Won’t accept its digital!

[Dans_D60]

Old high-school friend was over tonight and we were looking over some 13X19 prints from shots I took today at a car show here in Encinitas California. This is the second time in the last six months he is reviewing my work and just cannot believe this is digital. The 13X19 prints from the S9000 are pretty awesome! But it really is from a digital camera!

Here are a few reduced resolution images from today’s car show:

http://www.pettusphoto.com/carshow/3.jpg

http://www.pettusphoto.com/carshow/2.jpg

http://www.pettusphoto.com/carshow/4.jpg

http://www.pettusphoto.com/carshow/1.jpg

Dan

[robertwgross]

Damn, that fourth auto shot is a real dog!

---Bob Gross---

[defordphoto]

robertwgross wrote:
Damn, that fourth auto shot is a real dog!

---Bob Gross---

Probably the slowest of the bunch too. Heh...

Yes, these cameras are pretty amazing...Of course, we already knew that though. ;)

[lightandlife]

The cars and the dog look better than they really are.

Not even new cars shine that much.

[Dans_D60]

lightandlife wrote:
The cars and the dog look better than they really are.

Not even new cars shine that much.

Remember, we’re in California where cars do shine better than real life!
Dan
http://www.pettusphoto.com

[fox1]

Im a little confused. The S9000 is a photo printer
right.? What camera was actually responsible for
the prints.?

[CyberDyneSystems]

fox1 wrote:
Im a little confused. The S9000 is a photo printer
right.? What camera was actually responsible for
the prints.?

Well,. you COULD guess a D60,.. judging from Dan's screen name,.. :D

But I think Dan owns a 10D now too if memory serves.

Anyway,. it is a solid bet the images were taken with a Canon Digital with a 6 megapixel CMOS :D

[defordphoto]

CyberDyneSystems wrote:
fox1 wrote:
Im a little confused. The S9000 is a photo printer
right.? What camera was actually responsible for
the prints.?

Well,. you COULD guess a D60,.. judging from Dan's screen name,.. :D

But I think Dan owns a 10D now too if memory serves.

Anyway,. it is a solid bet the images were taken with a Canon Digital with a 6 megapixel CMOS :D

6? really....Mine has a 6.5mp sensor. You must have gotten ripped off.

[Dans_D60]

fox1 wrote:
Im a little confused. The S9000 is a photo printer
right.? What camera was actually responsible for
the prints.?

Cameras = D60 and 10D. I usually carry both. Lenses for that day = 28-70 2.8L and 70-200 2.8L. Prints = Canon S9000 ….. Dan

[defordphoto]

lightandlife wrote:
Not even new cars shine that much.

Multi-coated paints and hand polished cars DO shine that much. The paint we get on our consumer cars doesn't even come close to the paint those cars have on them. Aren't they just magnificent? Awesome photos. Beautiful!

[msvirick]

Well besides a good camera, behind is a good photographer.
Credit should go to you too.
Well done

[Dans_D60]

RFMSports wrote:
lightandlife wrote:
Not even new cars shine that much.

Multi-coated paints and hand polished cars DO shine that much. The paint we get on our consumer cars doesn't even come close to the paint those cars have on them. Aren't they just magnificent? Awesome photos. Beautiful!


Rather apparent that these owners take pride in their hobby. Magnificent presentation of colors and yes they do shine just as posted! Even the interiors are cleaner than my new car!

http://www.pettusphoto.com/carshow/5.jpg

http://www.pettusphoto.com/carshow/6.jpg

http://www.pettusphoto.com/carshow/7.jpg

Dan