View Full Version : to sign or not to sign
dkenney
21st of June 2006 (Wed), 14:43
I notice some people put their signature on their photos. My question is when is this appropriate? If I do a shoot and offer some proofs, should I sign the photos or not? Where would one use this? Thanks for your reply.
AccidentalArt
21st of June 2006 (Wed), 14:50
good question.
PIXI_666
21st of June 2006 (Wed), 22:29
When i do weddings and i make a proof book for my clients, i have my lab make a white border around ALL of my proofs and have (C) Adelle Cousins its not my actual business name, nor my signature that i use, but its just to show that every single photo posted in the proof book i photographed.
Del
dkenney
22nd of June 2006 (Thu), 12:35
that is a great idea! thanks for sharing Del!
SRPhotographic
22nd of June 2006 (Thu), 12:53
I never sign prints, ever. Putting a signature on a print ruins the flow of the image, IMO. I DO, however, sign the mats that I sell my photos in. That is okay because it doesn't compromise the photograph.
dkenney
22nd of June 2006 (Thu), 13:10
thanks SRP... do think it ruins it if its in the border?
chtgrubbs
22nd of June 2006 (Thu), 16:32
"Does God sign the sky?"- Alfred Stieglitz
dkenney
22nd of June 2006 (Thu), 18:29
"Does God sign the sky?"- Alfred Stieglitz
Great point. however, God isn't selling a copy of it to anyone and hoping they don't go to CVS and make prints. LOL.
PIXI_666
22nd of June 2006 (Thu), 19:16
I think its personal choice, i never sign the actual photo just the border on the print...its an extra $40 to get it done to over 300 photo's but i think its worth it - comes out looking very professional
liza
22nd of June 2006 (Thu), 19:39
Great point. however, God isn't selling a copy of it to anyone and hoping they don't go to CVS and make prints. LOL.
Good point. And a really funny comeback. :lol:
dkenney
22nd of June 2006 (Thu), 20:53
Hi Liza, I always enjoy your posts ;)
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.