PDA

View Full Version : Consider a D30 too!


paul162brown
3rd of April 2004 (Sat), 17:08
Don't rule out a cheaper, but still superb.............Canon D30!

I was in exactly the same position around 3 months ago. I wanted the increased control over DOF and the ability to use higher ISO and the choice with lenses and quicker shutter response etc.

I also looked at the 300d which was just a little out of my price range at the time, but I was concerned that many of the custom functions had been disabled, in comparison to the features on either a D30/D60 or 10D. Controls over white balance, metering and the cheaper feel to the body are some concerns that spring to mind (although the camera does produce excellent results).

You also mention that you are on a tight budget, as I was and my solution was to buy an older Canon D30 which I have found superb. It has more features than the 300d and more controllable functions and has a higher build quality. The auto focus suffers a bit in low light, although to overcome this I simply switch to manual! It is also only 3.2 mega-pixels but the quality of the pictures that I have got so from it so far exceed those from the G3 (which did produce some excellent shots). I have printed up to 10 x 8 with superb results.

You could consider this as a cheaper alternative to the 300d, which I know has better AF and higher pixel count etc, but once you get past that and accept those points, with what is left, the D30 is a better deal, in my opinion, given the cheap secondhand deals available.

You could also consider a D60, with a 6 mega-pixel count, but its AF also suffers a bit in low light and the smaller price difference between that and the 300d makes less sense.

I got my D30 boxed with manuals in mint condition with a warranty for 450 pounds in the UK. After selling the G3 and a few other bits and buying the D30 I had little left over for lenses and so I have just the two, the 50mm 1.8 and 28mm 2.8. I know this is restrictive in some ways but the quality from both lenses is superb.

The 50mm 1.8 almost matches the quality and sharpness of an L lens in my opinion, and the 28mm is not far off either. The restrictions have also been a good thing in many ways as I now worry less about which lens and what zoom setting etc and simply concentrate all my efforts on producing the best pictures I can with the tools available. Over the years (I spent many happy years with a manual Nikon camaera with a very expensive high quality lens) I have found that a simple set-up can sometimes be very helpful in encouraging inspiration. Too many people (me included sometimes!), in my opinion, get too caught up with buying bits and peices and upgrading etc and forget to concentrate on simply taking good pictures! Someone has said it on this forum before...something like great pcitures are 10% camera 90% photographer!

Anyway, I realise I have rambled somewhat, but lastly, I have also recently purchased a 420ex speedlite again boxed in mint condition with a 12 month warranty for 80 pounds and, as with my lenses, all these can come with me should I decide to upgrade to a D60 or more likely a 10D in the future. Or I can sell any part of my current set-up should my needs change.

Have a look at some of Pekka's shots with the photo gallery link to see what can be acheived and here endeth my champion of the trusty old D30!!

Good luck with whatever you decide to get!


Paul :D

London

paul162brown
3rd of April 2004 (Sat), 17:13
I have accidently started a new thread.

I apologise to all but this message was meant to be a reply to the thread on "Have G3, want 300d, should I?"

I must have pressed the new topic button by mistake.

I am very embarassed.

I'll get 'me coat and leave now. :oops: :oops: :oops:

Pekka
3rd of April 2004 (Sat), 17:50
No, this is a good post for all who want to enter the world of EOS digital. I sold my D30 and I miss it even if I don't really need it. It has something in its image quality that I've only see in Mark II images after that. And as D30 was the "breakthrough DSLR" and my first DSLR it still holds IMHO some hard to explain "magic" which most cameras lack. And even if it was relatively slow in focusing and usage it was very accurate, reliable and "felt good".

This is of course purely personal view, but D30 is great camera as a first DSLR.

Malaxos1
3rd of April 2004 (Sat), 18:09
I just got a D30 a few weeks ago as a backup to my 300D. I love the D30 and it does have more of a pro feel to it compared to trhe 300D. The Rebel, overall is a better camera. The colors are more accurate, it is less noisier at higher ISOs and has more features. Having said all that, the D30 looks better and is a bit easier to use. I love the option to use partial metering in all modes as well as Al Servo mode. The 300D has seven point focus as opposed to three. I do feel though that the D30 has better dynamic range compared to the 300D and 10D...Dean

Malaxos1
3rd of April 2004 (Sat), 18:11
I forgot to mention that the D30's auto focus is way terrible in low light. I have yet to have a problem with the 300D...Dean

paul162brown
4th of April 2004 (Sun), 04:34
It is true that the AF on the D30 can sometimes be a bit slow in dark conditions, although I have had several low light situations where it performed just fine. I suppose it is not a big deal for me as most of my photographic experience was with a completely manual camera so in low light, I just switch to MF and get back to what I am used to!!

Also, I am awaiting arrival of a 420ex and have read somewhere that this will help the AF in low light as the D30 will use the 420ex's red beem af assist.

The 300d does produce good pictures, but I think it covers a different section of the market compared to the what the D30 was aimed at when it was first released, and this is most clearly seen in the build quality of the D30, which is very high indeed. I am careful with my equipment but it I just get the feeling that the 300D would not last as well, it felt lightweight and plastic in my hands.

The D30 is an older "previously top of the range" type camera with slightly older technology and the 300d is cheaper type DSLR, but uses the lastest technology in a cheaper shell. One additional thing that I found frustrating with the 300d is that many of the functions that it lacks, such a complete control over white balance and metering for example, are simply software functions that have been disabled by Canon, to make sure there is some space in the market between the 300d and the 10d. So the inner workings of the camera are fully capable of performing all functions, but these have been turned off before they leave the factory!

But the biggest reason to get one over a 300d is........THE PRICE!! :D

hickory
4th of April 2004 (Sun), 15:32
No, this is a good post for all who want to enter the world of EOS digital. I sold my D30 and I miss it even if I don't really need it. It has something in its image quality that I've only see in Mark II images after that. And as D30 was the "breakthrough DSLR" and my first DSLR it still holds IMHO some hard to explain "magic" which most cameras lack. And even if it was relatively slow in focusing and usage it was very accurate, reliable and "felt good".

This is of course purely personal view, but D30 is great camera as a first DSLR.

Pekka,

I couldn't agree more! I just gave my D30 a hug after reading your message. :D I think the D30 gets overlooked a lot by folks who are looking to get into digital slr photography for the first time. Prices are running around $600 USD on ebay! Thats a bargain compared to what I paid for mine.

tom