abitbent
12th of October 2003 (Sun), 22:57
I've about had it with this A40. I'd probably have a little more patience, but one thing I do know, is I can take my crappy 35mm with 200 speed film and get way way way better pictures than this.
If someone can tell me what I'm doing wrong (without telling me to TRY this or TRY that) it'll save my faith in this crappy digital camera. You can't tell me that the FM (f*cking magic) that goes on in the digital processing can't give me the ability to point and shoot good pictures in the auto setting, without fiddle farting around with manual settings everytime I want to snap a pic.
Everytime I think I'm being impatient about digital photography, I take out my 35mm and shoot brainless shots that always turn out great.
Here's my dilema.... I'm in a situation where I'm indoors, the subject I want to take a pic of, is not 24 inches in front of me, so the flash ends up being completely useless, and I get shots like this:
http://members.rogers.com/abitbent/pic2.jpg
(Auto Mode, with flash, subject about 12 feet away, moving)
It's always too dark, and when I touch it up after by fooling with brightness and contrast, I always get red eye and grainy shots.
So, if I force the camera not to use the flash, I get this:
http://members.rogers.com/abitbent/pic1.jpg
(Auto Mode, no flash, subject 12 feet away, moving)
Unless the subject is completely still, it's always blurry. The brightness, contrast and colour is great, but motion kills me.
This camera is completely useless, unless, I'm either outside on a nice day, or the subject I'm shooting is two feet in front of me.
I still say digitals should be able to get rid of the blur with no flash. They should be able to emulate 400 speed film somehow. GRRRRRRR!!!!!!!
Anyone seem to find the magic combination of settings in Manual or P mode to overcome this problem? I'd love to hear your thoughts!
bent
If someone can tell me what I'm doing wrong (without telling me to TRY this or TRY that) it'll save my faith in this crappy digital camera. You can't tell me that the FM (f*cking magic) that goes on in the digital processing can't give me the ability to point and shoot good pictures in the auto setting, without fiddle farting around with manual settings everytime I want to snap a pic.
Everytime I think I'm being impatient about digital photography, I take out my 35mm and shoot brainless shots that always turn out great.
Here's my dilema.... I'm in a situation where I'm indoors, the subject I want to take a pic of, is not 24 inches in front of me, so the flash ends up being completely useless, and I get shots like this:
http://members.rogers.com/abitbent/pic2.jpg
(Auto Mode, with flash, subject about 12 feet away, moving)
It's always too dark, and when I touch it up after by fooling with brightness and contrast, I always get red eye and grainy shots.
So, if I force the camera not to use the flash, I get this:
http://members.rogers.com/abitbent/pic1.jpg
(Auto Mode, no flash, subject 12 feet away, moving)
Unless the subject is completely still, it's always blurry. The brightness, contrast and colour is great, but motion kills me.
This camera is completely useless, unless, I'm either outside on a nice day, or the subject I'm shooting is two feet in front of me.
I still say digitals should be able to get rid of the blur with no flash. They should be able to emulate 400 speed film somehow. GRRRRRRR!!!!!!!
Anyone seem to find the magic combination of settings in Manual or P mode to overcome this problem? I'd love to hear your thoughts!
bent