Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM - The Brick

[hannaxt]

Jannie, your feed back has been great and for that reason alone I will give the 24-105 another couple or so days of try outs.
Thanks again, you've been great.

[Shultz]

Are there still quality issues with this lens? I'm thinking of ordering one from Kerso, but concerned how I stand here in the UK if its not tack sharp?

Or have Canon ironed out the issues now?

Shelton.

[angryhampster]

it's my teacher :D


I don't think I'd trust a teacher using techniques like that.. One hand on the camera, and using an omnibounce at an angle outdoors?

[Spazzmodicus]

I don't think I'd trust a teacher using techniques like that.. One hand on the camera, and using an omnibounce at an angle outdoors?

I thought that was quite odd myself. The grimace didn't help much either...heh heh.

[Spazzmodicus]

". . . . The lens (this was about six months ago) was soft wide open at 24mm, not terribly but not good enough to use on work for a client and they replaced it. . . ."

This is the main problem with this lens as far as I know. It is, in fact, an issue with mine. But sometimes the outcome is great, it's a throw of the dice. I'll be sending mine in to Canon for non-warranty calibration soon.

[David S]

f/2.8 @ 70mm and ISO 1600...

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3143/3051527061_a0163c08be_o.jpg

[ALaS]

Looks like it is waaaaaay over sharpened in some areas.

Cool shot otherwise.

[BKGInc]

Here's some photos from my recent trip to Las Vegas..............
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g165/BKGInc/Las%20Vegas/IMG_0809.jpg
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g165/BKGInc/Las%20Vegas/IMG_0811.jpg
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g165/BKGInc/Las%20Vegas/IMG_0812.jpg
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g165/BKGInc/Las%20Vegas/IMG_0813.jpg
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g165/BKGInc/Las%20Vegas/IMG_0818.jpg
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g165/BKGInc/Las%20Vegas/IMG_0820.jpg
http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g165/BKGInc/Las%20Vegas/IMG_0821.jpg

[Ty H]

Is the inside of the Palazzo done yet? They were still working on it last time I was there.

[BKGInc]

Is the inside of the Palazzo done yet? They were still working on it last time I was there.

Yes.....It's absolutely beautiful!!!

[Tareq]

Too bad, i took this lens with me to New Zealand and i never took it out of my bag [because the filter still on it, damaged and i was thinking to fix it here in NZ but seems never, and i can use it but my 24-105 do the job for me], so i think i will keep it until i can take of the filter [it is not easy to take it off myself using those tools like a wrench or so] then i will use it outdoor more.

[boostisbest]

Here's one I took with my XSi...

http://lh4.ggpht.com/_XFJXV1TGFzY/SSzvbZZ2EII/AAAAAAAAEkQ/70eRelgLe4U/s720/20081102_0199.jpg

[TaDa]

Got the new brick yesterday. Couple shots from today.

http://lh6.ggpht.com/_s3TWm1zNgQA/SS2To1sd1uI/AAAAAAAAAk8/bwJVynncISw/s800/20081126-IMG_3011.jpg

http://lh3.ggpht.com/_s3TWm1zNgQA/SS2TqYuUN7I/AAAAAAAAAlE/rvnSw8eAw3s/s800/20081126-IMG_3042.jpg

[ieatstars]

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3224/3058755566_0e8b6835fa_o.jpg

[Two]

With an old Rebel XT & a tripod.

[Zeth]

Wow, checked out almost half the thread! Can't wait to get this with the 5D mk II on the same day!

[BrantG]

Not my sharpest lens (70-200 2.8 IS would be that), but definitely my most used lens.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3148/3064619810_90b049a031_b.jpg

[i_am_hydrogen]

A friend's band performing:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3235/3070139652_8463051650_o.jpg

Bassist disappearing into the abyss:
http://img392.imageshack.us/img392/3407/themaze2nv5.jpg

My friend posing in front of the wall of fame after the show:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3156/3069301819_7c0eeece4c_o.jpg

[flg8r]

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3276/3064596381_c5e390292c_m.jpghttp://farm4.static.flickr.com/3073/3064596621_fd5ecf187d_m.jpghttp://farm4.static.flickr.com/3199/3065435704_a7d668242c_m.jpg

Pulled Spiderman out of the box and took some more photos again. This is my favorite toy.

Here's some more:

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/150/338191481_c72779af70.jpg?v=0
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/143/344551032_bc49d667ff.jpg?v=0


http://farm1.static.flickr.com/163/346029379_3f704e6d84.jpg?v=0
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/133/346029259_9d80c80885.jpg?v=0
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/133/358375722_fb02d85f71.jpg?v=0

[malla1962]

Yep! Definitely a "brick"!;):)Lovely shots!

[DozerLYP]

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3276/3064596381_c5e390292c_m.jpghttp://farm4.static.flickr.com/3073/3064596621_fd5ecf187d_m.jpghttp://farm4.static.flickr.com/3199/3065435704_a7d668242c_m.jpg



the original set of shots you made of it, were a big part of why I wanted that lens.;)

[Radiohead369]

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3206/3049808226_3dd3439bdb_o.jpghttp://farm4.static.flickr.com/3138/3048966567_3b86d440aa_o.jpg

[Pearlallica]

I had to do a shot of a music group in an unkown location. My strobe equipment wasn't available and the best I had to work with was my 580EXII and the off-camera shoe cord, aimed up at the ceiling and created a really nice, balanced light.

http://www.intothenew.ca/images/jon/ascent_group_photo.jpg

24mm (because the room was so small) at f4, iso 400, shutter: 1/60

I photoshoped my wife in a day after.

[virus]

F/2.8

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v195/courage/eyes-1.jpg

[malla1962]

I had a use for it at the weekend.

[moedizzle]

A couple from the LA Auto Show

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3222/3070775018_7b7c2a24c3.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3276/3069935273_4bf39afe81.jpg

[Spazzmodicus]

It takes all kinds I guess....heh heh.


F/2.8

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v195/courage/eyes-1.jpg

[MKVMAX]

I have a request, I want to buy this lense. I own an XTi, I would like to see the difference between my 18-55 factory lense and the 24-70.

Any body who have both lenses can take the same image at same focal and same exifs, just to see the difference.

And if There's a link where I can see somes, please help me!

[Spazzmodicus]

Perhaps Pbase is your friend: Sample images here. You can look up samples for the 24-70 as well.

http://www.pbase.com/cameras/canon/ef_s_1855_35



I have a request, I want to buy this lense. I own an XTi, I would like to see the difference between my 18-55 factory lense and the 24-70.

Any body who have both lenses can take the same image at same focal and same exifs, just to see the difference.

And if There's a link where I can see somes, please help me!

[MKVMAX]

I would like to see the difference between two same pictures... Just to compare...

[Tareq]

I would like to see the difference between two same pictures... Just to compare...

First of all, 18-55 can't be used on full frame or 1.3x cameras [and i don't want to try those ways of removing lens plastic to attach to those bodies], and it can't shoot at 2.8 or 3.2 even, Second, 24-70 is an L canon lens which means the top best optical line.

I saw many photos from both lenses, but that 24-70 always making me to say WOW and very rarely i will say WOW for 18-55 shots.

I forgot to say that if you choose that 18-55 kit lens which is non-USM then the focus is so slow and it is so noisy.

I will not talk about the body performances between both lenses, you can read about that somewhere, but go to the lenses Samples archives for both lenses in this forum and give it a look.

[Pearlallica]

I would like to see the difference between two same pictures... Just to compare...

I have the EF-S kit lens you speak of (mine has IS, not sure if yours does too) as well as the EF 24-70. The two are like night and day. My EF-S 18-55 collects dust (figuratively speaking) as it can't compare in edge-to-middle sharpeness of this lens. I'll only use the EF-S if I really need the width which the EF cannot deliver (crop body).

This review compares the 17-55 f/2.8 to the 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 which should give you a good general idea of the performance gap.
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-S-17-55mm-f-2.8-IS-USM-Lens-Review.aspx

[MKVMAX]

Thank you guys!

I'm going to rent it for a day! Then I'll see the diff.

Thanks

[Spazzmodicus]

Thank you guys!

I'm going to rent it for a day! Then I'll see the diff.

Thanks

Just save your rent money up and buy the lens. It's a keeper and an essential tool for just about everybody's kit.

[Tareq]

Just save your rent money up and buy the lens. It's a keeper and an essential tool for just about everybody's kit.

+1 :D

[MKVMAX]

I'm scared of not seeing the differences, that's why I asked to see same pictures...

[Spazzmodicus]

I'm scared of not seeing the differences, that's why I asked to see same pictures...

It's quite a valid point, but by the uninformed. Please don't take that wrong, I mean no harm in it.....heh heh.

There are many different people contributing to this thread and with all levels of experience. Some even own the 18-55 or have owned it. I just sold mine earlier this week on Criagslist. It's safe to trust the input you're getting.

I say all that to say this: Just find a place on your desk to set your 18-55, preferably on a stack of papers. After you get a 24-70L, the 18-55 will already be in place as the paper-weight that it is. It's basically a functional body cover. It's not that bad of a lens, granted, but it can in no way, shape or form compare to the 24-70L. If the 24-70 isn't wide enough for you, just take a few steps back...heh heh.

[egordon99]

Does the 18-55 open up to f/2.8? Nope....That's all the reason I need to buy one.
(now I just need to find the money to buy one :lol:)

[Spazzmodicus]

Does the 18-55 open up to f/2.8? Nope.......")

Only after you drop it and it cracks "wide open"...heh heh.

[ieatstars]

http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk294/czechcanary/IMG_1678copy.jpg

http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk294/czechcanary/IMG_1781copy.jpg

http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk294/czechcanary/IMG_1925copy.jpg

http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk294/czechcanary/IMG_1944scopy.jpg

http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk294/czechcanary/IMG_1981copy.jpg

http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk294/czechcanary/IMG_2160copy.jpg

http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk294/czechcanary/IMG_1791copy.jpg

http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk294/czechcanary/IMG_1998copy.jpg

[Pearlallica]

MKVMAX:

I shot a comparison test of the two lenses in question. Trust me, I was just as curious about the results because I was in your position of being unsure at one time.

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?p=6805913#post6805913

This page doesn't have any photos yet - it's lookin' kinda white. So I'll throw in a sample picture from the test (ah, IEATSTARS beat me to it.

100% untouched at 1:1 view. Near-center portion is cropped.
http://www.intothenew.ca/images/jon/lenstest/EF-cropped.jpg

[Pearlallica]

Actually, here's a question for you guys.

I have the canon 24-70 and I also have a canon 50mm f/1.4 which functions a bit sharper and faster at f/2.0. I've been strapped for cash lately (the economy has already affected some of my business) and the 300 or so bucks it could fetch (canadian) could be nice. Would you guys get rid of the lens or is extra performance worth the 300 bucks despite having the 24-70?

[ieatstars]

Actually, here's a question for you guys.

I have the canon 24-70 and I also have a canon 50mm f/1.4 which functions a bit sharper and faster at f/2.0. I've been strapped for cash lately (the economy has already affected some of my business) and the 300 or so bucks it could fetch (canadian) could be nice. Would you guys get rid of the lens or is extra performance worth the 300 bucks despite having the 24-70?
I have the 50mm 1.4 as well, and I love it. It gets completely different shots than the 24-70 (for me, at least, because I almost always shoot with it @ 1.4). I use the 50mm when I don't want to lug around the 24-70 which gets really heavy after awhile. Before I had the 24-70, the 50 was my main lens and it did a fantastic job. I think it's a really versatile lens, but ultimately it's up to you whether you think it's worth holding on to, etc.

[egordon99]

I face a similar conundrum as Pearlallica. I could easily get the 24-70L if I sell my 30/85 primes, but I sure as heck love shooting those two primes at f/1.4-1.8-2 (I use two bodies so I don't have to switch lenses), BUT the L would give me wider coverage, and allow me to use the 24-70 on one body and my 70-200 on the other. I mainly shoot at those wide apertures for the shallow DOF rather than low-light, as I tend to use my 580EXII inside all the time. Occasionally though, I do go flashless, high ISO and wide aperture, so the 24-70L would fail in those situations.....ughhhhh, who wants to lend me $600? ;)

[Spazzmodicus]

Actually, here's a question for you guys.

I have the canon 24-70 and I also have a canon 50mm f/1.4 which functions a bit sharper and faster at f/2.0. I've been strapped for cash lately (the economy has already affected some of my business) and the 300 or so bucks it could fetch (canadian) could be nice. Would you guys get rid of the lens or is extra performance worth the 300 bucks despite having the 24-70?

Keep the lens. The $300 will come and go pretty much unnoticed.
On the other hand, the 50mm tucked into you kit and forgotten about would be useful if:

A. You didn't want hold up the weight of the brick for a particular shoot.

B. You accidentally drop your brick or it otherwise malfunctions and need the 50mm to get you through the shoot.

C. Other scary scenarios.

The 50mm f1.4 has AF problems I guess by reason of it's design. I had to send mine back to Canon already for this problem. The moral of the story is that it's not a bad idea to have a back-up lense although this isn't much of a problem with L lenses. I'm still a little ways off from obtaining the 50mm f/1.2l heh heh. I'll be getting a 5D Mk1 soon since Tareq wouldn't sell me his 1DsMkII...heh heh.

[Pearlallica]

very good points! They all remind me why I loved the 50 1.4 in the first place. What was I thinking, selling it!? lol

egordon99, we have a very similar shooting style. I used to use the 50 at times without the 580EXii for even more natural looks. I find, though, with the 24-70 2.8 is just not fast enough and for indoors, the only keepers I have are with the use of flash, making the 2.8 factor useless. So ultimately I'm paying for the sharpeness and the zoom range. Of course, outdoors is where the speed is better utilized.

Spazzmoodicus, backup is always something to consider which never popped in mind. Good point! I guess nobody actually plans on dropping their equipment even though it does happen. I don't use a neck strap (just hand strap) so I suppose I'm even at more risk for dropping. I've yet to use the 24-70 for long period of time. I lift weights so the macho in me thinks, "only wimps get bogged down by the brick!". When my thinking gets too cocky I just remind myself when I last shot an outdoor wedding with my 70-200 2.8 IS! I was more soar than I am after my typical power lifting sessions.

[single_track]

24-70; my newest toy

[synth19]

^ very nice!

[Markitos]

http://beltie.smugmug.com/photos/430933188_tUj3y-L.jpg

http://beltie.smugmug.com/photos/430940838_6BbKz-L.jpg

[tiarehi]

#1
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3163/3081326989_d771b8789d_b.jpg

#2
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3219/3082171942_06ab642bab_b.jpg

[DozerLYP]

This was taken this morning before sunrise,

Miami Downtown
http://i109.photobucket.com/albums/n56/dozerlyp/IMG_4053.jpg

[Photomek]

Two snapshots with the "Brick" on my 40D:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3095/3086828274_2b99bacbc5.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/photomek/3086828274/sizes/o/)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3146/3086828108_7444730375.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/photomek/3086828108/sizes/o/)

[Mum2J&M]

http://beltie.smugmug.com/photos/430933188_tUj3y-L.jpg

http://beltie.smugmug.com/photos/430940838_6BbKz-L.jpg

Thought I recognized these... this is the Museum of Natural Science in Raleigh, right? We just moved back to Mass. from Cary. I miss it a lot. :(

[babuszka]

Well I LOVE these....so georgous. From all the photos ive seen here, im really considering getting this lens....

http://obj.fotosidan.se/obj/photo/28/28ebc16575d0251993f61d96146d448e.jpg

http://obj.fotosidan.se/obj/photo/b6/b689879dabcd0a461309cfdd0e39b080.jpg

http://obj.fotosidan.se/obj/photo/f0/f06181871c61113d97c7fa968be2a119.jpg

3 of my first pictures with my new 5D and the 24-70 lens..

[babuszka]

That cat is badass! :lol:
Love the pic!

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v163/Meladori/IMG_9982edit1.jpg



:D

[Spazzmodicus]

That cat is badass! :lol:
Love the pic!


Actually that cat is a fat-ass...but it's a nice shot.:D

[Markitos]

Thought I recognized these... this is the Museum of Natural Science in Raleigh, right? We just moved back to Mass. from Cary. I miss it a lot. :(

Indeed. Not sure why you'd miss Cary, but to each their own. ;)

[synth19]

quick pic with my new "brick."


http://www.chicagoz.com/images/xmas.jpg

[Spazzmodicus]

quick pic with my new "brick."

Opened it about 3 weeks early, didn't you? Heh heh.

[wallybud]

quick pic with my new "brick."



First L? Congrats, and welcome to the...My cc is maxed out club;)

[BrantG]

Just save your rent money up and buy the lens. It's a keeper and an essential tool for just about everybody's kit.
Agreed. The 24-70 is my most widely used lens.

[Spazzmodicus]

No post-processing. Shot at ISO 3200, imported into LR, downsized and spit it out.

http://www.all-event-photos.com/img/v4/p817024425.jpg

[wtaccord]

Stinkin Amazon and its quick pick deals. It was one of my suggested items today for $1005.59. I had $165 in saved up gift cards too so got it for $840. There goes Christmas! hehe.

[Sfordphoto]

congrats man. when i got mine it was $1200 :(

[aringpingpong]

one of my first shots with the brick. still having a hard time hand-holding it, so decided to tripod it.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3095/3081219187_8bd181aae5.jpg?v=0

[bimmer02]

Just got mine yesterday. A few shots.
40D; 24-70L f 2.8 @ 70mm & 45mm

[Markitos]

40D; 70-200L f4 @ 175mm. Bokhen similar to the "brick"...

Why is this shot in the "Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM - The Brick" thread? Just because the bokeh is similar?

:confused:

[ieatstars]

http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk294/czechcanary/IMG_2297copy.jpg

http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk294/czechcanary/IMG_2349scopy.jpg

[i_am_hydrogen]

Window-washers
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3087/3104053006_3cded5d2b2_o.jpg

[BrantG]

^^
Very powerful shot!!! Love it.

[Nahte]

It's very sharp!

ISO 100 in low light, Stopped down to f/5, 51mm, Handheld, No PP.

Original
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3165/3103990889_57a1fd3c10_b.jpg


100% Crop
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3057/3103990933_af93779a57_o.jpg

Not great photographs, but a great lens...

[Radiohead369]

Freggin sharp!

[Jason C]

This lens is worth every penny.

3 generations of in-laws; mother, sister and niece.
40D/1-125th sec @ f 5.6/fl=70mm/iso 100/bounced flash/cropped and PP with Elements 5
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3233/3106718406_8c81608172_b.jpg

No ducks, but here is one of my cats, Chloe.

40D/1-200th sec @ f 2.8/fl=70mm/iso 100/PP with Elements 5
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3244/3105883601_463ca6f5cc_b.jpg

[kevinmcdade]

A fantastic thread with some wonderful photographs!!!

I've been debating this lens for the last year. I recently sold my 17-55, bought a 5D Classic and ordered a "brick" yesterday. It should be here tomorrow.

[Spazzmodicus]

A fantastic thread with some wonderful photographs!!!

I've been debating this lens for the last year. I recently sold my 17-55, bought a 5D Classic and ordered a "brick" yesterday. It should be here tomorrow.

Congrats dude. I think you'll be pleasantly suprised.

[Sharpstat]

Congrats dude. I think you'll be pleasantly suprised.


Just remember to allow for the weight of the lens. It sometimes takes a few shots to get used to it!

[Radiohead369]

Most likely won't be posting images here anymore guys.. As im switching to Nikon.

[i_am_hydrogen]

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3115/3118914793_96eac6075c.jpg

[Spazzmodicus]

Most likely won't be posting images here anymore guys.. As im switching to Nikon.

Doh!...I hate it when that happens.

You might be back after experience the wonders of "costly Nikon Glass". Good luck.

[maxblack]

Most likely won't be posting images here anymore guys.. As im switching to Nikon.

See ya.

[Radiohead369]

Peace out Spazz and Max. I got an offer on a D300 that I couldn't resist..

[maxblack]

That's cool man.
I was a Nikon man back in the film days.
I still have my 3 Nikon F's and great optics.
Enjoy!!!

[blam]

a couple from Vegas

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3152/3101883912_2d84487939_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3098/3101046869_6f148e6592_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3150/3101047377_89fd5ac755_o.jpg

[Scott71]

So many great shots on this thread!!!

Here's one from a few weeks ago. Man I really like this lens!!!! Vignette was added to the shot in LR and that was it. Not really a great shooting day just some dull sunshine.

http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m225/icarus71/IMG_0029-4.jpg

[Radiohead369]

Darn. The guy was just "joking" about the trade, can you believe that? Darn.. I had my hopes up and all.. Guess I'll be sticking to this setup. Which im fine with. lol.

[maxblack]

Hey, welcome back!
__________________

[kevinmcdade]

My brick was delivered today!!! I didn't have a chance to do any photography with it but, man, this thing is bigger than I remember!!! I've played around with the 24-70 in the camera store on several ocasions but I didn't remember the exact size. The physical size isn't much larger than the 17-55 that it replaced but it is much heavier. I can't wait to get some shots with it! The weight won't be an issue...I'm very used to carrying my 70-200 f/2.8 IS plus a second body with zoom or prime.

[Radiohead369]

Hey, welcome back!
__________________

Hey, thanks!:D

[IainUK]

I find that with my brick the close ups are really sharp but that any landscapes are a bit dull - does anyone else find this?

[Tareq]

I find that with my brick the close ups are really sharp but that any landscapes are a bit dull - does anyone else find this?

No, not me, in fact my landscapes are shiny more than portraits and close ups to me.

[Dork Knight]

Here are a couple from my copy;

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3011/3107951934_72fc35ac10_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3252/3097077063_453d5752e8_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3131/3095792829_a334c228d2_b.jpg

[i_am_hydrogen]

^Love the mood in the last shot.

[TeeTee]

I second that Jason, the last shot has such a great feel to it. Love the motion in the stars, the glowing lighthouse juxtaposed by the antenna, and in general the exposure of the photo.

[Dork Knight]

Thank you both, your comments are greatly appreciated.

[AndySix]

Took these in Yulara, Red Center, Australia:

http://www.andycam.no/albums/australia08/IMG_1716-01.jpg

http://www.andycam.no/albums/australia08/IMG_1770-01.jpg

http://www.andycam.no/albums/australia08/IMG_1748-01.jpg

http://www.andycam.no/albums/australia08/IMG_1787-01.jpg

http://www.andycam.no/albums/australia08/IMG_1842-01.jpg

http://www.andycam.no/albums/australia08/IMG_1875-01.jpg

http://www.andycam.no/albums/australia08/IMG_1878-01.jpg

Hope you like them. :)

[BJWOK]

nice set! where is that big rock in the last two mate?

[alt4852]

nice set! where is that big rock in the last two mate?

looks like ayers rock in australia. i always thought it was one of australia's national icons but i might be mistaken if an australian doesn't recognize it. :lol:

[Moogle Pepper]

I love this lens! I am so glad that I have bought it! It never leaves my kit!

[Stealthy Ninja]

looks like ayers rock in australia. i always thought it was one of australia's national icons but i might be mistaken if an australian doesn't recognize it. :lol:

I think he was being facetious.

[Radiohead369]

Very nice set Andysix!

[moedizzle]

One of my niece

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3097/3128072843_fc8f700a14.jpg

[shakyhand]

Got myself old 28-70L in a trade.... sent in for calibration but still not sharp... sent in again and this time I talked to the technician that money is not an issue but please make that old lens good again....

He called back 3 days later that the lens got fungus in one of the elements that he must replace. However, being an old lens, Canon got no spare part anymore....

I was heartbroken until the guy said Canon would like to offer a brand new 24-70L if I'm willing to top up equivalent of USD250....

Now just started playing with it and I am very impressed not only with the lens but also Canon service.... date code... produced on 12th Nov 2008...

I love you Canon...

[Spazzmodicus]

Does it cost much to get one calibrated?

[shakyhand]

Does it cost much to get one calibrated?

Not sure in the US... Here it is done for free...:D

[Dork Knight]

Hi shakyhand,

Could I ask, where are you located to know where it's free?

Thank You

[Spazzmodicus]

I think I need to recalibrate my laptop's display. This image doesn't quite look like it's supposed to....but oh well....here it is.

I wish I had my 1ds2 back when I shot this wedding. The 30d is an OK camera but it's a real piece of crap compared to the 1ds2.:cry:


http://www.all-event-photos.com/img/v6/p922132864-4.jpg

[Spazzmodicus]

http://www.all-event-photos.com/img/v6/p392372983-4.jpg

[bReed]

looking to pick this bad boy up very soon!

[mrerico]

Do it bReed its well worth it..this lense is AMAZING.

[S-S]

I think I need to recalibrate my laptop's display. This image doesn't quite look like it's supposed to....but oh well....here it is.
I wish I had my 1ds2 back when I shot this wedding. The 30d is an OK camera but it's a real piece of crap compared to the 1ds2.:cry:


the only comment i have re: not quite right is that the bride's face is oof and really should be sharp, otherwise looks good

[Spazzmodicus]

the only comment i have re: not quite right is that the bride's face is oof and really should be sharp, otherwise looks good

Your right......might've been switched into al-servo mode and threw the focus off when I recomposed. I goofed.:confused:

[S-S]

Your right......might've been switched into al-servo mode and threw the focus off when I recomposed. I goofed.:confused:

forgot to say - stunning work on the 'kiss' photo, i love it

[Double Negative]

The 24-70mm takes a coffee break! I've been meaning to do something like this for a while... Today it was a rainy, lazy Sunday afternoon - I thought, perfect! Lit by a single AB800, softbox w/grid. The whole shoot took less than an hour. Click for larger/info:

http://litpixel.com/ee/images/thumb/_1D_5769.jpg (http://litpixel.com/ee/photo.php?photo=2260&exhibition=58&ee_lang=eng&u=2704,1) http://litpixel.com/ee/images/thumb/_1D_5794.jpg (http://litpixel.com/ee/photo.php?photo=2257&exhibition=58&ee_lang=eng&u=2704,4) http://litpixel.com/ee/images/thumb/_1D_5810.jpg (http://litpixel.com/ee/photo.php?photo=2256&exhibition=58&ee_lang=eng&u=2704,5) http://litpixel.com/ee/images/thumb/_1D_5816.jpg (http://litpixel.com/ee/photo.php?photo=2254&exhibition=58&ee_lang=eng&u=2704,7) http://litpixel.com/ee/images/thumb/_1D_5837.jpg (http://litpixel.com/ee/photo.php?photo=2265&exhibition=58&ee_lang=eng&u=2704,12) http://litpixel.com/ee/images/thumb/_1D_5846.jpg (http://litpixel.com/ee/photo.php?photo=2267&exhibition=58&ee_lang=eng&u=2704,14)

The whole series can be seen here (http://litpixel.com/ee/list.php?exhibition=58&ee_lang=eng)

[Spazzmodicus]

The 24-70mm takes a coffee break! I've been meaning to do something like this for a while... Today it was a rainy, lazy Sunday afternoon - I thought, perfect! Lit by a single AB800, softbox w/grid. The whole shoot took less than an hour. Click for larger/info:

http://litpixel.com/ee/images/thumb/_1D_5769.jpg (http://litpixel.com/ee/photo.php?photo=2260&exhibition=58&ee_lang=eng&u=2704,1) http://litpixel.com/ee/images/thumb/_1D_5794.jpg (http://litpixel.com/ee/photo.php?photo=2257&exhibition=58&ee_lang=eng&u=2704,4) http://litpixel.com/ee/images/thumb/_1D_5810.jpg (http://litpixel.com/ee/photo.php?photo=2256&exhibition=58&ee_lang=eng&u=2704,5) http://litpixel.com/ee/images/thumb/_1D_5816.jpg (http://litpixel.com/ee/photo.php?photo=2254&exhibition=58&ee_lang=eng&u=2704,7) http://litpixel.com/ee/images/thumb/_1D_5837.jpg (http://litpixel.com/ee/photo.php?photo=2265&exhibition=58&ee_lang=eng&u=2704,12) http://litpixel.com/ee/images/thumb/_1D_5846.jpg (http://litpixel.com/ee/photo.php?photo=2267&exhibition=58&ee_lang=eng&u=2704,14)

The whole series can be seen here (http://litpixel.com/ee/list.php?exhibition=58&ee_lang=eng)

Geez.....I know you guys one the east coast are used to living life in the fast lane but a whole 24 hours ahead of the rest of us? It's still Saturday here in the midwest....heh heh.

[Spazzmodicus]

forgot to say - stunning work on the 'kiss' photo, i love it

Thanks man....I appreciate it......Now if I can just tip the balance of the "error ratio" so that 'mistakes' at least 'equal' improvements, rather than outnumber them....heh heh.

[Double Negative]

Geez.....I know you guys one the east coast are used to living life in the fast lane but a whole 24 hours ahead of the rest of us? It's still Saturday here in the midwest....heh heh.

LOL... You're right, it's still Saturday, isn't it? :o

These loooong weekends rock! :)

[Tareq]

It is Sunday here already and i didn't sleep, watch some photos and websites including this one.
Have a great weekend everybody!

[Radiohead369]

Wow amazing shots Spazz! Very sharp and nice colors!

Oh yeah, congrats on the 1ds2!:eek:

[Spazzmodicus]

Wow amazing shots Spazz! Very sharp and nice colors!

Oh yeah, congrats on the 1ds2!:eek:

Thanks RH....does the "dark side" still have you in it's evil clutches? Heh heh.

[Radiohead369]

Only a little.. Most likely not going to switch since no one wants to buy my crap:lol:

[Spazzmodicus]

Only a little.. Most likely not going to switch since no one wants to buy my crap:lol:

Dude....you've got as much or more than the photographers in the history books...there's plenty of learning to be done with your current equipment. Things will change for you when you get a set of wheels and can scoot to whatever location you want.

[Radiohead369]

True hehe:lol: I was eager to switch to a better setup but it won't happen. Im not bummed out because Im more than happy with what I have now :]

[Stems]

Quick Christmas bobble picture, which is actually my first ever image post here actually! :oops:

http://i43.tinypic.com/2w7mgcn.jpg

[ooo]

I love the sharpness at f/2.8

http://rlcstudio.com/images/potn/20081123/linda_3.jpg

[suyenfung]

http://www.inluxphoto.com/images/uploads/potn/081227_0471.jpg

[heathermarie]

Quick Christmas bobble picture, which is actually my first ever image post here actually! :oops:

http://i43.tinypic.com/2w7mgcn.jpg

I love this! lol that's awesome! :) Holy cow.. now I really want this lens haha

[nicksan]

http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v4/p320612359-4.jpg

http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v5/p213909915-4.jpg

[S-S]

cant see your pictures, they seem to be set to private?

[ooo]

Way to go Nick! Just like Pio!

[Spazzmodicus]

Wow....glad to see that I'm not the only fool that locks everybody out like that...heh heh. ;)

[Stems]

I love this! lol that's awesome! :) Holy cow.. now I really want this lens haha

I gave myself many a headache on deciding between this or other lenses. Save yourself the trouble and just...buy it :p

[nicksan]

For real? You can't see my pics?
That's odd...but then again I am pretty stupid so anything is possible.:lol:

[nicksan]

Yep, I am pretty stupid.
Should see the pics now. (And if you don't, then I underestimated my stupidity!)
For real? You can't see my pics?
That's odd...but then again I am pretty stupid so anything is possible.:lol:

[nicksan]

You didn't just call me a fool did you?;):lol:;)

Wow....glad to see that I'm not the only fool that locks everybody out like that...heh heh. ;)

[Double Negative]

LOL, Nick...

And yes, I think he did. :p

[Tareq]

Now we can see the pics ;-)
Nice shot!

[nicksan]

I am liking what I am getting from the Brick however I am not sure whether to keep it or keep my 24-105L. The lack of IS really kills it for me in casual shooting, which is the type of shooting I usually use my zooms for.

I have a great idea. Let me go start another thread about that! ;-)

[Double Negative]

I am liking what I am getting from the Brick however I am not sure whether to keep it or keep my 24-105L. The lack of IS really kills it for me in casual shooting, which is the type of shooting I usually use my zooms for.

C'mon, Nick - you should know you don't need IS with shorter lenses as much as longer ones and that it won't help with moving subjects. If f/2.8 is too dark, then you should probably be using a prime anyway. I know I've never wished it had IS. ;)

Vive le Brick!

[Spazzmodicus]

C'mon, Nick - you should know you don't need IS with shorter lenses as much as longer ones and that it won't help with moving subjects. If f/2.8 is too dark, then you should probably be using a prime anyway. I know I've never wished it had IS. ;)

Vive le Brick!


Look at this way...."IS" is just something else that can go wrong and break. IS can slow things down a bit and be noisy......I don't always use it.

[ooo]

Nick send me your 24-70L, I could use a second brick.

[Spazzmodicus]

You didn't just call me a fool did you?;):lol:;)

Um...inadvertently I did.....sorry about that Dude......Heh heh.:rolleyes:

[nicksan]

IQ-wise, though they are pretty close, I like how the 24-70L looks. It's probably not as sharp as my 24-105L (I have a particularly sharp 24-105L BTW) however there are other aspects of the 24-70L that I like, especially the bokeh, color, and contrast.

But despite how you feel about IS DN(:D), I am a real wimp and need my IS. Yeah, I said it.:lol: Actually if I had the dough, I would own both, but that's not gonna happen anytime soon.(I know y'all looking at my 200L and :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:) The 24-xx(x) zoom typically is my walkaround lens when I just don't know what the heck I am going to be shooting, like on vacations, visiting the nephews and what not. Otherwise I use primes exclusively.

I was Mr. Flash when I visited my nephews over the holidays. I mean I am happy with the results, but dammit, Canon...make a 24-xxL f2.8 IS lens already!@##$$%%^#$#


C'mon, Nick - you should know you don't need IS with shorter lenses as much as longer ones and that it won't help with moving subjects. If f/2.8 is too dark, then you should probably be using a prime anyway. I know I've never wished it had IS. ;)

Vive le Brick!

[Double Negative]

^ I use my 24-70mm the same way... It's my "default lens." :)

[Spazzmodicus]

^ I use my 24-70mm the same way... It's my "default lens." :)

My 24-70 was my default lens too until I got a 50mm f/1.4 and a 16-35mm f/2.8L......now I'm just confused. :confused:

All three are excellent lenses.

[Youridin]

I went out and got a brick yesterday because of this thread

Heres my first post on this thread
http://img224.imageshack.us/img224/3648/img4541io1.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img116.imageshack.us/img116/1499/img4549rw8.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[orisky]

That is sweet!!! Can you roast some marshmallows in it? :)

[davidinjp]

A couple recent, Nagano Japan

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3292/3151194450_48121f2ae8_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3213/3150330355_e789e3af7f_o.jpg

[kwkodiak]

Can someone post some Sport photos, indoors and outdoors , taken with the lens.

Thanks

[T. VO]

Barack Obama, November 2006.

http://img49.imageshack.us/img49/307/img4103po2.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

Very vice photo.. I wonder what he'll be doing in 2 years.. :)

[nicksan]

http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v5/p556312219-5.jpg

http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v6/p882404418-4.jpg

http://nicksan.zenfolio.com/img/v4/p850920341-4.jpg