Burning Image files with Nero software on PC

[Jeff Reynolds]

Need help with NERO software to burn photos to CD. I can't seem to get it working with .jpeg. The software offers burning of audio, video, super Video, UDF and UDF ISO.

Obviously I tried video, It completed the burn, I took the CD to an instant print machine at wallgreen, It can't read the CD. Any ideas.

Has anyone tried the external CD burner with CF card slot ?

Jeff

[Morden]

Just burn a "data" CD; after all, the JPEG image files are just files.

[msnow]

Easiest way with Nero is to use Nero Express wizard. "New"/"Data CD"/Add images. From there you can select a group or one at a time.

[Jeff Reynolds]

Well that sounds easy enough..

Another question. Is it possible to get back to raw image file once saved to PC through zoom browser or adobe. Or are raw files only available off of the CF card.


Thanks


Jeff

[Jesper]

Another question. Is it possible to get back to raw image file once saved to PC through zoom browser or adobe. Or are raw files only available off of the CF card.


When you copy the CRW and THM files from the CF card to the PC, the files are on your PC.... what is exactly the problem, can't you find them on the PC? With the Canon File Viewer Utility you can just browse to the folder that contains the CRW and THM files and open them.

[Paul Jordan]

You can easily copy the RAW files from your camera or CF card to a folder on your computer where you can either keep them archived there as your digital negative to work on at any time and also you can then burn these RAW files to CD for archiving.

This is the method I use now for most images and it works very well so far. Hope this info is of some help to you.

[Morden]

You can easily copy the RAW files from your camera or CF card to a folder on your computer....
Indeed. Utilities such as BreezeBrowser Downloader can substantially streamline and automate this process.

[Jeff Reynolds]

I have been shooting in the large file format and not RAW format. So once I transfred the "large" file to my PC with zoombrowser or Adobe, I thought maybe I had lost the chance to utilize raw. Either eay I should stop using large format and go to raw.

Based on info I read on another thread, it's not necessary to shoot on large file format because it wastes CF space and the best results come from raw anyway.

So regardless if you embedding large medium or small jpegs onto your CF, Ultimately you should use raw to print your best work and the other formats are really useless for professional applications...?

Thanks for the info.

Jeff

[Jesper]

I have been shooting in the large file format and not RAW format. So once I transfred the "large" file to my PC with zoombrowser or Adobe, I thought maybe I had lost the chance to utilize raw. Either eay I should stop using large format and go to raw.

Large JPEG format is not the same as RAW format. If you took the photos with the camera set to Large JPEG, you'll only get a JPG file, not a CRW file.

Based on info I read on another thread, it's not necessary to shoot on large file format because it wastes CF space and the best results come from raw anyway.

When you shoot in RAW format, the camera will save a CRW file on the memory card that contains the data that came from the sensor, without any processing. When you shoot in JPEG format, the camera will process the data from the sensor and convert it to a JPEG. So the difference is that with RAW you get unprocessed data, which you'll have to process yourself on the computer. The advantage is that you have more control over the processing - you can experiment with different parameters on the computer.

So regardless if you embedding large medium or small jpegs onto your CF, Ultimately you should use raw to print your best work and the other formats are really useless for professional applications...?

If you want quick results and you don't want to work too much on your computer to process the images, use JPEG. If you want maximum control and quality, use RAW, but be prepared to do some computer work on your images.

[ron chappel]

Nero burning software is close to one of the worst made things EVER.It belongs in the same category as windows 95/98 operating systems for the number of bugs and mind destroying design faults-and that's really saying something!!!!!!!!!! :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
As some helpfull people said allready-it simply won't burn pictures using either the 'image' function or the 'vidio's and pictures' function.......................................... .............................right-i'm of to kill some harmless little animals to drag my mind abit closer to normalcy after thinking about nero

I heartily recommend using the burning wizard-if it has one/lets you find it/lets you use it....or just throw it away and get some proper software.I think i read somewhere that windows XP lets you drag and drop/copy and paste files onto the CD...?If you have XP that may be an option

[msnow]

Nero burning software is close to one of the worst made things EVER.It belongs in the same category as windows 95/98 operating systems for the number of bugs and mind destroying design faults-and that's really saying something!!!!!!!!!! :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
As some helpfull people said allready-it simply won't burn pictures using either the 'image' function or the 'vidio's and pictures' function.......................................... .............................right-i'm of to kill some harmless little animals to drag my mind abit closer to normalcy after thinking about nero

I heartily recommend using the burning wizard-if it has one/lets you find it/lets you use it....or just throw it away and get some proper software.I think i read somewhere that windows XP lets you drag and drop/copy and paste files onto the CD...?If you have XP that may be an option

This is a totally uninformed and useless post. The fact that you don't know how it works or if it even has a wizard (most of us don't need "wizards" but it has one if you do) speaks volumes. The original poster should disregard this.

[ron chappel]

And the previous poster has shown his arrogance by defending nero.

Some computer people should talk to the poor suffering suckers who have no choice but to use their software- at least once in their lives...they wouldn't last a minute

[gillyworld]

I have burnt hundreds of Cd's and DVD's using NERO, it is generally accepted as being the best all round burning software , so please enlighten us as to what you consider is good burning software - I can't wait to find out......