Sigma 120-300mm 2.8 hard to find review

[Bill S]

Here is a review that doesn't come up easily on search engines.

I think I am going to get one of these for sports. I would feel better sticking with Canon but they don't make a lens with this spec.

http://www.popphoto.com/assets/download/5202003163559.pdf

The good news for everyone else is that once I buy one Canon will come out with a similar lens.

[liza]

Get a monopod, too. They're heavy!

[RichardtheSane]

I second the monopod suggestion. You WILL need it.

Here is my take on the lens
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=150405

[dmwierz]

http://www.shutterbug.net/test_reports/0204sb_sigma/

http://photographic.com/productreviews/lenses/204sigma/

http://www.press-photos.com/html/reviews/sig120300.html?3

[Michaelmjc]

Wazza has that lens, I'm sure he'll post what he thinks of it. It looks like a killer lens.

[cbock]

here's a few more..

http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/sigma_120300_28/index.htm
http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=104&sort=7&cat=37&page=1

[Bill S]

Thanks Dmwierz, hadn't seen the press-photos review.
I am having problems with the $, seems a bit excessive not for the lens but for me.

If I pull the trigger I will get a mono pod as well.

[carnagex2000]

http://www.ephotozine.com/equipment/tests/testdetail.cfm?test_id=336
http://www.jetzone2000.com/5_art_lenstest_sigma120300_1.htm
http://www.stevesforums.com/forums/view_topic.php?id=62353&forum_id=66
http://www.pbase.com/sparky14/gallery/300mm_lens_test

lens pics:
http://zoom2zoom.smugmug.com/gallery/347037/1/13794851
http://www.pbase.com/sparky14/image/38507336