Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

[Collin85]

Wait a minute, Canon makes an IS AND non-IS version of the f/4 70-200? I don't see IS versions anywhere except for the 2.8

Correct - there are four versions. Has been for awhile. The f/4 IS is the LATEST of the group. The f/4 non-IS version has been around for ages now.

[J-B]

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3356/3269851695_b8538f3ae3_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/jochenbongaerts/3269851695/)

[dbdors]

Wait a minute, Canon makes an IS AND non-IS version of the f/4 70-200? I don't see IS versions anywhere except for the 2.8
YOu can see all 4 listed here: http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ProductCatIndexAct&fcategoryid=150

[egordon99]

When I shot Pentax, I was bemoaning that there were NO high-end 70-200s available. When I switched, I was like "WHAT? I have to decide between SIX 70-200s????"

(The four Canon Ls, and then the Tamron and Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8s....)

It's good to have choices!

[John_TX]

When I shot Pentax, I was bemoaning that there were NO high-end 70-200s available. When I switched, I was like "WHAT? I have to decide between SIX 70-200s????"

(The four Canon Ls, and then the Tamron and Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8s....)

It's good to have choices!

I see you made the correct choice ;)

[egordon99]

Yes, yes I did :)

I totally love the "light weight" of the f/4 IS. I have the 100-400 and I've played with the 70-200 f/2.8 in the store, and they are ALOT heavier than the f/4 IS. For the type of shooting I use the 70-200 for, the light weight is invaluable (I'm a short wimpy guy!) I have no problems with bokeh/shallow DOF at f/4 and I'm always using a flash indoors, and if I can't use a flash I have my 85mm prime :)


I see you made the correct choice ;)

[mellowd]

Duck :)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3371/3272157412_301c185b3a_o.jpg

[puttekula]

http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/7562/img1374v2yj6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[puttekula]

http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/3558/img0050id2.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[puttekula]

http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/5557/img1765v2ua0.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[puttekula]

http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/2791/img0762vad7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[puttekula]

http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/2925/img1557kz8.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[puttekula]

I bet u can tell wich one of those 6 pics is from a crop camera (400D). Im really in love with this lens mounted on a FF camera. Simply fantastic combo!!
http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/4808/img1411v2tp2.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[fishingjts]

testing out my new 5D... gosh i love this lens!

http://www.johnnystacks.com/gallery/d/6545-1/IMG_0117copy.jpg

[HinkelJm]

I just got this lens (my first L :) ) and I can't wait to get out and shoot with it. Hopefuly I will have some good shots to post here soon. :) Everyone elses look great.

[00dahc]

Not the greatest. I saw these bozo's outside my office window and happened to have my equipment in the car.

http://www.pbase.com/cdandar/image/109139486/original.jpg

[sanil]

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3519/3237958555_eaeccc6992_b.jpg

[Helena]

Normally I prefer primes, but I have to say that I love this lens! Here are some from yesterday using 5D (also posted in the 5D thread - hope that's OK). Whooper Swans (Cygnus cygnus).


http://www.graphicgarden.com/keep/POTN/2009/20090214_002_5dbb.jpg

http://www.graphicgarden.com/keep/POTN/2009/20090214_006_5dbb.jpg

http://www.graphicgarden.com/keep/POTN/2009/20090214_003_5dbb.jpg

http://www.graphicgarden.com/keep/POTN/2009/20090214_007_5dbb.jpg

[WhyFi]

Here's my swan shot to add to the mix -
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3194/3281678144_64f146b571.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/whyfinyc/3281678144/sizes/o/)

[quattroatl]

40D; Canadian Geese; then my 2 daughters

http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c70/quattroatl/IMG_2499_resize.jpg
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c70/quattroatl/IMG_2496_resize.jpg
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c70/quattroatl/IMG_2603_resize.jpg
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c70/quattroatl/IMG_2720_resize.jpg
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c70/quattroatl/IMG_2678_resize.jpg

[junzo13]

Model shoot from the recent PhotoWorld Asia in Manila:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3433/3284965668_476191a03b_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3220/3284965472_24a5f375b0_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3322/3284965008_ae7e68ab76_o.jpg

[JoYork]

Some from today, all shot wide open at f/4 on a 400d/xti camera.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3660/3295273415_19892f701d_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3544/3295273901_c669163329_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3488/3296099022_43e0bcd1fe_b.jpg

[Collin85]

Some from today, all shot wide open at f/4 on a 400d/xti camera.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3488/3296099022_43e0bcd1fe_b.jpg

Was this the last shot you got before he marched over and hacked you to pieces? :lol:

[NevadaJack]

New puppy... Beagle/Boxer mix just 7 weeks old and 3 pounds.

http://nevadajack.zenfolio.com/img/v6/p221005688.jpg

http://nevadajack.zenfolio.com/img/v4/p141173965.jpg

[johnz]

This thread is killing my wallet, I am soo close on pulling the trigger on this lens. I even have an opportunity to buy it from HK -> relatively cheap! Argh..

[NevadaJack]

He made it.... but I see trouble brewing in the future with this antic at 7 weeks...:)

http://nevadajack.zenfolio.com/img/v5/p152743845.jpg

[John_TX]

He made it.... but I see trouble brewing in the future with this antic at 7 weeks...:)


It appears that you're raising the next Edmund Hillary (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_Hillary)!!!

One of my dogs was like that when he was a puppy.
He loved to climb up onto the back of the couches and jump from couch to couch. He really enjoyed the high-ground and it drove the others nuts!
He reminded me of a dang mountain goat!

[NevadaJack]

It appears that you're raising the next Edmund Hillary (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_Hillary)!!!

One of my dogs was like that when he was a puppy.
He loved to climb up onto the back of the couches and jump from couch to couch. He really enjoyed the high-ground and it drove the others nuts!
He reminded me of a dang mountain goat!

:lol:

[londonandlawson]

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3519/3237958555_eaeccc6992_b.jpg


Beautiful, looks like a painting almost

[jrkang]

just got this lens! my first L, cant wait to take it out!!

[vn_aviator]

Just got mine from another POTN member. Seems like the battery doesn't last as long with IS on and the motor noise is a little bit loud. Does everyone feel the same way with his/her?

[gh patriot]

Just got mine from another POTN member. Seems like the battery doesn't last as long with IS on and the motor noise is a little bit loud. Does everyone feel the same way with his/her?

IS on any lens will decrease battery life and it isn't as loud as some other lenses. My 300f/4L IS is louder.

[aznkidd55]

the more i use this lens the more i love it!

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3366/3271078072_5204615e6e.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3446/3271076598_2d3245217d.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3338/3271076474_12a1995a88.jpg

[johnz]

the more i use this lens the more i love it!

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3366/3271078072_5204615e6e.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3446/3271076598_2d3245217d.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3338/3271076474_12a1995a88.jpg

Nice photos!

I guess you added the vignetting in PP :) ?

[Oliviero]

Aww, where were you able to hold a koala?

[aznkidd55]

yes of course vignetting was in pp

this was in SF zoo, i did not get to hold the koala lol, it was the zookeeper cuz they were getting it off a tree

[NevadaJack]

I absolutely love this lens!

http://nevadajack.zenfolio.com/img/v3/p423808204.jpg

[colin842]

I love the IS on this lens. I was able to shoot this hand held at 1/20 shutter speed with the IS on. Just a quick B/W conversion with no sharpening. Awesome lens!

[Sean]

You know razors are dull compared to this lens. Talk about SPOILED!
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3653/3325344633_5381d8b748_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/eigtball/3325344633/)

[D-an-W]

Lovely shot Sean, I am considering this Lens as my first L.

Do you find 200mm is "enough" for general use (Used on a 50D)?

[blackzzz]

You know razors are dull compared to this lens. Talk about SPOILED!
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3653/3325344633_5381d8b748_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/eigtball/3325344633/)

That's just crazy good. I've been going back and forth over trading mine for the f2.8 but just can't make myself do it. I guess I just made the mistake of getting the f4 first.

[Jeff81]

That's just crazy good. I've been going back and forth over trading mine for the f2.8 but just can't make myself do it. I guess I just made the mistake of getting the f4 first.

Well, to give you some peace of mind, I did trade mine for the f2.8 version and now I'm back. :)

[D-an-W]

Can you explain more please Jeff81?

[fishingjts]

love my 70-200L F4 IS... especially since i've picked up a 5D... ;)

http://www.johnnystacks.com/gallery/d/6575-1/IMG_0136.JPG

[John_TX]

love my 70-200L F4 IS... especially since i've picked up a 5D... ;)


I too have found the 70mm end on a 1.6x crop body to be just a little too tight in various situations. Although the "perceived" reach on the long end with the crop factor is really nice!

[mellowd]

Squirrel was moving really fast and this pic has been cropped quite a bit, but I managed to get him :)

350D + 70-200F4LIS
http://mellowd.co.uk/potn/IMG_4629.jpg

[Jeff81]

Can you explain more please Jeff81?

Well I switched from the f4 IS to 2.8 IS thinking faster is better, but I really didn't need 2.8 for what I shoot. Since I didn't use 2.8 all that much, and I didn't like the added weight, I switched back.

[D-an-W]

Am I right in saying that the f4 also uses newer technology to the f2.8 (Due to being a much newer model I assume)?

[Sean]

That's just crazy good. I've been going back and forth over trading mine for the f2.8 but just can't make myself do it. I guess I just made the mistake of getting the f4 first.

Unless you NEED the 2.8 speed, skip it. The 4 IS is lighter, and sharper (:p to the 2.8ers) and I love this lens.

That's a bit of a crop as well. This lens is SO spot on, no calibration shot on a 40D so no AF micro adjust.

200mm is limiting, for skittish birds, but feeder or a lucky shot like this or my owl, and it's just pure beauty. Beyond sharpness, the colours, and overall optics are superb.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3348/3260025663_45f44a8d66_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/eigtball/3260025663/)

[llenuts]

Unless you NEED the 2.8 speed, skip it. The 4 IS is lighter, and sharper (:p to the 2.8ers) and I love this lens.



I've had a 70-200 f/4 IS for about 18 months now. It is a superb lens in every respect. But today I purchased a 2.8 IS version. At the present I have both lens'.

From my initial observation, the 2.8 is significantly heavier, on paper, the specs don't sound like much, but in reality it is very noticeable. Sharpness wise, it's difficult to tell them apart, both wide open. Image quality is very similar, but I do prefer the wider aperture for better background blur.

Price wise, well I'd stick with the f/4 IS of course, unless you need the speed. As for which one I am going to keep, umm, I don't know! Both at the moment I think!

[blackzzz]

I've had a 70-200 f/4 IS for about 18 months now. It is a superb lens in every respect. But today I purchased a 2.8 IS version. At the present I have both lens'.

From my initial observation, the 2.8 is significantly heavier, on paper, the specs don't sound like much, but in reality it is very noticeable. Sharpness wise, it's difficult to tell them apart, both wide open. Image quality is very similar, but I do prefer the wider aperture for better background blur.

Price wise, well I'd stick with the f/4 IS of course, unless you need the speed. As for which one I am going to keep, umm, I don't know! Both at the moment I think!

My guess is that you'll wind up keeping them both! Any chance of posting shots that were taken of the same subject with the same settings at the same time with each lens for comparison?

[blackzzz]

Unless you NEED the 2.8 speed, skip it. The 4 IS is lighter, and sharper (:p to the 2.8ers) and I love this lens.

That's a bit of a crop as well. This lens is SO spot on, no calibration shot on a 40D so no AF micro adjust.

200mm is limiting, for skittish birds, but feeder or a lucky shot like this or my owl, and it's just pure beauty. Beyond sharpness, the colours, and overall optics are superb.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3348/3260025663_45f44a8d66_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/eigtball/3260025663/)


I probably wouldn't NEED it that often since I don't take portraits, indoor sports, etc that the f2.8 is neccesary for. I do take indoor stills and low light outdoor shots on occasion which is why I'm so undecided. I do have the 17-55 f2.8 to cover some of that though. Actually I've used the f4 indoors with extremely good results. I'm also going to Alaska later this summer and thought that the f2.8 might be more useful. Great owl capture...I've yet to see one in the wild so I'm jealous!

[00dahc]

I owned the 70-200 2.8, 70-200 2.8 IS, and the 70-200 4 IS all at the same time

I set each of them up to take the same picture with the same settings with controlled lighting. All wide open. My two 2.8's were near identical in sharpness/contrast. My 4 IS was noticeably sharper. Even when I stopped the 2.8's down to f/4 they weren't as sharp as the 70-200 f/4 IS.

For what I shoot, and with a better IS system on the f/4 I sold the 2.8's and kept the f/4 IS. Very happy with it.

For your reference, shot on a crop body.

[blackzzz]

I owned the 70-200 2.8, 70-200 2.8 IS, and the 70-200 4 IS all at the same time

I set each of them up to take the same picture with the same settings with controlled lighting. All wide open. My two 2.8's were near identical in sharpness/contrast. My 4 IS was noticeably sharper. Even when I stopped the 2.8's down to f/4 they weren't as sharp as the 70-200 f/4 IS.

For what I shoot, and with a better IS system on the f/4 I sold the 2.8's and kept the f/4 IS. Very happy with it.

For your reference, shot on a crop body.

I'm pretty sure that I'd be kicking myself if I dumped my f4...just can't bring myself to do it. I took a picture of a small object on the fireplace in my living room with the curtains drawn with just existing daylight at 200mm and was just amazed at the results.

[John_TX]

The IS is phenomenal on this lens. I'd much rather have better IS than one more stop of light. So long as I'm not shooting action subjects, it's much easier to under-expose for the extra stop than to loose better IS.
The size, weight & 4-stop IS is what sold me on this lens compared to it's bigger brother.
The numbers pretty much speak for themselves!
F4.0 IS 26.8 oz(760g) vs
F2.8 IS 51.9 oz(1470g)

[HolgerK]

How good is this lens for macro? I am thinking of selline my sigma 105 mm f2.8 macro lens to buy canon 70-200mm f.4 IS L, but sometimes would still like to take some macro shots...
Some examples would be nice :)

[JoYork]

It's probably not an ideal lens for macro - it doesn't magnify much and there are softness issues when you're at minimum focus distance.

If you want cheap macro, get a 50mm f/1.8 and kenko tubes.

[kchow24]

Someone here can advise... about these two lenses Canon EF 24-105мм f/4 L IS USM and Canon EF 70-200мм f/4 IS L USM, instead of buying this 2 lenses,
just get 1 of this Canon EF 28-300мм f/3.5-5.6 L IS USM, and it serve all the range, does it work this way?

[chukdivad]

How good is this lens for macro? I am thinking of selline my sigma 105 mm f2.8 macro lens to buy canon 70-200mm f.4 IS L, but sometimes would still like to take some macro shots...
Some examples would be nice :)
I got these shots just messing around with my 70-200 f4L IS and some $20 extension tubes. The tubes have no electronics which is why the DOF is so shallow (I took these before I knew you had to set the aperture on the lens hold the DOF preview and remove the lens). I think results with Kenko tubes could probably be pretty good (better than mine anyway).

[00dahc]

How good is this lens for macro? I am thinking of selline my sigma 105 mm f2.8 macro lens to buy canon 70-200mm f.4 IS L, but sometimes would still like to take some macro shots...
Some examples would be nice :)


I'd advice against. Buy a Sigma 50mm Macro for $200 used and get shots that will knock your britches off.

[gary88]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v222/gheb88/IMG_8802.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v222/gheb88/IMG_8923.jpg

[ILikeApple]

Went on a cruise to mexico. This guy was actually a Phillipino crew member dressed up to look Mexican.

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1105/3337478732_a55cfacc9b_o.jpg

Funny little taxi in Cabo San Lucas.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3357/3336649239_aed0e98884_o.jpg

[Cavediver]

Couple of snapshots

[origamione]

Went on a cruise to mexico. This guy was actually a Phillipino crew member dressed up to look Mexican.

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1105/3337478732_a55cfacc9b_o.jpg

Funny little taxi in Cabo San Lucas.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3357/3336649239_aed0e98884_o.jpg

Wow...that's very sharp! & nice contrasty colors too.

[LV Moose]

The lens takes nice photos of little critters, too. This was from about 4.5 feet.

http://i376.photobucket.com/albums/oo209/mistermooster1/Malex800.jpg

[mikekelley]

Wow! How did you get so close? I have been trying some birding with this lens, but I find it is mostly useless unless you get really close. However, I'm thankful that it's so sharp because the 100% crops don't look too bad at all.

[Jeff81]

A little fun at the pier.

[JoYork]

A little fun at the pier.


You posted this pic in the 17-55 thread:

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=234558&page=110

[Disturbed UTT]

Is this the "IS" version?

The lens takes nice photos of little critters, too. This was from about 4.5 feet.

http://i376.photobucket.com/albums/oo209/mistermooster1/Malex800.jpg

[paparios]

Extraordinary lens. Example and 100% crop taken with the 50d. Note the detail on the reflection of the glass. It even can be used at 200% crop.

Taken at 200mm, ISO160, f8, 1/500 with minimal PP.

Miguel

[paparios]

Another example and 100% crop, with the 50d, taken at 200mm

ISO160, f4, 1/800, with some basic Lightroom PP

Miguel

[LV Moose]

Is this the "IS" version?

Yes, and it helps a lot at times; I have shakey hands. But this was shot at ISO 640 in daylight, 1/1000 of a sec., so it might not have made a difference here. Still, I love having IS.

[Jeff81]

You posted this pic in the 17-55 thread:

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=234558&page=110

Yeah I know...I need to remove it.

[LV Moose]

Wow. I guess I had been hanging out at the wrong place... the NON-IS thread, and somebody just called me on it :oops:.
Are there any more specific sub-sections I should know about... like 70-200 f/4L IS USM with serial numbers beginning with UW? ;)

Anyway, I took a bunch of hummer photos this past weekend, and this lense works pretty well up close and personal:

http://i376.photobucket.com/albums/oo209/mistermooster1/Male2_x800.jpg

[D-an-W]

Do any of the 70-200 f/4 owners regret not buying the f/2.8 (I am as yet still undecided which to invest in)?

[Jeff81]

Very nice shot.

Wow. I guess I had been hanging out at the wrong place... the NON-IS thread, and somebody just called me on it :oops:.
Are there any more specific sub-sections I should know about... like 70-200 f/4L IS USM with serial numbers beginning with UW? ;)

Anyway, I took a bunch of hummer photos this past weekend, and this lense works pretty well up close and personal:

http://i376.photobucket.com/albums/oo209/mistermooster1/Male2_x800.jpg

[Jeff81]

Do any of the 70-200 f/4 owners regret not buying the f/2.8 (I am as yet still undecided which to invest in)?

I went from F/4 to 2.8 and back to f/4. My opinion is that if you don't need 2.8, don't get it. I didn't need it.

[chukdivad]

Do any of the 70-200 f/4 owners regret not buying the f/2.8 (I am as yet still undecided which to invest in)?
Yes, until I pick up the f2.8 and hold it for a few seconds then I'm happy with the f4 again.

[D-an-W]

Ordering one now, can't wait!

[Cavediver]

Do any of the 70-200 f/4 owners regret not buying the f/2.8 (I am as yet still undecided which to invest in)?

I battled and battled and looked at both. f/4 IS won for me.

[ILikeApple]

I have never used the f/2.8 and thought for many weeks on whether or not I should get it or the f/4. Well I settled on the f/4 and have never had any regrets. However I don't shoot indoors with it, where the f/2.8 is probably a better choice.

[John_TX]

I have never used the f/2.8 and thought for many weeks on whether or not I should get it or the f/4. Well I settled on the f/4 and have never had any regrets. However I don't shoot indoors with it, where the f/2.8 is probably a better choice.

On a crop camera, I think the 70-200 is really a bit too long for most types of indoor shooting unless your at an event or venue like a wedding or sports complex.

The only times I've wished I had the f2.8 version is when using TC's. It would be nice to be able to use a 2x TC and still keep AF, but in that case, I've decided the EF 200 f2.8 prime is a much better choice as it's significantly lighter, a prime, and about 1/2 the price of the 70-200 f2.8 IS.

The better option though is just picking up a 300 or 400mm prime as I see using a TC on the 70-200 as purely an economical consideration for those who don't have one of the longer primes yet.

[D-an-W]

Ordered one last night, thanks everyone for the input...

[NevadaJack]

Deuce

http://nevadajack.zenfolio.com/img/v6/p622922708.jpg

[rparchen]

I sold my 70-200 F/2.8L (non-is) last night in favor of this lens and will have it on Saturday. I look forward to the weight savings and the IS. This lens will mostly be for travel/outdoor shoots so the speed/weight of the F/2.8 isn't quite what I needed.

[JoYork]

Duck shot:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3445/3351058097_0cabe04215_b.jpg

Bigger version here. (http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3445/3351058097_6e87ddfa81_o.jpg)

[John_TX]

Duck shot:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3445/3351058097_0cabe04215_b.jpg

Bigger version here. (http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3445/3351058097_6e87ddfa81_o.jpg)

Where's the fire hydrant???

[Mast3rChi3f]

Wow, very sharp and with great colors.
Finally my 70-200 f/4 IS arrives next week.:D

[D-an-W]

Mine just arrived, is it normal to be able to hear (& even feel slightly) the IS in action on the first press of the shutter release?

[JoYork]

Mine just arrived, is it normal to be able to hear (& even feel slightly) the IS in action on the first press of the shutter release?

Yes, the IS unit makes a gentle humming sound, kinda reminds me of the noise the Enterprise makes in Star Trek.

[D-an-W]

Mines not a gentle hum, it sounds like my Watch Winder (Which just fired up)!

I can also feel it through the camera body...

Done a couple of recordings if anyone has time to listen.

Quicktime for these two...

http://rapidshare.com/files/209087793/Canon_EF_70-200mm_f4L_IS_USM_-_IS_Noise_1.caf.html

http://rapidshare.com/files/209087805/Canon_EF_70-200mm_f4L_IS_USM_-_IS_Noise_2.caf.html

Here it is in wav format...

http://rapidshare.com/files/209090530/Canon_EF_70-200mm_f4L_IS_USM_-_IS_Noise_1.wav.html

http://rapidshare.com/files/209091530/Canon_EF_70-200mm_f4L_IS_USM_-_IS_Noise_2.wav.html

[NevadaJack]

http://nevadajack.zenfolio.com/img/v8/p683748440.jpg

[braidkid]

Can someone tell me if the IS in this lens is as prone to failure as the Canon 17-55 f2.8 IS? Do you leave IS on mostly without worry of the motor burning out?

[LV Moose]

Can someone tell me if the IS in this lens is as prone to failure as the Canon 17-55 f2.8 IS? Do you leave IS on mostly without worry of the motor burning out?

I read a lot of reviews on this lense before buying one, and I never saw a mention anywhere of motor burnout. I leave it on, unless I'm using a tripod.

[NevadaJack]

sRAW1 169mm, 1/100 @ f/7.1, ISO 200. Extreme crop.

http://nevadajack.zenfolio.com/img/v7/p477292174.jpg

[rparchen]

This certainly isn't anything great but hey, the weather sucks in Seattle today so a duck will have to wait. I am extremely happy with this lens though, especially the hand-holding opportunities because of the IS. I honestly wasn't very happy with my 70-200 F/2.8 non-IS so this is a refreshing change.

F/4, ISO 2500, 1/13, 200mm
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v67/rparchen/Jasmine.jpg

[gary88]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v222/gheb88/Chicago%20River%20Dyeing/IMG_9246.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v222/gheb88/Chicago%20River%20Dyeing/IMG_9271.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v222/gheb88/Chicago%20River%20Dyeing/IMG_9278.jpg

[wallybud]

From back in the day, Re-edited

http://i57.photobucket.com/albums/g213/wallybud/Surfing.jpg

[steveg4330]

I've just gone through all the pages of these fabulous images. Makes my leg quiver. I have a question though. What's your guess. Most shot w/ tripod or hand held ? Available Light or flash ? Fairly substantial PP ? Just wanting a feel here ? I just got my 70-200 f4 IS today.

Thanks

[John_TX]

I've just gone through all the pages of these fabulous images. Makes my leg quiver. I have a question though. What's your guess. Most shot w/ tripod or hand held ? Available Light or flash ? Fairly substantial PP ? Just wanting a feel here ? I just got my 70-200 f4 IS today.

Thanks

I would guess, especially with the IS version, most of the shots that were done in any type of daylight were probably shot hand-held.

Before I picked up the 70-200, I really thought I'd be using it on a tripod more, but in actuality, I can probably count on one hand how many times I've used support, and even then, it probably wasn't needed due to the excellent performance of IS.

[gary88]

I've just gone through all the pages of these fabulous images. Makes my leg quiver. I have a question though. What's your guess. Most shot w/ tripod or hand held ? Available Light or flash ? Fairly substantial PP ? Just wanting a feel here ? I just got my 70-200 f4 IS today.

Thanks

This lens can easily be used without a tripod. I can shoot @ 1/25 200mm all day long and still get tack sharp results. The IS on this lens is just awesome.

[ILikeApple]

^ agreed, I bought this lens thinking I would need my tripod alot.

I haven't used it once in the 2 months I owned it. The IS is AMAZING.

[cLin]

Can someone tell me if these two 100% crops look too fuzzy? I can't tell if it's me pixel peeping too much or if my camera isn't focusing well. I have IS on and in the whole image both ducks looks SHARP but the 100% crops look off. I don't know if I'm focusing on the wrong part or what.

http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/6072/cropc.jpg

[JoYork]

Can someone tell me if these two 100% crops look too fuzzy? I can't tell if it's me pixel peeping too much or if my camera isn't focusing well. I have IS on and in the whole image both ducks looks SHARP but the 100% crops look off. I don't know if I'm focusing on the wrong part or what.



Looks like your shutter speed was too low... what were your settings?

[Markitos]

I don't know about the others, but I shoot almost 100% handheld with this lens, with IS on, with available light... I have used with with flash, and I have used it on a tripod, but not much.

[cLin]

Looks like your shutter speed was too low... what were your settings?

Top image was ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/640 at 200mm
Second was ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/200 at 189mm. Damn, the shutter speed is slow for the second one..such a nice sunny day too. Damn water.

I'm using a 20D, what should the min shutter speed be for sharp images?

[Markitos]

I can handhold mine and get sharp images at 200mm and @1/30th of a second or so...

I think there's something else going on here. What's your focus point/focusing method? Are you using AI servo, or One Shot?

[cLin]

I just focused on duck and used my focus button. Once I hear a beep, I take the shot. I'm pretty sure I'm using one shot. Used AI servo for a while and didn't like it.

Man, this makes me want to go back to the park and test it out some more.

[JoYork]

I can handhold mine and get sharp images at 200mm and @1/30th of a second or so...

Yes but ducks move. IS helps with static subjects.

[LV Moose]

Yes but ducks move. IS helps with static subjects.

+1

The IS helps with camera movement (as in shakey hands), not subject movement. Maybe bump your ISO up to 200 or more when shooting moving critters, which will increase your shutter speed.

[cLin]

That thing people say that your shutter speed should be 1/focal length...do I need to take into account my crop factor? And why that specific number? Does it freeze the action/subject enough?

Example, if I shot at 100mm using a 20D, would my minimum shutter speed need to be 1/(100*1.6) to get sharp results?

[braidkid]

^ Yes, that's just a general rule, but IS gives you a bit more leeway for a slower shutter speed. You can shoot as slow as 1/30 at 200mm with IS ON.

[Markitos]

Yes but ducks move. IS helps with static subjects.

I realize this--it was more of a general comment, not thinking of the two photos he had posted. However, ducks do not walk so fast that a 1/200th (or certainly 1/640th) shutter speed should be too slow to stop movement.

My two thoughts--you focused on the duck with one shot, then the duck moved and you didn't refocus, or 1/200th was too slow for the duck (not likely).

[HolgerK]

Got this lens few days ago and took some samples today.
Can't wait to take it to some serious use.
http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/3867/img5684edit.jpg
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/9120812c33.jpg
100% crop
http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/4281/img5677100crop.jpg

[sesshin]

Just got this lens and love it. don't mind the bokeh at all
http://www.staticmedium.com/stans_big.jpg

and think it takes nice landscapes
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3614/3329689194_e1efa3255e_b.jpg

[gary88]

Wide open

http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/5241/img9476.jpg

[single_track]

Time Square St. Patrick's Day Parade

[sesshin]

another LA shot, from the roof of my studio.

f/16 / 111mm / tripod / cable release
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3585/3380878214_107c53b823_b.jpg (http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3585/3380878214_c3ee950eee_o.jpg)

the amount of detail from this lens stopped down is just staggering
click image for 3000x2000px resolution

[Mast3rChi3f]

My first photos with this lens.

http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/8956/retrato016.jpg

http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/1592/retrato020.jpg

http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/4103/retrato026.jpg

[Johnny Mango]

Tennis tournament... lovely lens, super sharp!

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3434/3368814365_a9e07907fe_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3644/3369638836_b72f0d48f3_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3646/3369636584_2ec1860652_b.jpg

[gary88]

Today I tried seeing just how slow of a shutter speed I could get acceptable results with @ 200mm. Looks like it's 1/5 for me.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v222/gheb88/IMG_9740.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v222/gheb88/IMG_9740-3.jpg

[highcountry]

Here's a couple from the first day that I got the lens last July.

http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff29/highcountry_photo/Wildlife/Hummer-2-blue-flowers-best.jpg

http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff29/highcountry_photo/Wildlife/Swallowtail-1.jpg

[John Photography]

Tennis tournament... lovely lens, super sharp!

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3434/3368814365_a9e07907fe_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3644/3369638836_b72f0d48f3_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3646/3369636584_2ec1860652_b.jpg

Johnny,

great shots! when i had my XSI, i never got shots like that! :) was this at Indian Wells? we were planning to go, but had a change of plans.

i'm in Chino and would love go shoot with you sometimes, i'd love to get some pointers.

John

[morob7]

70-200mm f/4L IS USM hand held from about 8ft. 100% crop. Shot RAW. NO sharpening applied, only exposure boost (sharpening set to 0 in PS). Lens just back from Canon Service.

ISO 800
1/160
f/4
XSi/450D

[Mast3rChi3f]

http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/6934/pauldaserra138.jpg

http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/7988/pauldaserra147.jpg

http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/1829/pauldaserra148.jpg

[D-an-W]

How's this look, took it of my Dad whilst out yesterday...

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3448/3398995921_ff953345a2_b.jpg

[LV Moose]

Okay, I know I just posted a hummingbird picture a few pages back, but that one was perched. This one was caught in flight. ISO 800, f/8, 1/1250 sec. I was using one-shot AF (it seems I get sharper images than with AI Servo). I'm very happy with the focus speed of this lens. :)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3645/3388721752_2044ffa1e4_b.jpg

[Keduf]

Okay, I know I just posted a hummingbird picture a few pages back, but that one was perched. This one was caught in flight. ISO 800, f/8, 1/1250 sec. I was using one-shot AF (it seems I get sharper images than with AI Servo). I'm very happy with the focus speed of this lens. :)




Awesome pic !! :D

[dandig]

Just sold my 70-200 2.8 IS to get this lens. LOVE the lower weight and sharpness. Don't miss my 2.8 one bit!
http://dancarrphotography.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/rileyleboe_dancarr7135.jpg

[dcran]

Here is one with some flare. I think i took this at 70 mm

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3658/3405170725_87208be132_o.jpg

[John Photography]

i'll be shooting a banquet tonight in a church gym. would it be possible to use my 580ex ii with this lens? if so, can someone post some samples.

[Mast3rChi3f]

http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/1244/nascerdodiae25fontes249.jpg

http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/221/nascerdodiae25fontes254.jpg

http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/4496/nascerdodiae25fontes264.jpg

[00dahc]

Candid shot of a friend laying on a couch.

Handheld with 430EX bounced off ceiling

http://www.pbase.com/cdandar/image/110754106/original.jpg

Image is 1050 pixels, sorry it's 26pixels wider than it should be :)

[LV Moose]

Candid shot of a friend laying on a couch.

Handheld with 430EX bounced off ceiling


Man, that's excellent.

I've gotta get me a decent flash.



A pretty girl on the couch would be nice, too.

[amladine]

Just got this lens and so far I am impressed:). Here is the first picture I took.

http://img83.imageshack.us/img83/5606/catz.jpg

[1downfall]

Candid shot of a friend laying on a couch.

Handheld with 430EX bounced off ceiling

http://www.pbase.com/cdandar/image/110754106/original.jpg

Image is 1050 pixels, sorry it's 26pixels wider than it should be :)
this is a stunning shot.....where is the series to it?;)

[1downfall]

i wish i did not find this thread...or even begin to look. :oops: Thew bokeh on some of these shots here is awesome!! errrrrrr..makes me wish I considered this before my 2.8.

[droopy1592]

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3500/3282312427_372c68cbf1.jpg

[yokozuna80]

I just got a great deal on this lens so I picked it up off of Craigs. Pics look Very sharp but I'm curious about the motor. Seems kind of loud. I'm a newbie and I've never shot with this lens before. It's definitely louder than my 24-105 f/4L IS... is this normal?

[Mast3rChi3f]

http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/6554/funchalnocturno0512345h.jpg

[1downfall]

woooooo.....so nice master. Love the exposure time and watching the effect on the clouds movement. nice one.

[Mast3rChi3f]

1downfall That one was HDR.

http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/2097/funchalnocturno035.jpg

http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/9053/funchalnocturno046.jpg

http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/7255/funchalnocturno050.jpg

[p360]

I've just gone through the last 30-some pages of this thread. What I want to see is - indoor pics, if someone can post indoor, low-to-medium light photos. May be at birthday parties, or stage events, or weddings.

I am trying to justify buying this lens and be able to use it in such situations. I am thinking may be the high ISO capabilities of 5D2 would come in handy while using this lens at f/4.

Thank you all in advance.

P.S. Oh, and, do you need a tripod ring with this lens?

[1downfall]

still very nice Master....i like!

[p360]

Mine's finally ordered..!!

Oh yeah.., oh yeah..!! Uhh.., uhhh..!!

It may take two weeks to arrive because of Passover (Adorama). But anticipation can be sweet too..!!

I was actually looking for a faster lens for future event photography, but images here, and the reputation this lens has convinced me. I think with the 4-stop IS, high ISO capabilities of my 5D2, and flash, I should be alright. Besides, I bought the lens for today, right now.., not future.!! I want to enjoy it now, not someday..!

With my 200 2.8L II gone, this should fill the void just fine. Plus, I like its versatility. I felt confined with 200 2.8L II, albeit it was a great lens.

[Markitos]

On a 5D with 1.4tc for a bit more reach:

http://beltie.smugmug.com/photos/507836731_aHGKh-O.jpg

[egordon99]

I can't really post any of my indoor stuff (most of it's for clients) but you will be fine with the f/4 and a flash. You'll actually be better off than me as I have crop bodies so your high ISO can kick my high ISO's rear end :lol:

As for the IS, if I am shooting indoors and not using flash, I'm usually fine with around 1/60s (provided the subjects aren't moving of course) but since you have the 5DII, crank that ISO up to 6400 and go nuts!

Mine's finally ordered..!!

Oh yeah.., oh yeah..!! Uhh.., uhhh..!!

It may take two weeks to arrive because of Passover (Adorama). But anticipation can be sweet too..!!

I was actually looking for a faster lens for future event photography, but images here, and the reputation this lens has convinced me. I think with the 4-stop IS, high ISO capabilities of my 5D2, and flash, I should be alright. Besides, I bought the lens for today, right now.., not future.!! I want to enjoy it now, not someday..!

With my 200 2.8L II gone, this should fill the void just fine. Plus, I like its versatility. I felt confined with 200 2.8L II, albeit it was a great lens.

[p360]

I can't really post any of my indoor stuff (most of it's for clients) but you will be fine with the f/4 and a flash. You'll actually be better off than me as I have crop bodies so your high ISO can kick my high ISO's rear end :lol:

As for the IS, if I am shooting indoors and not using flash, I'm usually fine with around 1/60s (provided the subjects aren't moving of course) but since you have the 5DII, crank that ISO up to 6400 and go nuts!


I am so looking forward to it. Thanks, mate.

[tirion]

My camera is mainly used for taking photos of the kids, the F4 IS does this job well. It is perfect for snaps in the garden or park. Here is one of my favourites.

[p360]

Very nice, tirion..!! Welcome to POTN.

I can hardly wait to get mine. Should be here on Tuesday, the 14th.