View Full Version : What effects do you use most often on pics
SonyaL
17th of June 2006 (Sat), 23:45
Talking about special effects.
After you are thru editing your pics what special effects is it that use most often.
For me its color to B & W conversion I use PSP to do this and the channel mixer settings. Then I add softness by using the soft portrait.
I dont just apply the soft portrait filter first I select each eye and the mouth then selections invert then add the filter that way the eyes and mouth are still very sharp.
Second would be sepia toning using virtual photographer.
Sonya
gkuenning
18th of June 2006 (Sun), 02:44
Back when an Olympus was my digital camera, the standard effect (on nearly every photo) was color adjustment to get rid of the excess blue. Grrr.
Since I got a G3, I hardly use effects at all. I crop for Web pages, and sometimes fiddle a bit with contrast or color balance. I also remove red-eye, and occasionally use a clone tool to get rid of a distraction. If I have a great shot that deserves it, I might desaturate and boost contrast to get a B&W version.
Sepia isn't my thing. :)
Terrywoodenpic
18th of June 2006 (Sun), 10:13
I tend not to use the built in Effects at all.
Though I do adjust the custom Effects in camera.
I reduce contrast and sharpness settings to the minimum,
as these can be better managed in photoshop.
though I do leave the Saturation on the middle setting.
You can always increase sharpness and contrast in more subtle ways later, but it is harder to reduce them.
SonyaL
18th of June 2006 (Sun), 22:54
I am working on another page for my website and I wanted to show different effects.
So I am showing B & W, Sepia,Color with softness added and I need one more.
I was going to do painting but everyone saying they dont like that I really need one more for this particular page any ideas?
Sonya
nancypics
18th of June 2006 (Sun), 22:56
I know it's cheesy, but I'm a sucker for brush stroke filters....
SonyaL
18th of June 2006 (Sun), 23:25
Would you mean like this pic?
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/1003/Sonya/Lira79.jpg
TooManyHobbies
18th of June 2006 (Sun), 23:45
If you were refering to techniques instead of a single effect, I would say...
selective sharpening like HPF or Dream Glow (red channel blurred blend for portraits.).
nancypics
19th of June 2006 (Mon), 01:30
Would you mean like this pic?
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/1003/Sonya/Lira79.jpg
Yeah! Exactly. My favourites are crosshatch and drybrush. I actually don't use them that often, but I find they can save a technically poor photo (i.e. noise, missed focus, etc.). Kind of fun...
andrewaaa5
19th of June 2006 (Mon), 03:30
varies from picture to picture. not normally a single effect, but a lot of individual manipulations depending on image type : ) I have been using the lens blur filter quite a lot recently, and a set of 'cross processing' photoshop plug-ins, and an excellent plug-in for 'lith print' effect. The crop tool and 'free transform' are probably my most used if they count as 'effects'.
SonyaL
19th of June 2006 (Mon), 08:40
I know in the past some pics make for a really good sketch where as others look horrible I tried this one in a sketch and it did not work very well.
The model in this pic is our 3 yr old grandaughters shes my best model. LOL.
Sonya
Andy_T
19th of June 2006 (Mon), 09:03
Unsharp mask?
Now don't start laughing as this is not supposed to be a 'special effect', but when I finally tried that out on my G2 images about a year after first hearing about it, it was some kind of revelation to me.
Best regards,
Andy
SonyaL
19th of June 2006 (Mon), 20:12
I have not tried unsharp mask what does it do?
Sonya
rpolitsr
19th of June 2006 (Mon), 20:48
It does exactly the opposed to what it’s name suggest: It SHARPENS your images. In my opinion it is the best filter yet to sharpen your photos whit a minimum of adverse side effects.
The name comes from a well known process in a real darkroom were the photographer used an unsharpened copy of the negative in the process of sharpening the print.
As I did nothing but basic darkroom work, I leave the explanation of the film technique to a better trained photographer (Terry?)
Andy_T
20th of June 2006 (Tue), 03:01
Sonya,
the unsharp mask will make your images sharper.
Take a look at this thread: By popular request: Workflow tutorial (http://www.photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=95468)
It's a great thread by forum user Schmoelzel (who I consider to be a nothing less than a genius when it comes to people images) about post processing on portraits, and USM is one step in that process.
Just look at the image he starts with and at the final result, I think you'll be as amazed as I was.
Before:
http://theteahaus.netfirms.com/DRebelPix/nfpicturepro/albums/userpics/10001/Raw1.jpg
After:
http://theteahaus.netfirms.com/DRebelPix/nfpicturepro/albums/userpics/10001/Tut6.jpg
Best regards,
Andy
Terrywoodenpic
20th of June 2006 (Tue), 05:44
It does exactly the opposed to what it’s name suggest: It SHARPENS your images. In my opinion it is the best filter yet to sharpen your photos whit a minimum of adverse side effects.
The name comes from a well known process in a real darkroom were the photographer used an unsharpened copy of the negative in the process of sharpening the print.
As I did nothing but basic darkroom work, I leave the explanation of the film technique to a better trained photographer (Terry?)
The origional Purpose of unsharp mask was to neutralise the fuzzy edges caused by poor focus.
On a picture of a black object on a white ground. those edges taper from black through grey to white.
To neutralize them, the negative was contact printed with a piece of clear film between the negative and the copy film, to give space for light to diffuse and make soft edges on the copy film. this was exposed and processed to give a mask that maintained those soft edges, but now of course it would be a posative.
When the origional neg and the copy posative were taped together in register and printed the new edges neutralized the negatives edges and made the print seem sharper.
Unlike unsharp mask in photoshop it only had an effect on edges, fine detail was not changed,( if there was any)
It was mainly done in process houses when the final output was to be used in printing books or advertisements, as it was a slow and expensive process.
Photoshop cs2 now has a super unsharp mask called smart sharpen, which is even better. than unsharp mask.
Andy_T
20th of June 2006 (Tue), 06:17
Terry, thanks for the explanation.
Best regards,
Andy
SonyaL
20th of June 2006 (Tue), 09:54
Thanks for the explanation.
I will go do some reading about this.
Sonya
rpolitsr
20th of June 2006 (Tue), 13:06
Thank you very much, Terry
It is an interesting description for those of us who just inserted the negative in a cheap enlarger to get the print.
Unlike unsharp mask in photoshop it only had an effect on edges, fine detail was not changed
I do not have CS2 yet, but now I understand better the reasons for the Selective sharpening steps described in PhotoShop CS!
Selective sharpening is a multi-step process to limit the unsharp-mask effect to the edges within the image.
I converted it in an action that is used very often in my post processing.
an33sh
26th of June 2006 (Mon), 08:58
well my favorite kindaf editing thing is B&W with highlighting all the really bright colours to attract focus on the subject::
This is me, but the pic was taken my buddy:: similar mods to other pics:::
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v637/m1g/MA%20PICS/SCOOT%20N%20SHOOT/kewl8.jpg
or just add colour to it::
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v637/m1g/MA%20PICS/67567547.jpg
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.