PDA

View Full Version : Stage photography technique thoughs invited


alan_potter
3rd of September 2006 (Sun), 07:07
I make no claims to be anything other than learning stage photography technique, and am at a fairly basic level. I am posting some notes here on what I try to think about when doing so in the hope that others will correct me, make additions and turn this into a useful thread.

So here goes - my thoughts on photographing stage musicals.

Preparation
* Try to get a recording of the show. Not the MGM musical version, the stage version. MGM - and other movie musicals - generally mess around with the music to fit the demands of film. Why learn the music?

- When does the music end? Directors often have a final picture for an instant, immediately followed by a crash blackout. If you're not ready for the moment, you've missed it.

- Are there "moments" in the music? Humorous bits that'll get a reaction from someone? Dramatic moments, again you're looking for the reaction.

* Get the libretto - this is the book that has the script. This lets you know what happens when, when the important moments in the show occur, what's going to happen in the dialogue, when people are going to react

* Equipment - what are you going to take along? Make sure you've got lots of memory cards, spare batteries for the camera (and flash?) Do you want to take a monopod? Do you want more than one lens (can you afford the time to change lens?) Should you take a laptop, to burn your pictures to CD to leave with the group, if they want to use any for publicity? Can you plug it in, or do you need to make sure it's fully charged?

On stage
* Okay, there are three main groups of people on stage in a stage musical:

- Principals. They are the named characters, who sing and/or speak solo.
- Chorus. Generally a numerically large group of people, they sing at the same time as everyone else.
- Dancers. Well, you know what they are.

How you shoot them varies by group.

- Principals should be the best singers and/or actors. Most (not all) acting comes from the face. So concentrate on that. Get in fairly close, those faces tell the story of the show. Of course, the entire body is often very important, depending on the show - don't forget that while concentrating on the faces.

"The art of acting is in reacting". What a person speaking says is important, but don't forget that the person to whom they are speaking will react. Those reactions will often be bigger and more visual than the dialogue that provokes the reaction.

Singing (this applies to the chorus too). When people are singing, they should have their mouths wide open, their heads ever so slightly tilted back, their shoulders open. It's very easy to take unflattering photos of people in such a pose. If at all possible, try to get above the performers; that way they'll be looking at you, their necks will be slightly stretched and hence no double chin, and you won't be taking photos up their nostrils.

- The chorus can be great fun! Don't just take wide shots of the picture they make - get right in there and take pictures of the individuals in the chorus. They can give great reaction shots, and often are doing things they shouldn't. Be merciless - take pictures of the guy who, unaccustomed to wearing tights, constantly adjusts his crotch. Take pictures of the woman who spends most of her time adjusting her ill-fitting rented dress to show less (or more!) ofher cleavage. That kind of thing makes for a great laugh when people look back on the show, and community theatre in particular is all about fun.
Of course, you should still take wide shots of the picture they make too!

- Dancers. Now dance probably started out as a way for people to demonstrate to each other their strength and fitness - the males showing that they could provide food and the women that they could bear children. Dance is still about physical attractiveness, about appearance and sexuality. You are doing a dis-service to dancers if you don't show this.

I understand that many of you are photographing school productions, and realise that there are difficulties here. But you are not "prying" with your lens - you're not taking pictures in the dressing room. You are reflecting what people are doing in a public auditorium.

So, what do dancers bring? Graceful movement, elegant body lines, attractive costumes and - possibly most importantly - a smile that can stop a clock at a hundred paces. You can't capture the movement, but the body positions, the appearance and that smile are the things that will get you thanks from the dancers.

Also, you can also imply the movement through things like catching the top of a leap, or from using a low shutter speed and getting motion blur.

Lifts are often very exciting things for dancers to be doing. Try to get those moments when the girl is being held in the air by her partner. And if you can avoid the man grimacing, so much the better!

Final thoughts
* If you can get more than one night night photographing, why not try one concentrating on the people who generate reactions, then the next night focusing on the reactions?

* Megapixels are your friend. Most people will be delighted to have 5x7 prints, and would be happy enough if that came from a 1000x1500 crop of your image. They are not camera geeks and won't care if the picture is slightly soft. Better that than missing someone's outstretched arm, or cutting a face in half as the actor moves quickly.

* If you're allowed a flash, it can help in those moments when the director has got really "interesting" lighting and you are trying to take the principals. Set it to something like -2EV, you can get some fill light to improve the colours on the principals while still getting the background from the existing light.

* Shooting RAW+JPG allows you to give "rushes" to the comapny to use for publicity photos that night, then you can go home and postprocess at your leisure. It's amazing how much detail can be pulled out of the RAW images, even when the lighting designer has been playing games...

Any thoughts?

regards,
/alan

johnstoy
3rd of September 2006 (Sun), 11:42
This is a studious effort...any new experiences add insight...Also, might add if available; Lens setting info is very valuable know how...feel free to reasearch and/or comment....I read this stuff....

John

Mine Equip. (all Canon): 30D Body, 50mm 1.4 USM, 50mm 1.8, 18-55mm 3.5-5.6 not USM kit stock, 28-135mm 3.5-5.6 IS USM Wide Angle Telezoom, 75-300mm 4.0-5.6 Telezoom, RS-80N3, several tripods, mono pod, no flash yet, dozens of filters/close up lenses.

redbutt
3rd of September 2006 (Sun), 11:57
I've been doing this for about 5 years now, and that's pretty much all there is. You just keep doing it, and then you start to anticipate the action and directors. It helps that my wife is a director, so I started out with the inside scoop. But, musicals in particular do have patterns. Once you know the patterns you can shoot a show blind (not knowing it) and pretty much be on top of everything. One thing I would add to your list of things to know...lighting...stage lighting that is (I never use a flash...always use the stage lighting to really capture the show. Also, flash really pisses off some actors.) The stage lighting is designed to show off the action and the characters. So, follow it. When the actors hit their marks, they will be in the best light they can be in (if everything is going according to the cues). In solos, the actors are almost always covered by a spot + the stage lights. If you follow the light cues then you will always have plenty of light for your shots. And for the other shots...don't be afraid to pump up the ISO. I shoot almost all my shows with the 24-70 f/2.8L and the 70-200 f/2.8 L. I've used the 50 f/1.4 on occasion, but I like the ability to change the zoom to follow a scene. Oh yeah...camera is a 1D MkII.

johnstoy
3rd of September 2006 (Sun), 12:50
Alan,

Your advise is really appreciated...It reinforces some of mine theatrical experience from yesteryear. I just didn't realize the reasons for the moment I snap the photos at.

It's during the highlights of the moment that the performer has his best face on. The crescendo's of the song's best parts are also great to catch the vocalist at.

Lighting, I like, and find that the Camera Flash takes away all the colors much of the time. (it's usually not permitted where I see shows at, and that's fine with me.)

Glad you can type well, please keep on posting here...

John

jgbeam
5th of September 2006 (Tue), 12:41
I make no claims to be anything other than learning stage photography technique, and am at a fairly basic level. I am posting some notes here on what I try to think about when doing so in the hope that others will correct me, make additions and turn this into a useful thread.

So here goes - my thoughts on photographing stage musicals.


That's a well written intro to stage photography - it deserves more attention than it's getting.

I do performance, promotional and headshot photography for a large community theatre and have learned by trying everything and discarding what doesn't work. I agree with just about everything you say, especially learning the show in advance. I usually start watching on tech Sunday, making mental notes about storyline, action, lighting (especially lighting), set design, shooting angles, etc. After a couple of nights of watching, I start shooting and later reviewing the shots in preparation for dress rehearsal. By that time, I am familiar enough with the play to know exactly what I want to shoot and where I should be to get the best angle for the shot and what lighting problems there will be. I chimp frequently and adjust exposure compensation to keep the histogram under control. Over-exposure is one of the biggest problems to deal with on the stage.

I use two cameras with a 24-70 on one and a 70-200 on the other. It's turned out to be an ideal combo. I like a mix of closeups and medium to wide shots. Sometimes I shoot from the balcony, but usually I roam around in the front rows. I often shoot from the wings during the shows and get some great shots there. I usually shoot Av wide open, but sometimes go to Tv and ride the shutter speed. Just like the actors, get as much experience as you can. You are always improving.

The one thing I disagree with you on is getting shots of actors adjusting costumes or anything like that. A well-trained actor is NEVER out of character and would suffer through it before doing something that would attract attention. That actor would not like a picture of him/her violating the most important stage rule. The exception, of course, is kids, who are liable to do anything on stage, often quite cute things.

Stage photography is fun! Do as much as you can.

alan_potter
12th of September 2006 (Tue), 07:29
Thank you for all the comments.

I agree that actors should be in character all the time, and the kind of photos I was talking about are certainly not what you want to see during performance. It was intended to be a "you can also find fun when..." kind of thing, but I didn't express it terribly clearly.

The idea of having two camers to hand is a good one, unfortunately my budget doesn't stretch to that!

Going for the crescendo is indeed a good idea, that's when the emotion is most likely to be on the face of the singer - good point.

Thank you again, and any further thoughts are appreciated.

regards,
/alan

selven
12th of September 2006 (Tue), 07:50
I used to do quite a lot of classical music recitals in live performance - commissioned work - rather than stage musicals as such. So a couple of ideas to add to the excellent summary so far:

1 spend time - lots of it - listening and looking, storing knowledge of potential photographic moments. Ok, you may have lost some shots for the present, but you'll have a kind of mental database for the future, especially if you get to take the same performer several times over the months and years.

2 if you are at all musical, it's worth getting to know scores and repertoire, and then listen as well as look, as it can be easier to get timing really accurate from the music rather than through the viewfinder.

Just ideas - use them if they work for you, otherwise try something else that suits you better.