Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II - Nifty Fifty

[willy b]

Is it wrong i was thinking that too :rolleyes::lol:

[JoYork]

Another one with the nifty fifty... I can't believe what a bargain this thing is. Shot under office lights with auto WB...

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2106/2197861032_36860ce1dd_o.jpg

ISO 400, f/2 aperture, 1/125 shutter. Camera - 400d.

[borg79]

Sister, you say?

:)

lol note to self, no more posting pics of family members. :p

[flipstyle72]

lol note to self, no more posting pics of family members. :p

lol...and the post above you is easy on the eyes as well! :D

[Salman1]

I was going to purchase the 50mm but a friend suggested not to because the 28-135 covers the 50mm range anyway?!

[jonnythan]

I was going to purchase the 50mm but a friend suggested not to because the 28-135 covers the 50mm range anyway?!

But at 50mm it's, what, an f/4.5 lens? That's glacial compared to 50mm f/1.8.

Plus that lens is like 7 times as expensive as the nifty.

[willy b]

Everybody "should" own one ! There such a good experimenting lens, really does improve your photography i think!
Ow and Jo, Dam that os one sharp shot! *the subject may or may not also be very attractive*

[mellowd]

I was going to purchase the 50mm but a friend suggested not to because the 28-135 covers the 50mm range anyway?!


Get one anyway. I've got 2 lenses that covers 50mm but I'd rather use my 50mm 1.8!

[willy b]

I have 3 :p

[S-S]

I have 3 :p

i have 4... :oops:
no wait... 5... (forgot the kit lens)

[Travisj]

Was playing with the light box again tonight and thought I'd throw the 50 on there to see how it would look. Still not too thrilled with this lens, anyway heres one that I have from it.


http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2341/2198676290_4b67befdb5_o.jpg

[willy b]

Travis. Why are you not happy with it. I mean for £50 what can you ask for?

[Jay McLaughlin]

I use mine for all sorts!

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1042/1434177909_4231c96642.jpg

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1415/540703278_358423df59.jpg

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/212/510688053_cce739e7a5.jpg

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/183/454363034_d8ad5b92cb.jpg

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/132/411264781_6ba3ee37e8.jpg

[Travisj]

Travis. Why are you not happy with it. I mean for £50 what can you ask for?


I just thought it might have a greater DOF at F10 than what this showed. I still need to shoot with it more I guess.

[willy b]

All very nice shots Jay, i like 1 and 2 the best *and no, not just because they have vert attractive woman in* :rolleyes:

[S-S]

I just thought it might have a greater DOF at F10 than what this showed. I still need to shoot with it more I guess.

at f10? arent the f-stops a universal standard?

maybe you chose the wrong hyperfocal length when you picked your focus point

[Travisj]

at f10? arent the f-stops a universal standard?

maybe you chose the wrong hyperfocal length when you picked your focus point


Yepper, upon furthur examination it was user error. I must have bumped the tripod or something but it sent my focus point to the back drop right above the barrel. I have a better one now that I have gone through them and really looked. Told ya I needed to shoot with it more...:oops:

[Salman1]

This looks like a great (cheap) lens instead of the getting the f1.4 but, does using the 28mm-135 offer the same photos/options and duplication of my lenses or does the fixed focal length of the 50mm offer more? I was questioned by a friend for my reason behind getting a 50mm when it is already represented in my collection now....

[mellowd]

This looks like a great (cheap) lens instead of the getting the f1.4 but, does using the 28mm-135 offer the same photos/options and duplication of my lenses or does the fixed focal length of the 50mm offer more? I was questioned by a friend for my reason behind getting a 50mm when it is already represented in my collection now....


F1.8 is why. And as you can see, it's super sharp

[jonnythan]

That 28-135mm doesn't go larger than f/4 or so at 50mm.

At a 50mm focal length, an aperture of f/1.8 (about 27mm in diameter) has an area over 5 times an aperture of f/4 (12.5mm diameter). In other words, you get about 5 times more light through an f/1.8 aperture than an f/4 aperture.

Combine this light-gathering ability with the fact that larger apertures make your DOF thinner and you have a pretty good argument for owning such a "fast" lens.

[JoYork]

Is there anyone here who's gone from the nifty to the 1.4?

[willy b]

Think this lens really does improve your photography, well it has with mine i'm sure!!

[TomTomTuning]

Here is one of my buddy from a party last week.

40D 1/60 f/1.8 ISO-1600

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2378/2189760551_588998b74c.jpg

I love my 50mm, it was the best 80 bucks ive spent lol.

[willy b]

Iso 1600, rather dam good i say!

[mellowd]

Is there anyone here who's gone from the nifty to the 1.4?

Eventually. But not for another year at least

[willy b]

Is it "really" worth the extra £££ though?

[jonnythan]

Well, if being sharper at 1.8 - 2.2, having better, faster, quieter AF, and working at 1.4 are important to you at all, and $230 isn't THAT much money to you...... then yes.

[willy b]

Pwned :(

[TomTomTuning]

Iso 1600, rather dam good i say!
I agree, i bet i could have cleaned it up with noise ninja, but i didnt think i needed to.

Plus i ran actions on that whole set to save time. I didn't want to PP them really.

[willy b]

Good work Tom!

[Salman1]

The photo's look great. I guess I'm more concerned because the 50mm is more like a 75mm-80mm isn't it as far as a digital lens is concerned?

[mellowd]

The photo's look great. I guess I'm more concerned because the 50mm is more like a 75mm-80mm isn't it as far as a digital lens is concerned?

On a crop body, yes. Your FOV would not match a 50mm on FF

[Salman1]

Okay, now I'm confused. On a crop body, which I thought the 40D was, 50mm is not really 50mm, but on a FF it is right?

[S-S]

Okay, now I'm confused. On a crop body, which I thought the 40D was, 50mm is not really 50mm, but on a FF it is right?

thats right, on a 1.6 crop it is really 80mm

[Salman1]

I guess for the price its and awesome deal but maybe a 21 or 24mm would be better but that could be expensive unless there is one out there in the similar price range but not the price of an IS or L lens.

[tonylong]

Okay, now I'm confused. On a crop body, which I thought the 40D was, 50mm is not really 50mm, but on a FF it is right?

You don't need to worry about it unless you're coming from shooting film and have worked with lenses and famiaiarized yourself in dealing with specific focal lengths, or have a full-frame digital body and want to match the field of view between the two cameras and your lenses.

On a crop body 50mm is really 50mm physically (the lens still has a 50mm focal length), but the smaller sesnor physically pics up the center portion of the image, hence the term crop. So, the field of view captured by the crop sensor is like the field of view you would get using a longer lens on a 35mm film or full frame sensor.

If you're trying to match focal length equivalence between a film or full frame camera and a 40D "crop" camera, you can just figure that to get an equivalent field of view of, say a 50mm lens on the FF you multiply the 50x1.6 and reach for a lens that is in that range.

In normal use, I think it's easier if I just get to know my lenses and what I want to shoot with a given camera, knowing that wide is wider on full frame, long is longer on crop, but it's the field of view that changes, not the physical focal length: 50mm is really still 50mm, but visually gives the field of view of something closer to 85mm.

[S-S]

You don't need to worry about it unless you're coming from shooting film and have worked with lenses and famiaiarized yourself in dealing with specific focal lengths, or have a full-frame digital body and want to match the field of view between the two cameras and your lenses.

On a crop body 50mm is really 50mm physically (the lens still has a 50mm focal length), but the smaller sesnor physically pics up the center portion of the image, hence the term crop. So, the field of view captured by the crop sensor is like the field of view you would get using a longer lens on a 35mm film or full frame sensor.

If you're trying to match focal length equivalence between a film or full frame camera and a 40D "crop" camera, you can just figure that to get an equivalent field of view of, say a 50mm lens on the FF you multiply the 50x1.6 and reach for a lens that is in that range.

In normal use, I think it's easier if I just get to know my lenses and what I want to shoot with a given camera, knowing that wide is wider on full frame, long is longer on crop, but it's the field of view that changes, not the physical focal length: 50mm is really still 50mm, but visually gives the field of view of something closer to 85mm.

yes - but if your crop sensor is 10pmx (for example) and u compare it to a ff sensor of the same size, the digital zoom effect will apply

[tonylong]

yes - but if your crop sensor is 10pmx (for example) and u compare it to a ff sensor of the same size, the digital zoom effect will apply

True (more pixels in the 10mp crop sensor than in the equivalent portion of a 5D 12mp sensor even). This is a valid reason to choose whether to shoot a given scene with a crop or a full frame.

But just so there is not confusion, a 50mm lens is still really a 50mm lens on both cameras.

[el aye]

One of my first shots with this lens.

[Salman1]

Well, there is a significant learning curve hear because I AM coming from shooting 35mm film for many years. Amateur photographer for most things and more experience shooting fire scenes for quite a long time.

[flipstyle72]

One of my first shots with this lens.

ha, i love it.

[willy b]

1http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o288/willyb_photo/118-1.jpg

2http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o288/willyb_photo/119-2.jpg

3http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o288/willyb_photo/120-2.jpg

[prime]

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1132/757850640_43bbeee167_o.jpg
1/320 sec, f/2.8, ISO 100.

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/160/436651082_fcb36b8b79_o.jpg
1/250 sec, f/2.8, ISO 400. Garfield Conservatory.

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/172/439323736_73b09d1435_o.jpg
1/100 sec, f/1.8, ISO 1600. If you've been to the shedd aquarium you know how dark it is around the tanks on the first floor.

[gixxer]

f/2.0 iso100 1/3200sec

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y13/method25/Canon%20Forum/R1.jpg

[Salman1]

Nice photos. I often read on these boards about how certain lenses etc. aren't accepted/revered etc. because of the AF. It is amazing to see how many people don't choose to use manual focus. I guess its just a technology thing...

[TxDietwater]

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1132/757850640_43bbeee167_o.jpg
1/320 sec, f/2.8, ISO 100.


Such a great picture man!

[Nick_b]

Nice photos. I often read on these boards about how certain lenses etc. aren't accepted/revered etc. because of the AF. It is amazing to see how many people don't choose to use manual focus. I guess its just a technology thing...

I think it's because digital cameras are a PITA to MF. I enjoy using my MF film camera but trying to MF with my XT and 20D is frustrating!

[e.pie]

I think it's because digital cameras are a PITA to MF. I enjoy using my MF film camera but trying to MF with my XT and 20D is frustrating!

you can get a split prism focusing screen, I've thought about it and I might still if the EF-D screen isn't as good as I'm hoping it is once it gets here

http://www.katzeyeoptics.com/cat--Canon-DSLRs--cat_canon.html

[S-S]

or you could get a live view model - manual focusing is pretty simple (for non moving subjects with tripod)

[e.pie]

or you could get a live view model - manual focusing is pretty simple (for non moving subjects with tripod)

that too :)

[Nick_b]

Hmmm, that looks interesting! I think I might try that! Thanks for the link!

[dec11ad]

But at 50mm it's, what, an f/4.5 lens? That's glacial compared to 50mm f/1.8.

Plus that lens is like 7 times as expensive as the nifty.
and its not as sharp either!!

[SKCIH]

My Puppy

[S-S]

now THATS a really nice shot, well done

[mellowd]

So cute!

[SKCIH]

Thanks, more cuteness

[Maddog12]

My turn.....I love this lens! No PP except for the frames.

f/1.8 @ ISO 100
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2374/2210845960_6d880d78f9.jpg

f/16 @ ISO 400
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2297/2210844944_6ea640a2ec.jpg

f/1.8 @ ISO 200
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2152/2210843676_b411445232.jpg

[modemanual]

Loving the thin DOF.

http://omgitsacamera.smugmug.com/photos/245911650-L.jpg

1/2500 f/2,5 ISO 100

[R0ger]

Gives me a error attaching/linking, send me a private message if you want examples.

[willy b]

Love that 2nd one Mike!

[JoYork]

I've had a few pics in low light recently where the focus missed entirely (fairly certain it wasn't user error for a change!)

However, when it's on focus you can get some incredibly sharp images. I took this one at the weekend, we were messing around trying to bounce the flash and came up with a very quick and cheap hack.

We ripped up a white envelope, bent it so it was curling upwards and stuck it near where the on-board flash lives.

This was very sharp even at 100%, here it is reduced down to 1200*800:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2082/2212388508_c991294a48_o.jpg

Pic is of my friend Stu - I'll have to tell him to smile next time :)

[JoYork]

Ferrari in London (http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2259/2212362524_701d2b169a_o.jpg)

Camera: 400D
Exposure: 0.013 sec (1/80)
Aperture: f/2.8
ISO Speed: 200

[willy b]

Nice shots Jo, love that Ferrari! Couldn't post a pic of that cheap flash bouncing could you... Sounds like what i need lol

[JoYork]

I will but I warn you it's not pretty and it's not clever... it will probably have people laugh at you if you try to use it. It's just a piece of paper inspired by http://abetterbouncecard.com/

Who cares, it's fun to experiment and the images came out way better than not having one :)

[willy b]

Thanks, would just be for experimenting:)

[PG07]

I love the nifty....

[willy b]

^^^^^
Those eyes...Crazy!

[silversldr]

Here is one that I took a month or so ago. All I have really done to it was desaturate it.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2158/2212667905_1b46665403.jpg

[willy b]

^^^^
Very sharp!

[cory1848]

f/2.0 iso100 1/3200sec

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y13/method25/Canon%20Forum/R1.jpg


That looks like the Cherohala Skyway...? Man I love that road...

[JCH77Yanks]

I love this lens... I took this one this past december.

http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c193/Shogun613/PolarExpressatf71.jpg

[Rhinotherunt]

I love this lens... I took this one this past december.


Nice!

[Salman1]

Nice photos. very crisp. are most of you shooting in AF and program using the lens?

[discoduck]

Just got home and took a quick picture of something random:
Forgive my newbieness!

Handheld
http://www.r-exp.com/photography/lamp.jpg

Resized and sharpened just a tad in photoshop.
If I had a tripod it'd look a bit less blurry on the focus.

The little bit of white spots are all dust particles. I don't clean my room much :D

[S-S]

i was playing with my 50mm last evening, it was very dim indoors, only a little light coming in windows and one small fluoro bulb on a lamp
it didnt hunt very much and seemed to find a focus point even on dark objects like a black cat
however, the low light IQ is not very good, somewhat fuzzy and grainy at 100% (on 40D at 800ISO). did not perform as well as my 17-55 f/2.8
this is really a daylight/bright light lens, in spite of the f/1.8

[builtfromashes]

here are some of the ones i took the day after i got mine. not the best but i was just playing with setting and seeing what i could do.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2352/2091534852_b0dcd68400.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2239/2091538554_0d88899fa8.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2002/2090754459_02170bc96a.jpg

[davo_robbo]

heres my contribution :)
took it last trip to the coast and i cant let go of the shot, i just love the dramatic emphasis of the waves on the rocks
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2343/2187266764_bb23e2cf14_b.jpg

[S-S]

thats really nice, looks like an oil painting

[discoduck]

More with the 50mm

1/60 ISO800

http://www.r-exp.com/photography/multiflower.jpg

[Amfamora]

I bought it today its sooo sharp and LOVE the DOF!!!!

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v157/Amfamora/_MG_0092.jpg

Never mind the subject all I could think of in my excitement to take a picture of lol. No post processing under exposed blah blah but still I likey :)

The bokeh is great!

[gixxer]

That looks like the Cherohala Skyway...? Man I love that road...
Acutally it was Taken on the Blue Ridge Parkway, which is a fun road too.

[HiImSean]

http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r152/HiInSean/067.jpg

it was snowing at my apartment complex so i snapped a few pics. i liked this one best
f/5.6, ISO 100, expo. 2.5 sec

[justisnmnz]

http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/1958/img0864copy2ra9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[flipstyle72]

i was playing with my 50mm last evening, it was very dim indoors, only a little light coming in windows and one small fluoro bulb on a lamp
it didnt hunt very much and seemed to find a focus point even on dark objects like a black cat
however, the low light IQ is not very good, somewhat fuzzy and grainy at 100% (on 40D at 800ISO). did not perform as well as my 17-55 f/2.8
this is really a daylight/bright light lens, in spite of the f/1.8

I have to agree with you.... mine won't "find" the subject in poorly lit conditions. I usually have to mf it

[willy b]

http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/1958/img0864copy2ra9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

Now that is a good shot!

[Amfamora]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v157/Amfamora/WetNose.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v157/Amfamora/BeardedDragon5.jpg

[willy b]

Amfamora that could be a very nice shot, if the focus was on the eyes!

[S-S]

or on the teeth, for effect

[Amfamora]

He was a very hyperactive subject..... If only Staffies had a go slow mode!

[S.O.P]

ISO200, F/4, 1/250

http://www.users.on.net/%7Eevangw/pics/POTN/_MG_5208.jpg

ISO800, F/2.8, 1/60

http://www.users.on.net/%7Eevangw/pics/POTN/_MG_5775-2-2.jpg

[Amfamora]

I love the second shot!!! Looks like she spots something tasty!

[willy b]

Agreed, love the second shot

[srdjanhorvat]

ISO 1600 f 1.8
http://i204.photobucket.com/albums/bb30/srdjanhorvat/ruka.jpg

[primalcarl]

Took my first shots with this lense over the weekend. Very impressed!

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2280/2223289470_8cd240e4e2_b.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2045/2223274262_d43ed9f6cc_b.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2153/2223341752_336865e946_b.jpg

[djeuch]

Took my first shots with this lense over the weekend. Very impressed!

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2280/2223289470_8cd240e4e2_b.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2045/2223274262_d43ed9f6cc_b.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2153/2223341752_336865e946_b.jpg

You've controlled DoF excellently in these shots! Well done!

[Epix]

239598

Camera Model: Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT
Flash Used: No
Focal Length: 50.0mm
Exposure Time: 0.013 s (1/80)
Aperture: f/1.8
ISO equiv: 200
Exposure: aperture priority (semi-auto)

[dwill123]

Chorus concert

[R0ger]

Just a couple from one day, no processing.

[LeighM]

Took me a while to get used to the narrow DOF of this lens but i'm finally getting the hang of it.

Here's a recent shot of my girlfriend, cropped, curves and WB adjusted.

http://i204.photobucket.com/albums/bb56/Leigh0276/Share/20080122_0026.jpg

Cheers,
Leigh

[R0ger]

Question, I posted shots with my 50mm 1.8 @ 1.8, does the later matter?

If not, then I'll post others.

[-spam-]

Question, I posted shots with my 50mm 1.8 @ 1.8, does the later matter?

If not, then I'll post others.

Doesnt matter what aperture you used for the shot, just as long as it was with the 50 1.8

And while i am here

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2197/2222807154_2ee52b2492_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/-spam-/2222807154/)

[djrambis]

Quick snap shot...

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2206/2224068485_1e0ce1f6fd.jpg

[BobbyT]

http://images31.fotki.com/v1087/photos/9/949682/5851848/1270824-vi.jpg

[discoduck]

A few more..

1/4000, ISO-800, f/1.8
http://r-exp.com/photography/RebelXT/50mmf1.8/snowbush.jpg http://r-exp.com/photography/RebelXT/50mmf1.8/snowbush2.jpg

[S.O.P]

I love the second shot!!! Looks like she spots something tasty!

Agreed, love the second shot

Thanks guys.


ISO800 (I hate when that happens!), F/8, 1/200, 430EX
http://www.users.on.net/%7Eevangw/pics/POTN/_MG_5646.jpg

Showing off her new two front teeth. Not the most flattering shot though.

[R0ger]

50mm 1.8 @ 1.8 , without processing.

[illusions]

Here's my share ;)

[illusions]

My favorite painting; cropped.

[willy b]

1http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o288/willyb_photo/006-4.jpg

2http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o288/willyb_photo/008-9.jpg

3http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o288/willyb_photo/010-5.jpg

4http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o288/willyb_photo/012-6.jpg

[djeuch]

I've noticed that AF focus can be off. Did these with Liveview while connected to my laptop, and used the laptop controls to control focus. I've had some hit-and-miss with this lens, but this performance is impressive! (There's a lot of junk on a table 5 feet behind it)

At the request of my 4-year-old, I photographed his crayons!

Shot at about 22" wide open (f/1.8). Second one is a center 100% crop.

http://www.jeuch.com/jpg/niftyfifty/nomark/IMG_5005c.JPG

http://www.jeuch.com/jpg/niftyfifty/nomark/IMG_5005crop.JPG

[crosseyed]

Seaworld, Goldcoast, Australia

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2313/2225798734_78d956eef2_b.jpg

[-spam-]

Seaworld, Goldcoast, Australia

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2313/2225798734_78d956eef2_b.jpg

Nice. Id know that ferris wheel anywhere (http://flickr.com/photos/-spam-/1346248450/in/set-72157601336779959/) ;)

[crosseyed]

Hard to miss over there:D great shot by the way!!

[-spam-]

Hard to miss over there:D great shot by the way!!

Definitely, although it stands out much more from across the broadwater than it does from the air. Still wish i had my camera out in time as i flew over the coast.

Thanks too :D

[willy b]

Crosseyed love your shot!!
Spam love your shot too!

[philmony]

Somebody - way back posted up a turntable pic - inspired me to take one of mine ... :)

[flipstyle72]

that is a neat picture....I'm gonna have to play around with some "macro-like" shots when i'm bored at home.

[-spam-]

Spam love your shot too!

thanks mate :)

Somebody - way back posted up a turntable pic - inspired me to take one of mine ... :)

heheh, that would have been me (http://www.flickr.com/photos/-spam-/2127317463/in/set-72157600203677158/) (i think)

[juliema]

I have posted this before, but I like it so I'll post it here as well. :)

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2218/2229666678_97bb6f1d4b.jpg?v=0

I guess you can tell as it's my avatar too. :p

[willy b]

Nice Turntable shots!

[djeuch]

Took these yesterday. Fun lens to play with! Relatively poor light and no flash.

one could have used more DoF, but then again, I kind of like how soft it turned out! Shot wide open:
http://www.jeuch.com/pics/2008/2008-01-28/nomark/IMG_4945A.JPG

1/3 f-stop (f/2):
http://www.jeuch.com/pics/2008/2008-01-28/nomark/IMG_4992A.JPG

[Max F]

A couple over Christmas:

[drandtus]

Hey, my cat's at your house! Kidding, of course. Beatle looks just like that kitty, perhaps a bit older. Nice pics!

[el aye]

Here's one of my first shots with the lens...

http://wighty.googlepages.com/aIMG_0558resized.JPG

[JeffreyVB]

f/2.0 iso100 1/3200sec

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y13/method25/Canon%20Forum/R1.jpg

Great shot up on the Parkway. Makes me home sick!! I am from Hendersonville.

[mson]

From last Satruday
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2113/2221763395_b242bd5afc_o.jpg

[willy b]

1http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o288/willyb_photo/hdr1dog.jpg

2http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o288/willyb_photo/005-7.jpg

3http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o288/willyb_photo/006-5.jpg

4http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o288/willyb_photo/007-3.jpg

[Azzure_7]

http://picasaweb.google.com/muliadi27/Portfolio/photo#5157615526642733778

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/editor/quote.gif

Why can't I put pics?
What did I done wrong ?
This is from picasa.
I had no trouble when uploading from photobucket.

[Azzure_7]

[url]http://www.flickr.com/photos/23236523@N06/2222329650/jpg[url]

[-spam-]

[url]http://www.flickr.com/photos/23236523@N06/2222329650/jpg[url]

Instead of the [url] tags, use and

[crosseyed]

From last Satruday
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2113/2221763395_b242bd5afc_o.jpg


Very nice!! Well done

[Welby]

One from a little while ago. When it focuses good it's good ;)

http://www.users.on.net/~onexi/_MG_0850.jpg

[cesstrelle]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2316/2226374502_2758914526.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2178/2225584997_3799864327.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2006/2134813885_6948b5bc9a.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2268/2098950342_4cb9fbd4be.jpg

[Azzure_7]

http://www.flickr.com/photos/23236523@N06/2222329650/jpg


tried.

[willy b]

Castrelle, there brillaint! Very sharp, what PP is done hear?

[cesstrelle]

All I did was boost some colors in lightroom but didn't touch the sharpening at all :)

[willy b]

Well you have a very sharp copy:)

[cesstrelle]

Thanks so much Willy b :) It's such a FUN lens. It amazing how much it can do. It's really helped me learn more about my camera and get more creative.

Here's a few more that were not brought into lightroom, I believe just re-sized in photoshop for posting on the web.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2226/2120106577_f86d47a6dd.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2122/2120158277_b978fac6e5.jpg

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1391/1314390401_d5445cbb96.jpg

[willy b]

It amazing how much it can do. It's really helped me learn more about my camera and get more creative.


That is just the same with me!

Love the Bear and the Croc one!

[castaneda]

http://i202.photobucket.com/albums/aa276/castafotos/be24.jpg
Got to meet Travis Pastrana at Gillman Subaru "Big Subaru Event" in Houston, TX. Awesome person to meet! I put on my goofy face.

[gixxer]

Took this during an ice storm we had this past week.

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y13/method25/Canon%20Forum/IceStormLeaf.jpg

[drandtus]

Niiiiiice! Good one, gixxer.

[shutterguy]

http://www.elianthony.com/v1/images/stories/albums/vehicles/IMG_1874.sized.jpg

[willy b]

Gixxer, nice shot!

[justisnmnz]

Because your eye only sees a small portion of an object at once. My eyes are only seeing two or three lines of keys on my keyboard right now, so if a photo were to show all of the keys in focus, the photo would feel unnatural.

Now I require your 5d for answering your question. :D

[Bansheercr]

50mm at f8

[S-S]

just a tip - when humans look at other humans/creatures, they always subconsciously try to find a 'face' and always look for something that can be called 'eyes' in the face

a shot that doesn't make the eyes sharp will prevent the viewer from identifying closely with the subject

[Mediation]

lol at the pun!

[S-S]

what pun?

[Mediation]

just a tip

:p