PDA

View Full Version : Lexar 12X CF Flash Sale


Jerry Eisen
4th of January 2004 (Sun), 18:19
Office Max has it for sale after rebates for 99.95. Limited time.

Jerry

defordphoto
4th of January 2004 (Sun), 18:22
What size? Give us linkage man! :)

Canuck
4th of January 2004 (Sun), 18:51
Office Max has it for sale after rebates for 99.95. Limited time.

Jerry

Ho-hum...
Here's the link: http://www.officemax.com/max/solutions/product/prodBlock.jsp?BV_UseBVCookie=yes&expansionOID=-536879947&prodBlockOID=536992274

The gist of it:
512MB CompactFlash. Price shown reflects $60 Instant Rebate. $20 Mail-In Rebate Also Available. Mail-In Rebate Valid 12/28 - 1/24 Only!
Item # 20602117 , Style # CF512-12-232/251
cost:$119.98 I read that as normally priced at $179.98 less $60 instant rebate=$119.98, then the $20 mail in rebate gets you final cost of $99.98

Clear as mud? Cool!

defordphoto
4th of January 2004 (Sun), 19:04
Ahhh. Yeah. As clear as the poll thread eh?

Actually you can go here: http://www.mydigitaldiscount.com/product_info.php?products_id=56&osCsid=d145c3a42cc 44b15900f05b3106f2771

And for $29 more with no rebate-itis get a card that is more than twice faster (30X card).

Canuck
4th of January 2004 (Sun), 19:18
Ahhh. Yeah. As clear as the poll thread eh?

Actually you can go here: http://www.mydigitaldiscount.com/product_info.php?products_id=56&osCsid=d145c3a42cc 44b15900f05b3106f2771

And for $29 more with no rebate-itis get a card that is more than twice faster (30X card).

This is what I did while waiting for you to reply to my polling idea.

defordphoto
4th of January 2004 (Sun), 19:23
Ahhh. Yeah. As clear as the poll thread eh?

Actually you can go here: http://www.mydigitaldiscount.com/product_info.php?products_id=56&osCsid=d145c3a42cc 44b15900f05b3106f2771

And for $29 more with no rebate-itis get a card that is more than twice faster (30X card).

This is what I did while waiting for you to reply to my polling idea.

GMTA

arthurb
4th of January 2004 (Sun), 19:48
And for $29 more with no rebate-itis get a card that is more than twice faster (30X card).

Of course since the Canon Digital cameras don't use the higher speed, it may be a waste of money...

defordphoto
4th of January 2004 (Sun), 20:05
And for $29 more with no rebate-itis get a card that is more than twice faster (30X card).

Of course since the Canon Digital cameras don't use the higher speed, it may be a waste of money...

Yes they do. That's not a WA card.

defordphoto
4th of January 2004 (Sun), 20:09
Now this card: http://www.mydigitaldiscount.com/product_info.php?products_id=122 is WA and the Canon's would not utilize the WA function. That still does not make this card a 'waste of money.'

msnow
4th of January 2004 (Sun), 20:27
And for $29 more with no rebate-itis get a card that is more than twice faster (30X card).

Of course since the Canon Digital cameras don't use the higher speed, it may be a waste of money...

Yes they do. That's not a WA card.

Jim are you sure about that? Because that goes against what I've heard and read also. I asked the Canon rep while at Canoga Camera a couple of months ago and he said the same thing. I may have also seen a post from Chuck Westphal (sp?) in some other forum that confirmed it. My understanding is that spending the money on a 60x card as opposed to a 20x would be wasted because it would show no discernable increase in write spead to the card from the camera. Now if you mean read/write from the reader then, of course, it would make a big difference. If I'm wrong I'd like to know it because it would be great get those images to memory in the camera as fast as possible.

defordphoto
4th of January 2004 (Sun), 21:53
So you're saying that all Canon dSLRs have a read/write cap on them? I have never heard of that, but that does makes sense. The buffer can only write so fast I guess. I have just never heard/seen it discussed. What is that limit then? They do not support WA. That we know.

But, on the other front, the difference between a 40x and 60x card would be measured in fractions of seconds (milli? micro?). There comes a point where the speed would have to exponentially increase to make it worthwhile. Just like the difference between a 2.66gHz Pentium and a 3.0 would be undiscernable to almost all users.

4walls
4th of January 2004 (Sun), 21:58
The G3 makes use of the higher speed cards. I have a Scandisk card which will record a maximum of 30 seconds of video and a Lexar 12X card which will record well over 2 minutes of video. According to the Canon manual, high speed cards allow more video recording.

__
4walls
YVR, G3, Photoshop CS

msnow
4th of January 2004 (Sun), 22:01
So you're saying that all Canon dSLRs have a read/write cap on them? I have never heard of that, but that does makes sense. The buffer can only write so fast I guess. I have just never heard/seen it discussed. What is that limit then? They do not support WA. That we know.

But, on the other front, the difference between a 40x and 60x card would be measured in fractions of seconds (milli? micro?). There comes a point where the speed would have to exponentially increase to make it worthwhile. Just like the difference between a 2.66gHz Pentium and a 3.0 would be undiscernable to almost all users.

Yes, that's what I understand but let's see what others know about this. Your right about the speed increase, it would probably not be noticable. You sort of have to do a cost/benefit analysis on the advantage of the added speed versus the significantly higher cost (on the Camera R/W). On the card reader/writer it's a completely different story because a 40 --> 60 increase is 50% increase in speed on the R/W.