PDA

View Full Version : Copyright format question


Mike R
24th of February 2007 (Sat), 16:26
I am providing a print to someone as consideration for a Property Release.
The original images was shot in 2004. What should the wording and year be on the © notice I place on the back of the print?
Should I also put my company name & ph. number, along with my name?
Thanks

MJPhotos24
24th of February 2007 (Sat), 18:53
My copyright on the back of photos is...

Photo by: Mike Janes
DO NOT COPY (C) 2006 - 555-555-5555
email@email.com
website addrss

RossW
24th of February 2007 (Sat), 20:03
Per the Library of Congress page on copyright (www.copyright.gov), this is the correct format in the USA:

Form of Notice for Visually Perceptible Copies

The notice for visually perceptible copies should contain all the following three elements:

1. The symbol © (the letter C in a circle), or the word “Copyright,” or the abbreviation “Copr.”; and

2. The year of first publication of the work. In the case of compilations or derivative works incorporating previously published material, the year date of first publication of the compilation or derivative work is sufficient. The year date may be omitted where a pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work, with accompanying textual matter, if any, is reproduced in or on greeting cards, postcards, stationery, jewelry, dolls, toys, or any useful article; and

3. The name of the owner of copyright in the work, or an abbreviation by which the name can be recognized, or a generally known alternative designation of the owner.

Example: © 2006 John Doe

The “C in a circle” notice is used only on “visually perceptible copies.” Certain kinds of works—for example, musical, dramatic, and literary works—may be fixed not in “copies” but by means of sound in an audio recording. Since audio recordings such as audio tapes and phonograph disks are “phonorecords” and not “copies,” the “C in a circle” notice is not used to indicate protection of the underlying musical, dramatic, or literary work that is recorded.

Mike R
24th of February 2007 (Sat), 20:23
Mike & Ross, thanks for the info.