View Full Version : Holding a butterfly
ArcticEOS
22nd of May 2006 (Mon), 18:12
I was fortunate enough to get this shot and only one. The focus is not perfect but this is what I got.
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y56/jeremyirwin/Nature/butterflyinhand.jpg
Sharyn1983
22nd of May 2006 (Mon), 22:18
the focus is excellent and exactly where you want it (butterfly's eyes). It is the DOF that is not perfect. All in all a good shot.
goatee
23rd of May 2006 (Tue), 03:39
I agree, it's an excellent shot. The depth of field is so narrow, and the fingers are so blurred, it gives it a really surreal quality. Great shot!
ArcticEOS
23rd of May 2006 (Tue), 03:40
Thanks Sharyn1983 and goatee. I have all kinds of pics from the zoo today aswell. It was a beautiful day!
goatee
23rd of May 2006 (Tue), 03:53
It certainly looks like you had a great day! Just out of interest - what lens did you use for the butterfly shot - your 50mm f/1.4?
ArcticEOS
23rd of May 2006 (Tue), 03:59
It certainly looks like you had a great day! Just out of interest - what lens did you use for the butterfly shot - your 50mm f/1.4?
Yes, you are right :) I should have stopped it down a notch or 2 for better DOF but I had not time.
goatee
23rd of May 2006 (Tue), 04:17
Hehe, no worries - if you had it may not have been as crispy sharp
ArcticEOS
23rd of May 2006 (Tue), 13:56
Any other suggestions or ideas as to make this a better shot?
Grace
23rd of May 2006 (Tue), 16:22
beautiful!
kp
staciecd
23rd of May 2006 (Tue), 16:28
That's an awesome shot - I like the blur of the hand.
Stacie
In2Photos
23rd of May 2006 (Tue), 16:37
Any other suggestions or ideas as to make this a better shot?
No, but should you ever get this opportunity again please let me know so you can pick my lottery numbers.:lol: Great shot.
tmigraphics
23rd of May 2006 (Tue), 17:36
What does DOF mean?? Sorry to ask a dumb question...
goatee
23rd of May 2006 (Tue), 18:39
That's ok :). DOF is an acronym for Depth Of Field - basically, how big an area is in focus - with large apertures (smaller numbers), longer focal lengths, and the closer you get to your subject, the DOF get's smaller, so you need to be more accurate with your focussing.
MattyB
24th of May 2006 (Wed), 01:09
as said the focus is dead on, yet the DOF is a tad too shallow
i'd clone out the bokeh to the left of the butterflys eye (the one thats a touch lighter shade grey than the rest) as it's a tad distracting
mbze430
24th of May 2006 (Wed), 02:51
Any other suggestions or ideas as to make this a better shot?
Always evaluate your background. Pay attention to things that can turn in to a distraction.
I think you will agree it is the first thing you notice after the fact. But to become a better photographer, you need to know your scene.
ArcticEOS
24th of May 2006 (Wed), 11:41
Always evaluate your background. Pay attention to things that can turn in to a distraction.
I think you will agree it is the first thing you notice after the fact. But to become a better photographer, you need to know your scene.
You actually think I had time to think about my back ground in this shot :p This guy was about to fly away as it was anyway. I understand your comment though and this is somthig I do think about when shooting on a regular basis. I thought about cloning out the big yellow orb in the upper left but never did.
Sharyn1983
24th of May 2006 (Wed), 17:11
When I travel to the zoo I leave my camera on Ap or Shutter Priority and auto focus during my down times so if I see something like that I can just snap it before it gets away. Then I switch to manual when I have time to compose the shot. Since you have a 1.4 you can choose a good all around DOF aper. or a good picture catching shutter speed and leave it on that. Then when a butterfly lands near you, you can catch it and not worry about a good DOF since you planned for a good DOF beforehand. I used to work on a whale watching boat and I picked a shutter speed to catch the leaping dolphins and let my camera do the rest since I was moving around so fast and the light would change from direct sunlight to complete shade in seconds and I would have missed the shot if I had to stop and meter and change my exposure settings every few seconds.
Sharyn1983
24th of May 2006 (Wed), 17:12
that and I found I got a little sick running back and forth and also trying to mess with my camera too much on a pitching boat.
mbze430
24th of May 2006 (Wed), 17:57
You actually think I had time to think about my back ground in this shot :p This guy was about to fly away as it was anyway. I understand your comment though and this is somthig I do think about when shooting on a regular basis. I thought about cloning out the big yellow orb in the upper left but never did.
Don't make excuses for yourself. It the first sign of weekness in photography.
A real photographer overcomes the immediate problems. You gotta go beyond the call of duty to make your shot. Otherwise you are just the rest of the population.... a snapshooter.
Sharyn1983
24th of May 2006 (Wed), 18:07
And this whole time I thought the first sign of weakness was the inability to correctly spell weakness.
mbze430
24th of May 2006 (Wed), 18:25
And this whole time I thought the first sign of weakness was the inability to correctly spell weakness.
I didn't think this was an English literature forum either.
goatee
24th of May 2006 (Wed), 18:38
Surely English language? I doubt anybody would refer to this forum as literature ;)
ArcticEOS
24th of May 2006 (Wed), 18:46
Don't make excuses for yourself. It the first sign of weekness in photography.
A real photographer overcomes the immediate problems. You gotta go beyond the call of duty to make your shot. Otherwise you are just the rest of the population.... a snapshooter.
I see we have a real grouch on our hands. Dont take my replies as an attack. Just a reply is all.
mbze430
24th of May 2006 (Wed), 19:40
I see we have a real grouch on our hands. Dont take my replies as an attack. Just a reply is all.
Grouch? Hardly... When I was in school, my professor simply rips up my work, and say, "Go do it again, you can do better than that"
So I am being gentle.
Sharyn1983
24th of May 2006 (Wed), 23:07
technically its grammar not literature.
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.