PDA

View Full Version : low key portrait


Marc Cozijn
29th of August 2006 (Tue), 03:13
any feedback welcome on this, trying to find a good balance of shadows and light

a b/w version here (http://marc.shutterchance.com/), let me know what would work better b/w or color

new final result

pakololo
29th of August 2006 (Tue), 03:19
Im diggin the bw. is she laying down?looks like its a head on a table..hehe

Marc Cozijn
29th of August 2006 (Tue), 03:20
ha! funny enough she is actually lying on her back, the animanl print stuff is a blanket she pulled up...but it actually does look like she is on her stomach with her chin on something..

talat
29th of August 2006 (Tue), 03:57
I think the photo needs little bit more light on eyes. It's not hard to see the beauty of them but I am looking them with my sixth sense. Everyone should see it easily ;)The darkness and leopar texture is a good combination. Yellowlight may help us to improve it but in general I like it. Thank you for sharing with us.

Marc Cozijn
29th of August 2006 (Tue), 04:24
thanks for the feedback

Keiffer
29th of August 2006 (Tue), 22:17
Really nice shot, just alittle too dark and like the other poster said I would lighten the eyes more. Really nice shot though.

samsen
29th of August 2006 (Tue), 22:22
Light is fine IMO.
I only don't like the landscape frame for a portrait and think a portrait frame will serve this picture better.

Marc Cozijn
31st of August 2006 (Thu), 05:22
alrighty, after the feedback (thanks) i have come up with this one, as always , thoughts and comments welcome

samsen
3rd of September 2006 (Sun), 13:46
alrighty, after the feedback (thanks) i have come up with this one, as always , thoughts and comments welcome

Definitely a successful outcome.:)

NewbieXT
3rd of September 2006 (Sun), 16:20
looks underexposed, is this intentional

Marc Cozijn
3rd of September 2006 (Sun), 17:46
ehm yes that was the plan , often low key pictures are like that, the trick is , as i am practicing , to keep enough detail on the right areas to keep the picture interesting as pointed out by Samsen , Talat, and Keiffer

NewbieXT
4th of September 2006 (Mon), 01:28
ehm yes that was the plan , often low key pictures are like that, the trick is , as i am practicing , to keep enough detail on the right areas to keep the picture interesting as pointed out by Samsen , Talat, and Keiffer

Not sure I agree with that. yes, low key usaully contains alot of shadow, but underexposing an image makes it look soft and grainy. Your images will be alot sharper if the highlights are bright and crisp. Low key is more about sculpting your light than it is about making it look dark. One of the masters of low-key in this forum is lorek. just search for his work in glamour and nude. There is alot of talent there.

Marc Cozijn
4th of September 2006 (Mon), 08:15
i agree with some of the things and really agree with the comments on Lorek , he really has great stuff,this pic was actually not underexposed (from a camera meter point of view) perhaps some of the light and details were lost a bit in the PP, but hey that's why i post things here, to get feedback like yours and to use it for future pics and improve on them.