View Full Version : First shot 17-35 2.8L
scooter
13th of March 2007 (Tue), 00:21
Hi All,
Just got a s/h 17-35 2.8 L from a friend who likes the ef-s 18-55 kit lens so he gave me the L for $200.00AU (bargin I think),
Anyway we met at Mooloolaba spit and I had My 3yo son with me, Put it on the 30D checked the focus and this is the very first shot. Just wanted to share L is growing on me ..... Next 24-105 f-4 :-)
http://images.fotopic.net/ymg1m9.jpg
disneydork06
13th of March 2007 (Tue), 01:43
nice. i wish a friend of mine had an L lens that they would sell me cheap. and a nice wide angle too. interesting tree ur boy is sitting in there.
iddie
13th of March 2007 (Tue), 01:46
i think you mean the 16-35 f2.8 Btw nice shot, i think it would be better if he was looking into the lens.
Angel_LCD
13th of March 2007 (Tue), 01:51
i think you mean the 16-35 f2.8 Btw nice shot, i think it would be better if he was looking into the lens.
The version before the 16-35 2.8L is called 17-35 2.8L. I own one myself.
You will not regret getting that lens ;) especially for that price :p
Nice shoot btw :)
iddie
13th of March 2007 (Tue), 01:53
The version before the 16-35 2.8L is called 17-35 2.8L. I own one myself.
You will not regret getting that lens ;) especially for that price :p
Nice shoot btw :)
ahh, i didn't know they have a 17-35. Never seen it on the canon site, and ive only had my camera for a couple of months. Thanks for clearing that up Angel
scooter
13th of March 2007 (Tue), 02:11
Thanks Guys,
disneydork06 it's a pandanus Tree weird looking like the roots are above the ground.
iddie... It's the 17-35 2.8L, I would love to get a 16-35 2.8L that cheap however even off a friend it would be like steeling, ...... It's so hard to get a 3yo to look directly at the camera.
iddie
13th of March 2007 (Tue), 02:13
Thanks Guys,
disneydork06 it's a pandanus Tree weird looking like the roots are above the ground.
iddie... It's the 17-35 2.8L, I would love to get a 16-35 2.8L that cheap however even off a friend it would be like steeling, ...... It's so hard to get a 3yo to look directly at the camera.
Yea i didn't know they had a 17-35. Im new so i thought it was a 16-35. Angel cleared it for me as you can see up top. I can imagine it would be difficult to get a 3 y/o to look at the camera.
scooter
13th of March 2007 (Tue), 02:19
Yea i didn't know they had a 17-35. Im new so i thought it was a 16-35. Angel cleared it for me as you can see up top. I can imagine it would be difficult to get a 3 y/o to look at the camera.
We are all new and learning imo, Might take his favorite toy or something next time :)
Angel_LCD
13th of March 2007 (Tue), 02:25
ahh, i didn't know they have a 17-35. Never seen it on the canon site, and ive only had my camera for a couple of months. Thanks for clearing that up Angel
No problem ;) we all learn while going reading in here ;) I know I do :)
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.