Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM

[macroshot]

'tis a beautiful lens...


323151

[xMClass]

I <3 this lens.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3240/2896890123_db836fd22b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3142/2896898253_f90fe62127.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3202/2897741682_a2430d9c1c.jpg

[DonG]

A couple of mine from last week.

http://amtphoto.smugmug.com/photos/423865179_u7zRt-L.jpg

http://amtphoto.smugmug.com/photos/423865959_PZvoe-XL.jpg

[Leeuwarden]

Could you explain what that gravestone actually is?

[DonG]

Could you explain what that gravestone actually is?
It's on an old family farm that was donated to the town of Durham NH as a park, here is what I found about him.
James Davis, son of John & Jane (Peaslee) Davis, was b. 23 May 1662 in Dover, Strafford Co NH and d. 8 Sep 1749 in Oyster River, Strafford Co NH. He m. 1 Oct 1688 in Durham NH to Elizabeth Chesley, dau of Thomas & Elizabeth (Thomas) Chesley. She b. 1669 in Oyster River NH and d. abt 1748 in Oyster River NH. During the French and Indians War: He was a Lieutenant in 1691 in King William's War, a Captain in Queen Anne's War in 1704, and afterwards Colonel; he was a brave and successful officer. He was also, for many years, a prominent and useful member of the General Assembly of New Hampshire.

[Leeuwarden]

Thanks DonG.
I got a bit confused because of the new flag standing next to an old gravestone. Your culture is (as far as I can tell) a bit different than over here in The Netherlands. We do not actually honour graves of important people who died a long time ago. A lot of them are buried inside churches. Most people usually look up when visiting a church but onderneath their feet are the people who once were important.
The only exeption is made for soldiers of any nationality who died during WWII. We still honour them! For their courage and also to teach our children.

[Sydor25]

http://sydor25.com/Pictures/Bunny_11.11.08-083.jpg

[camw]

Taken a couple of weekends ago on my first outing with this lens ...

http://gallery.camwheeler.com/photos/432622456_EBQSm-L.jpg

[SwiftFootTim]

Was messing around with a tripod, low light and trying out the macro focus. Gotta love the fake flowers!

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3144/3120787071_e082f3ca9b_b.jpg

100% Crop
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3247/3121609386_95d55318a9_b.jpg

[SwiftFootTim]

This lens is sharp at macro for sure.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3094/3168268271_33ea860118_o.jpg

[dlintz]

Okay, I'm convinced. This is most defnitely my next lens purchase. :D

Doug

[primalcarl]

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3231/3129227154_949496431d_o.jpg

[p360]

I like that shot a lot, primalcarl.

[primalcarl]

All at 420mm

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3085/3181458071_50331fdd79_o.jpg


http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3133/3181458005_d880cd8c5f_o.jpg


http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3491/3181458129_5719bcd5d9_o.jpg

[davidinjp]

Mount Fuji from a distance. Cropped a fair bit.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3494/3188150552_babd728311_o.jpg

[Bill634]

I just bought this lens also and so far I've been amazed with the images it has produced with my EOS 30D. Here are three samples: the first has been resized from 3504x2336 to 1680x1050...no other processing of any kind. The second is a 100% crop from the first. The final image has been post processed with ACR and CS3.

http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk249/Bill634/sample1.jpg

http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk249/Bill634/100percentcrop.jpg

http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk249/Bill634/sample2.jpg

[inthedeck]

^^ Nice shots of Mt. Fuji.

^^ NIce action shots, of the snowboarder. Good use of timing and skill in that one.

[1downfall]

^^ Nice shots of Mt. Fuji.

^^ NIce action shots, of the snowboarder. Good use of timing and skill in that one.
much agreed!!

[mrcpix]

ok I am sold this is my next lens. plan on using it for daytime soccer and wildlife.

[primalcarl]

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3098/3227050610_8d075d34a1_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3130/3226177355_bd1742cf55_o.jpg

[Sydor25]

http://sydor25.com/Pictures/Salt_Creek_Surfing-439_10x20.jpg

[primalcarl]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v195/jaffacake71/IMG_5772-2.jpg

[bradynel]

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3498/3254120009_6f4067786e_b.jpg

300mm f/4 L IS USM with Canon 2x extender. Autofocus still works on my 1dmk2. Not as fast as a 400mm f/5.6 L USM with a Canon 1.4 extender but has slightly more reach.

[Sydor25]

http://sydor25.com/Pictures/_S1T1321_1020.jpg

[primalcarl]

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3409/3257137579_fd095b3c39.jpg


http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3519/3257137535_39e44c1e58.jpg


http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3377/3257137497_3ac3be45ff.jpg

[1downfall]

Here are 2 taken this morning: also posted in landscape

1.
http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s174/1downfall/DPP_1273.jpg

2.
http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s174/1downfall/DPP_1274.jpg

[Methodical]

Do you still own this lens and does it still provide the quality that inspired you to purchase the lens? Or have you upgraded to a bigger and better lens?

Just curious to see where those who owned or own this lens purchased as the next lens and for what reason.

Thanks

Al

[davidinjp]

Do you still own this lens and does it still provide the quality that inspired you to purchase the lens? Or have you upgraded to a bigger and better lens?

Just curious to see where those who owned or own this lens purchased as the next lens and for what reason.

Thanks

Al


I have wanted the 300mm F/2.8 since before I got the 300mm F/4. But every time I go out with the 300mm f/4, I am thrilled with the bokeh and sharpness. I consider it the hidden gem in the Canon lineup. It is easy to under appreciate it but only because most of us don't take the 300mm out with us as much as other lenses. And since the 300mm f/2.8 is much bigger and heavier, I would shoot with that much less than the f/4.

So yes, this lens still over delivers every time out. In fact I took only the 300mm f/4 with me during a short walk through the neighborhood park today... a few samples:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3428/3296610105_e030d174ff_o.jpg


http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3627/3296605405_62f9577cf0_o.jpg


http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3633/3297429944_5f968ba5d9_o.jpg

[pdccameras]

[
So yes, this lens still over delivers every time out.
[/quote]

I agree completely with davidinjp. The 300 f/4 IS is superb all-around telephoto lens, which can be pressed into service for a variety of applications - even for some it is not perfect for. I have a 400 f/5.6 for birds-in-flight shots, but the 300 does a stand up job as well - especially with the 5DMII which has a very precise central focus mode and high enough resolution to allow drastic cropping of images. Here's a shot from last week. I went out to shoot some geese in the water, but they were just leaving as I arrived. I only had the 300 with me. P.

[mrfourcows]

^

bow wow, wonderful shot!

[Mick Emmett]

Both taken with a 2X converter attached, I love how I've still got AF with this lens when the 2X converter is on. Sorry about the brown cast on the rump of the Squirrel on number 2, there must have been a twig sticking up in the foreground. Great lens although sometimes sounds like the I.S. is steam powered, from what I read here it appears that is normal.

Number 1
345956

Number 2
345957

[kolok]

Both taken with a 2X converter attached, I love how I've still got AF with this lens when the 2X converter is on. Sorry about the brown cast on the rump of the Squirrel on number 2, there must have been a twig sticking up in the foreground. Great lens although sometimes sounds like the I.S. is steam powered, from what I read here it appears that is normal.



2x, eh? Those photos are sharp! Very nice indeed! Seems this lens is a very capable offering!!

Of course, a good immobile subject, transfixed on munching seeds is always welcome, of course.

[kolok]

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3633/3297429944_5f968ba5d9_o.jpg

Nice shots - as usual David!

IMO this one would be more effective in portrait format instead of landscape format. Nonetheless, very nice photos!

Makes me want to run off to the store and get this lens. Seems it's a great lens for portraiture and would be a perfect addition to my current lineup even though I seldom shoot long (except for the odd bird here or there).

[Mick Emmett]

2x, eh? Those photos are sharp! Very nice indeed! Seems this lens is a very capable offering!!

Of course, a good immobile subject, transfixed on munching seeds is always welcome, of course.

It was quite a dull day, with that set up there would have been little chance of getting anything moving and no chance of getting anything in flight (well maybe if it was hovering :D).

[BIGTUFFGUY]

I went to visit my buddies with the new lens today. This guy was pretty happy for me.
http://i41.tinypic.com/smdclc.jpg

I saw him too, Nicest photo i've taken of him yet.
http://i39.tinypic.com/2qvuzp1.jpg

[h2dal]

I really miss my 300mm f/4L IS...

[Sydor25]

http://sydor25.com/Pictures/Fort_Worth_Blue_Heron-095.jpg

[Methodical]

http://sydor25.com/Pictures/Fort_Worth_Blue_Heron-095.jpg

That is a big fish. Nice shot. Did you handhold or tripod or monopod?

Thanks

[Sydor25]

That is a big fish. Nice shot. Did you handhold or tripod or monopod?

Thanks

Handheld.


http://sydor25.com/Pictures/Fort_Worth_Flowers-058.jpg

[Sydor25]

http://sydor25.com/Pictures/Fort_Worth_Blue_Heron-281.jpg

[Mick Emmett]

Deleted

[Mick Emmett]

Deleted

[kolok]

Holy!@@!! That flower shot is sharp and saturated! How far away were you?

[Mick Emmett]

Deleted

[Sydor25]

OK I give in, I can't spot the difference; you'll have to tell me ;)

lol...thanks guys.... :lol:

[DonG]

Here's one I shot the other day. I also had on Canon's 1.4 TC

http://amtphoto.smugmug.com/photos/497335882_HiAK9-X2.jpg

[hz536n]

EF 300mm f/4L IS lens on my Canon 5D

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3661/3385271871_88aa84c041_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3617/3380656100_c6b25ae29b_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3547/3372933800_a98c0d1543_b.jpg

[puttekula]

Absolutely stunning photos.... And with a lovely 5D. Very nice...

[kolok]

Those flower photos are really something!! Beautiful, very nice saturation, almost 3D-like!

I'm torn between getting the 300 f/4 or a 100 2.8 macro lens - I'd love both for different reasons... Alas no money, no funny. :cry:

Gah... decisions!

[gh patriot]

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3568/3390482177_b8b64e51af_b.jpg

[BIGTUFFGUY]

http://i44.tinypic.com/6fw9vk.jpg

[mrerico]

EF 300mm f/4L IS lens on my Canon 5D

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3661/3385271871_88aa84c041_b.jpg






Amazing...

[davidinjp]

Amazing indeed!

A bit of luck the other day...
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3553/3398317646_0223b11013_o.jpg

[jsinon]

Traded my 100-400 for this lens and don't regret it one bit.

[hz536n]

Canon 5D and EF 300mm f/4L IS lens, Unique Tulip variety shot with existing light
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3306/3410813522_cd2467e2cc_b.jpg

[jsinon]

^^^Very nice!

[1downfall]

well...i feel out of place posting my shots here since they are not as close as the majority.....But..I will anyhow cause I like to .....:rolleyes:

POsted some in sports as well....2 should do....;)


1.
http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s174/1downfall/DPP_1460.jpg

2.
http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s174/1downfall/DPP_1467.jpg

[Sydor25]

http://sydor25.com/Pictures/Fort_Worth_Flowers-041.jpg

[dlintz]

My favorite subject

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3506/3462158076_f2e804a3b9.jpg

d.

[Methodical]

Here's my contribution to the thread. Carolina Wren

50D, 300 f4, 1/60 @5.6, ISO 800 on a rainy day


http://methodical.zenfolio.com/img/v7/p868694970-5.jpg

[butcha27]

http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w207/robsheeley/FBS14.jpg

[hobbes2112]

@Rob...that expression is priceless!

This thread is evil...I think I'll be buying one of these soon.

[Methodical]

@Rob...that expression is priceless!

This thread is evil...I think I'll be buying one of these soon.

Check out the 400 5.6 thread too

[fishingjts]

Rented the 300 last week... have a bunch of pics to go through but this one caught my eye...

http://www.johnnystacks.com/gallery/d/8276-1/IMG_1769_ni.jpg

[Methodical]

Rented the 300 last week... have a bunch of pics to go through but this one caught my eye...

http://www.johnnystacks.com/gallery/d/6915-1/IMG_1769_ni.jpg

Now that I likeee. I have a Mustang Cobra so I am a little bias though. Nice shot

[fishingjts]

Now that I likeee. I have a Mustang Cobra so I am a little bias though. Nice shot

Thanks! This was from last weeks Mustang 45th Anniversary event... So I have a few Cobra pictures... ;) Just need to find the time to go through all the pictures! LOL!

[Methodical]

Thanks! This was from last weeks Mustang 45th Anniversary event... So I have a few Cobra pictures... ;) Just need to find the time to go through all the pictures! LOL!

Please post them. They have an article on www.foxnews.com (http://www.foxnews.com) about the Mustang 45th anniversary with pictures from all years.

[hobbes2112]

Check out the 400 5.6 thread too

I'm currently in the 300/400/100-400 decision loop that people go through so I've been in all the threads. They are all going to make be very very poor.

[Mick Emmett]

I have the 100-400, the 70-200 f2.8 and the 300 f4 prime. Out of the 3; the 300 f4 prime consistently produces the sharper shots, it's just not as versatile.

[1downfall]

I have the 100-400, the 70-200 f2.8 and the 300 f4 prime. Out of the 3; the 300 f4 prime consistently produces the sharper shots, it's just not as versatile.
I am in the same boat...minus the 100-400.....Love this lens and picked it up for a great great deal. Just waiting for kids to move onto bigger soccer fields. 70-200 works well for that now.

[Cole_Schmitt]

I cannot wait! I have made the decision to take this over the 70-200 2.8 IS and I will be picking it up in about 2 weeks! Ugh that agony of waiting :D

[RyanHutchinson]

http://www.pbase.com/image/111742077.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/image/111742079.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/image/111742082.jpg

[RyanHutchinson]

http://www.pbase.com/image/111732249.jpg

[jsinon]

I'm currently in the 300/400/100-400 decision loop that people go through so I've been in all the threads. They are all going to make be very very poor.

I originally had the 100-400, and although it was a great lens, I just never could get the hang of it. I think having the lens change length so much over the zoom range takes some getting used to. I actually liked the push/pull zoom though. I found someone looking to trade a 300 f4 IS for a 100-400, and couldn't be happier. Plus, add a 1.4tc and you have a 420mm f5.6 with IS. And judging by the 300 sample archive the lens does real well with a tc.

[nazpicman]

Has anyone used this lens for lower light stage situations, as opposed to the outdoor bird/animal shots and the outdoor sports shots also??

[Mick Emmett]

It's an f4 mate, can't expect too much from it under low light conditions; especially if your subjects are moving.

[RyanHutchinson]

http://www.pbase.com/image/111795244.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/image/111795245.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/image/111795247.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/image/111795249.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/image/111795250.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/image/111795251.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/image/111795253.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/image/111795255.jpg

[RyanHutchinson]

http://www.pbase.com/image/111795256.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/image/111795257.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/image/111795259.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/image/111795260.jpg

[1downfall]

whooooot!! some very nice tack sharp images here!

[Bill634]

Here's a Dark-Eyed Junco shot with the 300mm f/4L IS USM & Canon 1.4 extender.

http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk249/Bill634/Junco4.jpg

[twoshadows]

Has anyone used this lens for lower light stage situations, as opposed to the outdoor bird/animal shots and the outdoor sports shots also??

Yes, it works very well for that application.

uncropped, from the very back row of a theater:
1/250s f/4.0 at 300.0mm iso1600
http://www.pbase.com/iangreyphotography/image/112008670/original.jpg

[Mick Emmett]

They appear to be quite well lit though, I wouldn't consider that as a low light level shot; a good low level shot would be a good one of the guy in the background.

[twoshadows]

They appear to be quite well lit though, I wouldn't consider that as a low light level shot; a good low level shot would be a good one of the guy in the background.

Well,

They "appear" to be well lit because I did my job.

I've found that when the producers want you to see something on stage, they turn the lights on :rolleyes: . I have NEVER been to a production that the 300 f/4 IS couldn't handle.

PS - the general definition of a low light shot is, iso800, wide open and and 1/FL(x crop, if any) for a shutter speed. This shot was taken at iso1600, wide open and 1/250, well below the definition of a low light shot. AND, I'm not in the mood to post more shots to prove my point, so instead I'll ask the question, "Have you even tried the 300 f/4 IS for stage/theater work?".

[Mick Emmett]

Well,

They "appear" to be well lit because I did my job.

This shot was taken at iso1600, wide open and 1/250, well below the definition of a low light shot.

Ah! I see, that would explain the noise and the blown out areas then ;) I'm joking mate, don't jump down my throat. I have tried it but I've found it better for me to get closer to the front and use the 70-200 2.8. That said; the rest of the audience don't seem too keen on me sitting on my step ladders at the front to get level with the stage :lol:

[twoshadows]

Ah! I see, that would explain the noise and the blown out areas then ;) I'm joking mate, don't jump down my throat. I have tried it but I've found it better for me to get closer to the front and use the 70-200 2.8. That said; the rest of the audience don't seem too keen on sitting on my step ladders at the front to get level with the stage :lol:

OK,

So maybe I woke up a bit grumpy ;) . This image was done for a newspaper - no time or need for NR. There are many times getting closer is not an option, so my 70-200 f/2.8 IS becomes a rather shortish lens. Yes the 7-2 is better (except for ultimate IQ) if you can get up close than the 300, but even then the 300 is good for head shots.

Oh, and be careful on that ladder ;) :) .

[philthejuggler]

A few from yesterday - I'm so impressed with this lens, especially how it retains detail & colour even with the 1.4x! (All are handheld)

5D, f4, 1/1250, ISO 800 (Through fairly tight meshing)

http://www.philhackettphotography.com/img/v3/p739401201-5.jpg

5D, f4, 1/250, ISO 200

http://www.philhackettphotography.com/img/v0/p734066296-5.jpg

5D, f7.1, 1/200, ISO 200 with Canon 1.4x II extender

http://www.philhackettphotography.com/img/v8/p851830409-5.jpg

[Gibbo]

Wow the IQ from the posts in this thread are amazing. Some great images.

One day i will be able to contribute to this thread.. (not too soon though)

[philthejuggler]

Oh and the IS is amazing too:

Handheld @ 1/80 sec, F4, ISO 400, 5D

http://www.philhackettphotography.com/img/v8/p695600473-5.jpg

[philthejuggler]

One last one:

5D, ISO200, 1/320 @ f6.3 on 5D

http://www.philhackettphotography.com/img/v8/p836436688-5.jpg

[inthedeck]

^^Nice shots...Phil. Same to everyone else, too. ;) Love this lens. :)

[philthejuggler]

^^Nice shots...Phil. Same to everyone else, too. ;) Love this lens. :)

Many thanks!

[inthedeck]

What kind of flower is that, anyway, Phil?

[Sydor25]

http://sydor25.com/Pictures/_S1T4069.jpg

[jsinon]

http://sydor25.com/Pictures/_S1T4069.jpg

Very nice. I've seen that you have posted a few with the 2x TC(one with a 20D if I remember correctly) , how do you rate the overall results? I know the general consensus is there is too much of an IQ hit, but your results seem to indicate otherwise. Penny for your thoughts...:)

[hz536n]

A few backyard shots with the EF 300mm lens and Canon 30D...

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3624/3480597893_1ee35da01e_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3600/3501076152_c2fbe8b160_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3646/3473879466_228052af0d_b.jpg

[kolok]

A few backyard shots with the EF 300mm lens and Canon 30D...

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3624/3480597893_1ee35da01e_b.jpg



Great timing and capture of a crazed acrobat. They do anything for a few seeds, won't they? :lol:

[Mr. Clean]

Very nice. I've seen that you have posted a few with the 2x TC(one with a 20D if I remember correctly) , how do you rate the overall results? I know the general consensus is there is too much of an IQ hit, but your results seem to indicate otherwise. Penny for your thoughts...:)

I'm astounded by the 2x TC performance.
This one is HEAVILY cropped (from landscape to portrait orientation and then a bit more) on a MarkIII, shot wide open at f8. DPP sharpening at 3, jpeg quality of 7 (unfortunately)

[amriddell]

Taken with the older 300 F4, without IS.

http://adamriddellphotography.com/photos/532324605_AaCkG-L.jpg

[homersapien]

Okay, so after seeing this thread I finally decided to pickup a 300mm f/4 IS. Got mine from Amazon. Shot some fun stuff this weekend (owls, herons, bald eagles) and am extremely disappointed. My 70-200mm f/4 @ 200mm @ blown up to match the 300mm = much sharper! It's obvious (to me at least) that a I got a bum lens :/ Back to Amazon it goes.

[Mick Emmett]

That's disappointing, hope your mark 2 gives better results.

[philthejuggler]

Okay, so after seeing this thread I finally decided to pickup a 300mm f/4 IS. Got mine from Amazon. Shot some fun stuff this weekend (owls, herons, bald eagles) and am extremely disappointed. My 70-200mm f/4 @ 200mm @ blown up to match the 300mm = much sharper! It's obvious (to me at least) that a I got a bum lens :/ Back to Amazon it goes.


Just to check - have you used similar lenses to this before? I didn't get stellar results at first with my 300L, but then learned how to use it to good effect & I'm now delighted.

If you are a seasoned long-lens user, please ignore the question & I hope you get satisfaction on the return!!

Phil

[inthedeck]

And to add to what Phil said, are you sure the focus limiter was set correctly? I've known a couple of people that have muffed that up, and as a result received not so stellar images, with other lenses. Of course, if you've tried that too...then, I concur...send it back. ;)

[gh patriot]

I shot this one in my front yard. Its a couple of friends that wanted a quick portrait.

[gh patriot]

oops, here is the photo.


http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3378/3519233908_1593fc2a84.jpg

[macroshot]

Just goofing around today in the garden. I liked the yellow in deep within the green of the ferns so I shot it and then I plucked it. Only 6,439 more to go...wide open with a 20mm extension tube.


365877

[Methodical]

Just goofing around today in the garden. I liked the yellow in deep within the green of the ferns so I shot it and then I plucked it. Only 6,439 more to go...wide open with a 20mm extension tube.


365877

I like picture - nice (life in a sea of hope)...was this handheld? Also what type of extension tubes do you use?

Thanks

[macroshot]

Thanks. Yes, handheld with Kenko tubes. IS - it's a lovely thing.

[Sydor25]

http://sydor25.com/Pictures/Kauai_5.20.09-1495.jpg




http://sydor25.com/Pictures/Kauai_5.20.09-0894.jpg

[macroshot]

That's pretty sharp stuff with a 2x TC, James. Very nice.

[sheawyatt]

Some ducks from yesterday evening, while testing my new 1DsII

http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u219/snwyatt/2009-05-24_19-03-22_SwanLake1.jpg


http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u219/snwyatt/2009-05-24_19-10-02_SwanLake.jpg

http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u219/snwyatt/2009-05-24_19-10-41_SwanLake.jpg


http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u219/snwyatt/2009-05-24_19-47-33_SwanLake.jpg

This colour is straight out of camera -- a natural sepia!
http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u219/snwyatt/2009-05-24_19-53-18_SwanLake.jpg


http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u219/snwyatt/2009-05-24_19-12-35_SwanLake.jpg

[Methodical]

Here's my contribution to the thread:

House Finches

http://methodical.zenfolio.com/img/v8/p312887605-5.jpg
http://methodical.zenfolio.com/img/v8/p138430083-5.jpg
http://methodical.zenfolio.com/img/v7/p236907011-5.jpg

[Scout_Pete]

Long time lurker, first time contributor... The order arrived yesterday morning in time for me to go to my local wildlife preserve to have lunch with this babe--my first shots through the new glass below! :D

The landscape is the only edited image at a full width crop from portrait with one click both of sharpening and light. Otherwise, all were shot hand-held on a 50D in Faithful at ISO 100; stopped to either f/5.6 or f/7.1; with SS between 1/500-1/800, then resized to the 1024 limit. This is going to be great glass for the $$$.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/pete2210/Public%20Linked/524dfa0a.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/pete2210/Public%20Linked/8fba7718.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/pete2210/Public%20Linked/b297297e.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/pete2210/Public%20Linked/8ce2c4e8.jpg

[Jman13]

Got a chance to try this lens out while swapping with another photographer at the Memorial Tournament practice rounds on Tuesday. Good lens.


Jim Furyk tees off on the 6th:
http://www.jordansteele.com/forumlinks/furyk_drive.jpg

[philthejuggler]

Not in the same league as Methodical but I feel a valiant effort.....

300mm F4 L IS + Canon 1.4x MKII, 50D, 550EX, 1/250, f/6.3

http://www.philhackettphotography.com/img/v6/p176063321-5.jpg

[iceis007]

I just got this lens a few days ago. I am already in love ...

[Scout_Pete]

Fishing series. All shot in AV @ f/4; ISO 200; SS~ 1/320-1/640

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/pete2210/Public%20Linked/c3fc3417.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/pete2210/Public%20Linked/a3aeb99a.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/pete2210/Public%20Linked/f35ff1e3.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/pete2210/Public%20Linked/affd3b9a.jpg

[nazpicman]

Have been debating between this wonderful glass and the 100-400L. Even though the 100-400 would give me greater versatility, the image quality of this lens and the lesser bulk points me in this direction. And knowing I can add a TC to give me greater reach is good.

[blackmatch456]

How would this lens be on a 1dmkii for football, lacrosse and such?

[inthedeck]

Lovely shots, all...can't get enough, from this lens. Just dig everything about it. ;)

5D+300F4L IS, at f/4, 1/250th, IS on, at ISO 100. Full frame.
http://inthedeck.smugmug.com/photos/574167751_nudQ4-XL.jpg

[mizouse]

wow, nice shot.!

[dlintz]

I'm borrowing a coworker's Canon 2x Teleconvertor tomorrow to pair with my 300 f/4. Hopefully a few days of playing will help me decide whether to buy my own. I've got a two week trip to Tetons/Yellowstone/Glacier/British Columbia coming up and I'm thinking I'll need more reach than just the 300mm on its own.

d.

[inthedeck]

Thanks, mizouse....I get it...'mizouse..' :lol:

dlintz, I don't think it's a disappointing lens, at all. Though, the 300 f/2.8 IS, now, that would be something. ;) Nonetheless, it's a sharp lens, IS is great cause I have the shakes, and for me to get to 1/250th with IS is a blessing. :) I've never tried it with a 2x tcon, but, the 1.4tc isn't 'all' that degrading...though, I think with the 2x you may lose AF...not sure. Might depend on the cam. ;)

[dlintz]

Thanks, mizouse....I get it...'mizouse..' :lol:

dlintz, I don't think it's a disappointing lens, at all. Though, the 300 f/2.8 IS, now, that would be something. ;) Nonetheless, it's a sharp lens, IS is great cause I have the shakes, and for me to get to 1/250th with IS is a blessing. :) I've never tried it with a 2x tcon, but, the 1.4tc isn't 'all' that degrading...though, I think with the 2x you may lose AF...not sure. Might depend on the cam. ;)

I should clarify. I have the 300 f/4 and really like it. I'm deciding whether to pick up a 2x teleconvertor or possibly rent/buy something longer for the trip (and beyond). I've got a 1Ds II so autofocus won't be lost on my current setup.

d.

[inthedeck]

DOH! I need to check signatures. ;)

If possible, rent a 500 or 600. I can't imagine you'd regret it... :)

Ever gonna sell the 1Ds2? :lol: I've always wanted one....some day....some day...

EDIT: And here's one more. Only took maybe 3-4 shots...and this was the only other one I liked. The other two, I haven't even touched, or looked at...

http://inthedeck.smugmug.com/photos/574309248_PJGiY-XL.jpg

[dlintz]

As others have said of the 1Ds II, it feels like the "end all" for DSLRs. It's definitely way more camera than I need as a hobbyist but I love the absolute security you get from it's focusing.

I'm just hoping the 2 stops of light loss from a 2x tele won't turn me off as the 500 and 600 are fairly pricey...plus they would be superfluous for my needs/wants. I really do love my 300 f/4 but the f/2.8 would certainly be nice too. :cool:

d.

[inthedeck]

Well, then of course, rent a 400 5.6L prime. Love that one, too. The wife mostly uses the 300 and her 5D. I use the 400, on mine, and love it just the same. ;)

G'night now. :)

[ancistrus]

Got my 300mm F4 today ... second hand but seems in A1 condition. Liking it so far

[inthedeck]

Nice, and congrats. ;)

[Modifier]

300mm f/4L IS + 1.4tc

http://www.mikan.galleria.fi/kuvat/Luonto/Linnut/LH7U2929.jpg/_small.jpg

[ancistrus]

Still liking this lens ... but a bit too fond of f4 to try and get the superb bokeh, forgetting that the depth of field is small .. a lot of butterfly shots with a perfectly focused flower and an out of focus butterfly head but these two are o.k.

[Methodical]

Here's a shot of the Male Northern Cardinal

http://methodical.zenfolio.com/img/v7/p808963107-5.jpg

Female Northern Cardinal

http://methodical.zenfolio.com/img/v7/p288302335-5.jpg

[DDWD10]

I checked eBay completed listings and couldn't believe my eyes. Copies of this lens selling for around $750-900?

http://cgi.ebay.com/Canon-EF-300mm-f-4-0L-IS-USM-Lens_W0QQitemZ180373614590QQcmdZViewItemQQptZCamer a_Lenses?hash=item29ff1aeffe&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=65%3A13|66%3A2|39%3A1|240%3A1318|301%3A0 |293%3A1|294%3A50

http://cgi.ebay.com/Canon-300mm-f4-0-IS-L-Lens_W0QQitemZ130310782349QQcmdZViewItemQQptZCamer a_Lenses?hash=item1e5720bd8d&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=65%3A13|66%3A2|39%3A1|240%3A1318|301%3A0 |293%3A2|294%3A50

I'm looking for a nice L telephoto and was considering the 70-200 f/4L and 200 2.8L, but this is mighty tempting!

[ancistrus]

Seems to do the job so far. They don't fly away any more.

[jon.s]

The Fed Ex van has just arrived, Oh Yes!

Whacked it on the 1D2 for a quick snap and this is what it delivered.. Obviously not spot on but i need to learn this lens.

http://i453.photobucket.com/albums/qq256/JMSPhotographic/JW4B1574-C.jpg
crop
http://i453.photobucket.com/albums/qq256/JMSPhotographic/JW4B1574-C-crop.jpg

Added the 1.4x

http://i453.photobucket.com/albums/qq256/JMSPhotographic/JW4B1589-c.jpg
crop
http://i453.photobucket.com/albums/qq256/JMSPhotographic/JW4B1589-c-crop.jpg

Then tried it on the 40D with the 1.4x Seemed to suit this better straight out of the box..

http://i453.photobucket.com/albums/qq256/JMSPhotographic/IMG_1368-c.jpg
crop
http://i453.photobucket.com/albums/qq256/JMSPhotographic/IMG_1368-c-crop.jpg

300mm + 1.4 Converter + 1.6x = SWEET!

Well happy!

Should have fun with it tomorrow shooting Low Fly :-)

No PS apart from resize and watermark..
Just realised my error with shooting it on the 1D it was at 1/100th @ F22 lol!!! 1/640th @ 5.6 on the 40D!

Regards,
Jon.S

[Mick Emmett]

You watermarked pictures of a cropped Tranny Van ???????

[jon.s]

You watermarked pictures of a cropped Tranny Van ???????

Indeed, Everything taken from a camera attached to us remains our work whatever it is etc etc and never leaves without it.8-)

Does it class as a sharp copy was the query though?

Regards,
Jon.S

[sheawyatt]

A bunch from last week:

http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u219/snwyatt/2009-06-29_21-27-28_KnightInlet.jpg

These are all with 1.4X TC
http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u219/snwyatt/2009-06-29_17-00-27_Hummingbirds.jpg

http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u219/snwyatt/2009-06-29_16-54-34_Hummingbirds.jpg

http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u219/snwyatt/2009-06-29_16-53-10_Hummingbirds.jpg

http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u219/snwyatt/2009-06-29_16-33-33_Hummingbirds.jpg

[macroshot]

Looks like you need someone directing air traffic on that last one ^ - great capture.

[Scout_Pete]

Man, I love this lens. For the long end of the bag, it's a great compliment to the workhorse 70-200 zoom. Light, quick enough, rich colors, contrast-y, and sharp. Great for creative work, too:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/pete2210/Public%20Linked/245ec2e3.jpg

[ric type r]

Just bought one on Ebay £680 unused, Love it.

[Copidosoma]

Wow, 40 pages of bliss.

Thanks for everyone who posted.

I just ordered one (before I saw this thread). Now I can't wait to get my mitts on it. Should be a pleasant upgrade from my Tamron 200-400 5.6;)

Will post pics when I get them...

[Cl!ckFoto]

Just ordered a non-IS version. Not sure if there is an archive for that though.

[Westx]

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3127/3627756476_a4db329cd2_b.jpg

[Methodical]

Just ordered a non-IS version. Not sure if there is an archive for that though.

I have a '97 version of the IS (old technology) lens and at times it frustrates me - the spooling up. I find myself shutting the IS off when shutter speeds is 400 or above sometimes.

[sheawyatt]

I have a '97 version of the IS (old technology) lens and at times it frustrates me - the spooling up. I find myself shutting the IS off when shutter speeds is 400 or above sometimes.

The IS is the same for all 300 f/4 IS lenses. It was designed way back in the day, and that design has remained the same over the years. It will take a mkII version of the lens to be released before you don't get "'97 IS."

I find I can get consistent sharp shots at 1/125 or higher (slightly more than 1-stop correction), but anything below that is a crap shoot. With my 70-200 I can shoot at 1/40 (~2.5 stops) at 200mm and be consistently sharp.

[Cl!ckFoto]

I had the 70-200/2.8 and 200/2.8 on a 1.6x body and had no problems hand holding that so I dont think the 300/4 on a 1.3x body will be much more difficult especially since the 1D bodies are so well balanced to begin with. I'll try it and if after two weeks I feel it's too long without IS, back it will go.

[ancistrus]

I know this shot isn't going to win any prizes but it is with the 300mm IS and because the expert photographer forgot to check the camera settings it's handheld at 1/30; ISO 200.

[Cl!ckFoto]

pretty damn good for 1/30. Im tired of waiting for my lowly non-IS to show up.

[Methodical]

The IS is the same for all 300 f/4 IS lenses. It was designed way back in the day, and that design has remained the same over the years. It will take a mkII version of the lens to be released before you don't get "'97 IS."...

I didn't know that. I thought it was updated, I guess I confused it with the 70-200 f4 IS lens.

[Cl!ckFoto]

It showed up this morning! Duck shots being uploaded. Hood is broken, d'oh.