michaelj
6th of August 2003 (Wed), 03:13
Hello all.
I've had my 10d for about a month now, and have been reading here to supplement my picture taking. I'm very happy with the camera, and thought I'd ask for some lens help.
I currently have a used 50mm 1.8 (nice), and a new 100mm 2.8 macro USM (very very nice), but need something a bit wider, for my landscape shots, and an upcoming wedding (I'm not the main photographer, so no stress).
I was initially looking at the Sigma 15-30, and the Canon 17-40L, but I'm really enjoying working with primes, and the constraints of no zoom. (I don't want to turn this into a zoom vs prime debate)
Therefore, would a 20mm lens give me enough wide 'latitude' for group shots at a wedding, and also the specific 'wide look' ?
I hope you can understand what I'm saying. I don't envisage taking many very wide shots, but I do shoot old houses and landscapes quite a bit.
Thanks for any help.
Michael.
I've had my 10d for about a month now, and have been reading here to supplement my picture taking. I'm very happy with the camera, and thought I'd ask for some lens help.
I currently have a used 50mm 1.8 (nice), and a new 100mm 2.8 macro USM (very very nice), but need something a bit wider, for my landscape shots, and an upcoming wedding (I'm not the main photographer, so no stress).
I was initially looking at the Sigma 15-30, and the Canon 17-40L, but I'm really enjoying working with primes, and the constraints of no zoom. (I don't want to turn this into a zoom vs prime debate)
Therefore, would a 20mm lens give me enough wide 'latitude' for group shots at a wedding, and also the specific 'wide look' ?
I hope you can understand what I'm saying. I don't envisage taking many very wide shots, but I do shoot old houses and landscapes quite a bit.
Thanks for any help.
Michael.