/photos/32591329@N06/5983829046/
Steve
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.