PDA

View Full Version : HDR/BW.. which?


BrandonSi
6th of January 2007 (Sat), 22:44
Just curious if you like the HDR version, or the bw conversion from the HDR? This was done with 1 raw file, 4 exposure levels.. some PS work to get the soft focus look..

http://www.thankyouchucknorris.com/images/addison_color.jpg



http://www.thankyouchucknorris.com/images/addison_bw.jpg

Shutter22
7th of January 2007 (Sun), 00:35
Hmm, I like them both very much. They both have a totally different feel to them. Very nice work.

White_Marten
7th of January 2007 (Sun), 09:19
Nice work, but a too soft for my taste...

cgratti
7th of January 2007 (Sun), 15:39
Nice work, but the first one doesn't look like HDR to me. It looks more like a softened and desaturated image. Doing HDR's with only 1 image doesn't make it look like a true HDR to me.

But I like the color and image.

Mannytkd
7th of January 2007 (Sun), 16:45
Not so keen on HDR and looking at you edits you can clearly see the halos where you've used the brush tool....???

BrandonSi
7th of January 2007 (Sun), 16:59
Nice work, but the first one doesn't look like HDR to me. It looks more like a softened and desaturated image.

Not so keen on HDR and looking at you edits you can clearly see the halos where you've used the brush tool....???



Thanks! That's actually what I was trying to do, was make the HDR not look HDR.. Here's the original HDR :)

I didn't use a brush tool.. maybe the softening, layering and blurring created those halos?

http://www.thankyouchucknorris.com/images/addison_hdr.jpg

I Simonius
7th of January 2007 (Sun), 19:13
Just curious if you like the HDR version, or the bw conversion from the HDR? This was done with 1 raw file, 4 exposure levels.. some PS work to get the soft focus look..


the colour one doesnt quite do it for me but the B+W is interesting;)

toddb
7th of January 2007 (Sun), 19:33
I'm one of those who like this look. I like both the color and B&W versions. I think you've made an image that would normally be tossed out a keeper. Doesn't really look soft to me. There is allot of detail there. Looks like you duplicated the layer and changed it to softlight (or something like that) and then blurred that layer. It's like it blurs the color but the details are sharp which I like. Like your seeing the image in a more dream like state.

Now you just need to create some more ominous looking clouds in the background to complete the transformation. :-)

BrandonSi
7th of January 2007 (Sun), 19:39
I'm one of those who like this look. I like both the color and B&W versions. I think you've made an image that would normally be tossed out a keeper. Doesn't really look soft to me. There is allot of detail there. Looks like you duplicated the layer and changed it to softlight (or something like that) and then blurred that layer. It's like it blurs the color but the details are sharp which I like. Like your seeing the image in a more dream like state.

Now you just need to create some more ominous looking clouds in the background to complete the transformation. :-)

Thanks! I agree the sky is the weak link here.. It was a throw-away, I decided to play around with Photomatix with it and it just turned out appealing.. I think I'll start doing that more.

TooManyHobbies
7th of January 2007 (Sun), 19:39
HDR version.

oni0n56
7th of January 2007 (Sun), 20:19
I like the color one. It's got nice soft colors and the b/w one is just lacking all that detail and warmth.

viatorum777
7th of January 2007 (Sun), 20:31
I like both alot. I personally think the "softness" adds to the edginess and drama of the story which the two pictures are both telling. Interestingly, I think both pictures may tell a slightly different story with the color vs. B&W. In my opinion then it is a both-and decision. Good job.

misskitty5077
8th of January 2007 (Mon), 00:12
The color version reminds me of the soft glow around the buildings in a Thomas Kincaid painting.

I like the B/W the best.

StealthLude
8th of January 2007 (Mon), 20:16
B&W version rocks.