iwatkins
4th of November 2003 (Tue), 18:26
Hi CDS,
I've been looking at the Sigma 50-500 and the Sigma 500 Prime and here in the UK I am seeing that the 500 Prime is approx. three times the cost of the 50-500.
I know you have used both lenses and I know you love the 500 prime and IIRC you didn't buy it new.
However, can you say that give the choice again, and having to buy new, that the 500mm prime is *that* much better (i.e. three times) than the 50-500 ?
I ask as I'm looking to buy a long lense for wildlife work, mainly birds, for my trips away to bird reserves here in the UK. I.e. the lense will only be used occasionaly in comparison to my normal diet of landscapes/skyscapes.
Any advice would be gratefully received.
I would have emailed, but thought this info might be useful to others.
Cheers
Ian
I've been looking at the Sigma 50-500 and the Sigma 500 Prime and here in the UK I am seeing that the 500 Prime is approx. three times the cost of the 50-500.
I know you have used both lenses and I know you love the 500 prime and IIRC you didn't buy it new.
However, can you say that give the choice again, and having to buy new, that the 500mm prime is *that* much better (i.e. three times) than the 50-500 ?
I ask as I'm looking to buy a long lense for wildlife work, mainly birds, for my trips away to bird reserves here in the UK. I.e. the lense will only be used occasionaly in comparison to my normal diet of landscapes/skyscapes.
Any advice would be gratefully received.
I would have emailed, but thought this info might be useful to others.
Cheers
Ian