PDA

View Full Version : Ultra II CF Cards


august23
29th of January 2007 (Mon), 00:03
Just wondering, is there a huge difference between Ultra II and Extreme III? Because on newegg, a 1GB Ultra II CF card costs a mere 28 bucks. So getting 3 GB's worth of storage for under 100 bucks sounds pretty good to me. The extreme III 2GB is almost double that price. So which way should I go?

coreypolis
29th of January 2007 (Mon), 00:07
for your P&S, the ultra II is more than adequate. the III is about 2x the speed, but few cameras can take advanatge of that.

there are other good deals like 2gb ultra II for $39, or 4gb ridata for under 100

pcasciola
29th of January 2007 (Mon), 00:12
The performance difference between the Ultra II and Extreme III is almost nothing. The Ultra II is even faster in some cameras with JPEG, and the Extreme III has a slight edge in RAW, but 5% increase at best.

DEMO
29th of January 2007 (Mon), 00:14
for your P&S, the ultra II is more than adequate. the III is about 2x the speed, but few cameras can take advanatge of that.

there are other good deals like 2gb ultra II for $39, or 4gb ridata for under 100


As we speak the Sandisk 2gb ultra II's are $24.99 (after $20 mail-in rebate) from FRYS/outpost.com with free shipping..

august23
29th of January 2007 (Mon), 00:15
Thanks guys but the cards are actually gonna be for my 400D when I buy it a couple months from now. :)

coreypolis
29th of January 2007 (Mon), 00:18
really doesn't change much

Bob_A
29th of January 2007 (Mon), 00:35
Thanks guys but the cards are actually gonna be for my 400D when I buy it a couple months from now. :)

For a 400D I'd get the Ultra II's unless you can get the Extremes for essentially the same price.

jdmwerks
31st of January 2007 (Wed), 10:15
I wouldnt order these off ebay, theres tons of fake cards flating around which I made the mistake of doing. If it seems to good to be true it probably is.

Woolburr
31st of January 2007 (Wed), 10:25
I shoot almost exclusively with 2gb Ultra IIs...best bang for the buck in my book. I have a couple of Extremes...but those are reserved for "extreme" conditions.

sebmour
31st of January 2007 (Wed), 10:30
I have 3X 2gig in ultra II. I love them. never had any problem whatsoever.

Dave_G
31st of January 2007 (Wed), 10:32
I've got a couple of Ultra IIs and a couple of Extreme IIIs that I use in my 20Ds

The Extreme is around 12-15 seconds quicker to clear the buffer, that's with jpeg - haven't tried it RAW.

I only bought them as they were cheap - £18 each. The Ultra IIs cost £15 each.

Yes they are genuine before anyone asks! ;)

Pinto
31st of January 2007 (Wed), 11:27
Extreme IV
40MB/second read/write
Extreme III
20MB/second read/write
Ultra II
10MB/second read/write
Of course additional spec differences also apply.

PhotoJourno
31st of January 2007 (Wed), 11:34
After trying both Ultra II and Extreme III on 10/20/30D, I decided that the Ultra II would be a better match for me. And it was, I now carry four 2GB cards for two cameras, and I can never tell which one is the Extreme III. I am sure there are some differences, and that some cameras make better use of those, but I have never felt such advantage at all. To the contrary, I found better prices with Ultra II. (Believe it or not, Costco had some on sale, exact same as BH, same wrapping, bar code, etc- and I bought three for very cheap, never a single problem).

After two cards per camera, I bought a Storage Solution, the Epson P-3000, and that is the end all discussions about cards for me. With time I will replace some cards, but I will never have more than two per camera. The Epson P-3000 transferred 1GB from CF in a little less than two minutes. To me, that is perfect when the Device has 40Gb, and at least enough battery to fill the entire space.

Big Mike
31st of January 2007 (Wed), 11:40
I have Extreme III and Ultra II cards (512, 1GB & 2GB)...I don't notice a difference between them, with normal shooting with a 20D.

I have plain Sandisk and Kingston cards that are noticeably slower when chimping...probably slower for extended bursts...but I don't shoot that way very often.

b00ty
31st of January 2007 (Wed), 21:08
There's probably a noticeable difference from when you are transfering the pictures to your computer, as long as you are using a card reader.

badams
31st of January 2007 (Wed), 22:56
As we speak the Sandisk 2gb ultra II's are $24.99 (after $20 mail-in rebate) from FRYS/outpost.com with free shipping..

Do you have a link to those as I cannot find them on their site?

ilovemycamera
31st of January 2007 (Wed), 23:02
I use a rebel xt, and shoot with the ultra II's with no problem. I agree that if you can get it for a good price, go for it, otherwise, the ultra II's will do fine.