Pictures of a 70-200mm f/4L on a 10D anyone?

[vvizard]

Someone got this? I've now seen images of the 10D with a sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 mounted, now I wan't to see the 70-200mm f/4L mounted :)

[rickwang]

Here is one of mine, hand held.

http://www3.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1063678

[vvizard]

Oh, think you misunderstood me. What I meant was, a picture showing the 10D with the 70-200mm mounted. So that I can see how big (or small) it is compared to Sigma's.

[maderito]

vvizard wrote:
I've now seen images of the 10D with a sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 mounted, now I wan't to see the 70-200mm f/4L mounted :)

Here it is ... Thanks to my wife who betrays her innocence by neglecting to put her forefinger on the shutter button :). Look closely and you'll notice the tripod mount.

If you can't view this image, send me an e-mail.

http://display.lifepics.com/imgdisp.asp?filespec=%60foxhx2cuxmwdogx%5D9%3C%3D8 %3B9dOjeOrmlffipto%3E936%3A35h9%2Fqym%0D%3A3%3C4%3 A1%10964%3A4%3A

[vvizard]

Thanks. Wow.. It wasn't small actuallly =) I read the specs saying ~ 17cm, and tried to imagine that length on my 10D. I didn't believe it was this big :) But that's not a problem. I'm just trying to decide between this lens and the 70-200mm EX, and now that I have all the specs, and their size (mounted), I think I got what I need to make the decision. No I just need time :)

[maderito]

Note: the lens hood (ET-74) adds another 50% to the length of the lens. Put your hand over the pic covering the hood to get a better idea of the size of the lens itself.

Don't think too long ... these lenses are going like hotcakes.