PDA

View Full Version : Canon 20D vs. 350D for F2.8 lens


dr_who
18th of August 2006 (Fri), 13:47
Recently I've heard some rumble about 350D lacking the sensor to acurately focus on F2.8 lens. Now, my lens is a bit soft at F2.8, but I don't know how much is due to the sensor or the lens itself. Can someone share their experience if they own both cameras. Any link to an trusty review?

Ewok
18th of August 2006 (Fri), 14:36
It's not that the 350D lacks something, it's that the 20D adds something. Canon describes it as "high-precision center AF point compatible with f/2.8". In other words, lenses that are f/2.8 or better can take advantage of high-precision AF on cameras that have it.

foghorn
18th of August 2006 (Fri), 14:52
I think the 30d has that feature, not the 20d. Someone correct me if I am wrong.

Ewok
18th of August 2006 (Fri), 14:54
You're wrong. :lol: http://www.canon.com/camera-museum/tech/report/200409/report.html

Nick_C
18th of August 2006 (Fri), 15:01
Remember it might not be the focussing, as I found out after lots of tests in low light with my 350D, it was just that at F2.8 its generally soft, which I believe is the case on all but the most expensive lenses.

So I wouldnt automatically blame your 350D, as you will find the same problem on any camera, F2.8 is usually soft, I prefer to stop down a little & raise the ISO rather than use F2.8

Nick :-)

Ewok
18th of August 2006 (Fri), 15:11
Are you talking about zooms or primes? There are several excellent non-L primes that produce sharp pictures at wide apertures with the 350D: 85 f/1.8, 50 f/1.4, 35 f/2, Sigma 30 f/1.4.

tbrasington
18th of August 2006 (Fri), 15:17
Occasionally it has struggled but only on the side AF points. The center one always is fast with my copy.

foghorn
18th of August 2006 (Fri), 16:08
You're wrong. :lol: http://www.canon.com/camera-museum/tech/report/200409/report.html
I sit corrected. ;)

This also influences my future upgrade concerns.

rklepper
19th of August 2006 (Sat), 00:26
The biggest downfall I found to the XT is the speed and accuracy of the AF. When shooting sports this was a real nuisance as many photos just were not in focus completely. 30D fixed that issue.

Lightstream
19th of August 2006 (Sat), 07:01
The 350D is great for static subjects like landscapes, which do not run away easily. (I would worry if they did ;) ) however now I see the point in a better AF system for moving subjects. If you do any AI Servo at all, spend the extra money. Much as I love the 350D, it's AI Servo is simply not up to par.

I've owned the 20D and the 5D, and there is a huge difference.