PDA

View Full Version : What is the accepted norm for cropping body parts in a portrait?


SonicYan
11th of July 2006 (Tue), 01:14
I often see comments where someone giving critique on a picture will mention that the picture would have been great if not for (insert random body part here) being cropped out. I'm just curious if there are any set standards as to what a perfect picture would look like in terms of composition. For example, a portrait or headshot would include just the head, or probably from the waist or shoulders up.

Hehe, not sure if I'm getting my point across. Basically I'm just asking if its acceptable sometimes to crop out some part of the subject in the portrait, like hands, elbows etc. Or does that just mean that I'm using the wrong orientation for the picture? (ie portrait vs landscape)

saravrose
11th of July 2006 (Tue), 02:02
I think the rule of thumb is to not crop at joints. as for the norm I think that depends on what your going for.. accidentally cropping out part of one foot can look sloppy.. it's all a matter of perspective and personal taste..

sari

JustKat
11th of July 2006 (Tue), 02:18
I agree, I've always heard not to crop at joints. I think cropping at mid calf usually looks kinda yucky too.

coreypolis
11th of July 2006 (Tue), 02:26
generally don't cut into the head, unless its a very closeup

don't crop at joints, avoid cropping the hands only to have the fingers back in or a toe etc

watch where you crop in relation to clothing

chris clements
11th of July 2006 (Tue), 09:39
generally don't cut into the head
Style gurus would disagree strongly; check out any fashion magazine. Chopping the top of a head off is currently so common as to be the norm.

coreypolis
11th of July 2006 (Tue), 11:11
Style gurus would disagree strongly; check out any fashion magazine. Chopping the top of a head off is currently so common as to be the norm.

it dpends on the type of shot and the amount of person in a shot.

some fields like fashion are more apt to breaking rules than say, traditional portraiture.

It also depends on how far away you are. If its a full length shot and you cut into the head, whats the point? if its a head and shoulder shot, than sure

ghosh
11th of July 2006 (Tue), 22:03
can any one suggest me some link where I can get some fashion photographs to see and learn ?

Woolburr
11th of July 2006 (Tue), 23:52
can any one suggest me some link where I can get some fashion photographs to see and learn ?

Try Glam (http://glam.com/)

JaertX
11th of July 2006 (Tue), 23:54
Style gurus would disagree strongly; check out any fashion magazine. Chopping the top of a head off is currently so common as to be the norm.

but I would argue that they're purposely breaking the rules, and that's a whole 'nuther subject.

tzalman
12th of July 2006 (Wed), 07:09
Style gurus would disagree strongly; check out any fashion magazine. Chopping the top of a head off is currently so common as to be the norm.

It seems to be the standard for television and movies too. Most head & shoulders close-ups crop the top of the head.
Elie

blue_max
12th of July 2006 (Wed), 07:23
There are some who will never draw the line until they have the complete body in the shot. That seems a little limiting.

Fortunately, pick up any magazine, newspaper or website with pictures of people and you will see thousands of examples. Ultimately, there is no right or wrong, so see what works for you.

Graham

SonicYan
14th of July 2006 (Fri), 17:11
Oops, forgot about my thread. Thanks for the replies, I didn't know about that rule of thumb regarding joints. Thanks for the tip guys.

tim
16th of July 2006 (Sun), 01:54
I agree, I've always heard not to crop at joints. I think cropping at mid calf usually looks kinda yucky too.

I agree. This book (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1584281340/103-2645277-4400647?v=glance&n=283155) is good for posing and little things like that.