gruve
4th of April 2006 (Tue), 14:23
So I managed to lose my old S300 about a month ago. I loved that camera. I had it for over 4 years and it was an indestructible superstar. Dropped in the snow, showered with beer, used for four wildland firefighting seasons, dragged through europe, and it just kept on ticking. Of course, by the end it's once eye catching design and "small" size were no longer eye catching or small.
But now it's gone, and I need to buy something to replace it. As it was a canon, I definitely have a bit of brand loyalty, and first looked at the SD400/450 and the SD500/550. Though some people are in love with these little cameras, it seems that an alarming number are experiencing problems with the (ridiculously oversized) LCD's, which canon often does not cover. I don't know if the people complaining about this problem are telling the truth when they say that they did nothing to cause the lcd to break, but I would guess that a large percentage of them are.
Side note: Do we really need a 2.5" lcd, especially if it's made of porcelain? How bad are our eyes? You don't need to see the individual blades of grass in the lcd to frame the shot.
The point is, I loved my canon, and would love to buy another, but I'm not sure if these are really what I'm looking for. I need something to fit in my pocket, take decent pictures, and not break through REGULAR use. In addition to the canons I have been looking at some others. The casio exilim and the sony DSC-P200 seem to be the competition. They really don't appeal to me though. The sony looks like a spaceship...and it's a sony. And the casio, well.....casio makes cameras?
Believe me, I'm not one of those people that thinks I can get everything I want in a tiny camera with no compromises. I just want a solid performer, and am willing to spend the $$ to get one.
If anybody has any advice to offer, or even if they want to inform me that I know nothing about what I'm talking about (always a possibility), please reply.
But now it's gone, and I need to buy something to replace it. As it was a canon, I definitely have a bit of brand loyalty, and first looked at the SD400/450 and the SD500/550. Though some people are in love with these little cameras, it seems that an alarming number are experiencing problems with the (ridiculously oversized) LCD's, which canon often does not cover. I don't know if the people complaining about this problem are telling the truth when they say that they did nothing to cause the lcd to break, but I would guess that a large percentage of them are.
Side note: Do we really need a 2.5" lcd, especially if it's made of porcelain? How bad are our eyes? You don't need to see the individual blades of grass in the lcd to frame the shot.
The point is, I loved my canon, and would love to buy another, but I'm not sure if these are really what I'm looking for. I need something to fit in my pocket, take decent pictures, and not break through REGULAR use. In addition to the canons I have been looking at some others. The casio exilim and the sony DSC-P200 seem to be the competition. They really don't appeal to me though. The sony looks like a spaceship...and it's a sony. And the casio, well.....casio makes cameras?
Believe me, I'm not one of those people that thinks I can get everything I want in a tiny camera with no compromises. I just want a solid performer, and am willing to spend the $$ to get one.
If anybody has any advice to offer, or even if they want to inform me that I know nothing about what I'm talking about (always a possibility), please reply.