Will I be needing model releases for shots taken in the street?

[Claire]

I'm very vaguely toying with the idea of adding a page to my website where it'll say something like "If you're interested in hiring me...blah blah".

At this point I've always seen my website as an online portfolio. It's a site for my art work. If I add such a page as stated, will this turn my website into a commercial venue? Would I need model releases from everyone in the photos? No problems really with the potrait stuff, but all the photos I've taken on the street then??

Would greatly get some input about this. Of course I'll try to check with Swedish law as well, but I'm still a bit confused about street photography. I mean, I can't get model releases now for the shots! And I can't get releases for shots with tons of people in them.

[MagicallyDelicious]

as far as im aware you dont need one.

[MattyB]

from what i know - you do :\

all stock photography sites require them for any face that you can identify. :\

[Claire]

I don't intend to sell any of the photos on the site (unless it's not people shots, then I'd be fine with it). I meant more that I'd be offering my services for future clients. Would the photos on the site still be seen as commercial? Would my previously "art" photos turn into "advertising/marketing" material as soon as I put up such a page? And how are the photos displayed affected in this context? Even if I'm not selling any of THEM.

[liza]

http://www.danheller.com/model-release.html

[Col_M]

Like you have said it depends what the law is in Sweden really.

I know that the case is that in the UK you can take photos of anyone and use it however you wish with no legal problems, the US is another story.

Sorry it's not a definitive answer but without knowing Swedish law it's difficult to say :) I'm sure if you have a quick word with a solicitor/lawyer specialising in that sort of thing in Sweden they'd be able to tell you.

[OdiN1701]

I know in the US you don't need a release because out in public there is not a resonable expectation of privacy. If shooting someone inside someones house from outside using a zoom, that's different...though the paparrazi seem to love doing that.

[Claire]

I know that the general rule in Sw is that if it's journalistic or art work, no release is needed. There's a law saying photos published online should have releases, but it's not a firm law, & they're officially changing it now so you can basically show shots of anyone as long as they aren't degrading.

If it's an intended commercial use (excempted is art work & journalistic), then a release is needed.

You are allowed to photograph anywhere unless it's military ground,or you've been asked not to specifically (by a sign or person). Nobody can ask you to delete already taken photos.
Street shots are generally seen as not possible to get model releases, but I'm still confused if all photos on my site will be seen as marketing/advertising/commercial just 'cos I add a page offering my services?

[NordieBoy]

If the photos are not for sale then I don't see a problem.