Bodyart (warning tasteful nudity) - Take two

[jasonco]

Team,

Hows this look then... taken last night.

http://www.coledigital.com/bodyart/Art_05a.jpg

Comments please...

Cheers
Jason

[PhotoAZ]

It has a solarize look which for some reason I like. Though it would be nice to have it just a bit brighter.

[Leighow]

Good work Jason:
**************

Gees this stuff is hard to critique. I agree with Bill that there seems to be a tad too much darkness here in the NEW ONE. I had not thought about solarize.

If I compare this NEW ONE to Old #1 & Old #2 of your earlier post, I think that :

- Old #1is more erotic -- but at the expense of its art quality, but the lighting of the that shot now looks too bright.

- Old #2 has the best art feel. This seems to be due to the light that adds a very natural and contoured look to the stomach area. However, I think it falls short of adequate becuase it is limited to the torso and the treatment of the body below the belly buttom seems a bit too smooth!

- So back to NEW ONE . If it had the light or OLD 2 it would pass the test -- although it raises the question ; "Should the legs be included in the pose ?". I think that maybe they should be. I like the hair style and the ear ring, but the eye seems closed -- perhaps because the hair is blocking the view. Now, I am not saying that an eye is necessary. I am saying that a closed eye seems wrong here. Also, the arm seems a tad enlarged.

Hey Jason if it was easy, we'd all be posting bodyart! - wouldn't we ? ! ?

Nice photography.

HOWIE

[jasonco]

Hey Guys,

Thanks for your comments. I have the model coming over agaon Thursday so will concentrate on your suggestions. Keep an eye out for some new posts later in the week.

Thanks for your replies.
Cheers
Jason