How Much would you pay for

[resqd1]

How much would you pay for an all around lens?

16-300 IS L F 1.2 or 1.8 or even 2.8 ?

Even if they took the 28-300 and made it a f2.8?

What would you prefer and how much would you pay?

[René Damkot]

I wouldn't buy it, since I probabely couldn't lift it ;)

[resqd1]

well maybe you need to hit the gym LOL I have heard people saying the f2.8 70-200 is kind of heavy, but i havent experienced it.

[ZekaG]

I would pay from $3000 to $5000, but I am pretty sure it would cost more than that.

[august23]

If they made a 10-300 f/1.8L IS, I would pay about $6000 for it.

[resqd1]

yeah 10-300 would be awesome especially at 1.8 or even 1.2, But I think the front element would be like a 8 inch diameter to let enough light through or something

[Photolistic]

I would pay $25,000

[calicokat]

I wouldn't buy it, since I probabely couldn't lift it ;)

I am with you there ;)

[resqd1]

wel lmaybe you should hit the gym, LOL

[canoflan]

The question isn't what you would pay for, but more of whether the optics could handle the swings in perspective. The distortion in a 10mm and the types of build that go into such a super wide angle lens really don't fit into a zoom of that magnitude. It is like putting a square peg into a round hole. You can do it, but the square peg is going to have to give up something to get in. Hope that helps.