Chazs
17th of September 2003 (Wed), 20:34
Here's my problem....
I'm creating a coffee-table-picture-album of my dads paintings. Here are my steps
1. I used an S-40 in RAW mode, natural light, and tripod.
2. Converted RAW to 8-bit TIFF with Canon's converter (used camera settings for the conversion. Don't think I made any additional settings).
3. Used Photoshop7 to crop (no color adjustment).
4. Printed on a Canon S820D printer with glossy photo paper.
My problem is matching the color to the original oil print. I've "tried" to calibrate my monitor (LCD flat panel), but still unsure if it's correct. Also, a little confused on all the available ICC profiles.
The monitor's rendition is just slightly warmer than the original. By decreasing the red channel a few percentage points makes it nearly identical. But then, printing to the Canon printer, the final print is QUITE warm. I'll have to back off the reds and yellows a lot more, and push the cyans, to make the print look like the original. It'll most likely make the monitor image weird looking.
Soooo.... is there a way to calibrate all three, the monitor AND the printer, to match the actual painting? Or, do you think much of the color shift is the RAW conversion, and can be fixed there?
I'd like to find a "global" fix or work flow so I don't have to tweek-print-tweek-print 45 pictures.
Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated. :)
I'm creating a coffee-table-picture-album of my dads paintings. Here are my steps
1. I used an S-40 in RAW mode, natural light, and tripod.
2. Converted RAW to 8-bit TIFF with Canon's converter (used camera settings for the conversion. Don't think I made any additional settings).
3. Used Photoshop7 to crop (no color adjustment).
4. Printed on a Canon S820D printer with glossy photo paper.
My problem is matching the color to the original oil print. I've "tried" to calibrate my monitor (LCD flat panel), but still unsure if it's correct. Also, a little confused on all the available ICC profiles.
The monitor's rendition is just slightly warmer than the original. By decreasing the red channel a few percentage points makes it nearly identical. But then, printing to the Canon printer, the final print is QUITE warm. I'll have to back off the reds and yellows a lot more, and push the cyans, to make the print look like the original. It'll most likely make the monitor image weird looking.
Soooo.... is there a way to calibrate all three, the monitor AND the printer, to match the actual painting? Or, do you think much of the color shift is the RAW conversion, and can be fixed there?
I'd like to find a "global" fix or work flow so I don't have to tweek-print-tweek-print 45 pictures.
Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated. :)