Breezebrowser vs. DownloaderPro

[BayAreaPhotog]

I use a Canon D60 and I primarily shoot in JPEG mode, but occassionally in RAW. I shoot many images and then want to download from my Lexar Film Reader to a file on my harddrive for future Photoshop work.

I find Canon's Zoombrowzer just rediculously useless . . . maybe I don't know what I am doing, but Zoombrowzer seems difficult just trying to get the images to a folder. Can somebody tell me the difference between Breezebrowzer and DownloaderPro?
Do I need both? If not, which would you choose and why? Which is the most user friendly?

[Roger_Cavanagh]

They are both excellent and do different things. DL Pro handles moving images from camera/CF to PC with renaming and organisation functions.

BB is for sorting, converting raw files and HTML gallery generation with some other related stuff along the way.

They work well together and are both user-friendly and you should get both - there's no real overlap except for image renaming.

Check this pages for some more relevant info:

http://www.rogercavanagh.com/helpinfo/06_workflow.htm
http://www.rogercavanagh.com/software_reviews/13_downloaderpro.htm

Regards,