Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM

[P1X4R]

i shot this birdie before he took off!

http://i259.photobucket.com/albums/hh285/P1X4R_2008/TMP/IMG_2091.jpg

[macroshot]

That's what I'm taking about, P1X4R. Look at how detailed that is...good shot.

[macroshot]

A 100% crop from this morning of a (somewhat) cooperative dragonfly. About 5 ft away.

280161

And an Eastern Swallowtail butterfly just prior to to the above image. Again, no PP other than to crop and resize. About 10 ft away.

280162

[Mike55]

I took this "masterpiece" today. Love the IQ on this lens. No post processing whatsoever, wide open hand held ISO 800. Just a simple screen capture of the RAW image:

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y165/cubs5000/masterpiece.jpg

The bokeh on this lens is really nice.

[macroshot]

Couldn't agree more, Mike. You predicted that I'd like this lens, and it has not disappointed me. I just cannot believe how sharp it is and how it produces such gorgeous backgrounds. And the IS is phenomenal. Great for shooting handheld...

280343

[macroshot]

Another example of a previous post which was already cropped (about 200% crop of the original, no PP)

280350

[ninjaboy]

hired this lens this week here first couple of pics

[davidinjp]

Took my 300 F4 for a spin in a meadow...

http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s255/davidinjp/Buttercups.jpg

http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s255/davidinjp/Yewllowish.jpg

http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s255/davidinjp/Fence3.jpg

http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s255/davidinjp/Fence2.jpg

[Leeuwarden]

300 with Kenko 1.4

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3215/2597778587_882d585b19_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3037/2597797157_616ef35b2f_b.jpg

[Mike55]

amazing. What body and aperture?

[Leeuwarden]

The F-16:

1/1250s f/7.1 ISO320 420mm
Canon EOS 40D

And the NH-90:

1/400s f/5.6 ISO200 420mm
Canon EOS-1D Mark III

It was only after your question I realized that the NH-90 was shot with aperture completly open. Amazing! Sometimes I just don't get it. Using a teleconverter wide open is not the way to go. I guess this proves it can be done wit good result.

The 40D is my wifes camera. I wanted to try it because it gives me a bit more reach. It worked out fine. Very light to hold compared to the mkIII.

[inthedeck]

One from me, in macro mode. A larger version can be found by clicking here. (http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=523574)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3085/2596116951_08f06fdbb5.jpg

[Overkill]

300 with Kenko 1.4

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3215/2597778587_882d585b19_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3037/2597797157_616ef35b2f_b.jpg


Nice shots!! Ive been to Leeuwarden on Friday and used a 100-400 IS on a 40D! Can i view more shots of the airshow (link)?

This is the link to my photo's.

http://www.kiek.info/kiek/beta/public/folderview.aspx?l1=312

[Leeuwarden]

I do not have a website of my own. I usually publish my pics at forums such as www.milspotters.nl (only in Dutch) and www.scramble.nl (English and Dutch).

(Going to have a look at your pics now. There's a lot of them! :-) )

[Overkill]

I do not have a website of my own. I usually publish my pics at forums such as www.milspotters.nl (http://www.milspotters.nl) (only in Dutch) and www.scramble.nl (http://www.scramble.nl) (English and Dutch).

(Going to have a look at your pics now. There's a lot of them! :-) )


Ive looked at Milspotters.nl (leuke site)! Ive made 2785 pictures last friday!
(its for sure that i will go again next year.,... lots of fun)!;)

[G35Driver]

http://luis452.zenfolio.com/img/v0/p1046743264.jpg

[jacobsen1]

start of the Bermuda race Friday:
http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/newport-bermuda-2008/img_1154.jpg

http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/newport-bermuda-2008/img_1162.jpg

http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/newport-bermuda-2008/img_1183.jpg

http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/newport-bermuda-2008/img_1202.jpg

http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/newport-bermuda-2008/img_1205.jpg

http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/newport-bermuda-2008/img_1296.jpg

http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/newport-bermuda-2008/img_1325.jpg

http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/newport-bermuda-2008/img_1368.jpg

[macroshot]

Keeping the love alive... the 300 f/4L IS and 5D - what a pair...still waiting for all my butterflies and hummingbirds, but I do have some plants blooming and more ready to pop, with an abundance of dragonflies.

283530

283531

[Mike55]

start of the Bermuda race Friday:




Nice.

[frici]

from 2007

[DonG]

Keeping the love alive... the 300 f/4L IS and 5D - what a pair...still waiting for all my butterflies and hummingbirds, but I do have some plants blooming and more ready to pop, with an abundance of dragonflies.

283530

283531
Very nice.

[G35Driver]

Heres a couple of shots I took yesterday at the Honolulu zoo.

http://luis452.zenfolio.com/img/v2/p393202348-4.jpg

http://luis452.zenfolio.com/img/v2/p87006482-4.jpg

http://luis452.zenfolio.com/img/v2/p192297920-4.jpg

http://luis452.zenfolio.com/img/v2/p236882710-4.jpg

http://luis452.zenfolio.com/img/v2/p26123420-4.jpg

http://luis452.zenfolio.com/img/v2/p44099239-4.jpg

[macroshot]

G35D: that shot of the alligator-looking creature? What is it? Very nice shots.

[macroshot]

Very nice.

Thanks Don. There are some really snappy shots in here lately!!

[Mike55]

from 2007

Like em both. Great isolation on the ground squirrel.

[G35Driver]

G35D: that shot of the alligator-looking creature? What is it? Very nice shots.it is called a Gharial

[Leeuwarden]

MkIII + 300 IS USM f/4 + Kenko 1.4 300 DG: I could never have captured this shot with my Nikon D200. Glad I switched!

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3098/2625178079_276528d13c_b.jpg

[silverwolf]

MkIII + 300 IS USM f/4 + Kenko 1.4 300 DG: I could never have captured this shot with my Nikon D200. Glad I switched!

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3098/2625178079_276528d13c_b.jpg
Dang nice camera beautiful colors.Sean .L

[Leeuwarden]

Thanks Sean :D

[Mike55]

A few hours ago 40D with Kenko 1.4x DG 300 Pro at 50% crop:

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y165/cubs5000/robincrop.jpg

[luisv]

Here's one of mine... taken with the 40D:

http://www.vazweb.com/images/zoom/WUCPAB/IMG_3184.jpg

[Overkill]

A few hours ago 40D with Kenko 1.4x DG 300 Pro at 50% crop:

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y165/cubs5000/robincrop.jpg

Nice Shot

[picken]

lens arrived this morning, 15 minutes later this bird arrives in garden, no time to have a practice, fumble fumble then fired a couple of shots.
iso 200,1/750 at f4

Allan

[macroshot]

lens arrived this morning, 15 minutes later this bird arrives in garden, no time to have a practice, fumble fumble then fired a couple of shots.
iso 200,1/750 at f4

Allan

Congratulations - hope you enjoy this lens as much as I do!

[macroshot]

This is my favorite lens. I want a 135 f/2L to go with it, but until then, I really like this lens more than my 100 macro or 24-105. I am consistently impressed with what I shoot when this is mounted on my 5D.

287179

287180

[macroshot]

Seems to me this thread needs a new post or two. How about a couple from yesterday out in the garden. One of the reasons I bought a 300mm f/4L IS was to capture shots of butterflies like these Monarchs. I find that I tend to shoot this lens wide open for pretty much all garden related images and really enjoy the end result. Thanks for looking and enjoy!

By the way, this is a certified Monarch Waystation. You can creat the same type of environment for yourself - details here: http://www.monarchwatch.org/waystations/

290479

290480

[inthedeck]

The first one is nice, macroshot. Lovin' it.

[macroshot]

The first one is nice, macroshot. Lovin' it.

Thanks Manish - appreciate the comment. Still no cooperative hummingbirds though. They're starting to hang out, but really skittish and will not tolerate any movement. So I'll take what I can get for now.

[inthedeck]

Same here. The ones I was shooting have fled, and the newbs aren't so forgiving, or comfortable. :(

Here's my latest...click here. (http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=540448)

[macroshot]

ahhhhhh, an 85L. Very nice toy. Very expensive toy. I was lucky to snag a 135 f/2L last week. I like that one a lot as well - the 300 & 135 shoot a lot alike. Having the 1.4x adds a little diversity into the mix as well. My wife is expecting to see one less lens around the house soon. I thought it would be the 24-105, but now it may be the 100mm macro that goes.

And little Pumpkin seems to have an attitude...

[inthedeck]

85 is a wife approved lens. All the others, except the 70-200 f4L will stay. I've got an interest in the 70-200 f4L...but, for now, it's not on the market, till I decide otherwise.

300 though, she won't let me touch...haha.

How you liking the 135? I was going to get that, but, it wasn't available from many places, a few days before the rebate ended. I would have loved to get one of those, with the 5D. Alas, no more toys...time to start saving up for kids...which aren't too far off. It's OK, for now, I've got everything covered. It has taken me 9 years to save, and build up what I have. Never paid for anything via credit, except half of the 85. Time to add it to the insurance policy.

I'm going to start archiving my own pics based on lens, to make life easier. Gets really complicated, after processing this, and that.

[macroshot]

I love that - "Wife Approved Lens." Classic. But then, she has her own 5D and that says it all. Of course just convincing my wife how significant a 5D was to me took Herculean effort, but here it sits.

The 135 f/2L is everything people say it is. Very sharp. And what I like is the 3 ft MFD and compatibility w/ the 1.4x (189mm and pretty decent there too). Bought it on the forum (timnosenzo). I think it's a great lens for the money.

Still, the 300 is just an awesome (and fun) lens to shoot with. I wouldn't even know what to do with the 300 f/2.8L...

Wife Approved Lens. hahaha.

[inthedeck]

Yeah...saved up for 3 years to get her that.

Here's a couple more pics...with the 300.

#1
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3286/2691753598_a6675153dd_o.jpg

#2
Never 'released,' until this post...hehe.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3227/2690943791_922810ea7a_o.jpg

[brianch]

question for you guys.. how often do you find the IS useful? I am debating between this and the 400mm (like many others) i am favoring this one for its IS and its not as big as the 400mm... Do any of you guys have shots of this lens attached to a body? Struggling to find a picture.

[inthedeck]

Not a shot of the lens on a body, but, I have both, and each have their own use. Either can get sharp pictures. Just depends on how close you want to get.

As for a comparo, here's one...400 and the 300 with 1.4x TC, side by side. The bird in my previous post was with the 300 + TC (DOF is SHALLOW at 420 mm). You can look for other's images with the 400 in the birding forum. Tons of em out there, it's so good.

http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j124/inthedeck/IMG_0851_web.jpg

[Mike55]

question for you guys.. how often do you find the IS useful? I am debating between this and the 400mm (like many others) i am favoring this one for its IS and its not as big as the 400mm... Do any of you guys have shots of this lens attached to a body? Struggling to find a picture.

I find IS incredibly useful. If all I shot was BIF, I'd probably have the 400 due to high shutter speeds when pointed at the sky. Even the IS on the 300 makes it tricky to shoot with a monopod in lowlight. I couldn't imagine working the 400 in all but the best of light.

[brianch]

Not a shot of the lens on a body, but, I have both, and each have their own use. Either can get sharp pictures. Just depends on how close you want to get.

As for a comparo, here's one...400 and the 300 with 1.4x TC, side by side. The bird in my previous post was with the 300 + TC (DOF is SHALLOW at 420 mm). You can look for other's images with the 400 in the birding forum. Tons of em out there, it's so good.



thanks for the picture. i am still stuck between the two.. is 400mm unpractical for normal use? i am thinking about getting it for an african safari trip that i might be going on next year... but i also would like to use it for daily use. i do not want to use a TC.. maybe a cropped body if i needed greater reach.

[inthedeck]

brianch...some people that have been on African Safaris have like the versatility of the 100-400, others prefer the 400, others the 300 f/2.8, etc.

Since you have a year, why not rent both, or all 3 (400 5.6, 300f4L is, and 100-400). Hell, you want a one lens solution, go with a 28-300 f3.5/5.6 L IS. Done.

[macroshot]

question for you guys.. how often do you find the IS useful? I am debating between this and the 400mm (like many others) i am favoring this one for its IS and its not as big as the 400mm... Do any of you guys have shots of this lens attached to a body? Struggling to find a picture.

I very much enjoy the IS on this lens - as mentioned in other posts, it is an "older" generation of Image Stabilization, but IMHO feel it works extremely well and performs flawlessly - no complaints whatsoever.

Before buying this lens, I started with the 100-400 & 400. Quickly eliminated the 100-400 because the images didn't have consistent sharpness to them. The 400 was the finalist until I found this thread and realized how perfect it fit what I wanted: IS, 4.9 MFD (vs 11.5 of the 400!!!), and f/4. Adding the 1.4x gave me 420mm if I wanted it (at f/5.6 of course) but I really went for the beautiful backgrounds that I was seeing here. I have NOT been disappointed in any way since buying this lens. And that IS can be a lifesaver in lower light and you can't have that on the 400.

Here are a couple of photos that I shot tonight so you could see it on a body:

290801

290802


It is very comfortable to hold and relatively lightweight. I keep an extra QR plate on it at all times; I found it easier to work with on a tripod that way. I do leave the IS on all the time, especially if I am going to swivel using the tripod and ballhead and I have played with Mode #2 for panning (it worked surprisingly well!!) Haven't really used it w/o IS now that I think about it...FYI - the built-in hood is retracted here.

Hope this helps.

[Overkill]

I very much enjoy the IS on this lens - as mentioned in other posts, it is an "older" generation of Image Stabilization, but IMHO feel it works extremely well and performs flawlessly - no complaints whatsoever.

Before buying this lens, I started with the 100-400 & 400. Quickly eliminated the 100-400 because the images didn't have consistent sharpness to them. The 400 was the finalist until I found this thread and realized how perfect it fit what I wanted: IS, 4.9 MFD (vs 11.5 of the 400!!!), and f/4. Adding the 1.4x gave me 420mm if I wanted it (at f/5.6 of course) but I really went for the beautiful backgrounds that I was seeing here. I have NOT been disappointed in any way since buying this lens. And that IS can be a lifesaver in lower light and you can't have that on the 400.

Here are a couple of photos that I shot tonight so you could see it on a body:

290801

290802


It is very comfortable to hold and relatively lightweight. I keep an extra QR plate on it at all times; I found it easier to work with on a tripod that way. I do leave the IS on all the time, especially if I am going to swivel using the tripod and ballhead and I have played with Mode #2 for panning (it worked surprisingly well!!) Haven't really used it w/o IS now that I think about it...FYI - the built-in hood is retracted here.

Hope this helps.


Can you put on the TC 1.4 in a few seconds to get that special shot???;)
Thats why i stick to the 100-400....

[brianch]

brianch...some people that have been on African Safaris have like the versatility of the 100-400, others prefer the 400, others the 300 f/2.8, etc.

Since you have a year, why not rent both, or all 3 (400 5.6, 300f4L is, and 100-400). Hell, you want a one lens solution, go with a 28-300 f3.5/5.6 L IS. Done.

I very much enjoy the IS on this lens - as mentioned in other posts, it is an "older" generation of Image Stabilization, but IMHO feel it works extremely well and performs flawlessly - no complaints whatsoever.

Before buying this lens, I started with the 100-400 & 400. Quickly eliminated the 100-400 because the images didn't have consistent sharpness to them. The 400 was the finalist until I found this thread and realized how perfect it fit what I wanted: IS, 4.9 MFD (vs 11.5 of the 400!!!), and f/4. Adding the 1.4x gave me 420mm if I wanted it (at f/5.6 of course) but I really went for the beautiful backgrounds that I was seeing here. I have NOT been disappointed in any way since buying this lens. And that IS can be a lifesaver in lower light and you can't have that on the 400.

Here are a couple of photos that I shot tonight so you could see it on a body:

290801

290802


It is very comfortable to hold and relatively lightweight. I keep an extra QR plate on it at all times; I found it easier to work with on a tripod that way. I do leave the IS on all the time, especially if I am going to swivel using the tripod and ballhead and I have played with Mode #2 for panning (it worked surprisingly well!!) Haven't really used it w/o IS now that I think about it...FYI - the built-in hood is retracted here.

Hope this helps.

thanks for both of you for your comments and pics many people suggest that i go with the 100-400 but i have 2 family members who have this in their kit and i have borrowed it one time to shoot wildlife. I do not like the lens as much as the new 150-500 from Sigma. It might be the pump design, but I have older sigmas on my film SLRs that don't bother me. The images from both are pretty much similar, the 100-400L obviously has the advantage in slightly better sharpness and contrast. I am gonna get the 150-500 soon for myself. I also wanted to get a prime telephoto but i am extremely stuck between the 400mm f/5.6 and the 300mm f/4 IS... My uncle has a 300mm f/4 and he enjoys using it but sometimes wishes it was a bit longer. I have the 70-200 IS so that is why I am leaning towards the 400mm. On a cropped body the 70-200 has 320mm of fantastic telephoto reach. The only issue with having a 400mm lens is that you are only going to use it for special occasions. You wouldnt bring in "just in case" for events or weddings... So it won't get much use. I think I will be happy with either. But after a few days of pondering I am most likely going to get the 400mm.. and if nature calls the 300mm in the future.

[inthedeck]

The 400 is a great lens. Do I use it everyday, no. Does it do great when I do, yes. Same for the 300 F4L IS...though, it's macro feature is very nice. Sometimes, the IS is annoying, especially if you use the bump/lock technique...for BIF type photography...but overall, they are both sharp.

Here's two pics comparing them...not the greatest, but, shows the 'difference' per se.

#1 300
http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j124/inthedeck/IMG_1029_web.jpg

#2 400
http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j124/inthedeck/IMG_1025_web.jpg

[brianch]

in general outdoor conditions/sunlight what shutter speed do you find yourself at with max aperture of f/5.6 and ISO 100? is that shutter speed fast enough to eliminate general hand shake? if the 400mm f/5.6 had IS i'd buy it right now. (cough cough hear that canon? haha) edit: i wonder which lens is longer.. 150-500 or 400mm.. the 150-500 BARELY fits in my camera bag... -__-

[inthedeck]

I just tend to use the 1/FL (FF) or 1/FL x 1.6 (Crop) rule. That usually eliminates most of it...and sometimes, 1/600 or 800 is on the money. All depends on how close one can get.

[mleone]

I want to play here too.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3076/2637483426_6a5d624b39_b.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2324/2519181167_2cdf98ce8f_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3271/2591036336_ccda0b7aa5_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3079/2590195437_1b1e3ac4c6_b.jpg

[brianch]

I want to play here too.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3079/2590195437_1b1e3ac4c6_b.jpg

looks like a chinese lion laughing (im chinese btw, so i'm not trying to be racists lol)

[mleone]

looks like a chinese lion laughing (im chinese btw, so i'm not trying to be racists lol)

HAHAHAH!

[inthedeck]

brianch...not sure what else to tell ya. I'm just glad I own both. They have their own uses...and with the 1.4TC the 300 maintains AF. The 400 with the TC goes to F8, so, nothing but a 1 series cam, or taped pins, will allow AF.

Here's one, with the 400...at 5.6, @ 1/2500th, ISO 400. Click here. (http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3286/2691753598_a6675153dd_o.jpg)

And to keep in line with the 300 F4L IS...here's one at f9, 1/400th, ISO 400, with 580 EX.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3037/2628913641_f31fe59465_o.jpg

[brianch]

brianch...not sure what else to tell ya. I'm just glad I own both. They have their own uses...and with the 1.4TC the 300 maintains AF. The 400 with the TC goes to F8, so, nothing but a 1 series cam, or taped pins, will allow AF.

Here's one, with the 400...at 5.6, @ 1/2500th. Click here. (http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3286/2691753598_a6675153dd_o.jpg)

i'm sure i will be happy with either.. i have the 150-500 sigma if i am missing out on any telephoto range. i am using the 400mm on a full frame. so if i wanted to multiply the factor i would mount it on my 400D. i don't really like to use TCs

[atx880]

I'm planing to buy this lens and really wonder how it handles 2x tcons, especially wideopen..
Can u please post some examples with %100 crops?

[inthedeck]

No 2x here. Though, some say image quality may/may not suffer, with a 2x. The 300 f2.8IS works well, with the 2x.

[macroshot]

Can you put on the TC 1.4 in a few seconds to get that special shot???;)
Thats why i stick to the 100-400....

Infiltrator!!! ;)

No, well YEAH, I bet I could put the 1.4x on in a few seconds, but doing that regardless would be rather unlikely. If I am out specifically for the longer reach, it is already on and more than likely mounted on a tripod to boot. If I am shooting closer, it is the 300 only because I like the images better and I am probably shooting hand-held. I am not a fan of the 1.4x, AT ALL. I use it sparingly and only with plenty of light. But I never said the 100-400 sucked or anything, just that I wasn't seeing consistent posts in the various forums (100-400 archive, birding, etc.) and that had a significant impact on my decision to buy the 300.

Personally, I think the 300mm f/4L is the nicest lens that I own and my favorite to shoot with (includes 100mm f/2.8 macro, 135 f/2L, 24-105 f/4L).

[Overkill]

Infiltrator!!! ;)

No, well YEAH, I bet I could put the 1.4x on in a few seconds, but doing that regardless would be rather unlikely. If I am out specifically for the longer reach, it is already on and more than likely mounted on a tripod to boot. If I am shooting closer, it is the 300 only because I like the images better and I am probably shooting hand-held. I am not a fan of the 1.4x, AT ALL. I use it sparingly and only with plenty of light. But I never said the 100-400 sucked or anything, just that I wasn't seeing consistent posts in the various forums (100-400 archive, birding, etc.) and that had a significant impact on my decision to buy the 300.

Personally, I think the 300mm f/4L is the nicest lens that I own and my favorite to shoot with (includes 100mm f/2.8 macro, 135 f/2L, 24-105 f/4L).

I owned the F4 Non IS version and yes..... it was sharper and more consistent than the 100-400!!;)

[Lester Wareham]

It does seem there is some variability on the IQ of the 100-400 going by anecdotal reports, although these are I think suspect in general. What is true is Canon's MTF charts for the 100-400 at 400 are fairly close to the (http://www.zen20934.zen.co.uk/photography/MTF_Files/WR_Zoom_400mm/index.htm)300/4 IS + 1.4X, the 100-400 is perhaps a bit worse in the corner of full frame and better in the centre of the frame.

Of course Canon's MTF data is theoretical (we don't if it is ideal or some sort typical from a Monte Carlo analysis). One could argue that zooms have more elements to cause larger variations, there does seem (http://www.zen20934.zen.co.uk/photography/MTF_Files/Photodo_Canon_CV.htm) to be some element of truth in this.

All arguments about relatively small variations in sharpness aside, I think the most important thing is to get the lens that suites your needs.

If you need good closeup capability in a long lens but without an unmanageable focal length plus some birding/wildlife capability the 300/4 IS is probably the best choice.

If you need maximum flexibility then the 100-400 is the way to go (see my last comment).

If you need reach for birding then the 400/5.6 is probably optimum.

There is no one size fits all with lenses. For me the 300/4 IS fits my needs best. I use it very successfully with the 1.4X and often with the 2X even with manual focus. Of course a lens of the same combined focal length without a TC is likely to be much sharper.

However, if needs change then so does the strategy. If I were to go on a African Safari shoot I would get a 100-400 without hesitation. You can't be changing lenses/TCs in the back of an off-road-vehicle or with that dusty environment. (The 100-400 is not dust resistant but it has to be better than changing lenses). Would I sell by 300/4 IS? No way, the cost of a 100-400 I would just see as an additional overhead to the holiday.

[booby]

Hi,

I got my new 300mm f4 L IS lens two weeks ago. Except the bokeh it is a perfect lens.
I made a few sample photos, because I think that the bokeh is sometimes terrible. At closer distances it nicely blurres the background but at longer distances the out-of-focus areas look quite bad. I took a few samples without IS at F4. The first two are about 50% crop, the third is full sized, uncut, just scaled.
What do you think? Is this normal?
Here they are:
http://web.t-online.hu/csaptelep/50_crop.jpg

http://web.t-online.hu/csaptelep/50_crop_3.jpg

http://web.t-online.hu/csaptelep/_MG_2087.JPG

[inthedeck]

More from the 300 f4l is..set on a tripod with the 5D.

http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j124/inthedeck/5e43e25b.jpg

[folville]

Hi,

I got my new 300mm f4 L IS lens two weeks ago. Except the bokeh it is a perfect lens.
I made a few sample photos, because I think that the bokeh is sometimes terrible. At closer distances it nicely blurres the background but at longer distances the out-of-focus areas look quite bad. I took a few samples without IS at F4. The first two are about 50% crop, the third is full sized, uncut, just scaled.
What do you think? Is this normal?
Here they are:
[images]


Do you have a (cheap?) UV or protection filter on the lens? Filters of substandard quality have been known to reduce image quality and cause back bokeh.

[macroshot]

w/ 12mm extension tube - shot about 15 minutes ago. First time I've put the tubes on the 300 - I'm a happy camper!!

291815

[inthedeck]

Explain how tubes work. Let's say the MFD for macro shots is 4.9ft (which I believe is correct), and you add either a Canon (for example) 12mm or 25mm tube. What does that allow to happen? I'm a visual person, so, pictures (should someone happen to have them, would be a bonus.

Nice butterfly.

[macroshot]

My understanding is that the extension tube forces the lens to focus at a closer focal length (so 4.9 ft MFD is quite a bit less, but I cannot tell you what the distance is).

I bought a set of Kenko tubes that are 12mm/20mm/36mm for the Canon EF/EF-s lenses from Adorama. I was using them on the 100mm macro but wasn't particularly impressed with the results (the Macro people can explain all of this quite a bit better than I can, I assure you!)

Thought I would try these on the 300 & 135 f/2 today since there is quite a lot going on in the garden - here are a couple more photos, this time a hawk moth who has been quite cooperative. Shot with the 300 + 12mm extension tube again, from approximately 3 ft? Nevertheless, the tubes allow for a much closer focus and a magnification factor - but if you attempt to shoot at infinity, you will find that you cannot achieve focus past a certain point.

291830

291831

[Lester Wareham]

Hi,

I got my new 300mm f4 L IS lens two weeks ago. Except the bokeh it is a perfect lens.
I made a few sample photos, because I think that the bokeh is sometimes terrible. At closer distances it nicely blurres the background but at longer distances the out-of-focus areas look quite bad. I took a few samples without IS at F4. The first two are about 50% crop, the third is full sized, uncut, just scaled.
What do you think? Is this normal?
Here they are:
http://web.t-online.hu/csaptelep/50_crop.jpg

http://web.t-online.hu/csaptelep/50_crop_3.jpg

http://web.t-online.hu/csaptelep/_MG_2087.JPG

Your not shooting through window glass, or possibly a cheap filter with non-optical glass by any chance, that can cause some odd bokeh effects with this lens.

[inthedeck]

My understanding is that the extension tube forces the lens to focus at a closer focal length (so 4.9 ft MFD is quite a bit less, but I cannot tell you what the distance is).

I bought a set of Kenko tubes that are 12mm/20mm/36mm for the Canon EF/EF-s lenses from Adorama. I was using them on the 100mm macro but wasn't particularly impressed with the results (the Macro people can explain all of this quite a bit better than I can, I assure you!)

So, if you were within three feet or so of the moth, at what point would focus become an issue? I mean, you could still stop down to f/16 or slower, and achieve focus, correct? I know you'd probably need tons of light...but, that's a whole other conversation.

[Lester Wareham]

Originally Posted by macroshot
My understanding is that the extension tube forces the lens to focus at a closer focal length (so 4.9 ft MFD is quite a bit less, but I cannot tell you what the distance is).

I bought a set of Kenko tubes that are 12mm/20mm/36mm for the Canon EF/EF-s lenses from Adorama. I was using them on the 100mm macro but wasn't particularly impressed with the results (the Macro people can explain all of this quite a bit better than I can, I assure you!)


macroshot suggested I add some additional explanation:

The above explanation is correct. In the old days (20 years ago) this is exactly how almost all lenses focused, a helical screw mechanism moves the lens futher away from the image plan forcing it to focus closer. Some lenses still work this way, other use internal focus etc where the lens formula is changes to effect closer focus.

An easy way to estimate the magnification you can get with extension tubes is give by the simple formula:

M=E/F, where E is the tube length and F is the focal length.

Note that magnification is defined as the size of the image divided by the size of the object. So for a magnification of 1/3, the image of a 66mm long object will be 22mm long, so filling the 22mm sensor of a 1.6X crop camera.

For this 1/3, or 0.33X magnification; with a 100mm lens you would need to add a 33mm tube, and with a 300mm lens a 100mm of tubes. So you see it gets harder to get more magnification the longer the focal length of the lens.

This is with the lens focused at infinity. Using the focus ring on the lens you will be able to get to focus closer still depending on the lens MFD/max magnification.

Canon publish tables of magnification and minimum focus distance that comes with their own tubes.

You will find measured and estimated information on this on my macro page http://www.zen20934.zen.co.uk/photography/Macro_Equipment.htm

Bob Atkins reproduces a most of the current Canon tube tables here http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/eosfaq/closeup.htm, but the only cover a single tube (which is all Canon officially recommend).

So, if you were within three feet or so of the moth, at what point would focus become an issue? I mean, you could still stop down to f/16 or slower, and achieve focus, correct? I know you'd probably need tons of light...but, that's a whole other conversation.

I would not stop down as much as f16, specially with a crop camera because of diffraction softening. Try f11 as a maximum. When I use the 300mm with tubes and ambient light I tend to work between f5.6-f8, only f11 if there is a lot of light.

Finally, I have to say I had some near disasters with Kenko tubes http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=186161 and now only use Canon tubes. Although I know others find there are no problems. My advice is to check there is no rotation movement in the mounted lens/tube/body assembly and beware if there is.

[macroshot]

Thank you, Lester! I was somewhat shocked to read your thread regarding the Kenko tubes, however. Then I noticed it was from 2006 and started wondering if they hadn't improved the set considerably. I was switching between the 300 & 135 yesterday and observed no play whatsoever.

So, after reading, I started giving the 135 a good twist back & forth to see if the 12mm that is currently mounted on the camera would have any play. I am very happy to report that the spring is quite firmly locked and there is next to no play on the mounting points between the 5D, 12mm tube, and 135 f/2L.

Also, I just mounted the 300 f/4L to see if I could get some play and it appears that lens/tube combo also are firmly locked. You had me freaking out there a bit.

I suppose if this was an issue for many users, Kenko must have improved the product. I do have the set where it has both white (EF-s) and red (EF) mounting points - not sure if that makes any difference as it relates to manufacture dates. I will now be more observant to see if the spings lock as they should and/or if they wear over time. Thanks again for the explanation on the extension tubes as well as the heads-up on the mounting issues.

Hank

[jacobsen1]

found this dude while picking up the land mines in the backyard before mowing:

#1
http://www.benjacobsen.com/wp-content/gallery/toad/img_8210.jpg

#2
http://www.benjacobsen.com/wp-content/gallery/toad/img_8214.jpg

#3
http://www.benjacobsen.com/wp-content/gallery/toad/img_8215.jpg

#4
http://www.benjacobsen.com/wp-content/gallery/toad/img_8225.jpg

#5
http://www.benjacobsen.com/wp-content/gallery/toad/img_8227.jpg

#6
http://www.benjacobsen.com/wp-content/gallery/toad/img_8232.jpg

#7
http://www.benjacobsen.com/wp-content/gallery/toad/img_8233.jpg

#8
http://www.benjacobsen.com/wp-content/gallery/toad/img_8241.jpg

[twoshadows]

Here's some from the 300 f/4 IS. I love shooting Hummingbirds. These are NOT CROPPED, just resized for the web.

http://www.pbase.com/iangreyphotography/image/97402331/original.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/iangreyphotography/image/97434811/original.jpg

[inthedeck]

Nice hummers. Gotta love em.

[twoshadows]

More 300 f/4 IS - I love using this for concerts and plays.

http://www.pbase.com/iangreyphotography/image/99676016/original.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/iangreyphotography/image/99676017/original.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/iangreyphotography/image/91819896/original.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/iangreyphotography/image/91819913/original.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/iangreyphotography/image/96247510/original.jpg

[booby]

Your not shooting through window glass, or possibly a cheap filter with non-optical glass by any chance, that can cause some odd bokeh effects with this lens.

You were right, the odd striped bokeh is gone now as i removed the hoya uv filter.
I thought hoya would be fine, and it wasnt a cheap one.
What kind of uv filter do you usually use for L lenses? I would use something to protect the front glass of the lens.

[inthedeck]

Just use the filter that you have, and when you shoot with the lens, take it off. That's what I do.

[macroshot]

All I can say is "WOW," very sharp and that includes using the 1.4x in the last few shots. I am impressed.

found this dude while picking up the land mines in the backyard before mowing:

#1
http://www.benjacobsen.com/wp-content/gallery/toad/img_8210.jpg

#2
http://www.benjacobsen.com/wp-content/gallery/toad/img_8214.jpg

#3
http://www.benjacobsen.com/wp-content/gallery/toad/img_8215.jpg

#4
http://www.benjacobsen.com/wp-content/gallery/toad/img_8225.jpg

#5
http://www.benjacobsen.com/wp-content/gallery/toad/img_8227.jpg

#6
http://www.benjacobsen.com/wp-content/gallery/toad/img_8232.jpg

#7
http://www.benjacobsen.com/wp-content/gallery/toad/img_8233.jpg

#8
http://www.benjacobsen.com/wp-content/gallery/toad/img_8241.jpg

[macroshot]

Twoshadows - more incredible photos! Excellent indoor and outdoor shots. It seems that I will not get any hummer shots this year. I have them in the garden and they will not hang out. So I get hawk moths - they're close enough, I suppose. At least they act like hummingbirds!

[twoshadows]

Nice hummers. Gotta love em.

Thanks, inthedeck :) .

Twoshadows - more incredible photos! Excellent indoor and outdoor shots. It seems that I will not get any hummer shots this year. I have them in the garden and they will not hang out. So I get hawk moths - they're close enough, I suppose. At least they act like hummingbirds!

Macroshot,

Thanks for the good words. :) I love the 300mm f/4 IS for stage work. Sorry to hear you're not getting any hummingbird photos :( , but I think the Hawk moths are REALLY awesome.

[el jeffe]

292349

292350

no pp other than crop/re-size.
This lens will change my life!
Picked it up used in mint condition from a good local shop.

[Overkill]

Its an amazing lens.... i owned the Non is... superb lens.... the lack of reach and NON is made me sell it! I am still considering trading in the 100-400 IS USM for the 300 F4 IS!
(1.4 + 2.0 Tcons are already present)!

[Mike55]

with Canon 1.4x II @ f5.6. Processed in LR2 which I am enjoying quite a bit thx to the new RAW conversion

http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/4310/robinlr2zn1.jpg

[Mike55]

I got a kick out of this dog earlier today. It's tongue matches it's leash and collar. Testing out the lens as it had just come back from Canon. Wide open in AI servo.

http://img139.imageshack.us/img139/1820/fatdoggyuj7.jpg

[Sfordphoto]

those toad pics were toadally good :D

[jacobsen1]

ICEE what u did there. :lol:

[352McCoy]

Has anyone enjoyed using the 300 f/4.0 for action sports? I am interested in soccer, track & field and football. Thanks!

[twoshadows]

Here's some soccer, all with the TC.

http://www.pbase.com/iangreyphotography/image/84815234/original.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/iangreyphotography/image/87817903/original.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/iangreyphotography/image/85126275/original.jpg

[Sfordphoto]

which one has faster AF, 300mm f/4 or 400mm f/5.6?

[NZDoug]

Question,
What meter setting do you mostly use with the 300F4 IS?
I think my preference has been centre weighted.....

[Lester Wareham]

which one has faster AF, 300mm f/4 or 400mm f/5.6?

You need someone who has both.

I would guess they are both similar as long as the focus range limiter settings have a similar range.

The 300/4 MFD is much better than the 400/5.6 (max magnification 0.24X compared to only 0.12X for the 400/5.6).

A bit like a macro lens the 300/4 will be a little slower if you leave it on the full focus range, but one should compare eggs with eggs.

I am always wary of AF speed comparisons because there is no easy objective test, so any info is subjective; ie opinion.

[Sfordphoto]

You need someone who has both.

I would guess they are both similar as long as the focus range limiter settings have a similar range.

The 300/4 MFD is much better than the 400/5.6 (max magnification 0.24X compared to only 0.12X for the 400/5.6).

A bit like a macro lens the 300/4 will be a little slower if you leave it on the full focus range, but one should compare eggs with eggs.

I am always wary of AF speed comparisons because there is no easy objective test, so any info is subjective; ie opinion.

thanks!

[ninjaboy]

here a couple from when i hired this lens

[peber]

Taken in the zoo, no danger for the photog! :)

http://www.stortsett.se/potn/tiger-142.jpg

/Per

[G35Driver]

http://luis452.zenfolio.com/img/v1/p523420414-4.jpg

[nicksan]

300L + 1.4x TC
http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v1/p481394379-5.jpg

300L
http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v1/p16478946-5.jpg

300L + 1.4x TC
http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v1/p285997102-4.jpg

300L
http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v1/p285149869-4.jpg

[mizouse]

man i am trying to refrain from getting this lens because i know that i will want the 2.8 version, but those pictures are nice.

[EWR72]

Some great examples of what this lens can produce (along with the photographers of course!). I think that this will be my next lens purchase although it may take some time. I enjoy using the 200mm 2.8 Prime but I think by having the extra reach and IS I will be able to get a few more sports action shots ehich is something I plan to try out more. Now that the 50D has been released I will be getting that first then hopefully the 300mm F4 IS. Keep the samples coming:)

[timrocks311]

great pictures by everyone! this is my new favorite lens after reading this thread. i've always been interested in the 100-400L, but i now believe that this 300L w/ TCs is way better and quite versatile.

[nicksan]

Here'a a few more from the same series...

300L
http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v2/p403246945-4.jpg

300L
http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v2/p287971051-4.jpg

300L + 1.4x TC
http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v1/p384237261-5.jpg

300L + 1.4x TC
http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v1/p282941934-5.jpg

[nicksan]

Some Misc shots around the house testing the lens out...

http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v1/p411737944-4.jpg

http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v1/p558159388-4.jpg

300L + 2x TC
http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v1/p877188908-4.jpg

[pdccameras]

Here are a few more! I love the 300mm f/4 for football, marching band, even nature when I can get close enough (5 ft/mm or 15ft with the 300mm). These pics show the potential for static images. The next post shows the ability of the lens for sports.

[pdccameras]

Here are a couple of football pics (American football) taken with the 300 f/4. I may have used the 1.4X Mark II, I can't recall. It doesn't seem to show up in the exif.

[p360]

Man, I want this lens..!!

If my wifey gets mad, I am going to blame all of you. :D

[p360]

One question:

How's this lens for stage photography, under low light situations?? Any samples?

TIA.

[twoshadows]

sure :) .

1/200s f/4.0 at 300.0mm iso1600
http://www.pbase.com/iangreyphotography/image/96247510/original.jpg

1/160s f/4.0 at 300.0mm iso1600
http://www.pbase.com/iangreyphotography/image/96247512/original.jpg

1/200s f/4.0 at 300.0mm iso1600
http://www.pbase.com/iangreyphotography/image/96262405/original.jpg

1/320s f/4.0 at 300.0mm iso800
http://www.pbase.com/iangreyphotography/image/99676016/original.jpg

1/80s f/4.0 at 300.0mm iso1250
http://www.pbase.com/iangreyphotography/image/102641471/original.jpg

1/100s f/4.0 at 300.0mm iso1250
http://www.pbase.com/iangreyphotography/image/102641472/original.jpg

[p360]

Thanks, twoshadows.

I imagine it'd be difficult to stop stage action with it. For instance, dances. let's say.

[nicksan]

It probably depends on the lighting conditions and the kinds of shutter speeds you get, but generally f4 would probably be too slow to stop fast action unless you time things correctly.


Thanks, twoshadows.

I imagine it'd be difficult to stop stage action with it. For instance, dances. let's say.

[jacobsen1]

Got up early this morning and headed down to the pier first thing. Wasn't disappointed by the surf from Hanna.

#1
http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/hanna-surf-shots/img_9823.jpg

#2
http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/hanna-surf-shots/img_9846.jpg

#3
http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/hanna-surf-shots/img_9864.jpg

#4
http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/hanna-surf-shots/img_9896.jpg

#5
http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/hanna-surf-shots/img_9920.jpg

#6
http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/hanna-surf-shots/img_9925.jpg

#7
http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/hanna-surf-shots/img_0035.jpg

#8
http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/hanna-surf-shots/img_9963.jpg

the rest are here:
http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/2008/09/07/hanna-brings-some-waves/

[macroshot]

It's been raining for two days now. Here's one from yesterday during a lull in the weather and another that I converted to B & W from a few weeks ago. The 300 f/4L is a personal favorite. Taken with the 5D.

305360


305361

[inthedeck]

^Nice conversion. Just clone the little hotspot, on the right bottom. Both of them are awesome...love the rain on the petals. Soft scene, not image. :)

[macroshot]

Thanks Manish. I never even noticed that spot - how weird is that?

[airbutchie]

^ Very nice macroshot... I rented this glass over the weekend to shoot a few full moon shots... I'll post them to share soon...

- airbutchie :)

[G35Driver]

http://luis452.zenfolio.com/img/v3/p943141822-4.jpg

[inthedeck]

Thanks Manish. I never even noticed that spot - how weird is that?

Hey, when you have a very nice image...it's the littlest thing that's overlooked. It's all good, though...it's relatively minor. Oh, and you're welcome.

[macroshot]

^ Very nice macroshot... I rented this glass over the weekend to shoot a few full moon shots... I'll post them to share soon...

- airbutchie :)

Thank you. The 300 f/4 is the lens I use the most for the garden, with and without extension tubes. Next is the 135 f/2, and my 24-105 f/4 just sits in the bag waiting its turn.

[macroshot]

@ Ben Jacobson - those are awesome images. Particularly like #5 for the way the water is boiling. But all of them are exceptionally sharp. Very impressive.

[nicksan]

A couple of moon shots handheld.

300mm
http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v1/p721807386.jpg

300mm + 2x TC
http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v3/p726765037.jpg

[inthedeck]

I've decreed to go to the beach, and watch one, as well.

Nice shots dude.

[nicksan]

Here's another one.

300L + 1.4x TC + 2x TC stacked and handheld.
http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v3/p718353984-5.jpg

[airbutchie]

Add another set of "full moon" shots...

XTi + 300mm + Kenko Pro 1.4x (tripod mounted)

Saturday dusk/night:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v467/airbutchie/Photography/IMG_4335.jpg

Sunday night:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v467/airbutchie/Photography/IMG_4352.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v467/airbutchie/Photography/IMG_4361.jpg

Fantantic glass for the price... I'm sure the f/2.8 version would be quite as good, if not better... The TC actually registers on the image file (I was surprised)... Anyhoo... Here's my contribution to this great glass..

- airbutchie :D

[fz_za]

A couple of moon shots handheld.

300mm
http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v1/p721807386.jpg



Absolutely INCREDIBLE shot. I LOVE the clouds surrounding the moon and the eerie shapes formed. Well done!!!

[nicksan]

Thanks!

When I stepped out of the house to see if the moon was out I saw the moon and lots of clouds in small formations moving quickly being pushed by the wind. I thought that would make for some interesting shots.

Plus having the moon behind the clouds makes it easier to expose things better.;)


Absolutely INCREDIBLE shot. I LOVE the clouds surrounding the moon and the eerie shapes formed. Well done!!!

[nicksan]

Some more...
http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v4/p622709897-5.jpg

http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v4/p917917356-5.jpg

http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v4/p749403183-4.jpg

[drkstang00]

I've had this lens for about a week now and I'm loving it!!! :D

Here's a few of the 300 + Canon 1.4x TC:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3244/2894582439_73fc8f6344_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3187/2895213475_8a4236baf1_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3160/2896051634_3cfb58fe75_o.jpg

[jacobsen1]

another storm blew threw this weekend, left it wet and humid all weekend with either too much wind, or not enough to consider sailing....

http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/pete-surf-shots/img_0425.jpg


http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/pete-surf-shots/img_0643.jpg

http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/pete-surf-shots/img_0493.jpg

http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/pete-surf-shots/img_0632.jpg

http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/pete-surf-shots/img_0671.jpg

http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/pete-surf-shots/img_0412.jpg

http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/pete-surf-shots/img_0688.jpg

http://www.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/pete-surf-shots/img_0716.jpg

[silverwolf]

Awsome set Darkstang & Ben. This makes me look forward to going the the beach in a few weeks.;) Sean .L

[Mike55]

http://img158.imageshack.us/img158/3391/raven2ah5.jpg

[macroshot]

Here are a couple of my favorite hummingbird shots from this summer with the 300... pretty heavily cropped although this one let me get within about 6 feet.

312771


312772

[macroshot]

btw Mike, nice detail in the feathers on that bird.

[macroshot]

Not the best shots of the season but when I have a Red Admiral flitting about in mid-October when the temps have been in the upper-30's overnight, how can I complain about a butterfly that won't land on the right side of the plant? If I moved, it flew to a tree. If I repositioned, it still flew to the opposite side...

300 f/4 IS and Kenko extension tubes (12/20) and handheld. It can do semi-macro!!

313777


313778

[kini]

29 pages and hardly any field sports photos.

Is the lens not so good for field sports. I'm interested in using it for U8 and U10 soccer.

Thanks
Gene

[twoshadows]

29 pages and hardly any field sports photos.

Is the lens not so good for field sports. I'm interested in using it for U8 and U10 soccer.

Thanks
Gene

I personally prefer the Sigma 100-300 f/4 over the 300mm f/4 IS for daytime field sports. BUT, I ended up going with the 300mm f/4 IS anyway because it is much more versatile, imo. It's lighter, has slightly better IQ, and the IS is the kicker.

For pics from both lenses see my sports galleries here:
http://www.pbase.com/iangreyphotography/sports

This year's outdoor sports are shot mostly with the 300 f/4 IS, but you can check the exifs as they are all intact. You will find the 100-300 f/4 shots in the sports archives, since that lens was sold last year. Again, exifs are intact.

[kini]

twoshadows- thanks for the link and the info. Nice work. I see you also used it with the 1.4tc- seems the AF worked well judging by the photos. At least on a MkII anyway.

Do you feel a Sigma 120-300/2.8 is worth $800 more than the 300/4IS?

Thanks
Gene

[twoshadows]

Never owned a 120-300, so I really can't comment on that. I loved the 100-300 f/4 and may end up getting another someday.

[popnlock247]

Here is a shot (and a 100% crop) I took a month or so ago. Canon 40D w/ 300mm f/4L IS USM.

To be honest with you, this lens was nice but I didn't think it was THAT nice... especially for sports in low light. Once the sun set, iso was upped to 3200 to freeze motion.

[Leeuwarden]

This Hunter nearly crashed a couple of months ago when it had a birdhit. Yesterday it made its first flight after the repairs. It was a really big suprise to see her unexpected!!

During take off with Kenko 1.4:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3015/2967180134_1d1a923b84_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3296/2967180292_7b7e2c5781_b.jpg

And during landing without the Kenko:
(repairs are visible on the left wing air-intake)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3053/2967207312_3bb8380edd_b.jpg

[Overkill]

This Hunter nearly crashed a couple of months ago when it had a birdhit. Yesterday it made its first flight after the repairs. It was a really big suprise to see her unexpected!!

During take off with Kenko 1.4:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3015/2967180134_1d1a923b84_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3296/2967180292_7b7e2c5781_b.jpg

And during landing without the Kenko:
(repairs are visible on the left wing air-intake)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3053/2967207312_3bb8380edd_b.jpg


Great shots! Ive been in doubt if i should sell my 100-400 for a 300 + 1.4 Combo! I think i will be missing the superb zoom option???

This shot is before the Nearly Crash :-)
http://www.leidekker.info/kiek/beta/public/imageview.aspx?l2=6139
http://www.leidekker.info/kiek/beta/public/imageview.aspx?l2=6813

[hjohnson]

Jupiter, with the four Galilean moons. This was taken with my 300mm F/4L IS with the 1.4x TC in my back yard. Shot using a 40D, using remote camera control to fine focus the lens and run the exposure. ISO 1600, f/5.6, 1/25 exposure.

This is a 100% crop, but still impressive that I can do this with just a camera lens. :)

[Mike55]

btw Mike, nice detail in the feathers on that bird.


Thx! Nice work on the hummingbird as well. Not easy.

Here are a couple more with the Canon 1.4x:

http://www.camerablognetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/rmprariedog.jpg

[labbai]

318017

Rudolf late in the evenig with some mud and low light. 5D and 1.4×extender. 1/60 f5.6
Got some pics without the extender, but you see what you get... :rolleyes:
Anyways, great in low light even with the extender and so and so...

[macroshot]

Mix of rain and snow this morning so I didn't really want to go outside. Instead, why not use the 300 f/4 and shoot from the doorway?

1st edit
318211

2nd edit
318443

[inthedeck]

Nice one, MS. Love the beads of water, and the composition. Maybe a 'slight' crop at the top? I dunno, maybe just me???

Still, love the veins, and the water. Nice and sharp, to boot.

Nice edit, on the second one. Just thought I'd mention that!

[blackjacked]

Leeuwarden, Those are some really clean shots! Here's one I took last week with my 300 f4
http://www.pbase.com/image/105631975/original.jpg

[Sydor25]

http://sydor25.com/Pictures/_S1T0176_0019.jpg

[FociBC]

well, this thread has certainly been helpful for me. I am 95% positive on getting a 300mm and a 1.4x extender.

[1downfall]

let me see if I can try and help you......my feelings aside...i am blessed to have this lens. I feel like a sniper sometimes being so far away, capturing crisp, clean beautiful shots! Here is a quick of my son a few minutes ago, literally. I do not know how to post a 100% crop......

1.
http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s174/1downfall/DPP_0826.jpg