View Full Version : Camera flare always ruin photo?
jl_moped
19th of July 2006 (Wed), 11:06
This photo was taken with a Canon 100mm macro with lens hood, but camera flare was still present in the upper left corner. Does flare always ruin a photo or in certain case adds more interest to it? Please comment.
PhotoJourno
19th of July 2006 (Wed), 11:15
This photo was taken with a Canon 100mm macro with lens hood, but camera flare was still present in the upper left corner. Does flare always ruin a photo or in certain case adds more interest to it? Please comment.
This is probably not the problem, but I have eliminated most flare problems with my nifty fifty by removing the UV filter. Are you using any ?...
Nice photo otherwise, and I had to scan for a good second before I found the said flare.
Cheers,
AirBrontosaurus
19th of July 2006 (Wed), 11:15
I may be wrong, but I think the white dots in the upper left are bokeh, not camera flare.
In any case, great shot, whatever the dots may be.
Don Powell
19th of July 2006 (Wed), 15:04
I had this happen to me in, the distant past, until I realized that my protective filter sometimes protected me from getting the shot. On film, it took much longer to find out that my shot was ruined. I stopped using proctective filters, unless there was a real need.
photobitz
21st of July 2006 (Fri), 09:23
I think it depends on the shot... It may be a little distracting in this one because it is a fairly obvious light spot. You could always darken that area in PP - a couple of shades darker and it will be as good as invisible.
Hatch1921
21st of July 2006 (Fri), 09:25
may be wrong, but I think the white dots in the upper left are bokeh, not camera flare
I agree with AirBrontosaurus, I think it is just the sun reflecting off the water drops in the background...
Just my .02
Hatch
Lester Wareham
21st of July 2006 (Fri), 12:29
This photo was taken with a Canon 100mm macro with lens hood, but camera flare was still present in the upper left corner. Does flare always ruin a photo or in certain case adds more interest to it? Please comment.
I don't seem to have flare problem with my 100mm and I often shoot into the light.
Make sure if you have a protective filter fitted it is a good quality multi-coated one and that both sides of the glass are coated. I use Hoya HMC Pro1 and have zero problems. B&H is another well respected make.
You might be interested in a trick for the 100mm. It has a large and very effective hood that is first rate for telephoto use but can be a bit too big for close in macro work. So I also have the hood for the EF-S 60mm macro that I use on such occassions. ;)
jl_moped
23rd of July 2006 (Sun), 01:20
Thanks for everyone's comment. I borrowed the lens from my dad and it has a metal hood on it. I am not sure if it was the stock Canon hood for that lens, but it looked quite small. There was no filter on the lens.
Shooting macro it fun, but I am running out of shooting subject around the garden.
Littleben
23rd of July 2006 (Sun), 05:27
I love this capture i think that the glare blends in as a blur so your all right .
congrives.
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.