View Full Version : Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
staceyann
9th of May 2008 (Fri), 20:52
http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f245/staceyshipp/IMG_4826.jpg
newb2pro_1day_or_so
9th of May 2008 (Fri), 21:03
I have to say, I think that's a great image right there. Great shot of the piano!
Bill Pham
9th of May 2008 (Fri), 21:13
couple more from me today. uncrop and natural lights.
Bill
http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t210/Billphotos_2007/Billphotos_2008/_MG_0067.jpg
http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t210/Billphotos_2007/Billphotos_2008/_MG_0070.jpg
pixel_junkie
12th of May 2008 (Mon), 19:37
My beautiful wife, hours before we got married past Saturday ... I like this lens for macro as much as I like it for portraits.
http://www.emilkara.com/Images/bride.jpg
sml
12th of May 2008 (Mon), 19:51
Hey! I agree. Great portrait lens.
And congrats to you!!
pixel_junkie
12th of May 2008 (Mon), 19:58
Thanks very much! :D
Photo_Rebel
12th of May 2008 (Mon), 20:08
Hey! I agree. Great portrait lens.
And congrats to you!!
Yea, congrats and nice shot!
I've never tought about using my 100mm outside of macro shots, but I might start playing around.
Cotmweasel
12th of May 2008 (Mon), 20:11
Yeah it works great for portraits :D
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2186/2473096990_9cf87b517b_b.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3166/2469281497_92085a8f01_b.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2325/2470160492_afe49924ff_b.jpg
and congrats :D
staceyann
16th of May 2008 (Fri), 15:40
http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f245/staceyshipp/IMG_5102.jpg
http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f245/staceyshipp/IMG_5117.jpg
GrendelZ
18th of May 2008 (Sun), 20:15
That looks similar to one of mine. THis is one of the first shots I did with the 100.
http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d81/GrendelZ/myspace/DarkKeys.jpg
GrendelZ
18th of May 2008 (Sun), 20:17
Works great as a portrait lens too
http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d81/GrendelZ/myspace/MeanB.jpg
the_incubus
18th of May 2008 (Sun), 21:02
Works great as a portrait lens too
http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d81/GrendelZ/myspace/MeanB.jpg
woooooow. that is amazing. that just might have tipped me on the lens.
GrendelZ
18th of May 2008 (Sun), 21:58
Thanks! Yeah I wish I still had this lens. Most of the portraits on my website were taken with this lens and a 30D.
Dorman
18th of May 2008 (Sun), 22:36
Here's a few shots with my 100mm F/2.8 Macro - it is definitely the most versatile lens in my bag.
Dorman
18th of May 2008 (Sun), 22:38
Two more...
Dorman
18th of May 2008 (Sun), 22:39
And last two I promise...
Cotmweasel
18th of May 2008 (Sun), 22:42
I posted this in the Macro section already but here
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2376/2499258349_577bafb73f_b.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2125/2500083968_eef7f14ae0_b.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3003/2499258219_21feab51ce_b.jpg
Sydor25
19th of May 2008 (Mon), 00:11
http://sydor25.com/Pictures/Bees-5.3.08_0081.jpg
Winzzy
19th of May 2008 (Mon), 00:44
I just orderd mine! Can't wait to get it..... I better get a sharp copy =P
photobitz
19th of May 2008 (Mon), 02:15
I just orderd mine! Can't wait to get it..... I better get a sharp copy =P
I don't think I've seen any that weren't ;)
vinwin
19th of May 2008 (Mon), 12:40
Hi all 100mm f2.8 macro lens owner,
I just bought the 100mm f2.8 macro lens? Did some test shot and notice the center sharpness and contrast is peak at about f11 or f16. I am puzzle and hence posted a thread on " Center not sharp as apearture increase on 100mm macro?" (http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=504588)
From your experience, what is the best apearture for the centre sharpness when you are at the minimal focal distance to the object?
One other question is when using the extension tube, how much closer can we get close to the object?
Thanks for sharing.
photobitz
19th of May 2008 (Mon), 13:11
Hi all 100mm f2.8 macro lens owner,
I just bought the 100mm f2.8 macro lens? Did some test shot and notice the center sharpness and contrast is peak at about f11 or f16. I am puzzle and hence posted a thread on " Center not sharp as apearture increase on 100mm macro?" (http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=504588)
From your experience, what is the best apearture for the centre sharpness when you are at the minimal focal distance to the object?
One other question is when using the extension tube, how much closer can we get close to the object?
Thanks for sharing.
That is quite normal. You will find that sharpness will drop off past about f/16 due to internal diffraction. This happens on all lenses to some degree, but the effect is most pronounced at macro distances.
To get around the shallow DOF in macro you should consider using stacking software instead of using smaller apertures.
vinwin
20th of May 2008 (Tue), 12:10
That is quite normal. You will find that sharpness will drop off past about f/16 due to internal diffraction. This happens on all lenses to some degree, but the effect is most pronounced at macro distances.
To get around the shallow DOF in macro you should consider using stacking software instead of using smaller apertures.
What is "stacking software"?
This may be a dumb question. If the peak performance of the lens is at f/16, why would someone want to use the smaller apearture like f/22, f/29, f/32 when taking macro. Why a macro lens is design to have such small apearture when it no longer sharp at those small apeartures? ???
wimg
20th of May 2008 (Tue), 14:49
What is "stacking software"?
Stacking software essentially is software that allows you to combine just the sharp bits of several photographs of the same subject. When you do this at slightly different focusing distances, you can increase the DoF in a very dramatic way.
This is a technique which originated from and is often used in microphotography, but can be used for any kind of photography, provided the subject is static.
You could consider it the HDR of DoF, if you like, or HDoF :D.
This may be a dumb question. If the peak performance of the lens is at f/16, why would someone want to use the smaller apearture like f/22, f/29, f/32 when taking macro. Why a macro lens is design to have such small apearture when it no longer sharp at those small apeartures? ???
Because sometimes it is the only way to take a photograph of something. A slightly soft photograph may under certain conidtions be better than no photograph at all. Furthermore, not enlarging the photograph a lot may still result in an acceptable photograph, because it will look sharper at smaller magnifications than at larger ones.
Kind regards, Wim
10-Dee-Q
20th of May 2008 (Tue), 16:37
hi all i'm intersted to buy this lens for general purpose, potrait and macro and indoor sports
i have question though, can this lens be fitted with 1.4x or 2x Tcon? canon or 3rd party one ?
and what f it's gonna be when fitted with 2x tcon ?
thank you , sorry i'm still beginner :P
thx.
troypiggo
20th of May 2008 (Tue), 17:32
hi all i'm intersted to buy this lens for general purpose, potrait and macro and indoor sports
i have question though, can this lens be fitted with 1.4x or 2x Tcon? canon or 3rd party one ?
and what f it's gonna be when fitted with 2x tcon ?
thank you , sorry i'm still beginner :P
thx.
There's a teleconvertor FAQ sticky in the Lenses Forum (http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=41922)
My quick read says it can be fitted directly to the Sigma TCs, but doesn't mention it in the Canon TCs table.
I have used TCs with my Canon 100mm, but I put extension tubes between the camera body and the TC. It works. Can't remember, but pretty sure you don't get AF. Have to manually focus - but that's fine because you normally do with macro anyway.
JakPot
20th of May 2008 (Tue), 18:35
And last two I promise...
love these!
Winzzy
20th of May 2008 (Tue), 18:39
Mine comes in on Friday, just in time for my trip to Sedona, AZ... :D
Dorman
20th of May 2008 (Tue), 18:40
love these!
Thank you!
10-Dee-Q
21st of May 2008 (Wed), 02:41
There's a teleconvertor FAQ sticky in the Lenses Forum (http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=41922)
My quick read says it can be fitted directly to the Sigma TCs, but doesn't mention it in the Canon TCs table.
I have used TCs with my Canon 100mm, but I put extension tubes between the camera body and the TC. It works. Can't remember, but pretty sure you don't get AF. Have to manually focus - but that's fine because you normally do with macro anyway.
actually i'm thinkin to fit 2x on 100 macro for potrait or wildlife use , so i don't need to buy another tele lens ,
anyone ever tried this before ?
and will my 450D able to AF ?
thank you,
troypiggo
21st of May 2008 (Wed), 03:35
actually i'm thinkin to fit 2x on 100 macro for potrait or wildlife use , so i don't need to buy another tele lens ,
anyone ever tried this before ?
and will my 450D able to AF ?
thank you,
Ok, few of my thoughts:
- did you read the link to the FAQ I gave in previous post?
- as I just posted, you'd need to get the Sigma 2x TC unless you use tubes as well.
- with the 2x TC you lose image quality. There is also some loss of IQ with the 1.4x TC, but not as noticeable.
- with the 2x TC you lose 2 full stops of light, so f/2.8 lens effectively becomes f/5.6 len max aperture. Think that's the limit of AF effectiveness?
- the 100mm lens is fine as a portrait lens without 2x TC
- the 100mm with 2x TC is probably too short for wildlife, but depends what you're shooting. Typically would have thought you'd be after at least 300-400mm lens for wildlife. I have the 100-400 L. Plus for wildlife would think the loss of IQ is unacceptable.
- I'd recommended researching more whether you'll get AF with the Canon TC + tubes + 100mm lens. Table in the FAQ says you do with Sigma.
Personally, I'd get the Sigma 105mm macro lens (this will do your macro and portrait work), and with the bucks you save by not getting the Canon 100mm and don't buy a 2xTC, put it away towards getting a more "conventional" wildlife lens soon.
photobitz
21st of May 2008 (Wed), 04:54
Personally, I'd get the Sigma 105mm macro lens (this will do your macro and portrait work), and with the bucks you save by not getting the Canon 100mm and don't buy a 2xTC, put it away towards getting a more "conventional" wildlife lens soon.
I agree on this to a point. It depends on how much macro/portrait you do compared to wildlife.
I use a Sigma 100-300/4 EX for wildlife and I find I am often even needing a TC on that (it still produces excellent shots with a TC by the way). I just don't think a 100mm lens is long enough for wildlife. Now you may see people using 200mm lenses for wildlife, but you'll find the IQ you get from a 200mm prime will be far better than a 100mm macro with 2x teleconverter.
If you are more into macro and portrait I'd invest in a Canon 100mm macro. It has nicer features compared to the Sigma. Save up a while for a tele lens for wildlife. Perhaps you could look at the Sigma 100-300 EX for that side of things as it won't cost you an arm and a leg and it is an excellent piece of kit.
Lester Wareham
21st of May 2008 (Wed), 08:23
hi all i'm intersted to buy this lens for general purpose, potrait and macro and indoor sports
i have question though, can this lens be fitted with 1.4x or 2x Tcon? canon or 3rd party one ?
and what f it's gonna be when fitted with 2x tcon ?
thank you , sorry i'm still beginner :P
thx.
Not recommended, compatibility with the Canon TCs with a tube fitted also so loss of infinity focus. An independent might work OK but 100mm is a bit short for a TC to work well. Macro is demanding on lens sharpness so adding a2X gives a bit hit on sharpness, probably less of an issue at low magnifications.
Take a look at the 200mm/2.8L, an excellent and lightweight lens that is very sharp and a lot less expensive than some. Is compatible with the Canon TCs and takes them very well to boot.
BluewookieJim
21st of May 2008 (Wed), 14:04
I just ordered this lens from B&H today after looking through this thread with great envy for the last few weeks, especially staceyann and her ridiculously good photos.
tsw910
21st of May 2008 (Wed), 16:59
how did i do ? please CC .. im just starting to learn about macro
http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/8669/100mmtest31fq9.jpg
Photo_Rebel
21st of May 2008 (Wed), 17:41
^^^IMHO, I wouldn't consider your shot a macro, per se... I would shoot a tighter shot at one of those components (e.g. blue 'On' switch) with some bokhen would be better. Happy shooting!^^^
tsw910
21st of May 2008 (Wed), 17:46
yeah, you're right ... now where are them bugs lol
photobitz
21st of May 2008 (Wed), 20:58
It does demonstrate how versatile the lens is though. On any normal lens that would be about the closest you could get, but with the macro you can go much closer if so desired. I find it very useful in composition and not having to attach tubes etc when your just not quite close enough is a Godsend
rehype
23rd of May 2008 (Fri), 17:21
Heres my first pic with this lens,
http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb254/Rehype/flower.jpg
BluewookieJim
24th of May 2008 (Sat), 00:10
Just got mine in while I was at work today. Here is my very first shot with this lens, nothing special, just a handheld shot at my cubicle...
http://photos.kodanja.net/img/v0/p1016930492-3.jpg
A couple more, I saw this little critter on a walk through a local park after work.
http://photos.kodanja.net/img/v0/p883429740-3.jpg
My cat Buddy, in the backyard tonight.
http://photos.kodanja.net/img/v0/p822267193-3.jpg
http://photos.kodanja.net/img/v0/p672661628-4.jpg
newb2pro_1day_or_so
24th of May 2008 (Sat), 07:46
haha, that first cat shot is pretty cool looking. It appears as though it's ready to pounce out of the picture at me because of the way the paws are cropped off. It makes it seem a lot closer. Good stuff.
vinwin
25th of May 2008 (Sun), 13:38
Hi,
Just bought this macro lens. Did some self test at home. Here are some sample. All photos are straight from camera. Pictures are not post processed except resize and cropping.
1. Orignal Picture
http://www.pbase.com/calvin_y/image/97558297/original.jpg
2. Center 100% Crop
http://www.pbase.com/calvin_y/image/97558294/original.jpg
3. Lower Right Edge 100% Crop
http://www.pbase.com/calvin_y/image/97558295/original.jpg
4. Upper Left Edge 100% Crop
http://www.pbase.com/calvin_y/image/97558296/original.jpg
More test shots are availabe at http://www.pbase.com/calvin_y/ef100mm_f28_macro_test_shots
Ray.Petri
26th of May 2008 (Mon), 09:36
I've had this lens two weeks now - there is a bit of a learning curve to go with it and you don't realise just how much it likes a bit of stability until you try it. IS would be nice.
The shot is the innermost workings of a Rhododendron.
staceyann
26th of May 2008 (Mon), 10:21
http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f245/staceyshipp/IMG_5267-1.jpg
photobitz
26th of May 2008 (Mon), 19:39
http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f245/staceyshipp/IMG_5267-1.jpg
Interesting post. I like it a lot, but I'm not sure it demostrates the capability of the lens...
BluewookieJim
29th of May 2008 (Thu), 16:36
I think I'm really going to like this lens. Here are a few samples of my first serious attempts at macro shooting
Tripod mounted:
http://photos.kodanja.net/img/v0/p276674947-3.jpg
http://photos.kodanja.net/img/v0/p207286543-3.jpg
http://photos.kodanja.net/img/v0/p402434912-3.jpg
http://photos.kodanja.net/img/v0/p926595339-3.jpg
Handheld:
http://photos.kodanja.net/img/v1/p938612850-3.jpg
bennygalea
31st of May 2008 (Sat), 10:47
my first photo with this lens...
Why i cannot upload at better qualitty?
photobitz
31st of May 2008 (Sat), 10:50
I think I'm really going to like this lens. Here are a few samples of my first serious attempts at macro shooting
Those rose shots are beautiful.
photobitz
31st of May 2008 (Sat), 10:51
my first photo with this lens...
Why i cannot upload at better qualitty?
Check the attachment limits... needs to be smaller than 150kb
inthedeck
31st of May 2008 (Sat), 10:53
Here's one from me...5D and 100mm.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2356/2538074976_93c21fd2ef_o.jpg
BluewookieJim
1st of June 2008 (Sun), 00:04
Those rose shots are beautiful.
Thanks, I appreciate the feedback.
Next time I'll make sure brush or blow those "specks" off before I do any closeup work.
Here are a few from today, my first real outing with this lens.
http://photos.kodanja.net/img/v2/p796173470-3.jpg
http://photos.kodanja.net/img/v2/p706266533-3.jpg
http://photos.kodanja.net/img/v2/p890361154-3.jpg
http://photos.kodanja.net/img/v2/p878177683-4.jpg
Cotmweasel
3rd of June 2008 (Tue), 20:56
Did something that wasn't bugs for once :P.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3128/2548832659_c82f096325_b.jpg
Edit: forgive the Dust. I didn't get it cleaned off the guitar before the picture.
photobitz
3rd of June 2008 (Tue), 20:57
Ooooh nice :D
Pete
8th of June 2008 (Sun), 14:28
http://www.the-aperture.com/EE/photos/normal/20080608_APER6114.jpg
camera: Canon 1D Mk II N
lens: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM @ 100mm (130mm in 35mm film SLR)
aperture: f/4.5
shutter speed: 1/160s
ISO: 800
metering: Evaluative
rehype
8th of June 2008 (Sun), 14:33
Wow very cool shot.
Gerry Dawes
9th of June 2008 (Mon), 12:51
Not for the worm, it's not!!!
newb2pro_1day_or_so
9th of June 2008 (Mon), 17:00
I know a lot of people have seen bugs posted with this lense, but check out how sharp it is even with fast moving objects. This lense is so sharp, I hardly believe it sometimes.
http://i253.photobucket.com/albums/hh59/Iseethroughglass/Bees05-23-08026.jpg
Scott33
9th of June 2008 (Mon), 23:25
OK, I don't profess to be anything other than an amateur.
But I got this lens yesterday after reading the reports on this forum, and here is my first effort straight out the box, handheld (cropped and sharpened, and no off camera flash).
I think it will be a permenant fixture on my 40D
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b148/scott33_/macro_007.jpg
OK, not perfect, but has me hooked.
The fly sadly died just moments later, from horrific injuries received by a rolled up newspaper.
inthedeck
9th of June 2008 (Mon), 23:34
The fly sadly died just moments later, from horrific injuries received by a rolled up newspaper.
Umm...I'm not sure if those are words you want to speak around here...:lol:
Bill Pham
10th of June 2008 (Tue), 00:34
couple of flower shot using this lenses. natural light only.
Bill
http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t210/Billphotos_2007/Billphotos_2008/IMG_0023_1fullframeshotnaturallight.jpg
taken a few second after the first one. show how fast the light can change on you.http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t210/Billphotos_2007/Billphotos_2008/IMG_0024_1fullframenaturallight.jpg
Scott33
10th of June 2008 (Tue), 00:35
Umm...I'm not sure if those are words you want to speak around here...
Wasn't me. I wouldn't hurt a...Fly? :rolleyes:
poppie guy
10th of June 2008 (Tue), 02:19
Hand held using my 5d, ISO 1600.
http://mchurliman.zenfolio.com/img/v0/p436972324.jpg
AeroSmith
13th of June 2008 (Fri), 12:28
Here are a few.
On the 1D3: f/11; 1/200; ISO 800.
http://AeroSmith.smugmug.com/photos/302502427_NSrfS-L.jpg
1D3: f/11; 1/200; ISO 400.
http://AeroSmith.smugmug.com/photos/302509757_HJC9a-L.jpg
On the 1Ds3: f/9; 1/125; ISO 500.
http://AeroSmith.smugmug.com/photos/311963399_isss2-L.jpg
1Ds3: f/16; 1/200; ISO 800.
http://AeroSmith.smugmug.com/photos/264167704_2fMMF-L.jpg
strobe monkey
13th of June 2008 (Fri), 19:17
40D with EF 100Macro
ISO 1600 F11
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3269/2576677648_509bb1f3d4.jpg
doomba
14th of June 2008 (Sat), 17:49
Is there any other accessory equipment that might go with this lens like extension tubes, etc.?
shima
14th of June 2008 (Sat), 21:09
Just got mine! here's a macro tootsie roll :)
http://photos.cathoffman.com/photos/313137119_nmXm2-M.jpg
jasonleehl
14th of June 2008 (Sat), 23:27
Went yesterday to the local butterfly park. Coupled with a MR-14EX, settings are 1/160, f/11, ISO 200.
Realized a number of guys bump the ISO up to 800 to get a bright background. Will try that out next time! Pls. give your critics / comments as I want to improve on my macro shots. Thanks! :)
http://jasonlee.smugmug.com/photos/313215678_3pgTi-L.jpg
http://jasonlee.smugmug.com/photos/313217721_7kYUD-L.jpg
muzzap
15th of June 2008 (Sun), 04:20
40D + 100mm macro, 1/180sec, f/3.2, 400 ISO...
AeroSmith
15th of June 2008 (Sun), 09:13
40D + 100mm macro, 1/180sec, f/3.2, 400 ISO...
Great capture!
photobitz
15th of June 2008 (Sun), 09:57
Is there any other accessory equipment that might go with this lens like extension tubes, etc.?
Might be nice if someone answers your question... ;):rolleyes:
You can use tubes with this lens if you want but it depends on exactly how close you want to be to your subject (ie. how much you want to magnify it).
Probably the most helpful accessories would be an external flash unit and an off-shoe cord since you really need a lot of light for macro.
inthedeck
15th of June 2008 (Sun), 10:01
Muzzap, nice shot. Next time, close the aperture a bit more (go to > 5.6), so everything is in focus. Though, in this shot, everything leads to the eye...which is nice.
doomba
15th of June 2008 (Sun), 11:48
Might be nice if someone answers your question... ;):rolleyes:
You can use tubes with this lens if you want but it depends on exactly how close you want to be to your subject (ie. how much you want to magnify it).
Probably the most helpful accessories would be an external flash unit and an off-shoe cord since you really need a lot of light for macro.
Thank you, photobitz. If I understand correctly, off-shoe cord will let me move flash unit, right?
Colorblinded
15th of June 2008 (Sun), 11:51
Muzzap, nice shot. Next time, open up the aperture a bit more, so everything is in focus. Though, in this shot, everything leads to the eye...which is nice.
You'd want to close the aperture to get more in focus actually.
Tubes are a handy accessory if you find yourself needing to get closer. If you decide to get tubes I would recommend some of the 3rd party tube sets. I have the Kenko set of three tubes that costs around $170.
The off camera flash cord will allow you to use your flash exactly like it were on camera: fully automatic (should you desire and you have purchased the Canon off-camerea cord or something compatible). More importantly getting your flash off the camera's hot shoe lets you position it where you want and need it to get light on your subject. Flash makes macro photography much easier because you need a lot of light and flash helps you avoid shooting at longer exposures which especially with macro make motion blur a big issue.
inthedeck
15th of June 2008 (Sun), 12:00
DOH! I always get that wrong...when I type it. I meant go to 5.6 towards f/8. Thanks for the correction...I'll edit it.
macroshot
15th of June 2008 (Sun), 13:58
Here are a couple from this morning. Tis the season when snapping turtles appear randomly in the morning in the park where I walk everyday. They dig a shallow trench, but it isn't to lay eggs. Not sure what they do, but this shot is from about 6 inches away. The eyeball is a 100% crop w/ me in the shot.
280163
280164
BluewookieJim
15th of June 2008 (Sun), 21:48
Here are a few.
1Ds3: f/16; 1/200; ISO 800.
http://AeroSmith.smugmug.com/photos/264167704_2fMMF-L.jpg
They are all nice, but this one in particular is sweet.
photobitz
16th of June 2008 (Mon), 04:07
Thank you, photobitz. If I understand correctly, off-shoe cord will let me move flash unit, right?
Exactly. I guess it might be a good idea to get a flash bracket too so you don't have to hold the flash yourself.
AeroSmith
16th of June 2008 (Mon), 10:45
They are all nice, but this one in particular is sweet.
Thanks! That's mighty nice of you to say. :)
BluewookieJim
16th of June 2008 (Mon), 14:03
I've had this lens for 3 full weeks now, and it's barely come off my 20D since then. Still getting used to, especially the DOF, but I'm certainly having fun with it.
Here are a few of my favorite shots (in no particular order) with it so far:
http://photos.kodanja.net/img/v2/p743580042-3.jpg
http://photos.kodanja.net/img/v1/p945882287-3.jpg
http://photos.kodanja.net/img/v2/p713447006-4.jpg
http://photos.kodanja.net/img/v0/p959811562-3.jpg
http://photos.kodanja.net/img/v2/p911915536-3.jpg
http://photos.kodanja.net/img/v0/p315794156-3.jpg
AeroSmith
16th of June 2008 (Mon), 14:52
Awesome series...that fourth shot looks like it's out of a flower catalog.
BluewookieJim
16th of June 2008 (Mon), 15:18
Awesome series...that fourth shot looks like it's out of a flower catalog.
Thanks, you're much to kind.
Just took #4 around 5pm yesterday afternoon in my sunroom.
Sidelight coming in from the window, shot against a white mounting board background. Tripod mounted with a shutter release. I'm pretty sure the WB on this one was set with my ExpoDisc. I was doing some comparisons of custom WB methods yesterday, auto WB, vs camera set custom WB, vs ExpoDisc set WB...
Aussieroo
17th of June 2008 (Tue), 02:43
I guess I have been fence sitting here for long enough time I wrote and said hi and things. I have had this lens for about 12 months now and have been fortunate enough to have a great mentor take me out and show me the finer things about macro photography.
I thought you would like a few points on taking macro, some may seem pretty obvious but I will list them anyway. In no particular order just as they come to mind.
1. Get yourself some gardening knee pads, as you will be on your knees more often than not.
2. You will find a cable release invaluable.
3. An angle viewfinder helps as well saves lying on the ground at times.
4. Using the "Mirror up" option when in real close helps in eliminating that minute chance of vibration from the shutter.
5. When in grassy wet areas a pair of rubber boots helps as well.
6. Keep an old pair of scissors in your camera bag for getting rid of any annoying grass stalks that may be in the background making it messy.
7. Concentrate as much on the background as the subject matter. A busy messy background will distract for the subject and will be difficult to remove later in PS. Keep the back ground as blurred as possible checking your DOF and aperture.
8. Be sure you are as parallel to the subject as possible. Shooting at an angle will result in too much out of focus due to shallow DOF. You may have to shoot up, you may have to shoot down the angle will depend on how the subject is positioned.
9. Get in as close as you can without frightening the subject away.
10. Use a tripod where ever you can Remember with the Velbum you can remove the bottom half of the support stalk to get even lower to the ground. A Ball head is very handy for those odd angles and adjustments.
11. Be aware of lighting. Shadows are easier to keep highlight from blowing out and using slow shutter speeds will give you exposure you need.
12. Practice shooting in RAW and the doing your initial edit in the PS RAW editor.
13. Use manual focus always
14. Shoot early in the morning while insects are cold and less likely to move. Best in the spring when days are warm to hatch the insects but cold enough mornings to have them nice and slow.
15. Take your time with every shot, shoot less and shoot better.
16. Enjoy the "Hunt" and learn to look down and see small things. Sometimes sitting still in a reedy area your eyes will become accustomed to the things around you and you will start to see smaller things you previously have missed.
17. Learn the habitat and habits of what you are likely to shoot. Times of year and times of day etc.
18. develop your skills in editing for even better results.
A couple of samples
http://Ozphotos.smugmug.com/photos/265809335_QeAbx-M.jpg
http://Ozphotos.smugmug.com/photos/247315387_UPFXR-M.jpg
http://Ozphotos.smugmug.com/photos/242597864_4YDqs-M.jpg
troypiggo
17th of June 2008 (Tue), 04:02
Very nice Aussieroo. More please :) In the macro photo sharing forum.
Aussieroo
17th of June 2008 (Tue), 04:53
Very nice Aussieroo. More please :) In the macro photo sharing forum.
Happy to now to find that thread
AeroSmith
17th of June 2008 (Tue), 09:55
Those draggon fly shots are fabulous. Would you mind sharing the exif for them?
And many thanks for the list of shooting tips. Very good stuff.
Cheers.
photobitz
17th of June 2008 (Tue), 12:14
Excellent advice and excellent examples ;)
Aussieroo
17th of June 2008 (Tue), 22:39
All the exif infos are available in my albums at my smugmug site this is a direct link to the dragonfly. http://ozphotos.smugmug.com/gallery/3324019_RfXRD#P-3-15
The 2 mating are actually Damselflies. Feel free to browse the album and look at all the exif data there. Here is a screen shot of the dragonfly exif
http://Ozphotos.smugmug.com/photos/315170152_jbhsd-L.jpg
silvex
17th of June 2008 (Tue), 23:23
All the exif infos are available in my albums at my smugmug site this is a direct link to the dragonfly. http://ozphotos.smugmug.com/gallery/3324019_RfXRD#P-3-15
The 2 mating are actually Damselflies. Feel free to browse the album and look at all the exif data there. Here is a screen shot of the dragonfly exif
http://Ozphotos.smugmug.com/photos/315170152_jbhsd-L.jpg
You have an AMAZING collection of macros...how much do you paid the models ? :) Can I get the bug model agency...:)
bagtagsell
17th of June 2008 (Tue), 23:56
40D + 100mm macro, 1/180sec, f/3.2, 400 ISO...
Incredible shot.
RowdyReptile
18th of June 2008 (Wed), 00:21
Great shots everybody... it's making me feel better about my purchase of the 100mm macro and I'm anxiously awaiting its arrival.
Aussieroo
18th of June 2008 (Wed), 02:08
Thanks everyone, you are too kind. I am fortunate enough to live very close to the local lake and nearly all those insects in my album were shot in one location over an 8 month period. Had a routine going there for a long time, down most morning just after sunrise for a couple of hours to go bug hunting. Makes it so much nicer when you have company of course. Is interesting just how many different varieties we have found in such a small area. Great little eco system we have there. I have posted a few in a thread in the macro forum but feel free to browse my macro album at smugmug if you like.
grandadraymond
18th of June 2008 (Wed), 03:11
My first shot with my 100mm
http://lancashirehobbies.co.uk/galleries/albums/userpics/10003/Hypericum_androsaemum_-_Tutsan.jpg
photobitz
18th of June 2008 (Wed), 03:43
Nice. I'm sure getting a first shot like that instantly made it your new favourite lens ;)
macroshot
19th of June 2008 (Thu), 20:48
Well done, sir. It is certainly a fun lens to have available. Enjoy!
My first shot with my 100mm
http://lancashirehobbies.co.uk/galleries/albums/userpics/10003/Hypericum_androsaemum_-_Tutsan.jpg
macroshot
19th of June 2008 (Thu), 20:51
Remarkable shots, Aussieroo! Really digging the blue dragon shot. They are out in force now, as well as damsels. And a great list of shooting tips too.
I guess I have been fence sitting here for long enough time I wrote and said hi and things. I have had this lens for about 12 months now and have been fortunate enough to have a great mentor take me out and show me the finer things about macro photography.
I thought you would like a few points on taking macro, some may seem pretty obvious but I will list them anyway. In no particular order just as they come to mind.
1. Get yourself some gardening knee pads, as you will be on your knees more often than not.
2. You will find a cable release invaluable.
3. An angle viewfinder helps as well saves lying on the ground at times.
4. Using the "Mirror up" option when in real close helps in eliminating that minute chance of vibration from the shutter.
5. When in grassy wet areas a pair of rubber boots helps as well.
6. Keep an old pair of scissors in your camera bag for getting rid of any annoying grass stalks that may be in the background making it messy.
7. Concentrate as much on the background as the subject matter. A busy messy background will distract for the subject and will be difficult to remove later in PS. Keep the back ground as blurred as possible checking your DOF and aperture.
8. Be sure you are as parallel to the subject as possible. Shooting at an angle will result in too much out of focus due to shallow DOF. You may have to shoot up, you may have to shoot down the angle will depend on how the subject is positioned.
9. Get in as close as you can without frightening the subject away.
10. Use a tripod where ever you can Remember with the Velbum you can remove the bottom half of the support stalk to get even lower to the ground. A Ball head is very handy for those odd angles and adjustments.
11. Be aware of lighting. Shadows are easier to keep highlight from blowing out and using slow shutter speeds will give you exposure you need.
12. Practice shooting in RAW and the doing your initial edit in the PS RAW editor.
13. Use manual focus always
14. Shoot early in the morning while insects are cold and less likely to move. Best in the spring when days are warm to hatch the insects but cold enough mornings to have them nice and slow.
15. Take your time with every shot, shoot less and shoot better.
16. Enjoy the "Hunt" and learn to look down and see small things. Sometimes sitting still in a reedy area your eyes will become accustomed to the things around you and you will start to see smaller things you previously have missed.
17. Learn the habitat and habits of what you are likely to shoot. Times of year and times of day etc.
18. develop your skills in editing for even better results.
A couple of samples
http://Ozphotos.smugmug.com/photos/265809335_QeAbx-M.jpg
http://Ozphotos.smugmug.com/photos/247315387_UPFXR-M.jpg
http://Ozphotos.smugmug.com/photos/242597864_4YDqs-M.jpg
macroshot
19th of June 2008 (Thu), 20:55
Here are a couple more shots that I really liked from a week ago (5D & 100mm macro). I did a little PP on the lillies because I shot it too dark to start with.
281481
281483
symby
19th of June 2008 (Thu), 21:11
I really like the lillies..
If you don't mind, what kind of pp did you do on that one?
chowmien
19th of June 2008 (Thu), 21:17
Such good looking photo's. You guys got me considering this lens over a 55-250 IS I was planning on buying.
doomba
21st of June 2008 (Sat), 13:27
Exactly. I guess it might be a good idea to get a flash bracket too so you don't have to hold the flash yourself.
thanks a lot for the info. I just checked b&h, they have a whole bunch of extension tubes. how do i know which one I need?
inthedeck
21st of June 2008 (Sat), 13:28
Get the Kenko set, it's a bit cheaper than the Canon set. Especially since you're paying for hollow tubes. Either are well renouned, around these parts.
doomba
21st of June 2008 (Sat), 13:39
I've had this lens for 3 full weeks now, and it's barely come off my 20D since then. Still getting used to, especially the DOF, but I'm certainly having fun with it.
Here are a few of my favorite shots (in no particular order) with it so far:
My first shot with my 100mm
How do you guys manage to get so close and have such excellent DOF in the same time? I have tried many different ways but I just can't seem to get both things together.
troypiggo
21st of June 2008 (Sat), 19:51
How do you guys manage to get so close and have such excellent DOF in the same time? I have tried many different ways but I just can't seem to get both things together.
What apertures have you been using? Try f/11 or so. If you're keeping ISO down to 100-200 for better image quality, you'll probably need flash.
What have you been trying?
BluewookieJim
21st of June 2008 (Sat), 22:19
How do you guys manage to get so close and have such excellent DOF in the same time? I have tried many different ways but I just can't seem to get both things together.
I've done several series of shots on the same subject, testing from f/2.8, up to f/16 or f/22. It's been a lot of trial and error in terms of getting DOF. I find that my best results are generally at F/8 to F/11.
Also, I'm sure you've probably heard this numerous times already, but manual focus can make a huge difference.
BluewookieJim
22nd of June 2008 (Sun), 00:31
While we are on the topic of DOF, I thought I'd share this image I shot today, ay f/2.8.
http://photos.kodanja.net/img/v2/p139041455-4.jpg
doomba
22nd of June 2008 (Sun), 18:15
What apertures have you been using? Try f/11 or so. If you're keeping ISO down to 100-200 for better image quality, you'll probably need flash.
What have you been trying?
I've done several series of shots on the same subject, testing from f/2.8, up to f/16 or f/22. It's been a lot of trial and error in terms of getting DOF. I find that my best results are generally at F/8 to F/11.
Also, I'm sure you've probably heard this numerous times already, but manual focus can make a huge difference.
Here, some of the shots. All shots were made under direct sunlight with no falsh on 40D. I am as a beginner as one can get and these are my very first shots, so I have a lot to learn. All and any of your comments will be very appreciated!
1. exp. 1/500s, iso 250, aperture f/5.7
Here only fly's butt and some parts of wings are in focus.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3208/2602201798_5c0e7716d5_b.jpg
2. exp. 1/500, iso 250, aperture f/5.7
Same setting as previous.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3137/2602203166_332fc2a211_b.jpg
3. f/5.7 iso 400
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3143/2601377069_4ea0be3e9c_b.jpg
doomba
22nd of June 2008 (Sun), 18:21
Get the Kenko set, it's a bit cheaper than the Canon set. Especially since you're paying for hollow tubes. Either are well renouned, around these parts.
These ones?
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/375102-REG/Kenko_AEXTUBEDGC_Auto_Extension_Tube_Set.html
troypiggo
22nd of June 2008 (Sun), 18:35
That's them.
troypiggo
22nd of June 2008 (Sun), 18:42
f/5.7 is a little too shallow depth of field for macro at 1:1 (min focusing distance). As I said above, you'll be wanting f/11 or so as a starting point. Even then, the DOF is in the order of millimetres. You really need to practise and you'll get it.
That being said, those shots you posted below are a good start. They're not at min focus distance, so not 1:1. You could probably get away with slightly wider aperture, just slightly off with the focus on the hoverfly, but not much. The dragonfly is a great shot. You won't see anyone getting a macro of a dragonfly head-on like that with the whole body in focus. Maybe if the DF was side on and if they focus stack or something, but that's another story.
Here, some of the shots. All shots were made under direct sunlight with no falsh on 40D. I am as a beginner as one can get and these are my very first shots, so I have a lot to learn. All and any of your comments will be very appreciated!
1. exp. 1/500s, iso 250, aperture f/5.7
Here only fly's butt and some parts of wings are in focus.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3208/2602201798_5c0e7716d5_b.jpg
2. exp. 1/500, iso 250, aperture f/5.7
Same setting as previous.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3137/2602203166_332fc2a211_b.jpg
3. f/5.7 iso 400
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3143/2601377069_4ea0be3e9c_b.jpg
doomba
22nd of June 2008 (Sun), 20:14
f/5.7 is a little too shallow depth of field for macro at 1:1 (min focusing distance). As I said above, you'll be wanting f/11 or so as a starting point. Even then, the DOF is in the order of millimetres. You really need to practise and you'll get it.
That being said, those shots you posted below are a good start. They're not at min focus distance, so not 1:1. You could probably get away with slightly wider aperture, just slightly off with the focus on the hoverfly, but not much. The dragonfly is a great shot. You won't see anyone getting a macro of a dragonfly head-on like that with the whole body in focus. Maybe if the DF was side on and if they focus stack or something, but that's another story.
troypiggo, thanks for your feedback! I will try your suggestions when weather clears.
Aussieroo
22nd of June 2008 (Sun), 20:54
I find f11 is the sweet spot for me on the 100mm Macro going to hight up to f22 creates more problems than it add DOF and if you have any dirt on your sensor anything smaller than f16 will show the dirt up dramatically :-(
You are also better of where possible to shood accross the insect rather than along the length of the whole body. You sill never get it all in focus that way unless you start to photostack
troypiggo
22nd of June 2008 (Sun), 21:14
Agreed Aussieroo. I've read, and also done some of my own testing, on apertures f/16 and above. Diffraction softening comes into play over f/16. You get much sharper images if you can keep f/11-f/13 for 1:1. If you're putting tubes on to get 2:1, drop down even more to f/8-f/9 or so. The guys using MPE-65 at even higher mags go lower than that if they want to avoid diffraction softening.
Talk about dust on the sensor showing up - put a full set of tubes on and see how much it stands out, even at f/11. Add a 2x TC for added effect :)
inthedeck
22nd of June 2008 (Sun), 21:28
These ones?
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/375102-REG/Kenko_AEXTUBEDGC_Auto_Extension_Tube_Set.html
As troypiggo said, that's them.
fxk
23rd of June 2008 (Mon), 15:41
The 100 f/2.8 macro should be an "L" lens - good at 1:1 and at infinity. Takes tubes well, to, to get beyond 1:1. One of my better purchases.
doomba
23rd of June 2008 (Mon), 15:45
That's them.
As troypiggo said, that's them.
Thanks again, folks!
Pete
26th of June 2008 (Thu), 10:23
http://www.the-aperture.com/EE/photos/normal/20080524_APER5924.jpg
camera: Canon 1D Mk II N
lens: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM @ 100mm (130mm in 35mm film SLR)
aperture: f/8
shutter speed: 1/400s
ISO: 400
metering: Evaluative
Nordly
26th of June 2008 (Thu), 16:15
I love this lens, and works great for me when I lack inspiration as I'll force myself to put it on my 5D and it makes me want to go out to the garden!
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3210/2612994772_d511b5fa6e.jpg?v=0
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3045/2602814109_b6bd381552.jpg?v=0
macroshot
26th of June 2008 (Thu), 21:49
A couple from this afternoon - too hot to work in the garden so I thought a couple of hours shooting the garden was a reasonable compromise.
283481
283483
macroshot
26th of June 2008 (Thu), 21:54
And let's not forget the bugs as well. And I received my set of Kenko extension tubes today while shooting these. Should be interesting.
283486
283487
Bill Pham
27th of June 2008 (Fri), 22:32
figure i add a few more to this thread. not as good as some of you but i like them.
Bill
http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t210/Billphotos_2007/Billphotos_2008/IMG_0135orchidA.jpg
http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t210/Billphotos_2007/Billphotos_2008/IMG_0139orchidA.jpg
smallpotatoes
27th of June 2008 (Fri), 23:39
Love the ladybug!
Jaci
I love this lens, and works great for me when I lack inspiration as I'll force myself to put it on my 5D and it makes me want to go out to the garden!
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3210/2612994772_d511b5fa6e.jpg?v=0
MuahMan
28th of June 2008 (Sat), 02:01
Here is my first attempt ever at a Macro shot. I had to get this lens after seeing all the great Macro shots. I'm hooked on Macro now!!! :eek:
I just got my 40D after being away from photography since film..... hard learning curve especially figuring out the post processing. Here it is.
C&C needed!
100mm Macro. 1/100 f/16 ISO 400 Downloaded with Lightroom 1.4 so I think it's post processed. Doesn't Lightroom automatically sharpen for the camera you select?
http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/5899/pistilmacrotq3.jpg
By muahman (http://profile.imageshack.us/user/muahman) at 2008-06-27
macroshot
28th of June 2008 (Sat), 13:07
Bill - that first orchid shot is just amazing - very well done!! Great depth in the photo, seems to just be suspended in mid-air (better than my shrub rose and that was the effect I was aiming for too). I underexposed and tried to bring the petals out using PSE6 - the idea was to make it seem as though it was opening while you watched it...I think I like yours better.
figure i add a few more to this thread. not as good as some of you but i like them.
Bill
http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t210/Billphotos_2007/Billphotos_2008/IMG_0135orchidA.jpg
http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t210/Billphotos_2007/Billphotos_2008/IMG_0139orchidA.jpg
Bill Pham
28th of June 2008 (Sat), 13:25
thank you Hank. i like that shot alot myself. it's my new screen saver :D.
Bill
funhouse69
4th of July 2008 (Fri), 06:27
I am a complete novice when it comes to Macro Photography. I decided to pick up this lens and I am still playing with it. Here are a few of my first attempts all of which are straight out of the camera, NO PP, Resize Only!
1) 40D, ISO 400, f/3.5 @ 1/125
http://funhouse69.smugmug.com/photos/321091032_3YDub-XL.jpg
2)1) 40D, ISO 400, f/3.2 @ 1/100
http://funhouse69.smugmug.com/photos/323004733_rDDVw-XL.jpg
3) 40D, ISO 1600, f/8 @ 1/30
http://funhouse69.smugmug.com/photos/323004561_62i5G-XL.jpg
drama
7th of July 2008 (Mon), 04:37
Conquistador
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3128/2636847736_eef877b435_b.jpg
Swarthy
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3059/2628975140_6c1725dcc9_b.jpg
Robberfly
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3023/2636014367_bb75cb0849_b.jpg
Cotmweasel
7th of July 2008 (Mon), 11:48
not perfect but I think its a nice picture
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3157/2629092998_08d118f5bb_b.jpg
pixel_junkie
12th of July 2008 (Sat), 23:44
So far, I've used this lens for everything but macro...
http://www.emilkara.com/Images/Kolibri.jpg
http://www.emilkara.com/Images/Bird-1.jpg
http://www.emilkara.com/Images/Bird-2.jpg
Nordly
13th of July 2008 (Sun), 04:30
pixel_junkie, those three shots are wonderful! Gorgeous colours & sharpness, unreal. Sterling job!
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3041/2662058188_c47f30074d.jpg?v=0
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3162/2662057416_e440bbc10b.jpg?v=0
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3134/2661232835_d7aa712787.jpg?v=0
macroshot
13th of July 2008 (Sun), 07:10
Great to see this thread back up again - more excellent photos!! Here's another contribution from my garden shot last weekend:
288043
pixel_junkie
13th of July 2008 (Sun), 16:08
pixel_junkie, those three shots are wonderful! Gorgeous colours & sharpness, unreal. Sterling job!
Thanks much! Your first two are like out of a dream ...
http://www.emilkara.com/Images/Splash.jpg
Gustavo Cardoso
14th of July 2008 (Mon), 20:03
Please I need advise on where to get service to repair a CANON MACRO LENS EF 100mm 1:2.8.
Accidentally it was dropped off about 1 meter from my camera case to a ceramic floor hitting it with the front edge; the crystal lens was not compromised, at that moment it was fitted with a Haze filter which did not suffer any damage except for a minor scratch in the ring. Since then it is not performing.
When it is hooked to the camera it makes a mechanical noise even though the camera is OFF, and my EOS 400 D camera reports “Err99”. Something sounds loose in the inside.
Lens serial number is: 3400533D.
I sent it to:
Canon Factory Service Center
100 Jamesburg Road
Jamesburg, NJ
08831
They told me they do not service this product and suggested:
Chrysler Camera Repair - <http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=es&ie=UTF8&q=chrysler+camera+repair&near=N ueva+York,+NY,+USA&fb=1&li=lmd&t=m&latlng=40753016 ,-73995364,5010383753282310653&ei=yUcPSJCLEpLYigGb65 kQ&cd=1 (http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=es&ie=UTF8&q=chrysler+camera+repair&near=N ueva+York,+NY,+USA&fb=1&li=lmd&t=m&latlng=40753016 ,-73995364,5010383753282310653&ei=yUcPSJCLEpLYigGb65 kQ&cd=1)>más datos » 367 W 34th St # 2, New York, NY (212) 682-3547
No luck either, they also told me that can not take that lens.
Is there a place in the US where I can send it?
My e.mail is:
cardosogustavo@hotmail.com (cardosogustavo@hotmail.com)
or
antena1@etapanet.net (antena1@etapanet.net)
Phone number: (593)84980247
Thank you!
inthedeck
14th of July 2008 (Mon), 20:09
Not sure where to send it, if Canon has told you that they are not able to fix it. Maybe call the place where you purchased the lens?
silvex
14th of July 2008 (Mon), 20:45
So far, I've used this lens for everything but macro...
http://www.emilkara.com/Images/Kolibri.jpg
http://www.emilkara.com/Images/Bird-1.jpg
http://www.emilkara.com/Images/Bird-2.jpg
Gorgeous shots!!! I am envy of the hummer. Were these at the wild animal park aviary?
Pinto
14th of July 2008 (Mon), 22:02
Please I need advise on where to get service to repair a CANON MACRO LENS EF 100mm 1:2.8.
Accidentally it was dropped off about 1 meter from my camera case to a ceramic floor hitting it with the front edge; the crystal lens was not compromised, at that moment it was fitted with a Haze filter which did not suffer any damage except for a minor scratch in the ring. Since then it is not performing.
When it is hooked to the camera it makes a mechanical noise even though the camera is OFF, and my EOS 400 D camera reports “Err99”. Something sounds loose in the inside.
Lens serial number is: 3400533D.
I sent it to:
Canon Factory Service Center
100 Jamesburg Road
Jamesburg, NJ
08831
They told me they do not service this product and suggested:
Chrysler Camera Repair - <http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=es&ie=UTF8&q=chrysler+camera+repair&near=N ueva+York,+NY,+USA&fb=1&li=lmd&t=m&latlng=40753016 ,-73995364,5010383753282310653&ei=yUcPSJCLEpLYigGb65 kQ&cd=1 (http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=es&ie=UTF8&q=chrysler+camera+repair&near=N ueva+York,+NY,+USA&fb=1&li=lmd&t=m&latlng=40753016 ,-73995364,5010383753282310653&ei=yUcPSJCLEpLYigGb65 kQ&cd=1)>más datos » 367 W 34th St # 2, New York, NY (212) 682-3547
No luck either, they also told me that can not take that lens.
Is there a place in the US where I can send it?
My e.mail is:
cardosogustavo@hotmail.com (cardosogustavo@hotmail.com)
or
antena1@etapanet.net (antena1@etapanet.net)
Phone number: (593)84980247
Thank you!
Did they tell you why they do not service this lens. Is this the older, non-USM model?
pixel_junkie
14th of July 2008 (Mon), 22:18
Gorgeous shots!!! I am envy of the hummer. Were these at the wild animal park aviary?
Close :) The zoo.
photobitz
15th of July 2008 (Tue), 03:14
Did they tell you why they do not service this lens. Is this the older, non-USM model?
That would be my guess.
If so, I think it's time to buy a new lens because there are no parts available for the old non-USM model any more. (Which is why they are turning you down)
Gustavo Cardoso
15th of July 2008 (Tue), 23:09
I think so.
gordoon
23rd of July 2008 (Wed), 11:30
super sharp, macro and beyond...
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3137/2693329288_fefd2748fb_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3089/2692514661_396c9a9082_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3077/2692514141_06367c02f0_o.jpg
blackwize
24th of July 2008 (Thu), 15:32
http:////farm4.static.flickr.com/3118/2697495495_fc52711765_o.jpg
benee
24th of July 2008 (Thu), 16:28
heres a personal fav
strobe monkey
26th of July 2008 (Sat), 20:20
Here's a new one taken in my back garden.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3131/2706303671_91a01851bc_o.jpg
strobe monkey
27th of July 2008 (Sun), 06:05
here's another set this morning:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3253/2706453368_23bbbf889c_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3233/2706453950_4f281cb1ae_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3027/2705635307_e54610c49b_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3268/2706453624_4395231e3c_o.jpg
and the ugly b@$%&rd! :lol:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3038/2706453094_1124079189_o.jpg
photobitz
27th of July 2008 (Sun), 07:54
Your burning the pixels out of my monitor with all those bright colours ;)
Amazing shots :D
strobe monkey
27th of July 2008 (Sun), 20:57
LOL @ photobitz
One more before I go to bed.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3003/2707922755_ee255edfee_o.jpg
rehype
27th of July 2008 (Sun), 21:20
This lens makes a great portrait lens. Its so sharp. I took some pics of my niece while she was eating.No pp
http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb254/Rehype/imanisharp2.jpg
http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb254/Rehype/imanisharp.jpg
Nordly
28th of July 2008 (Mon), 05:26
This page is a knockout so far! Love all the bees/wasps above!
And one from today in the side garden...
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3054/2709833006_6b169f58cd.jpg?v=0
Mil
28th of July 2008 (Mon), 05:37
One of my example with 5D.
More on my page.
http://www.pbase.com/milv/image/84697617.jpg
rehype
29th of July 2008 (Tue), 23:23
^^nice shot!
Heres one i got of a bumblebee feeding.
http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb254/Rehype/bumblebee.jpg
drama
1st of August 2008 (Fri), 14:04
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3005/2716916894_1def923d7e_b.jpg
BluewookieJim
1st of August 2008 (Fri), 16:15
I am constantly amazed at the closeness and the amount of detail some of you are able to get from this lens. I've had it for a couple months now, but when shooting insects I've never been able to get the focus that close.
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.