BreezeBrowser v2.8 released

[defordphoto]

http://www.breezesys.com

[psk4363]

Thank you for this post. Downloading now!

Cheers,
Barry

[xxlt]

RFMSports~~Hello :)
Thank you for the headsup..I read your post this morning . Glad you're looking out for us.

bill fr Ohio w/DRebel

[RGorrill]

Appreciate the notice about the upgrade. I am now up and running with BB v2.8.

Thanks!

[Ballen Photo]

Jim, Thanks for the heads up.
..........Bruce

[scottbergerphoto]

Thanks for the heads up. Downloaded it last night and used it today!
Scott

[Vegas Poboy]

I would like to know do you need breezebrowser if you're using photoshop CS?

[chris maddock]

Vegas Poboy wrote:
I would like to know do you need breezebrowser if you're using photoshop CS?

Depends on whether CS is giving you all you need or not.

I use Capture 1 to do all my raw conversion, but I still use Breezebrowser - principally for my first sift of a day's shooting, batch renaming of the "keepers" and website generation. Occasionally I'll use it to do a batch conversion of a folder of images at a single setting.

Have a look at what it can do and see if there's anything there of interest to your needs - it doesn't cost anything to try it out.

KRs
Chris

[GenEOS]

Heck, I use 4 different programs. It all depends on what I am doing. For sorting through a days shoot and managing RAW files, BreezeBrowser is the way to go. Not to mention it automating the creation of webpages...I use Photoshop for RAW conversion, not fo rany particular reason, other than I like it and I have learned its tricks and tweeks. I use AcDsee for quickly viewing jpegs, some resizing, renaming tasks and for making screensavers,,

So I would say YES to your post. I have found Breeze Browser well worth the $99 bucks... Go For It.