Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM [Archive] - Page 4 - Canon Digital Photography Forums

TheHoff

31st of January 2009 (Sat), 22:07

Sync speed with strobes on shouldn't matter unless you have too much ambient light and you're not stopping down far enough to drop out the ambient effects.

Also with some bodies you can push it 1/3 stop past the sync speed and not see it in the frame. And why can't you hold 1/FL (even though it shouldn't matter) -- do you need to switch to Sanka decaffinated?

Perry Ge

31st of January 2009 (Sat), 22:10

Sync speed with strobes on shouldn't matter unless you have too much ambient light and you're not stopping down far enough to drop out the ambient effects.
I'm not understanding what you're saying here - I'm talking about in studio here - almost always at f/11, all ambient cut out completely. If I shoot anything above 1/160 on my 5D I get the partially black frame, anything above 1/250 on my MK3 and that happens. So the point is my shutter has to be at those speeds in order to use my studio strobes, and at those shutter speeds, camera shake is visible on the 200L 50% of the time :(. Unless for some reason the flash fires faster than 1/200 but won't sync at that speed, I'm not following.

TheHoff

31st of January 2009 (Sat), 23:41

Perry Ge

31st of January 2009 (Sat), 23:44

The actual duration of the strobe is much much less than 1/200. This explains it pretty well

http://www.flickr.com/groups/43292336@N00/discuss/72157612736909611/

Your shutter speed is inconsequential if your ambient light isn't affecting the exposure, the strobe duration is very very quick. You should never see motion blur.

That's the kind of thing I thought you were getting at. I think you are right, guess I didn't need to sell the 200 after all...goddammit :p. Oh well, the 135L is pretty sweet on the 1D3 so I'll just hang onto it for a while.

4rgentum

7th of February 2009 (Sat), 14:24

i don't think i can ever part with my 200L

http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/53098/pics/potn/200L-01.jpg
http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/53098/pics/potn/200L-02.jpg
http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/53098/pics/potn/200L-03.jpg
http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/53098/pics/potn/200L-04.jpg
http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/53098/pics/potn/200L-05.jpg
http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/53098/pics/potn/200L-06.jpg

versedmb

10th of February 2009 (Tue), 20:41

I've had the mkI verson of this lens for a couple of weeks now. This is the first Canon lens to really amaze me and I've used alot of Canon lenses. Love the built in hood of the mkI.

Its difficult for me to imagine ever selling this lens, its simply phenomenal.

All on a 5D....
(damn dust)...
http://brownphotography.smugmug.com/photos/468342957_V69QU-L.jpg

f/2.8...
http://brownphotography.smugmug.com/photos/457974645_Mv8RY-L.jpg

http://brownphotography.smugmug.com/photos/468342959_HaWhX-L.jpg

http://brownphotography.smugmug.com/photos/468342880_ba73K-L.jpg

http://brownphotography.smugmug.com/photos/468342918_KgZkG-L.jpg

http://brownphotography.smugmug.com/photos/470903482_bCdrD-L.jpg

versedmb

10th of February 2009 (Tue), 20:48

It's an interesting lens, I've only had mine a few days and here are my thoughts so far.... It's a cheaper build than the 135L, much of it's casing is plastic especially around the tripod mount recess. Which is a surprise, where as the 135L has more metal in it's construction. .

Don't know about the mkII, but I've got the mkI version and it feels like nothing but metal - its the best built Canon lens I've ever held. After all, isn't it nick-named the "prime-pipe"?

kansascityshuffle

12th of February 2009 (Thu), 23:13

Mine is on it's way. It's my first L, a longer replacement for the 100 f/2 that I loved. I can't wait to get it and start adding to this thread!

[CaliGirl]

14th of February 2009 (Sat), 15:42

Mine is on it's way. It's my first L, a longer replacement for the 100 f/2 that I loved. I can't wait to get it and start adding to this thread!

Mine is on its way too! My first L! I can't wait :D

TheGaffer

14th of February 2009 (Sat), 18:15

Ignore me. I'm in the wrong thread...

King of Canada

20th of February 2009 (Fri), 12:00

Yeah! Ill Will!(Wilson Chandler)

I love my copy. It's sickly sharp. I'll post up a couple of my first test shots later.

i don't think i can ever part with my 200L

http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/53098/pics/potn/200L-01.jpg

King of Canada

20th of February 2009 (Fri), 18:33

Two shots from my MKI. Shot in RAW, and only converted to jpeg (no other processing). Can you say sharp?

http://i329.photobucket.com/albums/l368/EOCKOC/IMG_1023.jpg

http://i329.photobucket.com/albums/l368/EOCKOC/IMG_1024.jpg

p360

20th of February 2009 (Fri), 18:59

Can you say sharp?

sharp

[CaliGirl]

21st of February 2009 (Sat), 00:34

i don't think i can ever part with my 200L

http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/53098/pics/potn/200L-01.jpg

How did you get this lens into the game??

DonJuanMair

22nd of February 2009 (Sun), 13:04

TheHoff

22nd of February 2009 (Sun), 13:08

i read somewhere that this lens on a crop camera, such as my xsi, it was difficult to get sharp images due to camera shake. Seeing as it is the equivalent of 320mm.
How do people here with crop bodies find the lens and the camera shake issue?

It is probably the easiest ~300mm lens you'll find to hand hold... it is small, compact, and balances well. I like it with the tripod collar on as it gives a palm rest on the bottom.

So it isn't any more difficult to hand-hold than any other 200/320mm lens you'll find. If I can get a brace on something, I'll go consistently to 1/60th on full frame with it.

DonJuanMair

22nd of February 2009 (Sun), 13:10

thanks hoff, i really want this lens, i might rent it and take it for a spin this week

King of Canada

22nd of February 2009 (Sun), 18:28

Shot some wildlife this weekend.

http://i329.photobucket.com/albums/l368/EOCKOC/IMG_1139.jpg

dannygt

24th of February 2009 (Tue), 21:48

I'm buying this lens on friday, I can't wait.

I sold my 70-200F4L just for this.

kolok

25th of February 2009 (Wed), 14:56

i read somewhere that this lens on a crop camera, such as my xsi, it was difficult to get sharp images due to camera shake. Seeing as it is the equivalent of 320mm.
How do people here with crop bodies find the lens and the camera shake issue?

This was taken hand-held with a 1.4xTC attached using a 30D:

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showpost.php?p=7226711&postcount=444

No issues whatsoever in terms of camera shake, etc. Just don't be nervous holding this puppy and you'll be fine ;)

DonJuanMair

25th of February 2009 (Wed), 22:48

WOW great shot, so sharp!

dannygt

4th of March 2009 (Wed), 22:26

My shot had a just a bit of clarity and sharpness done in Lightroom2 but it can show you how amazing is the lens.

2.8 wide open, 1/1600, handheld

http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo324/dannytaillon/sq1of1.jpg

dannygt

5th of March 2009 (Thu), 16:32

all handheld,

http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo324/dannytaillon/dt1of1-3.jpg

http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo324/dannytaillon/dt1of1-4.jpg

http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo324/dannytaillon/dt1of1-2.jpg

DonJuanMair

5th of March 2009 (Thu), 17:15

kolok

5th of March 2009 (Thu), 18:26

all handheld,

http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo324/dannytaillon/dt1of1-4.jpg

Ooo.. dunn look too happy to me :eek:
What is that - a German/Lab mix - or a straight wolf??

dannygt

6th of March 2009 (Fri), 11:28

Ooo.. dunn look too happy to me :eek:
What is that - a German/Lab mix - or a straight wolf??

Hehe... they were just playing..

They are both straight German, no mix, all black. :D

kolok

6th of March 2009 (Fri), 16:36

DonJuanMair

6th of March 2009 (Fri), 18:17

yeah those dog shots are great, like you said perfect exposure. i have a black cat and hes hard to shoot sometimes, i usually have to shoot in manual

dannygt

7th of March 2009 (Sat), 13:19

Nice dogs! Had a German shep that went to pooch heaven a couple of years ago. They do like to protect their toys. hehe

Nice pics though, nicely exposed (particularly with the snow). Nice behavioral set. The first one kind of threw me for a loop for a second, that "toy" looked like the dog was making bubbles or something - perhaps it drank too much soapy water? he he he...

@ danny - that's a sharp photo! Sweet bokeh too!

I suppose those are the two reasons why we all really like the 200 f/2.8!

yeah those dog shots are great, like you said perfect exposure. i have a black cat and hes hard to shoot sometimes, i usually have to shoot in manual

Thank a lot, I'm glad I sold my 70-200F4L for this pure gem of glass.

About the exposure.. I did my metering on my dogs and then I lowered the fill light and the exposure around 'em with Lightroom so I can get a visible image without any blast of highlight.

Thank to the metering on my 450D, my dogs exposure was great from the start!

This lens is amazingly sharp.

kansascityshuffle

9th of March 2009 (Mon), 10:58

Here's one of Riley!

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3626/3341647898_75f8a5c7a9_b.jpg

kolok

10th of March 2009 (Tue), 16:35

Pensive pooch.

Nice photo - great colors! Another thing I love about the 200 2.8 - color reproduction is incredible

dannygt

10th of March 2009 (Tue), 16:43

http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo324/dannytaillon/self1of1-copy.jpg

rx7speed

19th of March 2009 (Thu), 01:28

and now I'm bummed. went through all these and wish I had the money to buy one as I know where I can get one for 300 bucks

mrgooch

20th of March 2009 (Fri), 19:51

My contribution.

geo1976

20th of March 2009 (Fri), 19:56

Hehe... they were just playing..

They are both straight German, no mix, all black. :D

A black German? About as rare as a Black Russian.lol

Photomek

21st of March 2009 (Sat), 11:28

Some shots with my new 5D today. :)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3601/3372832902_eee456aa85_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/photomek/3372832902/)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3637/3372832092_6e7b386788_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/photomek/3372832092/)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3587/3372830996_2990a3184d_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/photomek/3372830996/)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3657/3372011107_ac53204f89_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/photomek/3372011107/)

dannygt

21st of March 2009 (Sat), 12:12

A black German? About as rare as a Black Russian.lol

Hehe yeah well.. a lot of people don't believe it! The female one look more like a german shepard beacause of her legs which are a brown.

dannygt

30th of March 2009 (Mon), 01:26

http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo324/dannytaillon/20090329-_MG_2835.jpg

http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo324/dannytaillon/20090329-_MG_2901.jpg

http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo324/dannytaillon/20090329-_MG_2882.jpg

http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo324/dannytaillon/20090329-_MG_2852-2.jpg

[CaliGirl]

30th of March 2009 (Mon), 01:55

Morning Doves
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3662/3354919112_d009aa91d2_b.jpg

DDWD10

1st of April 2009 (Wed), 12:19

How does this lens take to the 2x TC? It becomes a very compact 400mm f/5.6 but how is the sharpness/CA?

The photos here are amazing - I think I've fallen for this lens. Even if I have to severely compromise my lineup I want this lens next! :P

Cl!ckFoto

1st of April 2009 (Wed), 16:30

Nice photo - great colors! Another thing I love about the 200 2.8 - color reproduction is incredible

just saw this quote and i have to agree 100%. I want my 200/2.8 back in the worst way. Trying to decide if getting rid of the 17-40L is worth it to pick up the 200/2.8?

kolok

1st of April 2009 (Wed), 22:04

I'd suppose it depends on a couple of factors: shooting style and finances. The 200 isn't a cheap lens, but neither is it way out of reach like many L lenses. Additionally, if your shooting style (and finances) permits you to have both, then by all means add the 200 and keep the 17-40!

In my particular case, the 200 was my first L lens which I initially used on my EOS 3 and Elan7e; I added the 17-40 years later. Both serve different purposes but oddly enough I often combine the two in street and nature photography - the 200 allows for some discretionary tighter shots from a distance while the 17-40 brings in a nice "whole" picture - especially practical on my 5D. Beauty of both these lenses is that neither one attracts too much attention.

The 135 you show in your signature isn't a slouch though. That's a beauty of a lens as well.

Choices, choices.... money, money... decisions, decisions.... I hate those words. :p

Cl!ckFoto

1st of April 2009 (Wed), 22:14

oy i know. the thing is, the 135L is pretty darn close in FL to the 200 so im not sure if it'd be wise to do. There is always the option of the 1.4x tele which would give me roughly 200/2.8. not sure what the IQ would be comparatively speaking but it might be worth a shot to keep the 17-40.

Cl!ckFoto

1st of April 2009 (Wed), 22:20

and just so im not muckin up this thread. 30D/200 @2.8

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3133/2904356632_02d238b92f.jpg

Stealthy Ninja

2nd of April 2009 (Thu), 06:23

This is a very good landscape lens:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3582/3397770144_aa280b3c63_o.jpg

madspartus

4th of April 2009 (Sat), 01:28

Vascilli

4th of April 2009 (Sat), 01:53

Got my 13-year-old copy for $450 CAD, couldn't be happier:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3475/3367466946_4d36de7a10_o.jpg

[CaliGirl]

4th of April 2009 (Sat), 02:08

After days of reading I think this will be my next lens. I was shopping and comparing all the tele zooms like the sigma 120-400 and canon 70-300 IS, but now I can't wait to find one of these used. I hope I can...

There's one here (http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=670456) in the for sale thread. :D

kansascityshuffle

4th of April 2009 (Sat), 08:10

;7664146']There's one here (http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=670456) in the for sale thread. :D

Thanks Monique. That's my lens! Price was just updated to $570 shipped plus Paypal.

It took the picture of the Boxer on the bottom of page 32!

DDWD10

5th of April 2009 (Sun), 01:40

I've been researching this lens quite a bit (likely my next big lens purchase) and I'm a bit concerned with the CA at f/2.8. I looked at the charts at The Digital Picture and was a little put-off by the CA wide open. Is it really that bad in practice? I figure I'll be using this lens wide-open quite a bit, especially for sports. I'll be using a 30D.

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=245&Camera=396&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=0&LensComp=245&CameraComp=396&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=3

GMCPhotographics

5th of April 2009 (Sun), 08:01

CA isn't really an issue with this. The 135L and 85IIL have far more CA than the 200IIL.
What I would say it that there is CA colouring if the point of focus is off. From the review site that you posted, I'd say that there's a slight front focus to image. It's not a surprise really, it was taken with a pre-live view camera.
I've owned and used a number of good 70-200/2.8 lenses from Sigma and Canon. optically, they are pretty much the same but with different contrast, build ect. The 200mm f2.8 II L is sharper and has less vignetting than any of the zooms.
If you want versatility, get the zoom. If you want the best optically, then get the prime.

DDWD10

5th of April 2009 (Sun), 11:47

I think I will get the 200mm prime but I'll also keep my 70-210mm zoom for when I need the versatility.

Nick_b

6th of April 2009 (Mon), 19:53

http://i88.photobucket.com/albums/k162/nickandaline/IMG_8841-1.jpg

Goos

7th of April 2009 (Tue), 19:22

Haven't been able to use it that much yet but I already love it. Will be even better when i upgrade this 30D to a 5D though!

All wide open.

1/125, ISO 800
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3598/3422661558_a353334afc_o.jpg

1/160, ISO: 1600
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3325/3421852923_feef9016df_o.jpg

Too bad the light was so poor that weekend :<

binlerne

7th of April 2009 (Tue), 23:44

Anybody use this with the 2x converter on FF? I assume no AF and it is probably difficult to handhold.

DDWD10

8th of April 2009 (Wed), 00:03

You do retain AF; the aperture becomes a still-decent f/5.6.

dannygt

8th of April 2009 (Wed), 00:34

You do retain AF; the aperture becomes a still-decent f/5.6.

and it makes a amazing 640mm F5.6 on a 1.6x crop body.

dannygt

10th of April 2009 (Fri), 00:14

http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo324/dannytaillon/_MG_4151.jpg

cwphoto

11th of April 2009 (Sat), 06:01

EOS-1D Mark III, 200/2.8 II, ISO 100, 1/250s @ f/2.8:
http://www.dcresource.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=45212&stc=1&d=1238163508

EOS-1D Mark III, 200/2.8 II, ISO 100, 1/160s @ f/4:
http://www.dcresource.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=45206&stc=1&d=1238161395

gambit

11th of April 2009 (Sat), 07:18

great shots of the V8's there!@

DDWD10

12th of April 2009 (Sun), 23:37

I tried out a copy of this lens at the Camera Exchange and was thoroughly impressed. Good heft, solid-feeling and its optical performance is perfect. It easily out-resolved my 30D's sensor. Of course, they wanted $834.00 :-P

I had one concern though. This new copy of the lens felt like it had some sand or grit in the focus ring. It was smooth and tight but I felt a grittiness at several points in the travel.

I'll spend a few months saving up and try to find a mint used one for $550-600.

toxic

13th of April 2009 (Mon), 04:10

Got the MkI a month or two ago, but I've only used it a few times, and mostly 'cause I felt bad that it wasn't getting much use.... I'm trying out sports photography, though, so maybe I'll get some worthwhile shots.

but for now... ISO 400, f/3.2, straight from camera:

[CaliGirl]

13th of April 2009 (Mon), 04:19

A great lens for inconspicuous portraits....of all kinds:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3352/3437719268_5303674504_b.jpg

HYBEagle

15th of April 2009 (Wed), 01:07

Has anyone's copy have CA problem ?

I have mine for over 2 weeks and I have noticed it produce quite serious CA even stop down to f4 even f5.6, with the sun just outside of the frame.

dshankar

16th of April 2009 (Thu), 00:55

Has anyone's copy have CA problem ?

I have mine for over 2 weeks and I have noticed it produce quite serious CA even stop down to f4 even f5.6, with the sun just outside of the frame.

CA has nothing to do with the sun being out of the frame. That would be related to flare.
CA has to do with contrast and stuff. If you shoot a dark tree against a blown sky, you will get some amount of CA depending on how far you pixel-peep ;)

HYBEagle

16th of April 2009 (Thu), 01:39

CA has nothing to do with the sun being out of the frame. That would be related to flare.
CA has to do with contrast and stuff. If you shoot a dark tree against a blown sky, you will get some amount of CA depending on how far you pixel-peep ;)

hmm...I just googled this new term: "pixel peep" and found this:

It´s when you look at a picture at very high magnification. Sometimes you discover things you certainly don´t want to be there.

Eg.
1) lack of sharpness
2) purple fringing
3) Dead pixels
etc, etc

So, if you want to beleive your gear is perfectly fine, and that you are one h.ll of a photographer: don´t pixel peep...

Mats

Guess I shouldn't be such anal and just live a happy life - out of sight, out of mind :cool:

AlphaChicken

16th of April 2009 (Thu), 03:10

Pixel peeping is pointless. The printer fits (or should if the photog prints correctly) 200-300 of those pixels into ONE INCH. You will hardly notice any of the small defects you see when zoomed in @ 1:1

Stealthy Ninja

16th of April 2009 (Thu), 04:06

Pixel Peeping is what made me the great photographer I am today. I never make mistakes and I am very, very modest.

I just sold my 100mm macro (to my Mum who I don't see often, so I had to take the opportunity to help her out).

I'm getting the 70-200mm 2.8L IS (later) to replace it. However I'll still keep the 200mm 2.8L because it's such a great street photography lens and it's small enough to fit in a small bag along with my 5Dmkii/24-105 when I go out with my family.

google

4th of May 2009 (Mon), 23:30

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3323/3496239140_050d9fbc5f_b.jpg

kokakaste2

5th of May 2009 (Tue), 14:56

Im looking to buy this lens used, the local shop have one used for ~550 Euros (~740 usd). Its mk1 and have built in hood, which to me seems a bit loose, but then again i have never owned a lens with one before so it might be like that. Lens looks like in good condition, no signs of wear. So what i am asking is, is this price good? I know that shop is a bit greedy imo, cuz some things there are overpriced... And only what is difference from Mk1 to Mk2? only the hood? or?

John_TX

5th of May 2009 (Tue), 16:03

pic1

Nice! Was this shot at f2.8? And what type of body (crop or ff)?

google

5th of May 2009 (Tue), 16:38

Nice! Was this shot at f2.8? And what type of body (crop or ff)?

Shot with a 40D and yes, at 2.8! I couldn't believe how sharp that photo came out. I adjusted the white balance and the color curves a bit.

Redlineracer12

8th of May 2009 (Fri), 11:21

This was a decent crop with the 1.4x Some USM (probably borderline too much) applied too.

http://www.shineyphotos.com/gallery/Wildlife/imgs/IMG_0272copy.jpg

malcolm027

10th of May 2009 (Sun), 18:25

and it makes a amazing 640mm F5.6 on a 1.6x crop body.

How would you compare this to the 400mm f5.6? I was looking at the 400 but now I think I may want this!

dannygt

11th of May 2009 (Mon), 02:13

How would you compare this to the 400mm f5.6? I was looking at the 400 but now I think I may want this!

I didn't not compare my lens to the 400 F5.6!

But honestly I think exenteder are only a cheap alternative. If you need a 200mm, buy yourself one, if 400mm is what you need, go for it.

What I do love about the 200mm is the sharpness at 2.8, it's simply amazing how sharp it is.

As for the choice, I think a lens longer than 300mm need IS or a strong tripod.

JeffreyVB

13th of May 2009 (Wed), 20:57

Oh sad day. Packed up and shipped my 200mm off to its new home today. Hopefully the new owner will get more use out of it than I did. I am sure I will regret selling it. It was a great lens for evenings out at the minor league ball park!

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v175/onenictoy/Tides/IMG_8836.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v175/onenictoy/Tides/IMG_8915.jpg

DonJuanMair

14th of May 2009 (Thu), 11:00

Stealthy Ninja

16th of May 2009 (Sat), 12:04

i read about a lot of people here that dont use this lens so much after owning it. i was thinking of renting it but after reading a review somewhere and a few peoples feedback on here i think im going to go for the versatility of the 70-200 f2.8

I really like bringing it around with my 24-105 on my 5Dmkii (also bring a 430ex II flash) when I'm going around with my family. It gives me a bit of a reach option when I need it.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3339/3536222424_c59f874251_b.jpg

100% crop:
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=365544&stc=1&d=1242489595

:lol:

Rafromak

16th of May 2009 (Sat), 21:21

A couple I took today, all handheld:
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y51/Rayfromalaska/Duck_3817.jpg
Grumpy ducky :)
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y51/Rayfromalaska/Duck_3800.jpg
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y51/Rayfromalaska/duck_3753.jpg
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y51/Rayfromalaska/ducks_3749.jpg

Naturalist

16th of May 2009 (Sat), 21:23

One I took hand held from about a week or so ago during my lunch break at work (Gotta love that EF 200 f/2.8L II USM lens!)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3645/3509125738_6f757b803d_o.jpg

Rafromak

17th of May 2009 (Sun), 16:05

One I took hand held from about a week or so ago during my lunch break at work (Gotta love that EF 200 f/2.8L II USM lens!)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3645/3509125738_6f757b803d_o.jpg

Very nice!

The 200mm f/2.8 is quite a jewel of a lens. Fast, sharp, reliable...

google

20th of May 2009 (Wed), 20:42

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3611/3549403113_667f80fa4c_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3575/3549403613_7d79e6fb2a_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3580/3549404249_2a8bc74256_b.jpg

Stealthy Ninja

21st of May 2009 (Thu), 05:10

For once I'm organised. Here's a shot I actually took TODAY not 3 months ago. :lol:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3589/3551216300_00c0a1cd14_o.jpg

DonJuanMair

21st of May 2009 (Thu), 12:16

thats awesome, i love l the red and the expression on that guys face

Matt-l

24th of May 2009 (Sun), 20:42

is he smoking 2 cigs?

Great shot!

trumpet_guy

24th of May 2009 (Sun), 21:50

An unusual use for this lens, but it's what I had on my 30D when
the "magic" happened. I'm unlikely to see a sunset like this one again
for a _long_ time.

http://tswen.zenfolio.com/img/v1/p656875514-5.jpg

DonJuanMair

24th of May 2009 (Sun), 21:52

is he smoking 2 cigs?

Great shot!

lol yeah hes mad for it

Stealthy Ninja

25th of May 2009 (Mon), 00:02

thats awesome, i love l the red and the expression on that guys face

Thanks. :)

is he smoking 2 cigs?

Great shot!

LOL looks like it, but if you look at it closer...

Tony-S

28th of May 2009 (Thu), 00:21

With the Kenko tubes added. Can't get too close, but it does reduce the MFD.

Redlineracer12

28th of May 2009 (Thu), 15:34

With the Kenko tubes added. Can't get too close, but it does reduce the MFD.

Not bad at all!

DonJuanMair

28th of May 2009 (Thu), 22:20

wow nice shot tony

Tony-S

29th of May 2009 (Fri), 01:32

Not bad at all!

wow nice shot tony

Thanks much, fellas. There is not much focus room with the tubes on. Focus is pretty much controlled by leaning to and fro. :)

Rich S

4th of June 2009 (Thu), 12:50

This was with a 200mm f/2.8L and the 12,20, and 36mm tubes . http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc150/blackies_owner/_MG_1341_edited-1.jpg

DDWD10

4th of June 2009 (Thu), 13:01

^^ Incredible shot :)

DonJuanMair

4th of June 2009 (Thu), 17:22

Yeah the detail is astonishing

Rich S

5th of June 2009 (Fri), 01:05

50D 1/250 sec f/5.6 ISO 320 http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc150/blackies_owner/_MG_1314_edited-1.jpg

Nick_b

7th of June 2009 (Sun), 22:43

IS?! we don't need no stinking IS!

1/50th

http://i88.photobucket.com/albums/k162/nickandaline/testing/IMG_0988.jpg

http://i88.photobucket.com/albums/k162/nickandaline/testing/IMG_0950-DPP.jpg

Stealthy Ninja

7th of June 2009 (Sun), 22:54

Nice. I agree who needs IS.

Just 1/500 of a second :lol:

Here's an example (with 100% crop, which is what we really need :) ).

5Dmkii ISO 800 f/6.7 1/500 no NR.

Large size (little too wide for POTN) here: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2479/3568254507_cb5e69c4e7_o.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2479/3568254507_5734a1d005.jpg

Rich S

8th of June 2009 (Mon), 19:37

http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc150/blackies_owner/_MG_1615_edited-2.jpg

nini02

9th of June 2009 (Tue), 17:43

This is my first post in here, so I hope I did this right! I am loving this lens :)

F/4 1/800 ISO100 hand held
http://i355.photobucket.com/albums/r477/nini02fabrics/misc/2009_06_03_0985.jpg

100% crop
http://i355.photobucket.com/albums/r477/nini02fabrics/misc/2009_06_03_0985crop1.jpg

Stealthy Ninja

10th of June 2009 (Wed), 03:08

^^ Good, you included a 100% crop. You get a lollypop. :)

nini02

10th of June 2009 (Wed), 20:10

^^ Good, you included a 100% crop. You get a lollypop. :)
Woohoo!

bob_r

10th of June 2009 (Wed), 23:38

I've posted in this thread before, but went to the Memphis zoo yesterday and thought I'd add a few shots from my visit. I think this is a perfect zoo lens on a crop camera.

http://www.pbase.com/bob_r/image/113583797.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/bob_r/image/113616558.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/bob_r/image/113616540.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/bob_r/image/113616549.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/bob_r/image/113616544.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/bob_r/image/113611964.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/bob_r/image/113616553.jpg

Stealthy Ninja

11th of June 2009 (Thu), 23:53

^^ No lollypop for you. :mad:

Nice photos though

Rich S

12th of June 2009 (Fri), 00:06

Sorry... 400 thread.........Rich

Stealthy Ninja

12th of June 2009 (Fri), 00:13

400mm f/5.6L 1/1000 sec f/5.6 ISO 160

Was this taken with the x2 extender? If not, I think you've got the wrong thread dude. ;)

p360

15th of June 2009 (Mon), 21:01

Anyone using this lens at weddings? Any samples?

Much appreciated, guys.

Stealthy Ninja

16th of June 2009 (Tue), 05:42

Anyone using this lens at weddings? Any samples?

Much appreciated, guys.

Sure, this was ISO 800 on a 40D (before I sold it). 100% crop included.

p360

16th of June 2009 (Tue), 11:10

bob_r

16th of June 2009 (Tue), 12:59

Thanks, Ninja.

I wonder how this lens would fare during wedding receptions where lighting conditions are generally challenging.

I am debating between the hand-hold ability, sharper image, low price, and black color of this lens and the versatility of 70-200 2.8L.

Pratman,

I thought you already had a 200 f/2.8. Did you sell it? Seems like I remember that being one of your favorites not too long ago.

p360

16th of June 2009 (Tue), 13:03

Pratman,

I thought you already had a 200 f/2.8. Did you sell it? Seems like I remember that being one of your favorites not too long ago.

You have good memory.

Yes, I sold it back in March to fund 135L. Now, I am yearning to buy it again. I am leaning towards this over 70-200 2.8L.

Any thoughts?

p360

16th of June 2009 (Tue), 13:07

And, Bob, I remember you were the first person I spoke to for advice on the forum when I first started out with this photography thing.

mrcoons

16th of June 2009 (Tue), 13:42

I've finally managed to save enough cash to buy this lens but I wonder when Canon is going to start shipping them again! B&H have not had any in quite awhile now. :(

p360

16th of June 2009 (Tue), 14:18

^^^ Adorama appeared to have them in stock this morning.

mrcoons

16th of June 2009 (Tue), 14:46

^^^ Adorama appeared to have them in stock this morning.

They certainly do and now they have one less in stock! Thanks Pratman!!:)

I had checked Adorama (I thought) last week but maybe I did not have my glasses on! :D

LostShootingStar

16th of June 2009 (Tue), 18:43

They certainly do and now they have one less in stock! Thanks Pratman!! http://www.entertainment-place.info/smile/img/2465/o09a0208gstn/POTNsmile.gif
http://www.entertainment-place.info/smile/img/3200/n08d1214eybr/1by1.gif

I had checked Adorama (I thought) last week but maybe I did not have my glasses on! :D

They probably just got some in

dannygt

16th of June 2009 (Tue), 18:46

http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo324/dannytaillon/20090613-_MG_1116_7_8.jpg

http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo324/dannytaillon/20090613-_MG_1110_1_2.jpg

http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo324/dannytaillon/20090613-_MG_1098_099_100.jpg

http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo324/dannytaillon/20090613-_MG_1081_2_0.jpg

http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo324/dannytaillon/20090613-_MG_1113_4_5.jpg

Stealthy Ninja

16th of June 2009 (Tue), 23:45

Thanks, Ninja.

I wonder how this lens would fare during wedding receptions where lighting conditions are generally challenging.

I am debating between the hand-hold ability, sharper image, low price, and black color of this lens and the versatility of 70-200 2.8L.

If you can use flash it should be OK (I know flashes aren't rated above 105mm, but it works). However I am getting a 70-200 2.8L IS for versatility as I think that lens is more than good enough (sharpness wise) for wedding etc. Not as sharp as the 200 2.8L but nice enough.

dannygt

16th of June 2009 (Tue), 23:53

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3338/3634792666_accb21f0e4.jpg

bob_r

17th of June 2009 (Wed), 23:30

You have good memory.

Yes, I sold it back in March to fund 135L. Now, I am yearning to buy it again. I am leaning towards this over 70-200 2.8L.

Any thoughts?

I had a 70-200 f/2.8 and replaced it with the 85, 135 and 200. Seems like you have almost the same setup. I much prefer the primes over the 70-200, especially after I added the 100-400 to my bag.

p360

18th of June 2009 (Thu), 00:09

I had a 70-200 f/2.8 and replaced it with the 85, 135 and 200. Seems like you have almost the same setup. I much prefer the primes over the 70-200, especially after I added the 100-400 to my bag.

Even closer. I just ordered 200 2.8 II from B & H. I didn't care for that focal length on 30D. But FF is making me change my mind. I had my doubts when I added 135L. But I love it on my 5D2. And I think I am going to love 200L just as well. I am a big fan of primes, once again.

Plus, I am starting to shoot weddings and events; it'll be real handy. I can not wait.

mrcoons

18th of June 2009 (Thu), 06:52

Mine will be here Friday so I will have all weekend to experiment with it!!

:)

p360

18th of June 2009 (Thu), 19:03

Does anyone know of a good, third-party tripod mount ring in black? I don't want to pay $150 for a Canon one.

ocabj

18th of June 2009 (Thu), 19:29

http://photography.ocabj.com/img/v0/p892972015-4.jpg

Rich S

18th of June 2009 (Thu), 20:57

Western Columbine......Canon 50D 1/250 sec f/4.5 ISO 160 http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc150/blackies_owner/_MG_2089-1_edited-2copy.jpg

Rich S

20th of June 2009 (Sat), 02:52

Western Fence Swift .....Canon 50D 1/250 sec f/8 ISO 160 http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc150/blackies_owner/_MG_2124_edited-1.jpg

Rich S

20th of June 2009 (Sat), 03:07

You would like "Blackie The Jumping Spider" He is very cute....http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc150/blackies_owner/_MG_0676_edited-2.jpg

Tony-S

21st of June 2009 (Sun), 00:09

A quickie with a 100% crop (to score more ninja points).

blackmatch456

21st of June 2009 (Sun), 00:26

WOW.

Amazing!

Cl!ckFoto

21st of June 2009 (Sun), 00:27

cant wait to pick another one of these up

DonJuanMair

21st of June 2009 (Sun), 02:44

wow indeed

dannygt

21st of June 2009 (Sun), 22:50

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3389/3633922333_3c71ae0ab4.jpg

Stealthy Ninja

21st of June 2009 (Sun), 23:15

A quickie with a 100% crop (to score more ninja points).

10 more ninja points. That makes 20 I think. :)

Rich S

22nd of June 2009 (Mon), 01:41

Male Plebejus Saepiolus Canon 50D 1/750 sec f/6.7 ISO 160.... http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc150/blackies_owner/_MG_1882-2_edited-1copy.jpg

p360

25th of June 2009 (Thu), 13:55

My inaugural shot with it. I have found a new love and appreciation for this focal length. And it's because of this lens.

375595

p360

25th of June 2009 (Thu), 13:57

Another shot with it. I am loving this lens. :D

375598

Nick_b

25th of June 2009 (Thu), 18:56

http://i88.photobucket.com/albums/k162/nickandaline/IMG_1086.jpg

Nick_b

30th of June 2009 (Tue), 23:27

http://i88.photobucket.com/albums/k162/nickandaline/IMG_1664.jpg

Rich S

1st of July 2009 (Wed), 00:23

Canon 50D 1/250 sec f/11 ISO 160.. http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc150/blackies_owner/_MG_2572_edited-1-1.jpg

DonJuanMair

1st of July 2009 (Wed), 03:49

Nck and Rich great shots

i love this lens!! rented it and the 5D mkII for a business trip to Chicago on Thu, so went and played with it downtown today

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3629/3677197975_7f6e46f9d9_o.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2557/3677197939_6ebe229197_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3572/3678013414_9b3ee9320b_o.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2630/3677181899_1de53d9440_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3639/3677181779_18ffbb34cf_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3552/3677181687_ff41f84fcc_o.jpg

Rich S

1st of July 2009 (Wed), 04:24

From Today "Lil Red The Hummingbird" 50D 1/250 sec f/11 ISO 160... http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc150/blackies_owner/_MG_2607_edited-2copy.jpg

Rich S

9th of July 2009 (Thu), 00:38

1/125 sec f/11 ISO 160 http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc150/blackies_owner/_MG_2895_edited-4jpg.jpg

p360

12th of July 2009 (Sun), 18:39

379263

dannygt

13th of July 2009 (Mon), 20:53

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2422/3717527305_4ac71017c9.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2655/3717527507_2ff441bb5a.jpg

Double Negative

14th of July 2009 (Tue), 21:26

^ Ha ha! Those last two are awesome.

dannygt

14th of July 2009 (Tue), 22:47

^ Ha ha! Those last two are awesome.

thanks ;)

zincozinco

15th of July 2009 (Wed), 11:31

have anyone tried this lens with a 1.4 or 2.0 converter if so please give me your opinions on sharpness and speed ( focus speed) cheers, judging by this thread looks like its gonna be a fun lens!! cheers!

Rich S

15th of July 2009 (Wed), 11:37

Fast AF works great with the 1.4x Kenko and gives a 280mm f/4L non-IS in your bag. I put extension tubes on it and get a Macro lens . Like 3 lenses in one...... http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc150/blackies_owner/_MG_1314_edited-1.jpg